RTX 5060 Reviews are out

Radeon 6700xt is better than 7600xt? Wtf

1 fps difference

It's not a good sign if your cope is "it's better than cheap work laptops ppl got with some gfx card just in case"

Should be called 5040.

Here's the video. OP being misleading. It's the best value per $ GPU you can buy right now at retail.

youtu.be/2e1a2-VxxvQ?si=65D0JOu7ekVOjunQ

Because its be off the chart. Not even joking it would just be way above the top card on the chart.

b580 performance

is it a 250 bucks gpu?

no it wouldn't. 3080 is about 4070/7800xt performance. it's no where near as fast as a 5070 ti.

The 5060 should have had 12, the 5070 16 and the 5070 Ti 20-24
THAT would be fair despite the series being a meme in terms of upgrade potential
It's just outright malicious behavior to force sales next year or the year after, or you spend more for a 5070 Ti-5090 range card

More like the 5050 because it can only play half of all new games.

Based opinion, don't let the retards tell you otherwise.

60fps

1080p

2010 called

I'm keeping my 3060 Ti.

yeah.
its getting a bit retarded where people pretend any issue no matter how insignifcant overwrites actual perf per dollar rankings

if you got 350€ to spend on a gpu you'll buy 5060
if you want 16gb vram, you have to spend a lot more

Still better than PS5 and Switch 2.

The chart is comparing midrange cards. 80 and above is high end. I guess the 7800xt is there but that's basically a discounted 6800xt.

there was a time when nvidia released x60 gpu that was on par with previous gen x80 gpu (gtx 1060)
gpus are really disappointing nowadays

350€

You mean 500 in the real world.

where is the 6800XT on this list?

if you have 1060 or 2060 just get 5060ti (16gb)

I can order a 5060 for 340€ right now
its in stock in a shop that ships to me.
wow.

I will never spend hundreds of dollars on anything less than 24gb, don't care how long I have to wait

Nvidia wins again it seems.

God, I'd be crying, too if I'd had to shill this shit to people, keep up nvidinons, or switch to a less questionable product like esoterically activated vacuum cleaners...

you just know this will be top of the steam survey by the end of summer

you are still paying 350€ for a 8GB vram gpu in 2025.

b580 is slower and more expensive
amd's alternative is also coming with 8gb

gpus with more vram cost more money.
like sure 5070 is a generally more appealing product, at double the price

That's because it's a weaker series the 7700xt exists too.

simple I choose to not buy the GPU and spend my money on something where i dont feel like im getting ass fucked by kike corporation.

16 fps than 4060

Is this supposed to be bad
This the same generational difference that every xx60 series card has had.

spend my money on something where i dont feel like im getting ass fucked by kike corporation.

but you buy mcdonalds daily

nah, its a pretty good gpu for its price but everyone hope nvidia would just kill 8gb models by now

btw

About 25% higher TDP than 4060 and about 25% more performance

The 50x0 generation has truly been a remarkable achievement.

The card is not going to be that price

"Oh yes Daddy Nvidia rape me harder!"

Nvidia shillbots or jeets?

uhh yeah they both use tsmc 4n
what did you expect

fatty projecting

it's impressive because it's not even new. 50 series is the same as 40 series. same 4nm manufacturing process and everything. they're basically increasing cores and power consumption to get better perf on the same process. it's a stopgap, essentially. the true generational leap will be 6000 series.

not every day you cretin

everyone hope nvidia would just kill 8gb models by now

If you're playing at 1080 8gb is enough.

well it'll be slightly more energy efficient but it wont be cheaper since the better tsmc nodes are much more expensive perf wafer

So, get an Arc B?

also yields and potentially already booked up. the amd 9070 cards are also 4nm. it seems they're all waiting for the big jump to the next one.

between 5060ti and 4070

6800 xt is basically the same as 7800 xt

looks like my 3060ti will last me another 5 years at least
thanks nvidia, for making my choices easy

You are a retard if you really needed to ask this

it's shit

20% better than 4060 at the same price

still beats the 3060ti your jerking it to

looks good to me

inb4 buh muh ram

yea more ram would be better but even ShitMD is going with 8gb

The card is not going to be that price

you know it's already out right?

yeah i'm sure you play those 6 games which had 32 bit support

i'll just use my current 1070 for physx if i need it

but it has 2000 gayAI cores to make your experience 4 times gay!

8gb VRAM

30 fps over my 3060, what an upgrade with less vram to boot

good i get to keep my money

Remember when 4k was supposed to be the standard 5 years ago?

I never see the 3080ti on these lists, so I don't know how it stacks up.

Consoles often run at 4k, TVs are all 4k - it is just the pc space where people don't use 4k. Hell most pc users need to use upscaling to reach 1080p.

i member retards seeing the 8K output sticker on the PS5 box and genuinely thinking it was going to play games at 8K
or Nshitia advertising the 3090?4090? as an 8K gpu

Consoles often run at 4k

It never was, it was people demanding it to be, but no one ever actually tried to make it standard since they knew that only the 1% of players even had the tech to do it. Not to mention monitors that actually could output in 4k. More PC users demanded higher frame rates, 120fps or higher with lower latency. 4k would only get you 6t0fps, if that.

Consoles often run at 4k

good joke

AMDunboxed

Well how much did you pay for your 3070?

You know what's the funniest part? That Nvidia shills justified 3060 ti not being able to run new Doom at native 1080p medium settings without drops below 60 fps, by saying that it's a 5 years old piece of shit

I don't understand the thought processes of NVIDIA when releasing such a shit product.
This has no market. Even the poorest of third worlders who have to save money for months for a gpu and just want to play Counter Strike and FIFA would see this as a terrible deal.
They created a GPU so shit that it's for nobody.

Looking at the current state of the GPU market, I'm glad I got my RX 6950 XT for $550 in 2023.
The only GPUs that aren't priced retardedly right now are some 7900 XTs I've seen for ~$670. Even the 5070 and 9070 are both overpriced.

youtu.be/IV2RcJKTlA4?t=423

900 euros...

