Kill all graphics fags

Genuinely the most retarded post I've ever seen.

advertise switch 2 with graphics, 4k hdr 120fps look how fancy it is, 30 dollars to upgrade botw to have fancier graphics!

some guy: uhm this game looks like dogshit?

anon: W-WHO CARES !?

If a supposed 10x graphical upgrade (according to Nvidia) can only produce textures and geometry this bad then that says a lot about the idiotic fans who still buy Nintendo games

If there's anything to be angry about here it's the generic looking environment.
Take away Donkey Kong and that environment could be from any modern slop. Zero identity

You're still going to buy it.

No, because it's more of an action game than a platformer, and I hate action games.

Seriously. If DK wasn't in the shot I'd think it was one of the sky islands from TotK.

This. Nu-Nintendo games are so garbage now.

Switch 2 is a PS4 tier system, it can absolutely produce better graphics. Blame lies with the devs/publisher. Developing a low budget game and charging 80 euro for it is a true Nintendo moment. I mean, the file size of these games is basically PS3 tier.
inb4

what, small file sizes are a bad thing now?!

No, but they are indicative of texture quality somewhat. It tells you the game probably didn't cost hundreds of milliona of dollars to develop, tells you it's a budget release in disguise.

Bros look PS5 can only do 144p?! #weaksony #blacklivesmatter

can we go back to the DS era and cheap 40€ games?

God that looks terrible. Is nintendo really so bereft of talent? Lets be serious here. That is pretty damn ugly graphics from what looks like 20 years ago. That is not ps4 tier like the switch is supposedly supposed to do. That is absolute low/no effort. Shameful.

Stop coping. It legit looks bad.

Ooooooh meltdown time!

And how does that affect you?

I agree Intergalactic looks terrible.

This isn't "outdated graphics" as no console ever looked like this, it's just bad artistry.

Snoytrannies forever coping that an underpowered handheld outsold the PS4 and they had to invent fake sales data to make sure it wouldn't beat the PS2.

I have to listen to tendie cultists gaslight me telling me it looks good, and then listen to them shit on much better games bot on nintendo in other threads.

THEY MAKE GOOD GAMES, YOU FUCKING TWAT.

And they could "make good games" for existing hardware instead of forcing you to buy new one and increasing the prices of games

Lmao snoyniggs are the same on twitter as they are on here

Because they wanna sell more consoles

Is the entire internet just twitter screencaps of ESLs now?

It looks good enough for people to not notice it during gameplay unless you are a turbo tranny about it. And no, I'm not buying these games until they lower the price or there's better deals. Cope, troons

If they can't keep up with modern graphics they shouldn't price it with modern prices

Le PS1 graffix

Fucking tourist, PS1 didn't look like that.

Everyone notices bad art no matter how much they virtue signal about it not mattering. Also anyone thinking this has anything to do with graphical capabilities is a massive idiot.

nint0ddlers will still pay 90$ + $800 for this game + console

For me, it’s to run more third party games. I don’t care how beautiful the graphics are, I just want those third party games running at all.

This. They aren’t pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into these games where a price hike might be justified. They’re one step about shovelware. Zero effort.

They price it based on what the market is willing to pay. That garbage new Atelier game sure as hell isn't worth $70 but it still ended up being the fastest selling game in its series.

Can't we just get along with each other?

fpbp, but also let's kill all the gays and their (((allies)))

If it's actually destructible environments and not just preset broken pieces this technique is actually pretty common, usually it will generate a new mesh across the collision points and just flatly apply a texture across the object in UV space, which can cause texture stretching when the world-space vertices are consistent with planar texture projection.

Everyone is (rightfully) mad at Mk World being $80

But not a peep that these prices have been normalized in Europe for the last 5 years.

Pic related is $90 after conversion from SEK to USD, I also checked MGS Delta and Doom Dark ages, they are also $90, why the fuck are people only NOW getting mad?

fuck off

nobody cares about europe

i think it looks like that because the entire terrain can be destroyed.
but I agree with need more photorealistic rocks

Come on, anon. let's play cross play games together

899 kromer

cross play

i'm not gay

Yeah the game doesn't look that good, but they knew they would have to sacrifice graphics for making literally everything destructible. If the game ends up being good, then good for them.

Don't care, still getting the Switch 2 and Mario Kart and Donkey Kong

no man's sky didn't have to do that

I don't see the issue? Both MKW and DKB are specific early builds btw.

make a game in current year

it looks like shit

NOOOOOO YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND, IT'S SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE SHIT!

?

They think that if they convince people to hate Nintendo, they will buy Snoy slop instead. They're delusional.

This guy is a terminally online platform warrior, just look how many posts he's made in the last day. I can't imagine wasting that much time and energy doing such a thing when i could be playing video games. I do, however, look forward to his posts when the Switch 2, Mario Kart and Donkey Kong sell millions upon millions.

Why can't we be friends?
Why can't we be friends?

Looks good to me, because it looks FUN. Will buy it and play it while you seethe, pajeet.

Fun > looks
That said, both games look good

but they knew they would have to sacrifice graphics for making literally everything destructible

You only have to do that because the system is extremely weak.

Snoytrannies need something to do while watching cutscenes from their movie games.

Not really.

But I don't like the performance of the Nintendo Switch.

...

