What you call 'censorship' is really just an adjustment to make sure that characters are represented in a way that respects their complexity and humanity. If you can’t see that moving away from outdated, hyper-sexualized portrayals is a step forward, then you're the one who needs to reevaluate what you consider acceptable
What you call 'censorship' is really just an adjustment to make sure that characters are represented in a way that...
Didn't read
Kill and rape yourself, tranny
Even if you actually believed this and weren't baiting, do you really think this board would appreciate this message?
why do fictional characters need to represent human complexity as opposed to just being a tool for game interaction and enjoyment? Must all works always reflect human complexity? Why ought they do so?
I think the problem is it all fails the moment people try to make a big deal out of something that REALLY isn't as big of a deal.
Some games can still be sexy and that's fine, but a game that decides sex appeal would ruin the art design a developer wants to go with, or say, a a game with a more serious vibe or a horror vibe, is also fine too. I don't need the monsters in Amnesia to have fat asses and huge tits to enjoy it.
Everything else is just people still griping over Gamergate.
shut the fuck up, stupid nigger
cringe
Must all works always reflect human complexity?
Not all. But why not try for something higher, even if it's gonna be niche? Why should Shakesphere have tried harder? Or Lovecraft? or Poe?
something higher
Sexy anime girls are objectively higher than negroes.
But then you come off as just a angry nerd raging about not being able to jerk it while gaming. Not a defender of the arts.
Truth doesn't care about appearances.
Disingenuous cunt, the changes are entirely because of localisers personal beliefs and tastes or to push some kind of politics.
Source?
sit down, you stupid nigger, and stop drinking vodka already
It's literally the opposite, only portraying the fictional worlds from a single, radical-left perspective, which consists of nothing but political caricatures and wishful thinking.
Okay, then no super horny queer stuff either, then.
lingerie women in CHUD games BAD
unsimulated blowjobs in WOKE movies GOOD
I hope you still have that attitude when you're filling out your unemployment forms.
Mr Chang is going to fire ALL feminist/LGBT activist when he buys your company out.
Respect has to be earned, not demanded.
Stop insulting people.
It's a shame the right is no longer competent to make videogames to portray worlds the way they want to see them
It's not censorship because of the reasons we censor
get rekt faggot
SOURCE???!?!?!?!?!?!!?
rape yourself
how does that work?
blah blah blah I'm a troon blah
Anon...yes it does. It really really really fucking does.
I bet you wonder how "muh woke" even "took over" AAA vidya.
I realize that traffic is up because of election day, but holy shit are you fags really getting baited this hard?
But why not try for something higher,
Diversity is something higher and guess what, diversity means sexy anime girls can and should exist without being bound by your personal feelings.
Just in case you didn't see the replies, here they are:
Now reply to them :)
You are a bootlicker and deserved to be treated like the redcoat you are.
did he die?
Anon Babble doesnt know even know what censorship is. Retards here calling the new Dizzy design ''censored''.
Does this board now have some deranged schizo who thinks he's a brave revolutionary by standing up for the poor oppressed multi-billion dollar companies?
FPBP
What I call censorship is censorship and censorship should never be tolerated, simple as that
dilating
Why is that "higher"?
What you call 'censorship' is ackshuly blah blah blah and blah blah blah then blah blah blah
thats a lot of words to rationalize censorship.
It’s literally tourists from r/gcj. They make threads like these and then post the responses to their threads. But, yes, they do tend to unironically defend billion-dollar corporations.
if the female character isn't an ugly ape, she's "hyper sexualized"
leftist moment
Wrong! 'Censorship' is just following market trends and max profits. If sexy outfit makes game M instead of T, you take it out. And if it would get negative press after being pointed out, you remove it to keep shareholders happy. Negative drama doesn't please shareholders, especially if said drama comes from sexy revealing stuff(explain to your shareholders that you gotta tank the negative press and possible avalanche from it because artist's vision of bikini costume is more important than the shareholder's money or opinion)
693832102
I will say and believe what I want, no matter what the sheeple think about it
52 words 323 characters
I thought the zoomer/gen alpha adhd attention span was just a meme.
ISN'T A PROBLEM
Whenever women bitch and moan about men having sexy women in their games just say
It wasn't made for you, men deserve their own spaces, fuck off.
I don't need to hear from a 40yr old white woman about what didn't "work for her" about Cortana's design.
It wasn't made for her.
also; sexualized, objectified character thread. Because men deserve their own spaces.
Men like sexy women. Thus sexy women appear in male spaces; therefore to label them as in any way "bad" is just a dishonest tactic used to attack & destroy male spaces.
Remember, they equate male interests with negative things, because they hate men.