DLSS Quality

What part of native don't you understand?

Yeah and this card is 300-400 euro so seems like an improvement.

Well it still runs 60 native, the start is nativa on maxed settings. It's just that DLSS Quality looks better than normal TAA and with some extra frames.

when your 400 dorra (+ tax + tip + tariff) gpu can't do 60fps in modern games

Slightly weaker than the 3070 from fucking 5 years ago

This is fucking insane, imagine an RTX 2060 performing on par with a fucking GTX 970.

you can play in 4k on a 1080p monitor no problem, if it works it works.

luv me 8 fps

brother

stutter engine 5 stutters

this is big news!

anyway drops settings down from Epic to Ultra, oh look at that, no 8fps lows

good thing 5060 is 300 then

Yeah. And a 5070 is $550

my entry level GPU struggles to play games at native high resolutions maxed out! WTF Jensen?!

lol
either get a job or play the game at a lower setting and resolution. and use DLSS

*$549

yea, funny how you dont add tax to that one

Zoomers don't remember when a new $300 ($250) GPU was actually fairly capable.
Yes, even at 1440p.

But goon the dark ages is 120 so 629 - 120 = ~500.

what is being facetious

100 discount

lets not pretend MSRP means anything it'll cost you 100 more if anything

hairworks off

Useless benchmark.

It's alien to them.

300 to run a game in 1440p 60fps

so... just like now? And that old 300 is without inflation.

They can't conceive of it.

BACK IN MY DAY GAMES RAN SMOOTHLY ON LOW TIER HARDWARE EVEN AT MAX SETTINGS

dude remember the good old days?

the ones where you helped shit get this fucked by buying 3.5gb 970s? I need a gpu and im not going to pay 500+ for an entry level one, thanks for putting us in this position boomer

the 970 was an amazing gpu for its time and it didn't have 3.5gb it had the full 4gb for all intents and purposes but the bandwidth of some of it was just a bit lower, which in practice isn't a problem because 90% of assets in vram are textures and don't require crazy amounts of bandwidth. so, sure it might have been misleading, but if that saved any cost on the card it was worth it because the 970 was a value beast. 780ti performance for $330 and an overclocking monster. also class leading performance per watt.

I have a 5090, eat shit

so... just like now?

...

*620+ for dogshit models. Easily even 680 in some cases for a good one.
In what world do you live in lmao, go and check how much a 9070xt goes for now and what is its msrp.
You see normalniggers dont give a fuck. Since everyone is poor everyone will buy the xx60 because that is it go to card, etched into people's brains. They dont give a fucking rats ass about 8gb, shit drivers. Mind you the 5070 is a 12gb card, which is already on the very edge of being exhaused, making the xx80 the actual midrange cards.
That is fucking brutal. If you want to rub salt on the wound the AI craze means even less competency, and more jeetcoding and its safe to say in 2 years if you dont have a 16gb card you are done for. If nvidia didnt had a monopoly on productivity i would never touch it again.

Those averages include the ones where they purposely broke its vram limit and hit 6 fps so its misleading.

bandwidth of some of it was just a bit lower

LMAO. Also: Nvidia got sued (and lost) over the 970 because they lied about the rops.

1440p

High resolution

Yes. Nobody in the pc space actually plays at 1440p (and ESPECIALLY not 4k).

its vram limit

Sounds like a problem on the manufacturer's end.
Wasn't an issue for the 1060, they should have given their $300 GPU more VRAM in fucking 2025.

the 970 was an amazing gpu for its time and it didn't have 3.5gb

but if that saved any cost on the card it was worth it because the 970 was a value beast

lol
AMDs R9 290x was 8gb at the same price, but of course YOU didn't buy AMD
And now we're here, with Nvidia dominating the market while not even giving a shit about gaming, and with their GPU lineups having shit amounts of ram

It's not the manefacturers fault if you are someone with room temp iq trying to run the latest tripla A games in 4k ultra with a 300 dollar card.

4060 is worse than a 3060 ti

5060 worse than a 3070

wew

I play at 4k

Except that wasn't 4k, it was 1440p.
Y'know, a resolution that the GTX 1060 could pull off easily in 2016, often in games that look better than current AAAslop like EAfront.
Again, sounds like they should have given their $300 GPU more VRAM, you worthless shill faggot.

AMDs R9 290x was 8gb at the same price, but of course YOU didn't buy AMD

ACKSHUALLY the only 290x that had 8gb was the sapphire vapor-x model and that was part of hawaii release that competed against kepler. The grenada rebrand to 390 (and 390x) which was up against the 970 had the 8gb.

AMDs R9 290x

according to techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-r9-290x.c2460
its 4GB had the same performance for double TDP and almost twice the money, really a fucking great deal you retard

No. It sounds more like you should buy a stronger card if you wish to run games in 4K.

Hairworks ran on cpu.

Botpost.

Pascal was an anomaly, the gains were just that good. It's been nearly a decade and you need to let go, because that generational leap has not been replicated on the GPU side of things.

8gb ram

why? what the actual fuck?

you're not presenting any arguments for why the card was bad. i know about all of this and none of it has anything to do with the card or its performance in the hands of users. it was and still is considered one of the best gpu's ever made. and it was the best selling gpu of all time till the 1060 came along which was another value beast.

amd's 290/x (and 390/x rebrand) were housefire disasters because amd at the time had awful dx11 driver support. the 970 had insanely higher performance per watt compared to those cards. amd were shunned by the media because of how shit the 390/x was as an offering. whereas the 970 got rave reviews across the board.

You want a fast car. You could buy a fast car. But instead you keep talking about the slow cars and how they are too slow. Why? Is it because you cannot afford a fast car?