This is just going to go around in a circle.

uh oh tendies won't like this post

So what you are saying is that if GTA VI doesn't have 100% destructible environments while also running in 4K 60fps the PS5 pro is extremely weak?

you could literally lose your virginity with those 80 bucks, but instead you choose to play a dogshit game
but you do you lmao

Virginity is underrated anyway

It’s not weak and it’s not hardware specs holding them back.

Nice Xbox 360 game

gameplay > graphics

Why does this simple and eternal principle filter retards and normalfags

Kek Fuck no

How dare you insult Sony. Stay in your lane!

Video game autists are some of the worst humanity has to offer

Resolution and framerate improvements are more important than other graphics improvements.

why ?

The game also looks boring

Normalfags don’t care about graphics anymore. PS5 games look exactly the same as PS4 games

I apreciate half life 2 for optimizing the game to run on most machines while looking good relatively to the user's specs WHILE also being a good game.

Nowdays you have dogshit unfun games that run like ass on max settings

The amount of hoops Nintendo cultist are jumping through for these games and console are fucking hilarious

And take years to make with credits full of Indian names

I could risk getting an std OR I could just buy a fun game that would give me hundreds of hours of entertainment tough choice indeed

So that they can do more with their games like having a mostly destructible world I'd imagine. Its not so that I can see the pores on Mario's ass cheek like most graphics whores want.

you guys speak too many different languages to have a consolidated front, it's why you're consistently getting fucked.

That will be $80+tax+tip+penis smegma inspection.

I liked how they shat on Sony for years due to $70 games, and now they're defending Nintendo for pushing $80 games

Name one game without some fucky textures or artifacts somewhere.

I spend $70 of my own allowance for Harvest Moon 64 some 20 years ago. It's basically a miracle that game have only recently gone up from the $60 max.

S-stop caring about graphics, gameplay is king!

Then why should I even buy a new console?

Pretty disingenuous because some 25 years ago boxed games prices were much more wacky there wasn't really a set standard price and even then big games were usually 49,99.
Actually NINTENDO was almost always the ones with the retard pricing until the gamecube made them HUMBLE THE FUCK DOWN, maybe that's what they need again.

schizosnoytranny meltdown general #9382027715526221028862677254966819002779107265369916294629628.5

Never doubt the Cult of Nintendo

So they can make you pay an extra $10+ for minor framerate and resolution boosts in games that otherwise haven't visually evolved since the Wii U.

this actually what game looks like

Good morning sir!

#Donkey

No, but they are indicative of texture quality somewhat.

File size has more to do with audio. File sizes are bloated because developers refuse to compress their audio anymore, which they do on purpose in the hopes that you'll delete their competitors' games to make room for theirs.

At least they sell you the update for a cheap $10 price instead of charging you full price by forcing you to buy the entire game again.

It will keep happening the more you cry about it.

so what's the point of upgrading the console if it works fine?
hope it helps, retard

PS1 tier textures are okay

Do tendies really have such low standards? Is that what 20 FPS at 720p does to people?

I'm less irritated at the graphicsfagging than at the fact you decided to repost this ESL nobody.

MASSIVE TRVKE

Nintendosisters...

Nintendo just spent the last generation doing exactly that with the Wii U's library. Remember when they ported Pikmin 3 for $60 and removed the $20 Wii U version from the eShop?

At least Nintendo is only forcing me to suck their dick instead of giving them a rimjob

I hate bootlickers

Pirat_Nation will repost this

To have more wiggle room to make more gameplay? Same reason they made the Gamecube because they wanted to display 100 Pikmin on screen at once

I can't refute this. I'll now cancel my pre-order

Tendiesisters... how do we respond?

It's funny how snoys claim the switch 2 will flop but continue to seethe about it everyday while spreading misinformation

To add destructible terrain you mong.

Tendies really do have zero standards

Yeah I can't wait to have Bad Company 2 tier destruction in my latest Mario Bing Bing Wahoo

I mean, the file size of these games is basically PS3 tier.

It's difficult to even believe that, must be horribly optimized

That's been a thing since N64/PS1.

but that clearly is a glitch to do with the random nature of texturing chunks pulled from the ground...

Is it just me or this game has PS1 textures Graphics?

I HATE ESLs

Doesn't sound like a glitch then, it sounds like a limitation that you're expected to tolerate.

you could literally lose your virginity with those 80 bucks, but instead you choose to play a dogshit game

but you do you lmao
I lost my virginity in 2006 with my girlfriend at the time for free. Not everyone is an ugly poor jeet.

me use TV recordings from phone to gauge graphical fidelity

with my girlfriend

Why are you lying?

moan when switch games run like shit

moan when they make a more powerful console so games don't run like shit

Lying about what? That I had a girlfriend in 2006? Sorry that you never experienced teenage love, jeet.

This guys entire account is just him losing his marbles over the Switch 2 and severe shilling for Playstation. I have my qualms with the Switch 2 but this guy just seems like a seething nutbar.

All the physics and the terrain itself being destructible objects, is not easy on the hardware.
Stronger hardware allows you to have more on the screen and do more with said things on the screen. If you ignore running crazy with the graphics at least.

3rd parties are targeting 30-40 fps because this tablet is still weak.

Switch 2 has been living rent-free in the heads of console warriors ever since Nvidia leaked it was coming with the SOC's full specs, especially in regards to graphics/computational plateaus meaning "Nintendo has caught up, they're not really a gen behind anymore."

I don't even understand this. HZD looks great on PC already. Are they just porting the PC port to PS5?

especially in regards to graphics/computational plateaus meaning "Nintendo has caught up, they're not really a gen behind anymore."