They don't care about "realism", "practicality", nor "historicisity". So don't fall for it.
They just hate men.
men's spaces is the world.
Reject and dismiss. Point out that the west is gynocentric, point out that men now lag behind women in almost all areas now, and point out that society carters to women at every meaningful level.
if men enjoy sexualizing women in their own spaces, those spaces do not deserve to survive because it is inherently wrong to sexualize women.
Call her out for being sexist. Do not beat around the bush. Point out that what she just said boils down to,
men's interests are bad
men's spaces are bad
the only acceptable psychology is female
She's a bigot. Tell her that. Point out she is a hateful narrow-minded sexist, and walk away.
Reject her premise outright, and discredit her as being a hateful sexist.
Fuck 'em.
Lollypop > Cigarette
Tell me why the candy ain't the better choice.
What you call 'censorship' is really just an adjustment
Then I'm anti-adjustment.
Doesn't fit a cook
Even better, don't say any of that, just call her a cunt and move on.
stfu achmed
wasting 52 words 323 characters to explain simple thing and twist it in the process
Yeah, that's a leftie moment.
blah blah blah I'm a troon blah
Still not reading it, troon.
What I call censorship is when the government enforces limits on free speech and expression, such as when civil rights law and disparate impact doctrine are used to pressure businesses into producing propaganda.
I think you're a little confused OP. That image is meant to represent an actually brave and controversial statement. Not being in lockstep with the mainstream narrative.
>>global/rules/3
based
FPBP
I know this is a troll thread and I'm retarded for biting, but the same could be said that instead of trying to be inclusive for people that won't play a game, the devs should be able to make it as sexualized or offensive as they want and those that don't like it can not play it.
it’s a video game, it’s not real
OP is being ironic, should be more an obvious. Tho ironic shitposting is still shitposting
I honestly hope your attention span isn't so bad that spending 5 seconds reading is 'waste of time'.
You most likely spend as much time with Captcha
*sigh* cmon now... at least try
If people were simply making new things that didn't appeal to me that'd be fine. But they actively destroy things I do like so I'm angry.
Based
t.
You don't read long posts because it's either left propaganda or shitposting so it's a win-win.
You leave the concept of hyper-sexualization up as a vague concept, which will ultimately result in a puritan view of it, resulting in any spec of female skin being called a gooner game. You are reducing what is deemed acceptable and making the world less tolerant.
Further, censorship can take many forms. And while there is a difference between an artist's original design and a refined design, it's dishonest to say that no characters are being censored via cultural pressure due to having to release in an international market.
Finally, you make an assumption that women who are hot or show skin cannot have complexity, humanity, or respect. You represent repressive ideas that go against the notion of free expression while at the same time pretending to champion groups that neither wish nor need your help.
You are worse than self serving scum because you do so under a false veil of selflessness.
It's the Jews
I don't know, but now that you've highlighted the paradox, I might use this insult in the future. It's truly bizarre!
Male spaces are literally illegal because of civil rights law.
Accurate.
Citing Lovecraft while advocating for censorship in the name of sensitivity and political correctness
Lovecraft and Shakespeare were mass-appeal.
What you call 'censorship' is really just an adjustment to make sure that characters are represented in a way that respects their complexity and humanity.
They're not human. They're not real or sentient. They're literal objects for my entertainment. Only thing that matters is my pleasure, not their "dignity". Kill yourself.
how is that nonconsensual?
This, chuds and grifters don’t want to admit that the culture is changing to be more inclusive and respectful.
What you call 'censorship' is really just an adjustment to make sure that characters are represented in a way that respects their complexity and humanity. If you can’t see that moving away from outdated, hyper-sexualized portrayals is a step forward, then you're the one who needs to reevaluate what you consider acceptable
It amuses me when low IQs add a maymay picture they saw on reddit to their hot takes thinking that it somehow gives weight to their nonarguments.
They used to do this with a Lisa Simpson image before this one came along.
Literally openly boasting to the world how you knocked an uppity nigger a peg or two
There truly is no low a leftist cannot sink to. Every time you think it cam't get any more clownesque - it just does.
I once got into an argument with a shitlib claiming Stellar Blade's HARD R censorship was NOT censorship, but in fact was really localization inline with Kiki's name being changed for Spainards because her name's slang for "fucking".
Why are they always so damn dishonest?
You're trying to claim it's something other than censorship, but all you're really doing is attempting to justify censorship
If you think it's such a good thing you should stand by it, not try to cower away from it by playing attempting to claim a spade isn't a spade
Use actual arguments against leftists
That'll work
What are you, 12?