Botpost

Buys entry level GPU

Expects decent performance

LMAO

Redline it pussy.

say what now

OpenGL

Nice try shill.

retard is comparing launch prices

its 4GB

takes two seconds to scroll down and get shown 8GB models

Thanks for proving that your retarded ass genuinely DIDNT buy AMD
we're here because of retards like YOU
Hope you enjoy $1.5k 16gb 6070s coming out next time

8gb

LOL

Ha ha.

So just get the 16 GB then if you want?

opengl

not using vulkan numbers which are better for everyone

i'm the shill? you presented a retarded example of two cards running like shit because they're running the maxed out settings. that's not a good example of anything. on both cards, if you play at sensible settings for midrage cards (which is what they were) performance was way better. not sub 60 fps. meanwhile it didn't matter what settings you used on amd in doom 2016 because their opengl drivers were dogshit back then and still are. the vulkan update didn't come out till 2 months later.

AMDunboxed

3.5gb got rave reviews across the board.

and we are where we are

LUV ME 970

It’s not the resolution, it’s the FPS. The status quo frame rate on PC has been 144+ for years. And you’re gonna need to upgrade to hit the meta target. Otherwise why even bother playing on PC? Just play on Switch Lite if you don’t like gaming.

im sure the extra 4GB for a double the price was relevant in 2014
for a fucking 300W disaster card. Sperging out about gtx 970 which is considered one of the best value cards ever makes you look like a retard.

I tried to play MD on my 970 when that game came out but I didn't have SSD so I gave up.
But now I don't want to play it because I know there will be no sequel.

we can all cherry pick

for a double the price

already stated that he's looking at launch prices

first thing i said before was AT THE SAME PRICE

3.5 gate happened because shit WAS using 4gbs of ram

But i get it, fanboy, it's nvidia, and you just LOVE polishing their knobs, that's why you're STILL doing it a decade later while complaining about low vram

im sure the extra 4GB for a double the price was relevant in 2014

it wasn't. hardware unboxed wrote a scathing review of it.

The 390 and 390X are really graphics cards we never wanted. At the time of their release the Radeon R9 290 and 290X were exceptional buys. The 290X cost just $330, while today the 390X costs around $100 more for no additional performance and it is no different with the 290 and 390.

We see plenty of gamers claiming that the 390 and 390X are excellent buys due to their 8GB frame buffer ensuring that they are "future proofed," and well, that simply isn't the case, as neither GPU has the horsepower to efficiently crunch that much data. Perhaps the only valid argument here is that the larger frame buffer could support Crossfire better, but we haven't seen any concrete evidence of this yet.

techspot.com/review/1114-vram-comparison-test/page5.html

The R9 nano was such a little beast

If the 5060 had 12 GB VRAM it could be an okay card. Nothing great but it would be usable. 8 GB in this package is just incredibly weak.

What the fuck, my 2070 Super has 8GB VRAM and it had about the same MSRP 6 years ago. Just how greedy has Nvidia become?

Who cares if it’s weaker ai will handle the rest and make it look and run as good as a high end card

I paid $1000 for my 4070 ti in my country. The 5060 ti is $800 in my country. Wild.

But they lowered the price 1 year after release SAAR

ignored TDP house fires or a fact it offered lower performance and STILL costed more

kill yourself faggot, im done arguing with you turbo retard

after two gens they almost reach 3070. guess Im fine for another two gens

Well it gets double the fps and that old MSRP 6 years ago would be more today.

gives up and resorts to pajeet calling

I accept your concession, shill

The game is absolutely brutal on a HDD and I know that pain. It was one of the first games I tested when I got my (now quite old) mx500 ssd.

Thanks to this thread we now know that the 5060 is a good bargain of you upgrade from the 970

its so funny because most people are still on a 1060 on 1080p. I think its just an outrage now because developers became so incompetent via massive outsourcing, that the games just brute force the cards to make the game run. Add to the factor that unreal 5 is a piece of shit, so people who now default into buying the 5060's thinking its a good upgrade gonna get fucked in the ass.
If you are the average guy you'll literally do not understand why the game blackscreens when the card runs out of vram. This wouldn't be a problem if nobody bought an 8gb card, but people will buy it, considering an entire generation is tech illiterate and get filtered by winrar and excel. Even 1080p being the go to res, instead of 1440p in 2025 just shows how people are dirt poor.

If your 970 survived for this long yes 5060 would be incredible bang for buck.

There are dozens on 970 users!

you're arguing with a disingenuous retard. 4gb was a lot of ram back in 2014. the previous top tier flagship (780 ti) had 3gb ram and the 290/x had 4gb. keep in mind, the previous midrange from both amd and nvidia at the time had 2-3gb. so the midrange for nvidia essentially doubled in ram, surpassed nvidia's previous gen flagship and matched amd's previous gen flagship. amd basically fumbled that generation hard and didn't even make a new product, they rebranded the 290/x to the 390/x and they were basically forced to double the ram to have some kind of selling point. in reality even amd themselves were ok with 4gb vram because their flagship that gen, the fury x, only had 4gb vram. the 980 ti had 6gb vram, so more than amd. these amd fans will never give you the honest truth because they're so buttblasted by nvidia all these years.

This wouldn't be a problem if nobody bought an 8gb card, but people will buy it, considering an entire generation is tech illiterate

or or, get this, people dont want to spend $500 on entry gpus and are left with this

2070 super launched at $499, and would be the equivalent of ~$620 given inflation.

The performance and vram are a problem, but the price is fine... if this product were delivered 3 years ago.