It's not even as strong as the PS4 Pro you fucking retard.

/thread
Let me play this on the Switch 1 if graphics don't matter for fucks sake. Just release a switch 2 edition like what metroid 2 is doing

That doesn't matter, base PS4 still gets new games at a rate relevant to current gen. You're also wrong, it's closer to PS4 Pro and Series S than it is base PS4.

Resolution and framerate improvements are more important

And you won't be getting those either lmao

Switch was too limiting even by the time it released due to the mobile hardware in it from a decade and a half ago. More power means more things they can do with it. Imagine what exciting things they can do wit the next exclusive Legend of Zelda.

is ok when switch games run like shit

is ok when he's now forced to buy new hardware just to keep playing games that are still going to run like shit

oy vey

$90 game has ps1 textures

KEK you guys are fags for defending this

oh wow, this rock you can pull out of the ground that is dynamically created and you're gonna see for a whole 5 seconds looks a bit wonky
surely something like this has never happened in the entire history of video games

Wasn't even the mobile hardware, the actual kicker was the lack of RAM, which still wasn't good enough for Capcom after their advice got the Switch an *increase* in the originally projected RAM. It's why Nintendo has 12GB to play with now, it's still a somewhat anemic amount of RAM for "modernity" but it's still more than Series S has so it won't get strangled in the same ways the Series S does.

kek

#Weaktendo
#Donkey

so what's the point of upgrading the console if it works fine?

There's none, thanks for agreeing, peanut brain

They upgraded the graphics for some reason even though the game already looked fine

The game is pretty ugly though. It's the same deal with Mario Kart Worlds. It's okay to acknowledge that Nintendo is cutting corners

what PS5 games and what PS4 games, neither console has any games

It likely started development as a Switch game. We won't even see what the system is truly capable of until a year and a half to two years into its life.

this random rock has a blurry texture

has to be the most obnoxious kind of grafixfagging, you're just desperately looking for things to be mad about at that point.

It's close enough and has a CPU that isn't total dogshit. Pro didn't even get exclusive games using its power either so it doesn't really matter if the switch 2 matched it or not in TFLOPs.

They talked about max resolutions and frames and the HDR but not once did they mention actual power.

The rock was just the most egregious thing. The entire game looks bad.

Just like the ps5 and xbox

DK himself looks bad. This entire cliffside looks bad too

Graphicsfags are ironically the reason we entered this slippery slope of price increases in the first place.

framerate

has not changed in 20 years

resolution

is another word for graphics

Even that random indieshit about digging a hole can do better than this.

People are trying to pretend that "portable PS4" isn't a big deal even if it actually were on that strength category, it is a bit higher. "Portable PS4" is still better than a Steam Deck in raw horsepower.

Then why can't docked mode do 4k at 120 fps?

Why does Pokeshit SV with its N64 graphics cost $90 then?
Why does a literal instruction manual isn't included for free with the purchase of the console?

must be muh cgraphicsfag boogeyman

Is it just me or this game has PS1 textures Graphics?

It's just you. This is PS1.

The "random rock" is the entire game, the gimmick is that you can dig through the terrain but they did it poorly.

$600 system

$100 game

I think it's within my right to nitpick and complain as much as I want when they asking for so much money it better be perfection.

I eat shit because it's Nintendo branded shit

too retarded to understand how resolution works

THIS is what PS1 textures actually look like you retard. It's not the game's fault that they're forced to run on shitty machine that makes everything blurrier

All the games they showed off are very likely early builds and will look better on release. Plus they seem to be prioritizing features/details and open worlds rather then graphical fidelity. MKW looks overall better than 8 but you can see some rough edges on character models but the tracks are very obviously more dense and gone are the 2D gif toad and yoshis

Why does MGS1 have better textures than a 90 dollar game from 2025?

So I can have hundreds of particles on screen while the Kong destroys everything without the frames dropping to negative numbers

This console is supposed to have Xbox Series S specs and without running AAA games yet texture quality is still stuck on the N64

it's not the game's fault it wasn't running in an emulator that rendered at several thousands of times its original fidelity

Because the rocks are dynamic but the texture mapping is shit, nothing to do with raw capabilities but rather poor coding since it's far from a novel idea that random indies already did better.

Rockstar has proprietary tech to dynamically morph the models of cars for car accidents so yeah it has destructibles that actually look good. Whatever tech DK is using isn't new. In fact it's quite a primitive version of it from the literal look of things.

Nigga, half the system's buzz/marketing is about it being a 4k/120Hz device at "modern gen graphics", and if you're trying to raise the standard price of games to $80+, people are going to nitpick more than usual. You shouldn't have people finding late-PS2 textures in your system made 25-ish years later, either.
Besides, the battery was brought to unusable levels thanks to the "cutting-edge" graphics and the 120Hz LCD screen. If they're gonna fuck one of the most important parts of a handheld device like that, the graphics better be damn good to make it feel like the tradeoff was worth it.

Nintendo too lazy to put decent textures in their first party games

So how is this a good thing again?

