RE4 Mexican Cops from the Opening

They don't even speak the same type of spanish. Spainard spanish is different from Mexican spanish since they're in different fucking CONTINENTS.

It was because Leon called them mexican. Geography was never his strongest suit.

They wuz conquistadors n shit

I don’t care Paco, just finish making my taco. I got places to be el pronto

Yuropoors seething

ah si senor anon, that bait thread isnt gonna run by itself!

Where even is Spain, I know it's near Europe since so many whites euros apparently go there "on holiday" it's gotta be close since cars are banned in europe, maybe just right below the UK?

The actual reason is likely some american film that mikami was watching. It's a common element for an American action film to have a solo agent be acompanied by foreign agents or police who are hostile or don't help out. The idea is to provide more barriers for hero to overcome.

ignorance isn't a virtue and immigrants knowing multiple languages while Americans think it's somehow a proud thing to only know one their whole lives is embarrassing.

This culture of willingly being retarded is why you're currently like this.

american """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""education""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

leon is a little bitch just look at him

forget your makeup or something?

i say based taco-man

These are blue collar working men and RE4 is a game for moids.

At least the developers didn't, the dub voices were mexican.

The voice acting was way better in the og game

That's something of an understatement when one hears the remake Ada.

Knowing how to speak inefficient, poorly designed languages is not a virtue. Growing up with them as your first language stunts the mind. All languages are not equal.

I bet you you don't even speak other european languages

forget your make up or something?

NOOOOOO YOU'RE SO MEAN

time to dilate op

they didn't want to get any parking tickets

Parking ticket, riiiight...

agent johnson

that guy is not a spic

He interrupted their siesta (nappy time). Neither Spaniards nor LatinX like to work, they're all lazy, unlike Germans.
They speak Mexican Spanish. Everyone involved in RE4's story was a filthy immigrant and deserved their ending.

When I was 13 I also thought I was just blasting Mexicans and thought it was hilarious. It doesn't help that the voice actors were apparently beaners.

its third worlders thinking they arent mexicans
lol
go mow my lawn faggot

a bunch of retarded rapebabies are proud of being retarded rapebabies

Who woulda thunk it

The only problem is it's blatantly out in rustic Europe. The giant fucking castle should be the biggest tipoff.

Everyone alive undoubtedly has rape in their family tree. That's just how savage humans were.

I thought spain and mexicans were the same shit just different countries. I was a retarded 13 year old I didn't know all this shit.

Have cushy job waving a gun around and taking bribes from locals, generally just be a lazy fuck and enjoy a steady paycheck

Boss calls you into his office

You two take this random american 4 hours into the fucking woods in the middle of nowhere

I'd be pissed too

poorly designed languages

you mean english?

Ok cool, but that anon was trying to imply Mexicans and Spanish people are the same.

Spain:
youtu.be/wIX6Ayb8ELc
Memexico:
youtube.com/watch?v=OfXid_DUI-A
Hope this helps.

Leon didn't want to sing Kumbaya with them.

english is so HARD people don't understand how DIFFICULT english is because it's so poorly designed!

third worlder cope

Mexican Cops

Mutt education

Fair. I don't know what age I grasped geography, I guess.

Mexican Cops

Retrasado mental

Did you know that their names are Mauricio and Lobezno?

This! One is full of culture and is one of the wealthiest countries on Earth.
The other is Spain.

didn't say it was hard, just poorly designed

Did you know?

spain is above mexico

i like how there are more og threads than the numake.

then why is it the lingua franca of the world? why is english spoken more widely than any other languages? why are people knocking down the doors to western, white, enlish speaking countries? english is a good language that helped facilitate the most dominant and globally influential cultural empire to date. there's a reason we aren't conversing in whatever dogshit you speak.

not brown enough to be mexican

to me, they're all just Latinx

t. panchito

youtube.com/watch?v=S_HiqpWBwqY

Mexican

do americans really

Lobezno?

Wolverine is in RE4???

all these seething Mexicans larping as Spaniards to pretend they're not Mexican

jaja

Completely irrelevant to the fact that it's poorly designed.

one of the wealthiest countries on Earth

Don't you have a Cartel beheading to star in?

in std rates

hey alright

Someone hasn't heard of Hindi
It's so bad there's like 6 different versions of it, all incompatible with each other, and India has streets that are in a completely diferent language connected to other streets that are completely different
The place is a shithole

mexico has double the rate of spain

idiotic. language and culture are synergistic. the success of one indicates the other is robust and capable. probably you have some retarded quibble to the effect of

durr these words sound the same but they're different

or some other efficiency focused, bean-counter tier idea of what makes something good. english is a fantastic, well wrought language.

here’s my favorites
youtube.com/watch?v=MPcdzoRuhNE
youtube.com/watch?v=1H2iB8Bc0E0

you might think that when it's the only language you know

You dont know how to argue at all. What you said has nothing in relevance with what he said.

please learn my language and validate it as being better than yours while my entire country tries to relocate to your (superior) one

but remember my culture is better than yours and needs to be hallowed while i act snobby in spaces built by your language and people

i don't care what you think i need to do in order to argue. "poorly designed" doesn't mean anything. it isn't defined at all. a language exists to communicate ideas, english did it's job so well it conquered the entire planet. have some reddit "umm achtually" definition of why it's secretly a bad language is a fucking retarded take, then saying that my opinions don't hold weight because i don't structure my thoughts the way you'd prefer them (I.E agree with you outright) is turbonigger behavior.