RX 7600 chads stay winning LMAO

The fury x was mostly limited because lmao gen 1 hbm. Vega saw the uplift to 8gb and the rare as balls radeon VII had a monstrous 16gb (which I only managed to overflow once).

the 3060ti is eternal

xfx 290x pcb

has a pic of the sapphire tri-x cooler

gtx 970

i finished Bg3 on it with medium textures(it doesnt even go over 3gb VRAM usage) and would have ~60fps in most areas if my CPU did shit itself in act3

the fury x, only had 4gb vram

expensive as fuck HBM memory you disingenuous retard

yeah. the point being that amd were perfectly fine with releasing a 4gb card. and not just any card, their literal flagship. so these crocodile tears about nvidia ram and holding everyone back boo hoo is all just asshurt because that gen amd got completely decimated. they still haven't recovered from it.

did amd release a 4gb card yes or no? did anyone force them to use hbm? yes or no?

also the faggot shilling for amd, i cant wait them release rx 9060 with 8gb vram for $300 lmao

Dirty cheap games and emulation, you swine

and piracy

Keep coping

theres gonna be 9060 xt with 16 I guess
but its then going to cost more than 5060

Most of those 1080p gamers are on a $200 Walmart laptop playing Stardew Valley.

did anyone force them to use hbm? yes or no?

they gambled on it being the future and tried to get on the train early (and it was the future, for enterprise GPUs only)

slightly better than a B580

Embarrassing. This really should've been a 12GB card, it's going to be obsolete in a few years.
Literal e-waste.

Why isn't that reflected in the Steam GPU stats then?

They are the main playerbase and where the money is.

im guessing you mean me, sadly for your retarded ass that can only fanboy for corporations i've already shat on it in this thread

bro has been making disingenuous arguments all thread but when he gets called out and has no arguments left suddenly everyone else is the corpo fanboy.

i would guess huge percentage of those people are kids who move out for college and take cheap "gayming" laptop with gtx 4060 and log with it on steam

If you play in 4k ultra yes. But if you play with that resolution you should get a higher end card anyway so...

It will still become the most popular GPU because faggots simply buy the least expensive nV GPU anyway.

not just that, shintel gpu struggle in plenty of other ways

they still willingly released a flagship with 4gb that was less than their competitor which had 6gb. and the competitor was a good ~20% faster too. fury x is like a bad dream for these bootlickers. it had the very real chance of completely killing off amd as a gpu brand. the consoles (semi custom solutions) saved them.

Two can play this game you double nigger

really amazing that the average population doesnt want to spend the price of 3 consoles on 1 PC component
boggles the mind that one

epic

So completely retarded settings to push a narrative, got it.

I literally just said that it depends on your needs which one is better. If you play in 1080p then 3060 is always better. If in 1440p ultra then almost always. If in 4k then not so much. But it's also questionable to settle for an Intel GPU if your goal is high end.

implying im nvidia fanboy

The GTX 970 was universally regarded by tech reviewers as a good value GPU and even now opinions on it remain positive despite the 3.5 GB VRAM controversy. You are another brain damaged Anon Babble schizoid posts i should have ignored long time ago.

Theres these utter retards who spam pictures of what happens when a game uses settings that push vram past what the gpu has
and 100% of the cases you can lower the settings and not have the issue

its like, pretty severe case of retardation or intellectual dishonesty

3060

I mean 5060. Having to talk about 3060 vs 3060 ti has gotten to me.

they are testing GPUs not CPU

If you can't afford toys you should not spend money on toys.
Gayming is still cheap hobby all things considered.

It would still get those framerates even at the lowest settings. There's just not enough VRAM on the card at that resolution.

Then test at 8k.

Because a used 3080 would be a far better purchase.

Resolution barely affects VRAM. It's the texture settings mostly followed by shadow caching.

they are testing resolutions people actually play on retard

1440p

a resolution people actually use

See

Any data on most people playing on 1440p maxed out settings?

Can vouch. I got one a couple months back. All this VRAM shit is blown out of proportion because my 3080 10GB is a monster for 1440p and 4K gaming.

Just as long as you avoid any and all HD texture packs (far cry 5, 6, space marine 2, fallout 4 etc).

getting an 2x8pin/3x8pin gpu

sure, let me just go buy a 1000w psu while i wait for it to arrive

Can;t wait for faggots crying their eyes out looking at black screens from 1 year now on. Its so fucking hilarious that they think they'll dodge the bullet if they remain on 1080p.

7600 and 6600 are beasts for still holding up

What does resolution have to do with it?

youtube.com/watch?v=QKjKMsEVBIU
Oh nonononoooooooooo
Nvidia sisters. Our response?

keeps posting AMDunboxed

do not believe his lies

Show us where the AMD card is in the video :^)

muh black screens

this isn't the 90s gramps, GPUs, drivers and games know how to deal with full vram
a rock suddenly being lower res isn't going to kill my experience

lol
lmao

boas

Games should scale at the resolution you are running at, not cripple into single digit territory or bug and crash out.

notice theres no 8K on that list
what concept of avoiding a CPU bottleneck do you not understand?

He said that turning the textures from ultra to high isn't going to kill the experience so why is it still on max?

You do understand how bias works right? Making nvidia look bad to get clicks without amd involved is still dishonest content.

Concept of avoiding CPU bottlenecks is called buying a new CPU when you need. The new Doom runs in 200 fps with a 10700 and that's 5 years.

Seems fine after a quick YT search

youtube.com/watch?v=Say2xF6HK3s

youtube.com/watch?v=I1UeKjm6ekQ

Couldn't find a video of SM2

underrated post

In that specific game, VRAM usage varies game by game basis. Usually the texture file size limits it.
And yes, consoles have higher memory bandwidth and capacity than most people's GPUs.

it's going to be very game & settings dependent. 4k is 4x pixels over 1080 which means every frame buffer goes from 8mib -> 32mib. the more buffers you need for your various effects the more the resolution will matter.

Usually the texture file size limits it.

But what about the render resolution?

You are polluting tests with CPU limited results that way u retarded jeet. Playing on ultra high you assure you are testing only GPU performance.

If the point of the tests is to calculate relative GPU performance in comparison to the other GPUs then why are you even talking about the framerates to begin with? Instead you should say that it gives X% performance.

benchmarks that use insane setting for the highest end cards

anyway, so much for 16gb of ram, literally doesnt matter when the GPU already struggles just to render games
youtube.com/watch?v=KbMgja1-hUE

those frametimes

Embarrassing

These steam surveys never open for me when my 4K oled tv is turned on (and were I actually game on) so it thinks I only have the monitor.