Reminder that Nintendo developers didn't even understand the concept of what framerate was until they had to start developing for Swtich 2

It's the Kojima effect

Yes? The emulator isn't changing the textures you dumbfuck. If the devs used colored textures but the game was forced to run on shitty hardware that couldn't show color, would the textures still be considered to be black and white? The naive answer would be yes, but by running the game on an emulator that could actually show color, we'd all see what the texture really look like despite the game being the exact same

MKW looks better than MK8

It looked pretty good in the actual gameplay they showed off. You can take still cherry picked shots of any game to make them look bad and break the "illusion". What's the fucking point dickhead?

negative nintendo thread

pedoshit gets posted

Nintendo fans and kid diddlers, is there a more iconic duo?

Are Game Freak making MKW?

Is that fucking CP?

Pretentious gamers who claim to be oblivious to poor graphics buy games less often than woke gamers. Woke gamers have their white knights so they may be more relevant.

The MKW screenshot reminds me of the dogshit graphics of SM64 where everything is just some raw stretched out texture from asset library CDs, zero identity, zero artistry, zero soul.

pedoshit

The fuck you are talking about,schizo?

indian

Because Americans don't live in Europe, duh?

You're on a list now

Yep Switch 2 will be running games better simply because developers will be specifically optimizing games for it even with the smaller amount of RAM on the system. DLSS is also a god send for a portable console like Switch 2

This.
It looks like that because of whatever mesh generation they're doing for making the chunks you rip out of the ground.
It's generating a mesh based on the area you pulled out presumably. Dynamic mesh generation like that has a lot of issues that can come up. Looking at the screenshot it seems they make a pretty rough, solid mesh, then do a basic auto UV process and apply a single texture based on the "material" you pulled the chunk from.

You can find some similar situations with games that allow for like dynamically cutting a mesh. In that case, usually what they do is create a line along the mesh to form the "cut", then creates two meshes from there and fill the inside with some dynamic planes and apply a quick flat UV to those planes that they can then give a different material to to look like it's different on the inside.
Can get some really wonky results from that kind of process as well, but it's good enough for the purpose it fills.

NOOO! You cant talk about how this $500 brand new console has mediocre quality! ITS COMFY ITS COMFY!!!!

loses the argument

starts posting CP

Why are snoypedos like this?

increase prices to $80-$90 per game on a BRAND NEW console supposedly 10x more powerful than the previous

why are people suddenly getting really nitpicky

Mysteries we may never solve.

MK8 mogs MKW Holy lol

FPBP
/thread

You can, but make valid arguments first, not "I want generic UE shit"

nintenbro already doing what thousands of other games have been doing during the past 2 decades

I'm supposed to feel excited for Wokey Kong

Pic related has more impressive destructible enviroment mechanics that the new notdonkey kong and I still dropped it after only 30 minutes of playing. That sort of shitty gimmick gets old as fuck pretty fast

Do Nintendo fans have free will? Do they only like what their corporation tells them to like? They're now praising mouse controls despite spending the past few years shitting on PCfags for playing games at a desk...

Comparison between XBSS and Switch 2 if anyone is curious

the reply to that post had cheese pizza

how cool of them to add Shanghai representation

It's no wonder why console war fags are seething this hard

projecting this hard

joke's on you, women love me and I have lots of sex, in addition to playing bing-bing wahoo. I literally can't sop winning.
Not even prostitutes want to fuck your sorry pajeet ass.

I just took a giant Shitch 2. Christ, it fucking reeked.

The left console costs like $200 and it's been criticized by everyone by holding the industry back
Also, you can get devmode and play Wii games for free on it unlike switchtrannies lol

Ok but just look at the picture you posted. It looks like a fan project with 0 content, its uninviting as fuck

murican diet

Yeah, Im sure it was messed up

Nintendo is so shit lol

cherry picked screenshot of different types of cityscapes.

Please look at all the gameplay released ( 1440p btw) and see how much better it actually is. HDR is also going to make every game look much cleaner
youtu.be/V9tJ471FyM4
youtu.be/cHaOXxtgH6U

Eric is not surviving next week at this rate.

That will be $679.99 + tax + tip + tariffs!

How supprising
Suddenly graphics dont matter
Cant wait for the "FPS" doesnt matter to come into play

People said this with the Switch and the games still looked the same as Wii U games the entire time. Meanwhile the graphical leap from the Wii was evident from day one on the Wii U, as was the graphical leap from the DS on the 3DS.

If graphics don't matter then why do you have your screen on?

dismissing a game because it looks unappealing

This is ok

dismissing a game because it looks unappealing (Nintendo)

+ 579 posts and 202 image replies omitted.

what is BB

It doesnt matter as long as the experience is good I dont, nor care, for 1000000000fps games. But it doesnt mean we want Pokemon games dropping to single digits, stop being dramatic about it

I'm actually a Pakistani in London.

developers will be specifically optimizing games for it

I don't know what fantasy world you're living in where developers are going to put any extra special effort into optimizing their games, but it sounds a whole lot better than reality.

First video showcases the same issues as the screenshot though? And holykek those tracks are so wide with barely any sharp turns. Literal racing game for babbies

unappealing

What appeals to you, tho? Its not an absolute category

you're kind of a retard dude. get that checked out

foreign ancestry in industrialized western world

Sounds american to me

Video games are a visual medium, visuals are part of the experience. It's a valid criticism when they're charging more money for games that are an eyesore to look at.
Nintendo used to understand the importance of visuals even without ultra-realistic graphics, but now it's like they've all plummeted to Game Freak's level ever since they put a TPC executive in charge of the company.

Lots of things appeal to me, but none of those things is definitely

what PS5 games

the PS5 remasters of PS4 remasters of PS3 games, so the other anon is right

Jesus. What fucking garbage.