Look up Clara Fernandez. That's what a Spanish woman looks like. She's not brown.

Boomercore.

i don't care what you think i need to do in order to argue

Its not about what I think, its about how objectively you're shit at arguing.
"english is a poorly designed language"
"o-ok but it took over the world"
These 2 points have literally nothing in correlation. You keep moving the goalpost like a moron.

english did it's job so well it conquered the entire planet

Yeah, because everyone on this planet earth unanimously agreed and voted that English is the best language and decided to adopt it. No you fucking retard. English took over the planet because the British empire spread its influence across the globe, because English is the primary language for the internet, and also it spread through TVs and cartoons and so on. English isnt big because its a good language you fucking retard. It just spread via soft power. Its literally the same thing with French and how French is prevalent on several countries because of the power the French Empire held.

then saying that my opinions don't hold weight because i don't structure my thoughts the way you'd prefer them

Where did I say that LOOOL. Please scroll up and find who said that your opinions dont hold weight.
I said that you dont know how to argue, because you arent counter-arguing, you're just moving the goalpost which is what the usual illiterate retard in here does, which is why I pointed it out. Then you somehow managed to twist it that im attacking you and your points, because you are as stupid as the so called turboniggers you mock.

"english is a poorly designed language"

"o-ok but it took over the world"

These 2 points have literally nothing in correlation. You keep moving the goalpost like a moron.

no, my goalpost is firmly fixed right here: a shitty language (like yours) can't proliferate like english can. the pure global scope of english is a testament to it's success.

English took over the planet because the British empire spread its influence across the globe, because English is the primary language for the internet, and also it spread through TVs and cartoons and so on.

ah, so english actually a really bad language that engendered a people that conquered the rest of the world and cultural touchstones that spread so far and wide that they're synonymous outside of their native culture. what are the hallmarks of a good language, then in your obviously expert and definitive opinion?

no, my goalpost is firmly fixed right here: a shitty language (like yours) can't proliferate like english can

So in one stroke, you admit you're moving goalposts like the moron you are, and then continue moving it again. This is just brilliant LOL. And for reference retard, any language can take over the world if it has enough power, I literally pointed that out with French already. Do you not read? French is literally prevalent in Cambodia. Go look up Latvian language. Now realize that a big chunk of Latvians actually know Russian because of the influence Russia had over it.

ah, so english actually a really bad language

Where the fuck did I say that?? Literally where on gods green earth did I say its a bad language. Please, copy and greentext the exact phrase I said that makes you think that I said that

You are so fucking stupid and genuinely retarded that you continue making shit up just to look better. You cannot argue for shit. Are you sentient?

conquered the rest of the world and cultural touchstones that spread so far and wide that they're synonymous outside of their native culture

The irony in this is brilliant, I swear it feels like im looking down on a lab rat.
Are you American? If so then im sure you're stupid enough to be shocked that Native Americans originally did not know how to speak English. Thats because the British rolled over to you and spread their language to you. Thats just how it works. I say again retard. English did not spread because everyone agreed to use it, it spread, via soft power. Ill be honest I chuckled a lot, and you made my night better. If you post such an equally retarded response I wont bother. Have a nice week

that was because of colonization in the past, get ready for chinese to overtake english as the dominant language

Where the fuck did I say that??

what you said has nothing to do... with what he said

that original reply chain was me asserting that english IS a "well designed language" because it did what language is designed to do: communicate, proliferate and shape ideas. you, like a caveman, separated in your mind the concepts of "successful" and "designed well". since i talked about the success and beautiful achievements of the language, and not whatever you arbitrarily define internally as "well designed", you hopped in to "UMMM ACHTUALLY" at me, posting these huge reams of blogposts about how im missing the point. i am not missing the point. "design" isn't the point of language. it is an extension and expression of the souls, attitudes, achievements and beliefs of groups of people. it's not something that you can minmax with design, language is as subjective and expressionistic as any art of the mindset of any given person. YOU are the one who is blowing past the heart of the conversation over the pedantic assertion that by talking about the achievements of the language, i wasn't addressing whether or not it was "designed well", which is an idea so limited, idiotic and divorced from the reality of existence that you can't even really address it without giving yourself brain damage.

not reading the rest of that post, learn how to be concise in your messaging from now on.

nope mexicans are closer to turks and jews than spaniards

Bro. In the 50 thesaurus words you pulled out, you still somehow, willingly, managed to ignore, one simple argument.

Are you American? If so then im sure you're stupid enough to be shocked that Native Americans originally did not know how to speak English. Thats because the British rolled over to you and spread their language to you. Thats just how it works. I say again retard. English did not spread because everyone agreed to use it, it spread, via soft power.

