Nintendo is officially worse than EA. What a time to be alive.
Nintendo is officially worse than EA. What a time to be alive
The sims is probably the most expensive game in the world.
Yeah they'll charge $100 instead.
Was this in response to MKW being $80 or microsoft planning to charge $80 for their games? Nintendo aren’t the only ones doing this, y’know
Good thing Rockstar will become worse than Nintendo by charging $100 for GTA6
why charge 80 dollars for a game when they can charge 80 dollars to WIN in that game instead
FUCKING EA OF ALL PLACES is able to read the consumer room better than other companies who think a $10 price raise is going to save their company from losing tens of millions on their turboflops
Yeah charge 60 for a game then 200 on the dlc how benevolent of them
Is this the new tendie cope?
Still buying a Switch 2
Yeah, I noticed that EA has been really benign lately while every other company is in a race to tie a noose around their necks. I remember when they were the ultimate evil killing vidya. This timeline is weird.
Yeah because tendies have no self respect.
ea can read the room and knows that if everyone increases the price of games to $80, less games get sold per year so they all lose. especially when they sell mtx riddled games that can probably be f2p and still make them billions.
still emulating switch 2
we know bro
EA has been trying to be a bit better. They still suck, but they, for example, have been supporting smaller and mid budget games. They published It Takes Two and Split Fiction and mostly let those guys do whatever they want and both games were critical and commercial hits. Weird when they're acting less scummy than businesses like Nintendo.
My brother bought one so I'll just leech off of him when he inevitably shelves it after getting his fix like he always does. Guy is always looking for the latest toy, God bless him.
come back when you ditch the EA APP and allow us to play using steam only..then I might buy your 2 dollar games on sales
even EA is less evil than Sony
I have noticed that EA is pretty much the only comppany that still does insane discounts on steam, too bad most of their new games are ass and not worth buying.
OP is also desperate to ignore the fact rockstar wants to charge over $100 for GTA6, and that sony is charging $100 for another re-release of the last of us
EA is the only company so far too cheap for even game key carts that they opt for code in a box
They don't have to, they bake in the post purchase shit instead
The $100 Last of Us is a bundle. Still unreasonable, charging $50ea for a couple of games, but let's keep the facts straight
bragging about getting sloppy seconds years-late with 20fps, graphical glitches and no online functionality
weird flex but okay
In other new, twitter user believes bold face lie from corpo yet again.
all these guys talking about how they love spending 80-100 dollars on new games to "own the poorchuds"
meanwhile, me as I go through my 5000th playthrough of Terraria, which you can get on sale for 99 cents
/thread
Have fun with Terraria, ACfag!
tendies gettin cooked like...chicken tendies
cope
you're paying $100 for a faggy thank you letter from drukmann
Because EA would actually fucking die if they charged $80 for their base games. There's no financial security there for EA. Nintendo knows people will still buy their games no matter what. That's the only reason.
They're called PCtroons because they have to emulate being a woman as much as they emulate console games out of sheer desperation.
DON'T MIND IF I DO!
ayo where the 3rd Cal Kestis game at?
Could these prices unironically kill AAA gaming? Games are too expensive to make now, they can't afford to flop at this rate
I believe them they are not going to charge $80, they are going to wait the GTA ripple effect and going straight for the $100
When devs of non-Mario/GTA games start doing it, yes.
I mean, what good would it be for them. They want as much people playing their games so they can shove Micro transactions down the paypigs throats
That's cause EA has no games coming out soon that they believe they could get away charging 80 quid for.
Wait until Jedi 3 actually gets to a sellable state and they'll charge 80 for it
They really don't need to increase the prices of digital games. It's just an easy win for EA.
EA is just being smart. When every other company charges $80 they will offer better value. Clair Obscur or Oblivion Remaster or Split Fiction sold so well this year because they were all $50 instead of $70. Gaming industry thinks they can charge for $80 for slop but reality is most people just won't buy them. Nintendo memed an entire industry to raise their prices but few games can afford to launch at $80+ and be successful.
That's cause EA has no games coming out soon that they believe they could get away charging 80 quid for.
Battlefield 6
yeah rite once every other company does they'll follow suit like a good little goyim corporation
EA corners the market of sports slop titles.
Sony increased their prices a long time ago too. People just focus on Nintendo because they're the biggest name and thus the biggest punching bag.
Tendies honest to god believe this btw.
After how the last few were received? They won't take the risk
with 20fps, graphical glitches and no online functionality
I'll be emulating it above native Switch 2 performance retard.
sloppy seconds with 20fps and graphical glitches
You mean buying switch games?
EA says they have no plans to start charging $80 for games
I believe them.
I expect those faggots to start charging 90$-100$ Base along with hundreds for DLC that should've been in the base game.
Probably hurts your feelings, doesnt it
It's telling how the simple facts of the situation apparently triggers you, tranny