The ps3 literally has no games thats where the proverb started.

I’m fine with playing at lower framerates (like 30fps for example) as long as it’s pretty consistent. Frame drops are noticeable

12 GB RAM

Well guess we are all owed an anons life savings

As opposed to the Switch 2 remasters of Switch remasters of Wii U games?

weird pricing and language in some islamic shithole

why would i care?

not true, ps3 has ps2 collections

YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ARE THOSE SOME SEGA SATURN SHADOWS??!?!?
WE'RE FUCKING GAYMING BOOOYS GET HOYP

Hi can you delete this post before I have to contact abib? Thank you

If the devs used colored textures but the game was forced to run on shitty hardware that couldn't show color, would the textures still be considered to be black and white?

No, the devs would be considered to be stupid
The analogy doesn't work in the case of PS1 games because higher fidelity textures were used to try and make the game look presentable "through" the inherent jittering and low-poly models, especially with games considered realistic for the time whereas cartoonier or more stylized games like Spyro didn't need suspiciously good texture work to turn the Fighting Polygon Team into believable figures (instead Spyro just had suspiciously good texture work because it was part of the artstyle)

Name all the games that Nintendo couldn’t have made with Wii horsepower if they didn’t downgrade the graphics for Wii

S O U L OVERLOAD
NINTENDO HAS DONE IT AGAIN

Same as last time "Switch will flop!" with a smug anime girl. Baffling opinion when T239 chip had already been known for a year or so when this post was made, there has literally been no point in arguing or speculating on the Switch 2's specs

tendies coping: the thread

it's ok when nintendo does it

it's only bad when nintendo does it

Switch went through the exact same cycle, it was good enough to get current games at the time but then it quickly showed its age and was left behind during its later half. Switch 2 is also mobile hardware and will also suffer from the same issue, with the added competition of the handheld market being far bigger now than it used to be.

calm down eric, it's just games
I know that's a somewhat foreign concept to you snoys, but that's no reason to freak out like this

Literal racing game for babbies

Yes it is Mario Kart.

SOUL is le bad now

Modern gaming was a mistake

The left console costs like $200

And has no display and is not portable.

Who is this attention starved faggot who keeps calling everyone Eric?

that'll be $90+ tip

SOUL is meaningless if the game isn't worth the price

I'm not a graphics whore, but that looks like ass, and you can't excuse it. It looks the same as Mario Odyssey, a launch title for the last gen console, even though Switch 2 is supposed to be a decent leap in performance, and this game should show off that power. It's incredibly underwhelming.

Then why is your retarded ass comparing a console to an handheld? Upset that the left console is getting GTA 6 while your overpriced toy won't?
Fine, Steam Deck is cheaper and looks better than the Switch 2. Cope

notorious schizo

"PC is le bad because you're forced to upgrade it every year!"

PCfags don't need to upgrade because they can just bump down the settings while Switchfags are forced because Nintendo doesn't let them run Switch 1 quality games on the Switch 1 anymore

Yikes!
Are Switch1fags even allowed to play the new Kirby DLC without upgrading? That would be really fucking bullshit

Donkey Kong looks fun and so does Mario Kart. I'm going to buy the Switch 2 and I'm going to enjoy playing video games instead of arguing on a Mongolian basket weaving forum.

Fine, Steam Deck is cheaper and looks better than the Switch 2. Cope

Only the more expensive OLED model has an upperhand, its still locked at a lower hz and smaller resolution than the Switch 2 though.

kek

If thats the sacrifice that needs to be made for a 3d platformer about terrain destruction, thats fine.
Its a fun premise that shouldn't be abandoned because every single angle of every destroyed rock isn't perfect.

seems like people are finally figuring the tendie schizo out, took nu/v/ long enough
that kind of spammer would be instantly pointed out and shunned right away during saner times

Whats funny is that he got caught replying to himself several times

reddit frog avatar fag

(You) issue
I also guarantee you that nearly no Switch 2 games will even run at 1080p. Cyberpunk is already confirmed to be fucking 720p/30fps in handheld mode and that's one of the early titles

fpbp

Cyberpunk needs AI frames to run on desktop PCs, what a surprise

White's are a minority in the US kek

so their games run above 20fps

That light bleeding through the screen on the bottom video

uhhh... switch2 bros...?

ANTEATERASSEATER @stupidfuck88 * 14h

Umm, is it me, or does, like, the latest Mario look like a title off the Jaguar? Abhorrant. My pre-order is at risk of being cancelled. Your move, Nintendo. Do NOT keep your customers waiting.

have you seen how much TOTK struggles to run?

Again the game is going to make use of HDR. Get a OLED TV and quit bitching because the game isn't max saturation

mohammed can't do math

many such cases.

Retard

you make money if more people reply to you on twitter now

Elon come on nigger you are basically a Jew at this point.

These same raresnoys complaining about these graphics grew up being fed '90s advertisement slop about prerendered garbage looking "realistic".

Will an OLED make the textures look better and remove the ugly fog? I'm looking at it though an expensive monitor with 120% accuracy and it still looks like shit

Better course design than Mario Kart World

MK8 isn't at max saturation but it looks way more pleasing as there is no fog and the scattering effect is way more realistic.

I've seen a trend of threads making it big on twitter, usually inane Cracked stuff like top 10 lists you have to keep clicking expand, the algorithm seems to promote a lot more of that high engagement stuff as opposed to quick likes and retweets which is fine by itself but also leads to stupid clickbait.

