ITT: games you’re not allowed to talk about on Anon Babble

BG3 is super mid compared to Clair Obscur. Honestly, no idea what they were thinking with that RNG combat, everyone hated that shit in Morrowind and the retards at Larian brought it back. Clair Obscur is actually fun to play because you don't just stand there and take hits while hoping yours land, you're in charge of everything.

Everyone will forget about Clair Obscur in 2 months and then the actual critiques will start coming out instead of the inorganic hype around it.

I would rather have character agency (dice interactions based off of statistics and skills) than player agency (player hits button)

It's referencing leftoids being upset at lolis in gamesnand calls their double standard out when they like the gay bear halsin.
When they argue it's different they are zoophiles. When they argue we one is worse because more people dislike lolis they open a vector of attack on their beloved LGBT protected class, and they can't have that.
Literally the perfect leftoid shutdown they can't counter.

idk.
i liked it and they are making another game.

Honestly, no idea what they were thinking with that RNG combat

It'd a D&D 5E game. That's the whole point of its existence. Now, D&D 5E sucks ass, but normalfags love it, which is why BG3 sold extremely well, despite being shit. That said, dice rolls are not an issue in turn based gameplay. Improving proabilities via game mechanics is the fundamental appeal, since there is no executional challenge

Why did Vavra go silent though?
Why did the sales flaunting stop?

Any Bethesda game, impossible to talk about them without anyone going "SAAAAAR" or "Bethesda was never good".

it doesn't makes sense to report all the thing after first month.
It was well received and performed well for a game of its kind.

sadly

It is beastiality. And it is child abuse. I know where I am, but this entire argument is so bad faith. Nobody is saying it isn't beastiality except for cherry picked screencaps. It's a joke done with a specific taste, and it might not be yours, but you can't be mad because the joke you're making is literally paedo bait at worst, dog whistling at best.
You're reacting in such a way that you represent a position of "if A is A then B is B" but you don't genuinely believe that the latter is true because you may have a preference for predating on younger people.
I only say this because that is what your argument is, "if it's not beastiality then it's not child abuse" which serves to disarm the point of it being beastiality, which it is, and somehow this means that child abuse is okay? What a weird, almost indicitive way of thinking. Telling, truly.
Also bears that can talk can consent because speech and communications are God given traits and that's what consent is, but a child is still a child and cannot consent regardless of God's gifts.

They did report on it with the first one. Why not with this one?

idk ask vavra
so he can call you a shit eating retard.

Why would you think it operates over positioning zoophilia as anything acceptable?
You just got caught into being a zoophile.

Oh he will ignore me unless he finds a swastika on my avatar or digs some dirt on me, he is a coward.

okay :/
did you like the game doe?

Around the clock shilling for a buggy patch in a tencent astroturf

do you have other hobbies?
can we be friends? i can really use one

he still thinks he has friends

projecting

missing the irony entirely

Did you learn nothing from what I just posted? It's literally a bad faith argument, and you couldn't help yourself but to reply. Think, anon, THINK. Look what you have to do to even copy a fraction of my intent. I didn't say I don't shame beastiality as a fetish. In fact, it's quite the opposite, same thing with feet fuckers and armpit fags. However, consent has a definition, and your opinion of the matter is irrelevant. My opinion? I don't fucking care that you fuck animals, but I think you're an abhorrent societal detriment that should be publically humiliated.

huh, guess op is right

Only the first one, refuse to buy the second one because gays and nigger.

oh, okay. why do you care about the sales the numbers so much

For the sake of confirming of refuting a pattern.
It was established that for actual profitability when Embracer buyout and marketing are considered it needs 4mil sales.
Vavra vent quiet shortly after 2mil report and I can only assume that's the moment of widespread info about the rugpull.
Will not be buying any game from warhorse until they publically promise no gays and niggers in game now, so good luck to them without the word of mouth.

op makes a thread about how you can't talk about a game

schizo shows up to prove him right

pottery

op spammed 3 more threads earlier today

Got pushback

Now crying about getting pushback

like always, harkness test
if you polymorph into a non adult body you stop passing the harkness test

why would tencent keep bothering with a 2 years old game that, according to you, isn't selling?
most other astroturfs of this kind stop after a bit when the game goes nowhere, like with Veilguard

if you polymorph into a non adult body you stop passing the harkness test

Then if you polymorph into a non-humanoid you stop passing it as well.

Because it's the one success story BlackRock is desperate to push.

keeping count of spam threads like a schizo

actually posting in them like a schizo

not a schizo

pottery

still lives rent free in schizo heads 24/7

truly one of the greatest games ever made

Anything that was just released, and that includes demasters and demakes. They should be reported for advertising.

AKCHUALLY YOU'RE THE WEIRD ONE FOR NOTICING MY RETARDED BEHAVIOR.

Cope harder faggot

Pissbaby is upset his mess is being noticed and called out

And don't worry, I'm never giving your threads bumps.

I don't really like the idea of anything on all fours or whatever. I kinda like nagas because it's still upright/humanoid on the most part. Dragons are REALLY pushing it, and even then it can get weird.