3060 Ti has only 8 gigs as well. It's oddly the base 3060 that has 12gb (though there's also a rarer 8 gig version and the laptop version has only 6)

What about the $300 vs $450 part?

they literally show relative gpu performance in their review. FPS is still valuable metric because i want to fuckign know what fps my brand new $350 GPU wil have in newst slop game.

if you have a cheap card why would you be pushing such high settings anyway. in most AAA games you should drop down to high or medium instead of ultra to get a solid 60 at all times.

It only makes sense to talk about fps if you are doing the tests on settings that you would be using the card with. If you want to play on ultra, yes they're valuable but most people don't mind turning one setting down (texture quality) for 10 times the performance increase when compared to 8 or whatever it was showing on the graph.

what about it? 5060 is just better price because you'll want to play shit at 60fps so you'll turn down shit and in the end, never need more than 8gb

if you buy nvidia you are part of the problem

People who buy new GPU do mind lowering their fps in fucking 2 year old games. Its fucking embarrassing to see jeet marketers like you go damage control for 8GB vram when rtx 3060 in 2021 offered 12G for similar price. TOTAL SHILL DEATH

People who buy cheap cards know what they're getting. If they wanted better they would pay more.

yeah let me just buy this amd piece of shit which is worse in every way from gaming to emulation to simply recording game footage to amateur 3d modelling to running lightweight lmstudio models.

neck yourself.

I'm perfect fine with my rtx 3060 ti

What about it? That it's a lie? The prices of the cards are the same.

I hope you get ran over by a train and have very long and painful death Rajesh.

only upgrade system every few years to play a new game that catches my eye

fondly remember my old GTX 770 with 2 (2!) GB of VRAM that made the world-destroyer 8800GTX look like a joke (it can run Crysis!)

upgrade years later to a 1060, going down a tier but multiple generations newer, blows it out of the water performance wise and has SIX gigs, holy shit I can run multi monitors all day long

look at new cards

rtx 3070: 8gb

rtx 4060: 8gb

rtx 5060: 8gb

rts 50X0 Super Goyslop You Want All That RAM For Your AI Shit, Right Retard Edition: 16gb

disingenuous AyyMD ramesh keeps on cherry picking

ramesh

Kek

technology can improve in two ways:
get better
get cheaper

sounds like they improved the xx60 series card by making it cheaper

are we gonna go back to the days of people buying two cheaper last gen cars and SLIing the bitches together? does SLI even still exist now that GPUs are so fat they take up multiple slots themselves?

1080ti and 3090 were the last good buys

ngreedia doesn't care about home users anymore, goyim get the chips that would have otherwise been thrown into the garbage

That's retarded considering a 3070 *TI* is selling for 300-400 in the used market right now.
So a new gen -60 can't outperforms a 2 generations behind card from 4 years ago, for comparison a 3060 outperforms the 2070 and the 3070 is better than the previous flagship card so that's not a good deal in the slightest and you shouldn't gaslight the mentally handicapped, faggot.

WHY SHOULD I CARE ABOUT XX60 BENCHMARKS AT 1440P + AND FUCKING ULTRA HIGH SETTINGS
ITS A BUDGET CARD ITS A BUDGET CARD ITS A BUDGET CARD ITS A BUDGET CARD ITS A BUDGET CARD ITS A BUDGET CARD ITS A BUDGET CARD ITS A BUDGET CARD ITS A BUDGET CARD ITS A BUDGET CARD ITS A BUDGET CARD
I FEEL LIKE IM LOOSING MY DAMN MIND
IF YOU DONT WANT BUDGET CARD PERFORMANCE DONT BUY A BUDGET CARD AT BUDGET PRICE

buying a new $400 gpu to play at medium settings

buying a budget gpu to play games at budget settings

Fixed that for you. No need to thank me.

Can you even buy a 1080p monitor now without going out of your way? People who buy PC now will pair it most likely with 1440p monitor as they should because current state of industry is so pathetic that 1080p+ TAA looks worse than 1440p with Quality DLSS

it also consumes 2x times, is 3x the size and might start losing feature support, you're already losing Frame Gen features

so your solution is that there should be no modern option for entry level gamers who dont care about AAA 4k ue5 slop?

keeps spamming $400 when he's been shown they're easily available at 300

these fucking niggers still dont want my money. how fucking hard is it to put 10 or 12? u couldnt play FORSPOKEN with 8 gb back in 2020 thats how fucking bad it is
i'd have spent at least $1200 from 2018 to 2025 on gpus if they actually provided good alternatives. retarded cum guzzling taiwanese motherfucker jensen rape your whole family while lisa watches as she gets proneboned retarded browns fuck every one of u microchip niggers

just buy a dogshit 400$ (((budget))) GPU and be content with 8GB vram low end GPUs had 5 years ago

kill yourself pajeet

the 5070 is right there

I think he is just mad that he can't get a top tier gpu for piss cheap or something.

that's like double the price and would remain feasible only at 1080p. its a dogshit alternative.

actually its literally the single best $ per frame alternative on the entire market but ok

regular 4070 not even pictured because it's so slow it doesn't even show up on the chart

it's over

???
Please consider getting glasses.

ofc u pay more to get more but theres 1 specific thing that would give up first and u know what it is. the raw performance doesnt even matter if it gets bottlenecked by u know what.

on the entire market

tfw dogshit gpu looks good because there is no other alternative because le monopoly

Can you even buy a 1080p monitor now without going out of your way?

what kind of stupid question is this? High refresh rate monitors are mostly 1080p ones because they want to give you the highest refresh rates possible

I'm riding with my 1080 until it dies and then I'll stop gaming forever. Modern video games are all dogshit.

literally nobody but absolute margin of nutcases goes for monitors over 144hz

why the fuck not considering framegen exists?