Yes, also step back a bit, all textures will look like shit unless they are 4K. Even PS3 era games look good still. I played Sonic Unleashed recompiled on a LG C3 and from a decent distance away and the textures looked surprisingly good and clean despite actually being low res and blurry

My monitor is 4k and it looks like shit though? If anything the muddiness is all the more apparent compared to everything else on the screen

would it really only cost $80 to lose my virginity?

Oh no the procedurally generated deformed terrain has a similarly deformed texture!
This is the sort of things that video game will probably never be able to escape so you might as well just ignore it.

Is Donkey Kong a deformed texture too? He's the ugliest thing on the screen.

#Weaktendo
#Donkey

Your mom's a deformed texture.

why cant we be at some medium where games don't need to look photorealistic and play like a boring sony movie game but at the same time have fun game mechanics but not look like shit on a switch?

Play Astro Bot. Better graphics than most AAA games and better game mechanics than Nintendo games.

And has no display and is not portable.

WRONG

ok kroomer

I think we need less triangles actually. Fuck it man just give me pixel games again like it's 1999.

Donkey Kong's fur looking muddy and jaggy is clearly a video resolution issue.
Being able to see the shadowing on individual polygons on the rock is not.

I don’t care about the graphics or DK’s redesign. What bothers me is that this barely feels like a DK game and they’re trying to erase all of Rare’s contributions to the series. No one would give a shit about DK outside of out-of-touch boomers if it wasn’t for them.

Wait that isn't a PS1 DK rip off?

I wouldn't have a problem with this if the console was $100 cheaper and the games were normally priced, or maybe if the console had some interesting new features.

there's a difference between mouthbreathers who want (((cinematic))) games and people who demand a bare modicum of effort
tendies absolutely blown the fuck out

Buying and playing Nintendo games post GameCube era

gamers when franchises stay the same

waaaaaaaahhhhh

gamers when franchises try something new

waaaaaahhhhhh

They've added mouse functionality so you can pretend you're disabled in a game that's gonna get really tedious to play within 5 minutes.

Why they didn't just make a new Mario Paint I'll never understand. The game literally used and came with a mouse for the SNES to play with. It would've been the literal perfect fucking release.

Can use the mouse

Or the touchscreen directly

Ship a peripheral to slide a joycon into to make it easier to use as a mouse

The money is literally free but they don't want it.

people get mad at bad changes

imagine my shock

New

Just a terrain smashing collectathon

Minecraft already did this

Its a TOY for KIDs you retards jesus fucking christ ITS A FUCKING KIDS TOY

The Switch 2 is more powerful than what Nintendo is showing. The best looking Switch games weren't made by Nintendo, btw.

You are a sad strange little man, and have my pity. Farewell.

hey man i love your meatballs can't have enough of them

resolutions and frames and HDR are not power talk.

I'm happy because it means the games will be easier to emulate.

Tendies

"SEEE how more powerful the Switch 2 is!? Impressed yet!?"

Also Tendies

"Actually power doesn't matter.".

ITT Anti-Nintendo Fags proving themselves to be the worst hatedom in gaming.

mouse functionality

that is kinda cool, but not exactly a system selling feature. I was hoping for vr, or dual screen similar to wii u, or haptic feedback joysticks or something.

vr but it's implemented like the 3ds's 3d

would you?

I never had an issue with the 3ds's 3d. My only issue with the 3ds was the lack of a second stick on the base model. I wish nintendo would release a console with the features, ui, and soul of the 3ds again.

Guys, don't fight.

tendies when they don't understand that new and "good new" aren't the same thing

waaaaaa

I actually just watched the trailer because of this thread. Man, you guys are retarded,

Sony got a lot of pajeets to shitpost here I see.

Reminder that the switch 2 is TWENTY TIMES MORE POWERFUL GRAPHICALLY than the Wii U and this is the best that they could do.

Remember that only a fucking retard would ever read this and think you made a valid point.

Another 10 years of Tendies coping about graphics.

SWEET!

Sorry, but the whole ‘you’re so wrong I’m not even going to explain how you’re wrong!!1!1!’ thing belongs on reddit.

I agree, instead I'll murder you.

don't insult the absolute kino PS1 graphics

They hated him for speaking the truth.

cool, now compress it x100 and turn it into a flat image the actual characters walk on

Tendies btfo'd

Yea

wow these switch 2 graphics are mind blowing

actually they aren't

wow stop caring about graphics, nerd

It's been rough for nintendo fans these past few days

Okay but how does that affect the gameplay?

Posts an emulated version

umm, kiddie bros, what do we respond with this time?

What gameplay does MKW have they requires an entire whole ass new console?

I took it off google and it's some gay upscale, this should be better.

That's still far better than it originally looked. I play the game when I was a kid, my man. It always looked choppy as fuck, it's just that a big world to explore and fight in was awesome.

for some reason

money maybe?, and you retards just consooooming with no end in sight

I would love an upscaled remaster of the og Digimon World

Answer this, why is every Sony account on Twitter seething so hard about Nintendo?
And why is every account ran by a black dude who only plays sports and shooters or a balding white dude who only plays Sony first party?

I changed my mind.
Tendies are worse than Snoys.
Just slightly though, Snoys are a special kind of cringe.

you can do that in any voxel engine in the fucking '90s

I don't care about graphics, but I care about framerates. It sucks that 60fps isn't the standard at this point.