Anon, you're close to solving the puzzle. It's because Twitterniggers do that all the time to instigate a big internet fight.
Based
"What you call 'censorship' is really just an adjustment to make sure that characters are represente-ACK!"
only retards seem to think freedom of speech extends beyond the scope of government oversight and somehow results in "freedom from consequences" americans are so stupid it's unbelievable
fucking kek
make sure that characters are represented in a way that respects their complexity and humanity.
Video game characters aren't humans, you retard. They are not real. You are a schizo that cannot tell apart fiction from reality.
GET DOWN MR OBAMA
OP is a huge cocksucking faggot.
Shouldn't we ask why you consider sexualization to be de-humanizing? Would you say this to sex workers?
reflecting human complexity
in a way that respects their complexity and humanity
Is this a live example of mental illness? fictional characters don't have humanity and using "complexity" as a means to describe what you consider appropriate aka subjectivity seems arrogant and vain.
What makes one so full of themselves to take their sexual insecurities which are triggered by attractive fictional characters and elevate them to a standard of morality? You're a self serving prick masquerading as a holy saint. You should, how should i say this, go back? Crawl back into your hole? Something like that, the point is, go away and stay gone, nobody likes self righteous pricks.
The only adjustment should be done by the original creators not some moral crusader on the other side of the planet. It is little more than cultural imperialism.
There needs to be a tranny flow chart for this stuff.
Does Fictional Character have bodily autonomy?
Yes = Based
No = Cringe
Do Chuds like it?
Yes = Cringe, force them out
No = Based, it's safe
Is Fictional Character 'censored'?
Yes > Is she still sexy? > Yes = It's fine
or
Yes > Is she still sexy? > No = Then it's not for them
No = It's fine
Alternative arguments:
Are there other sexy outfits or characters that aren't 'censored'?
Yes = Then it's not censorship
No = Then it's not for them
this would hit home a lot better if the people who make these arguments in earnest didn't support perverts adopting children
the naked hypocrisy is too damning to take seriously
I wrote you a song, it's called "you will never be a woman", it's based on your life and truth:
CRAAAAAAWLING IN MY SNEEEED
THIS WOUND IT WILL NOT HEEAAAAL
I CAN NEVER BREEEED
MY WOOOMB IT IS NOT REEEAALL
Not him but for one I think ugly characters can stay in gaming as long as it serves an overall good narrative purpose, I also don't care about "the gays" or "the browns" being in gaming as long as they're written and designed well.
t. fence sitting centercuck
I liked Shakespeare's original Titus but I prefer the remake where he took out the rape and the gore
stfu and kys tranny
The the age-old pseudo-science of objectification and conspiracy theory of media affecting your behavior in society, since art reflects reality, therefor, art effect reality.
An autist countering this once said:
While the media you consume CAN effect you, there are a whole host of factors you have to account for. It's also a question of HOW can the media you consume effect you."
Very ironic when you look at how obsessed trannies are with media that they vicariously live through fictional beings. It's be one thing if it were like VR or the Sim where they have full control of their avatars, but if not, they NEED to dominate over who gets control over the doll like playing a game of House.
hyper-sexualized
Can someone explain what hypersexualization is running under the assumption that each person is an individual capable of sexualizing anything they choose to? People are sexualized. I can skull fuck any face I see, the more expressive the eyes the more sexualized, but you don't see the anti-disney extremists screaming about those big eyeballs. What is sexualization? I don't understand. Can't sexualize sexual beings. WTF. God shut the fuck up.
If being a fencesitter means being reasonable then thank god I'm not you. I like all foods as long as they taste good. You sound like a plain jane.
It means
"This character made me aroused, this is entirely on you, you made me do this, I didn't want to, it's on you for designing them this way, this is your fault"
This is the reason why lolis trigger them, they get horny when they see them and they blame the ones who post them, and it doesn't even need to be a sexual picture, they see any little girl and they immediately think of sex, and they blame the ones who posted them. It is also rapist logic "I didn't want to rape you, you made me do this for dressing like that, it's your fault"
This. Any time a thing is written into a narrative - it must serve a purpose. Otherwise it is to be cut down as fluff. If there is someone who's unusually ugly, or gay, or black in an area where there should be no blacks, it must serve the narrative in some way. Otherwise there is no reason for it to exist ogher than fuelling someone's narcissism with representayshun.
I do not care about complexity and humanity in a fucking videogame, you can tell a story with depth without turning people into caricatures and censoring things.