you know why they have that monopoly? because i bought an r9 280x for $400 and it crapped out on me in under 2 years and ill never buy another amd shitfuck product again in my life
i dont care what any retarded newfuck or grifting ragebait basedtuber says the 50 series cards are objectively great performance for price and thats what people have been screeching about for the past half decade

buying a 1080p 280hz monitor to use framegen

t.Ramjeet - nvidia Anon Babble consultant

objectively great performance for price when they don't hit any of the various bottlenecks they have

Fixed for you

nta
funny, my r9 280 lasted 7-8 years, then because no gpus available i got gifted an old 1070 and now even tho my 280 did last, i dont want to go back to AMD again

series cards are objectively great
i got cucked by 8 back in 2020 so now u can either

buy a 5060 and get cucked as early as the checkout page

buy 5070 for $600 and stay on 1080p now and 720p in a year

so make an informed decision about what bottlenecks your gaming habits would be likely to meat and then buy the card designed for you?

the 50 series cards are objectively great performance for price

They're only good if you're upgrading from something OLD like the 1000 series. But usually a new generation is supposed to be noticeable better than the PREVIOUS generation. Like how the 3060ti was faster than the 2080 super.
The 5000 series flops in that metric. The 5090 is indeed faster than the 4090 by like 20%, but that's because it uses way more power and is a physically bigger more overloaded card. 5070ti doesn't even reliably beat a 4070 ti super, let alone a 4080. 5070 doesn't even reliably beat a 4070 super. A 5060 performs like the 3070. And so on.

Like how the 3060ti was faster than the 2080 super

The 5090 is indeed faster than the 4090 by like 20%, but that's because it uses way more power

The 5090 is faster than the 4090 almost exactly by the extra amount of power it draws.

you see, I read all that and all it tells me is that the 5060 is the only GPU in their lineup that's actually priced correctly

They're only good if you're upgrading from something OLD like the 1000 series

Not even. Like Intel's card they're only good if you upgrade the entire system because the 5060 and 5060ti get absolutely hammered by their PCIE5.0 requirements, so that means anyone with an old card will also need to change out their mobo, cpu, and ram if they don't want the card to be gimped.
If you do end up using them with a PCIE4.0 or 3.0 mobo then it'll perform worse than 3000 and 4000 series cards.

The memory bus limits what multiples of VRAM can be used. Having a 128-bit bus limits it to having a multiple of 8GB, so it has to be 8 or 16. A 192-bit bus would allow for 12 or 24.

you sure showed him with this cherry picked 1 game result showing both cards performing almost the same within margin of error

Im convinced there are unironic NVIDIA bots or paid marketers on this site.

with a 100 USD discount

Which won't be applicable anywhere since it'll be $600+ bare minimum kek
Imagine paying more than a xx80 class card was sold for more recycled 3000 series slop, njeetia fanboys are the biggest retards kek

I can do it too, anon.

Yes and? That's a problem of Nvidia's own making. No one else forced them to put that restriction on themselves. It's literally a problem of their own making.

.

MSRP still nearly the same as xx70 cards were

will be unavailable at this price in a few days, tops

Holy KEK buckbroken

I'm keeping my 3050 Ti.

as fast as the 3070 thats a 5 year old card

same amount of vram

probably even more expensive with scalpers

lol
lmao

half a decade to do no progress on performance on the mid range cards

as xx70 cards were

yes anon, it's the same msrp as the ancient 1070 from nearly a decade ago, congrats on noticing

will be unavailable at this price in a few days, tops

then get that one now? it's right there available

Why would anyone want to buy that piece of shit card?

wanting year on year improvements on bottom of the line 60 class cards seems a bit paradoxical no?
if you wanted your 4060 to 5060 to be a meaningful upgrade (and presumably 5060 to 6060 next gen too) why not just buy a higher tier card once every 4+ gens instead and save yourself money while bottoming out at the same performance

$380

where do I even sell a used GPU nowadays? facebook market seems full of retards

What the fuck are you smoking? Things typically get better as they're iterated on. The fact that this card is comparable to "equivalent" cards from up to 5 years ago is disgusting.
Yes. There should be year on year improvements (even though these are released bi-yearly). Fuck off and go back to your hole.
Disgusting shill.

20% is not insignificant btw, I expected less

im not saying they shouldnt get better im saying buying every xx60 series release is retarded and you shouldnt do it anyway

less than a quarter

Yes, insignificant.

I don’t need fancy hardware to play all my favorite doom wads and Mario 64 hacks, so why would I ever upgrade? I’m fine with my 1060

I am fucking lucky to get a 4070ti super

nobody is buying a fucking 60 series every year retard, do you also think people buy iphones every year?

BUY THE 5060 NOW BEFORE AMD FUMBLES THE 9060XT

im sure all the people with 1080p laptops are target audience of RTX 5060 gpu benchmarks

The only good thing in that pic is the LFII.

i like the look of all your shit, the ram the motherboard heatsinks the fans etc
but man that waterblock is fucking fugly

m-m-muh memeflation!

Funny how all other PC hardware has remained at nearly the exact same MSRP though despite using all the same exact materials kek
Good consoomer shilltranny, defend that artificially 3x inflated pricetag ;^)

and thats where my point of if you arent upgrading 4060 to 5060 then why does it matter that its only a 20% uplift
if youre skipping multiple gens then youre getting good frame per dollar value

saw a craigslist ad for 4070 ti super going for 700 bucks in January

5000 series starts coming out

suddenly 4070 ti supers are going for a thousand bucks everywhere

honestly
where the fuck where they thinking of pricing it? I think they where aiming at $400 but didn't think nvidia would keep 5060& Tis at the same price of the 40series

Because even 90 tier cards can't run 4K native still, since njeetia enabled devs to be even lazier and not optimize their games at all, so they have to use all their crutches available to run the game at 4K*** with fakeframes and the whole suite of shit.

They're about even. It's not an upgrade.

4k will NEVER be viable.