It's just the textures ripped straight from the game but you usually only get to see it zoomed in as you move around, I've been playing DW nonstop lately and I also own a non-emulated version I played a lot as a kid and it still holds up even in modern monitors.

the twitter algorithm is just giving you your preferences, anon-san, it says a lot about you.

I don't know. I don't use social media

Truthfully I just like to flood their inboxes with FEMA alerts so they can stop posting about Sony

Tendies can never recover from this

Suddenly Sony starts putting games on Nintendo and former PlayStation exclusives come to Nintendo and this board has been in meltdown mode

If you want a game that still holds up, play REmake on a Gamecube. Still looks amazing to this day.

Keep in mind that this console will be considered current gen until at least 2032

Resolution "improvements" have been a net negative for gaming. Games would unironically be better off if they were still at 480p, and yes i'd even still be fine if we went back to 240p, at least we'd get soulful menus back.

Jesus christ

t. retard who can't answer the question

Tendiefags...

I dont care about graphics at all, my first console was a snes after all, but its kind of retarded to have NO standards when thery are expecting you to buy a new console for it, like what is the point in the switch 2 existing if the games are possible on a switch

Depends on how you define "standards". If a game looks good aesthetically, that's all I care about. I don't care if the graphics aren't pushing the hardware to its limit, if it looks good it looks good.

like what is the point in the switch 2 existing if the games are possible on a switch

The gameplay with the destructible environment seems like it would be hard to run on Switch 1. If it could run, the framerate would likely be shit.

I only play in 120 or 144hz. Anything less looks like shit to me now.

name one that wasn't made for kids

A new Mario Paint would be cool but in this day and age, it really doesn't have a place on the market. It would be nice if they add the original to the SNES Online list.

I dont care if you guys are right
You are a bunch of nerds playing with toys

The SNES was capable of mind-boggling effects at the time, though.

Not quite, the Playstation was the first console capable of producing mind-boggling effects.

There should be a minimum level of competence you get for 90 bucks, and this ain't it.

Power of a PS4 pro

Graphics of the N64

Cause you people asked them to do that? Do you guys have short memories?

Tendies in shambles

the point in the switch 2 existing if the games are possible on a switch

This game would tun at 20fps and 720p upscaled because of it.
You can enjoy the ggame like that but this will.make it less rough experience.
Like totk

Art style looks shit/is just an ugly screenshot photographically (you wouldn't call Crysis ugly, but if you pick a generic room and took a screenshot focusing on a table then the game will look bad)
For direct comparison I'm going to post this from Nintendo's own trailer (no I do not care to get it in 1080P, if you care you do it!)

tiny big

THE NOSTALGIA
AIEE
I remember the game being fun, I'm gonna get real mad if it isn't.

Eric quoting this post 50 times with "tendies seething"

Nintendo hate is so forced.

Hey! where you've been all day? i knew these threads were missing someone.

The game drops frames all over the place. No way it was ever running on the switch.

OHHHH, U RIKE GAIJIN PIG DK, HUH? MAI DESIGN NO GOOD FO U? WELL I CHANGE IT. U GET MAI DK. FUCK RAREU

Why is Miyamoto like this?

I understand trying to hold switch 2 to current gen standrads of graphics.
But also dont pretend mk8 didnt look like ass and this is a big glowup

graphical fidelity

this shitty strawman again
you don't need moviegame photorealistic graphics. make it look good like okami

more powerful hardware

worse-looking games

what an absolute embarrassment

you can do that in any voxel engine in the fucking '90s

It has always been hardware intensive though. And exponentially so with scale.
This is why we don't have tons of games with notable terrain destruction.

Emulation CHADS stay winning

God, I miss pre-rendered shit.

Tendies utterly BTFO'd

The switch is wii u pro specs wise tbf
Switch to Switch 2 is meanwhile an entire console gen jump
Hopium is we will see games built from the ground up for the console in the June Direct and they'll be GORGEOUS (around Rachet tier)

Fpbp. Lmao

"Kill all graphics fags"

Cannot provide another reason for why upgrading to new hardware is necessary

you see this mountain? You can demolish it.

how is this voxel destruction toy in any way donkey kong? it's the kind of shit I saw on PC a decade ago trying to one up minecraft

No you don't understand, Nintendo is putting all that power into groundbreaking new mechanics like punching rocks (please ignore all the Switch 1 games that already do this)

rekt

If it was made by gamefreak we'd be getting the game confused with double dash instead of 8

that art style is a rare miss from Nintendo

grim

i think they're cooked without Iwata

Wario isn't marketable anymore.

It runs better and can do shit like below your post.

picrel is a voxel. Please stop using the term "voxel destruction" it doesn't make any sense in this context
Just say "terrain destruction" or "terrain deformation" which is the actual name of the technique (no actual destruction happen they just deform the mesh)

Dk has had alot of genre just like Mario.
No need to chain him to only 2d platformers.

because 4k tvs process non-4k signals poorly and with additional input delay, leading to a worse gameplay experience

120% accuracy means 20% oversaturated

he thinks voxels only come in cubes

hasn't actually played Donkey Kong

Breaking walls to find secres has been a mechanic since Donkey Kong Country 1, in the First level!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TNT barrels to open walls, or using Rambi, or even falling from a high place to break something on the ground

Look at all this yellow shit! Don't you want to collect it all?