They mean it in broad, extreme cases, like botoxed babes or roided chads, over the top whacky in your face type vidya, like Bayonetta, Gal Gun and Kings of Hell, but the former's more of an issue because "muh societal expectations/sexism" IE.) Insecure projection
It's ok to sexualize men because they've never experienced the ills of these sexist projections irl, from what they claim, but if they HAVE experienced it then it's THEIR fault because for creating these patriarchal expectations. It's gaslighting.
wants ugly niggertranny shit
mhhmmmm this shit tastes good
kek enjoy your slop then faggot
an adjustment to make sure that characters are represented in a way that respects their complexity and humanity.
so it is a deviation from the artist's intention by a third party that was never involved in the creation of the original work in order to broadcast their ideas over someone else's lips
so not only "censorship," but "propaganda"
Falseflag.
Not by merit that's for sure.
/thread
You heard OP, girls
If you have boobs then you're an outdated stereotype that should not be represented in videogames
Right leaning people are the biggest retards on this planet and I unironically think they should be killed.
Not until you define what "right leaning" means. Pro tip: You won't
kill murder genocide I'm the good guy
least retarded leftoid
There's sexualization, which is, "this character is attractive but has other elements in their design that are appealing". For example, the FROGs from Metal Gear Solid 4 and Quiet from MGS5 are sexualized.
Then there is Hypersexualized, which is "this character has some wild and exaggerated idea of sex appeal so deeply ingrained into the very core of their being that it cannot be separated." Examples of hypersexualized characters would be Action Taiman characters (particularly the ones that turn into fuckcubes) and Passionlip from Fate, and most hypermuscle bara art or cartoonishly proportioned gyaru/bimbo art.
It's not about how actually attractive these characters are. I like boobs, I would bury myself in the chest of a busty girl in a sweater, but there are times where I can see in the art that the artist has been huffing their own cockmusk long enough that he thinks the SS cup breasts and horse-face dick sucking lips are as attractive as a warm smile and two bloody great handfuls. Hypersexuality has the same aura as the artist who drew it, in that if it weren't digital you could smell it a mile away.
Right leaning people are the biggest retards on this planet and I unironically think they should be killed.
lol k
represented
video games are not political parties or corporate workplaces, its entertainment. i'm fine with video game developer studios hiring minorities by quotas or whatever, but video games as a product should cater to majority of gamers, not try to "represent" 0.002% of deranged trannies, if they want them to sell well. otherwise don't act surprised when another high budget AAA flops
Why can’t chuds and grifters realize that hypersexualized designs are part of the normalization of the degradation of women? Generations of men see women only as sex objects.
it's not censorship it's [word salad to justify censorship]
generations of women see men only as money resource but you never see men complaining about it, clearly it's a natural exchange between two consenting adults
Shakespeare also wrote many 'historical epics,' anon, and showed concern for historical authenticity and respect for the settings in which he told his stories.
80s soccer moms would be proud of your prudeness. You've became the exact same thing you supposedly hate.
If I'm playing a game meant for "adults" and characters and dialogue have to be toned down and neutered because it's too "offensive" or "risky" then it's not for adults it's for children and man children.
He also had to balance out the drama with poop jokes so the dumb poor people in the cheap seats wouldn't literally throw rotten food at his performers, fun fact
Zoomers read One Piece and think those scenes of Luffy hitting Vivi is le problematic
what if the character is underage?
he should pop one of these bad boys instead
this
joined may 2024
a literal pedophile expat from resetera/neogaf
OP is an imposter and spewing lies
a step forward
Forward to what?
What is this nebulous thing we're stepping toward?
There is no variety. They are changing one conformity for another.
Sir please put your shirt back on
The picture is titled "freedom of speech"
The poster is supporting censorship and attempting to muddy the definition to suppress alternative viewpoints.
Interesting how they have no self awareness.
No.
Op btfo
What you call 'censorship' is really just *schizo babble*
have you not played any games for the past years?
image of a guy standing up in a crowd
stupid fucking retard post
Why did this become a meme again?
That literally makes no sense, you blithering retard. If the original version has a bimbo dressed as a slut, and the censored version doesn't, then you are not representing that character as originally intended.
Hundreds of people falling for dogshit bait like this every single day has convinced me that the mean IQ of this board barely scrapes past 70
masturbate while drunk
if it's not sexy it should be at the very least be beautiful
gotta make sure everybody is still against this shit
Comparing video games to Shakespere
This is the problem, which means you have the problem.
Figure out why people would want fantasy in their fantasy or go away.
kys.
cater to normal people --->profit
The way Dragon Age Veilgaurd portoys Enbies will cause more self harm than anything this site could have ever posted.
you are not reasonable. No rue states that reason in the middle
Arbitrary dogshit that has no meaning beyond GRRR THE GIRL IS PRETTY
Bad on purpose is still bad
shut up you dumb faggot