The majority of people don't buy shit directly in the first place.
Just look at the list you posted

4060 Laptop

3060

4060

1650

4060 Ti

This is prebuild and laptop trash. Like 70% of Steam users get their "hardcore gaming machine" from Walmart with a nice discount. Same with the CPU list. Everyone is shilling AMD. Everyone knows Ryzen is superior and those who actually buy individual CPUs see Ryzen top the charts everywhere. But Steam? Intel domination. Why? Because those 70% of gaming PCs are shitty prebuild with dogshit Intel i3/i5/i7 chips.

Everyone is arguing about NVIDIA domination and how much of a hold on the market they have when the reality is that one big reason why NVIDIA dominates is them shitting out those cheap bottom of the barrel trash GPUs which end up in every prebuild.

'Only' 60 fps max settings on the latest triple A dogshit these benchmarks all use

So it's fine and you're raging over nothing.

what you're forgetting is that the i7 was the flagship for consumers and now we have a new sku called i9

60fps

mosh moshi, 1998 desu ne?

Except the i7 is still flagship and the i9 was marketed as excessive for gaming + also a productivity line of CPUs as well. You're being a disingenuous faggot by trying to compare two distinctly different SKUs because your memeflation cope got BTFO.
Next?

NVIDIA just released a 3060 TI

the 3060ti draws 40% more power and is 10% slower

Except even with 2000 series cards you're not really getting THAT massive of a boost. The only people that should be looking at this are those without a dedicated GPU or are entering the PC gaming market. There's no customer base for this.

This is prebuild and laptop trash.

literally 2 in it are laptop gpus
and i dont get the prebuilt cope? they're still what's available and shit people buy even without it being a prebuilt
you know fags with money are also more likely to buy prebuilts than poorfags right? because they can afford to have some get paid $500 tip to build their PCs while getting them warrantied

i9 was marketed as excessive for gaming + also a productivity line of CPUs as well

Maybe you've memory holed all the jewtube reviewers telling people they didnt need an i7 for gaming, that i7s are for people who want to edit videos etc etc, but i haven't

The only people that should be looking at this are those without a dedicated GPU or are entering the PC gaming market

There's no customer base for this.

lmfao

The majority of people are retards who can't build their own PC and not everyone has a PC uncle who can do the job for them yes.
Those people do not care about benchmarks, reviews or any sort of details. They have 600 bucks for a PC and when Walmart/Target tell them that they got a super hot discount they will take the bait. You have no idea how many people i know who bought absolute dogshit prebuilds.

4060 RTX

very new GPU

very good obviously

can play everything

except it can't because the shitty prebuild you bought comes with a nearly 10 year old Intel CPU which has simply been renamed to give you the illusion of buying a recent product

Enjoy your bottleneck retard.

Just look at the hardware store charts. Nobody is buying those shitty entry level NVIDIA GPUs. Nobody wants a 3060 or 4060 or 5060. The market there is dominated by middle-high end GPUs. The only reason why the shitty GPUs dominate the Steam lists is prebuilds.

lawl its worse than a 3060 ti

raw materials cost

retard

current intel i5 paired with current nvidia 60 card is literally all you need for gaming.

Nope because that was 5+ years ago and not relevant anymore since many esports games weren't really CPU heavy, but with 4K being pushed as the new standard xx700ks have been the bare minimum and people would call you retarded for getting a 13600 or 14600 to pair with a 5090. Again i9s were always marketed as productivity CPUs against AMD's productivity CPUs as too.

NOOOO that doesn't count

New CPUs are far more intricate in design than GPUs with far larger dies and their respective MSRPs basically haven't budged, shilltranny.
Can't imagine sucking crusty corpo ass this hard.

It never is a current i5. It's always old warehouse dogshit they bundle with those prebuilds cause nobody is buying them anymore.

Just look at the hardware store charts.

I did

Nobody is buying those shitty entry level NVIDIA GPUs. Nobody wants a 3060 or 4060 or 5060

how do you reach that conclusion from steam?
also do you have any sales data to PROVE that people aren't buying them?
AyyyMDs 9070XT have been shilled back and forth, and yet don't even appear there
So much for enthusiasts
So much for middle high end GPU domination

i5 used to be enough for gaming
one thing game engine programmers learned to do was how to actually utilize more cores. it was fukken pointless to buy an i7 or ha ha ha an i9 unless you were compiling code yourself or some other task that actually used your big-dick CPU...video games didn't.
but now video games have learned how to use and i5s are completely on their way out the door, with i7s about to become the li'l bro of the line.

current prebuilts have either 13400s or 14400s in them and thats perfectly fine for gaming. even a 10400 is still good enough.

nah 6 cores is all you need, 8 cores are useless for gaming. hardware unboxed did a video on this just a year ago or so.

couldn't even beat the 3070

embarrassing

Ignoring the 5060 which is now topping the charts due to its release lets check how our sales here look locally.

XFX 9070

Powecolor 9070

XFX 9070 again this time the OC model

Asrock 9070

Powercolor 7800 XT

RTX 5070 TI by MSI

XFX 9070 SWIFT OC model

RTX 5090 by Palit

RTX 5090 by Palit Nr2

RTX 5090 by MSI

Lines up perfectly. PC builders buy AMD because AMD has better value and cost per frame and NVIDIA is only really relevant on the super high end.

Is there any relevant game worth crying about here?

the 3070 uses 50% more power. the 5060 is a performance per watt beast and perfect for small form factor pcs and badly ventilated cases.

Lines up perfectly. PC builders buy AMD because AMD has better value and cost per frame and NVIDIA is only really relevant on the super high end.

and yet Nvidias are the ones sold out
they also appear on the harware survey while AMD sure as shit doesnt

ZOMG this card that's 5 years newer and an entire SKU lower only takes up 2/3 of the power!!!1!!!

This is not nearly as impressive as you think it is. If anything it's pretty mediocre at best, and more aptly underwhelming.