Not particularly.

am i just old now or are all new video games an insult to your intelligence

kill all twitter bots

The levels in DK are clearly not voxels, but meshes. They don't have a specific structure and don't break in a specific pattern. When you hit the hull, it deforms, generating a chunk.

nu-nintendos idea of fun is tedious time consumption
like the completely pointless and unfun building in Zelda or the utterly pointless open world they are adding in the new Mario Kart. They just want you to waste your time and not even have fun. Fuck you slave. Buy our product.

tendies now trying to newspeak donkey kong into being no man's sky for babies

LOL

now post what it actually plays like in DKC so we can compare :)

Ugly, but green and foggy. I fucking hate how devs are using fog to as a crutch for properly LoDs and color correction.

this looks like utter trash, I can barely register that brown blob as an actual character, the voxel destruction is not novel to anyone

Good graphics bother me because I just know AI was used somewhere.

Nintendo aren't AI tards. They respect artists and they understand that humans need to be humbled and live humbly.

MODS DELETE THIS RIGHT NOW

Look how the poster completely sidesteps my comment, just to bury it under unrelated responses.
Breaking walls/throwing explosives to find secrets has a precedent
You should also check out King of Swing for more climbing and breaking stuff.

The emulator isn't changing the textures

actually it does. is applying bi-linear filtering because for a long time gpus removed the ability to show raw pixels from small textures and emulators did leave it that way. now you can do it again and see how textures really were. "pixeleated".

wow this looks nothing like "bananza"

moving_the_goalpost.gif

I told you to post original DKC so we can obviously see it obviously plays nothing like it, you're really reaching very far if you think voxel destruction is somehow related to secret walls.

bu-but the developers said it can

Imagine they would say "no it cant" it would be pr disaster. of course they need to say yes.

run games at 4k is nothing new. if they are n64 or psp poligons is easy as fuck. 4k is like 15years old point

I would bet the only thing it can run on 4 is fucking netflix. everything else would be 1080p with a filters because retards are unable to understand that DLSS is not fuckin native resulution no matter what magic they do. is pure marketing slop.

frame generation. fancy work for frameskip 2.0

They don't have a specific structure and don't break in a specific pattern

Or maybe they just disguised the voxels so well, that they appear organic to the eyes.

HE'S ACTUALLY A FUCKING SNOY, AHAHAHAHAHAA. YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP.

All the Nintedofags trying to defend a company offering up the most expensive games and console on the current market while only capable of barely handling the tech from an entire generation ago. I agree you dont need next level graphics to enjoy a game but they shouldnt be asking for a significant amount more and anyone who defends this is a cuck in the most definitive sense.

If you comb over any game, you're going to find some lack luster textures here and there. It's not a big deal.

voxel destruction

gamernode.com/history-101-destructible-environments-in-videogames/
Fucking Pay hommage to Red Faction (2009)
Minecraft has nothing to do with actual implementations of destructible environment
This is like comparing 2D tile-based game physics with modern physics-based 2D platformer physics, or comparing Mr. Driller with Worms terrain destruction and saying it's the same tech.
You are a disgrace to retro gamers.

I can cum in your ass for free.

The queers who always say "looks like a ps1/ps2/n64/xbox" game never actually owned or played that console or games.

I'm not even a graphicsfag but the game look like that becaus it was supposed to release on switch 1

skipping air capsules

rrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

As an excuse to sell you another console

I wonder when people will wise up and just stop buying new consoles, when will current graphics be "enough"?

Nintendo fell for the graphics meme

All the Nintedofags trying to defend a company offering up the most expensive games and console on the current market

stopped reading there. You might want to check how much PS5 Pro costs

SEK

Show swedish bussy femboy.

Anybody shelling out a PS5 Pro over their PS5 is a retard as well but at least its offering games that make use of our current level of game development tech. Switch 2 is an 8th generation console released more than halfway through the 9th generation.

The Series S looks to be stronger and is cheaper to boot.

Wouldn't that be too computationally expensive? Minecraft gets away with it because Notch optimized it a lot (I remember Motion-Twin making a Minecraft clone called Kube and it was NOT running smoothly)
There already exist a way to do it cheaply with the mesh since you are already rendering the ground. Just cut a piece of it away where DK punches and voilà!
BTW that's probably why the texture is messed up. If it was voxels all blocks could look the same but if you are literally cutting a part of the ground mesh to make a chunk, it might look bad if that part of the cliff was badly textured to start with.

Voxel destruction doesn't necessarily mean that what you're looking at is shaped like a box. Nor does it mean that what you're destroying is adherent to single level of tiles. As once could subdivide the voxels to get more precise detail.
A voxel will just hold properties to assist in detection, and help figure out how the the object is supposed to be destroyed.

They are selling you that game for $10 dollars because no one fucking wants it.
Learn supply & demand, retard.

How does one cut a piece out of a model so easily as to say "voila!"? Sounds like a difficult task to me. But maybe you can enlighten me.

With voxels, you don't have to actually draw the cubes. Just calculate volume as a cube. Which is actually pretty fast. When DK's punching hit box passes through a volume cube, it can then do a second check inside of the volume cube, subdivided into smaller cubes, for more precise detection. So it only breaks away the parts that approximates the shape of DK's hitbox. Or something like that. I don't know. I'm no expert. This is just how I would pursue the idea.

people don't know supply and demand. this point is always avoided: games were 60 back in the day and you had like 4 releases per month. why you need to pay 60 when you get like 5000 releases per month.