Yes, it is a joke because those people don't exist.

amd cards are always massive power hogs, so tons of heat production and electricity bills that make you cry. cost of ownership is massive with amd cards.

Otherwise why even bother playing on PC?

Consoles can't hit 60fps unless they're on performance mode, which is essentially low settings + upscaling to 1080p.

You can't keep up with the conversation.
My point was that NVIDIA is dominating the charts because the majority of people are idiots who buy shitty prebuilds which are 90% Intel/NVIDIA hybrids.
Meanwhile the vast majority of PC builders buy AMD because Ryzen is better than Intel and because AMD GPUs offer better value compared to NVIDIA GPUs. But despite AMD having more appealing products it doesn't make a dent into NVIDIAs dominating marketshare cause they flood the market with dogshit hardware which your PC illiterate cousin ends up buying.

It's easier to sell through stock when it comes in 5-10 at a time.

i dont buy any card that draws more than 200 watts of power.

Stop pretending you're a professional you're on vee

"best price per performance value" isn't as enticing when the competition is primarily old cards that are out of print and inflated in price due to other shortages and aislop.

Seeing Elden Ring having textures and objects pop in nonstop on the piss5 was embarrassing and jarring as shit, I think if I were console only I'd just cope with the worse framerate but less of that.

nta
I could go buy an old rtx 3070
i'd need to waste time picking one that fits because nearly all of them are triple fan designs, and i'd need a new PSU ontop
and i'd need to be ok with not getting future features
or i could just buy a brand new 5060 for the same price with a warranty

massive power hogs

imblying

The 9070 and 9070XT are even more efficient than the 5000 series when underclocked. It's fucking baffling that AMD set the base powerdraw as high as they did.

again, that "nonexistent" stock appears in the survey

Really, you don't need it. This is mostly for people running shit at 4k. Im still on 2k, and im happy with that. Maybe I'll go up to 4k once 8k gets nice and popular lol

More people own the 1000 dorra 7900xtx than a 5070. How curious.

If you were smart you'd be looking for stronger 3000 or 4000 series cards in the used and open box special markets.

Consoles run at 4k the same way 7th gen consoles ran at 720p (most games actually running between 540p and 640p) and 5th and 6th gen consoles ran at 480p (games even on 6th gen consoles could run as low as 240p)

7800 XT was the best GPU last generation for 1440p gaming.
9070 XT is the best GPU this generation for 1440p gaming.

The 4070 launch was complete dogshit with it and the Ti only having 12 GB VRAM compared to the 16 GB AMD offers. Only with the Super refresh did the TI model get a 16 GB update but the 7800 XT was like 500 bucks while the 4070 TI Super was around 900 for similar performance.

And the 9070 is just dominating - basically being a 7900 XTX for 600 bucks but with better raytracing. Meanwhile the 5070 Ti is still over 900 bucks and lagging behind.

Okay thirdie.

H-Heh this new product has a warranty compared to buying a used product from 5 years ago.

Totally epic own there. And what PSU do you even have right now that couldn't power a 3070? 3090s were shown working just fine on some 850 units without tripping, do you seriously have a sub 600 PSU in this day and age nigga? And you're talkign about future proofing?
lmfao

Once again showing that most NVIDIA owners are poorfags and computer illiterates who buy shitty prebuilds.

have a sub 600 PSU in this day and age nigga? And you're talkign about future proofing?

650w, and where did your schizoid ass get future proofing from?

You do know that the hardware tester doesn't recognize the 9070 and 9070XT, right? They populate as generic AMD cards for some reason that only Valve can answer.

muh future features

WHOA WHOA WHOA WHO SAID ANYTHING ABOUT FUTURE PROOFING

Shit nigga, you actually are just THAT fucking retarded. Damn.

No.

hmm i wonder what costs more
4090 or 7900xtx

I never want to buy anything from NVIDIA ever again

The only NVIDIA GPUs people actually buy willingly.. Cause everything below a 4080 is complete dogshit and something that only ends up in your PC in form of some shitty bundle.

You want the best? Buy a 4090/5090 for a premium.
You want the best value in general? AMD has all the best GPUs in the mid range.
You are poor as shit? Just grab a discounter prebuild on sale or wait for your friend/dad to upgrade so you can have his 2080 or something. Definitely do not buy a 4060 or 5060.

no i do not know that, you're the only person to ever mention it

so basically its a really good card and will top the steam hardware survey for years to come. gaymd fans with their 1250+ watt gold rated psus seething of course as always.

but the 7800 XT was like 500 bucks while the 4070 TI Super was around 900 for similar performance.

both went around 750 where i'm from

You want the best value in general?

To be fair, the 5070TI isn't a bad card. The only thing wrong with it is that is should be $200 cheaper. But in terms of balance it doesn't have any of the retarded bottlenecks the rest of Nvidia's cards do.

Even if you look at there a vague number of radeon graphics that don't list models that get polled but valve doesn't name.

The only NVIDIA GPUs people actually buy willingly..

motherfucking flip flopper

4060 is popular because my prebuilts

heres 5070s

uhm there are less 5070s than this old gpu that's been longer in the market and nvidia is poor people

here's 3 gpus that existed as long as the 7900xtx and cost MORE

uhm actually those only have more sales because it's the thing people are willing to buy

jesus christ

fr? i dont believe that cuz 5070 does like 230 tops while 9070 xt consumes 323~ in the same instance. no way UV would make it drop by more than 100w, and the 5070 could be undervolted too tbqh

gents is 1440p worth it over 1080p?

can you're vrams handle? 10 is for 1080p, 1440p maybe 12 but it wont last long

fr fr. Depending on your silicone lotto it actually gets a performance boost but typically you will only see a 2-3% perf drop while reducing power draw by around 100 watts.

i'm on 6gb but i want to upgrade and i'm trying to figure out if it's worth spending the extra money to go up to 1440p instead of just grabbing a 5060 ti or 9060xt and living the 1080p life forever.