This was fun.

Look up Canelo Alvarez. That's what a Mexican man looks like. He's not brown.

he's an irish fag adopted by mexicans

the irony of your retardation is pretty impressive. whether or not anyone agrees to be influenced by english is irrelevant. strength doesn't require consent. there is no condition or predicate that will ever erase how influential english has been on the world stage, which is itself a testament to how "well designed" it is. the interplay between people from USA and the UK is completely irrelevant and doesn't address my core point at all, which has remained consistent: the standing of english on the world stage is a testament to it in itself. whether or not you personally like it is irrelevant.

Point is exceptions aren't the rule. Like Mexicans, 95% of Spaniards are swarthy shit eyed brown people.

Leon was staring at their dicks every time they took a piss.

95% of Americans look like shit aswell, what is your point?

Yes. Can't polish a turd thoughevermorebeit

nothing wrong with that
youtube.com/watch?v=VhdOwDe-Pgg
youtube.com/watch?v=RsYbNv7icOA

How are polyglots even real. I refuse to believe people like that even exist. Takes so much mental capacity to even learn one new language. Telling me people out there who know seven languages at once. It isn't real. Fake news.

Ayyyy carlito

What the fuck are you talking about? Where are all these dark skinned Spainards you're talking about?

On the first page of google images "Spaniards"

I saw this. The bottom right guy could be described as swarthy. The rest look similar to anglos.

Spain had some white people like 500 years ago. They were the conquerors, explorers, and architects of the Empire. However mixing with the brown hordes mongrelized their descendants who now look like this.
Kind of like Mexico.

well I mean to be fair, who give a shit?

the irony of your retardation

not reading the rest of that post

Huh.

You have this argument that English by default is a good language because of the influence it has across the globe. And im not denying that it might be the biggest language of all time. But thats quite literally not how it works retard. Lets say English was a poorly designed language. It literally wouldn't matter, because you HAVE to learn it if you wanna use the internet to its fullest capacity. Not only that, but in a huge amount of countries English is a secondary language, meaning you will learn about it in school. Is it because English is such a perfect language that everyone adopted it because of so? No. Its big, literally because, of the fucking British Empire, and because of soft power.

what you said has nothing to do... with what he said

If you really wanna take it that far, sure. My original point is that you dont know how to argue. The reason why your arguments have nothing in common is because, they literally have nothing in common. You keep on just moving the goalpost without really arguing, because you're just that dumb. The original point is that english is a poor language. Okay but why? Maybe the words are hard to pronounciate, maybe its poorly structured, maybe this, maybe that. Then you go on and say, nah you're a dumbass, because actually the words are easy and bla bla bla. All of these points address why its a poor language, and yours why they dont. Its how you actually argue, you stick to the point. Instead, you just completely switch it up, saying that English is actually not poorly designed, because if it was, then why is it the biggest language? Well thats because of soft power you fucking retard. Thats the whole point why its such a big language. Because of how it spread. It has nothing in correlation with its 'design'.

Oh come on. That's just an African.

no the spanish came to mexico rap..er I mean conquered the mayans and the aztecs and turned them into mexicans

The other 5 are spics. Notice how the only swarthoid in your pic was the only modern Spaniard.

yeah but it's not hard at all to do a spanish accent you just have to sound extra retarded

You have this argument that English by default is a good language because of the influence it has across the globe. And im not denying that it might be the biggest language of all time. But thats quite literally not how it works retard. Lets say English was a poorly designed language

not reading the rest of your post, you've blown past my point again, while chimping out for an hour claiming that's what I did. I'll lay it out for you one more time: The best metric of a "well designed" language is the success and proliferation of the ideas, people, and culture that it fosters. You continually scootch by that point while saying "weeeeelllllll that doesn't make it well designed" even though I already explained, in detail, why I think that's a nonsense term to apply to a language. you HAVE to learn it because you want/need to engage on devices invented by white english speakers to use a utility service, the internet, made by white english speakers, which is a service made possible by a society and network of white english speakers, all of whom used ENGLISH to design, build, ship and invent these things and then bring them to your backwater shithole, where you ignore several points in an argument in english, ABOUT english, in favor of shitflinging like a monkey.

ill make it easy, what makes a language "well designed"? what language is "well designed" and how does it embody "good design"?

kys

english did it's job

english did it is job

a retard that can't even speak his own language shouldn't be teaching others about the virtues of it

im not teaching about the virtues of the english language dumbfuck, im disputing the notion that it is poorly designed, and that the concept of "poor design" can apply independently of the achievements and cultural scope of the language which is a brain dead way of looking at something as dynamic as language. it's like bitching about the optimization of bats or crocodiles. obviously grammer and intelligence don't have perfect correlation since you caught a typo on Anon Babble, yet very curiously still eat paste and masturbate to pictures of horses.

The best metric of a "well designed" language is the success and proliferation of the ideas, people, and culture that it fosters

??? The best metrics of a good language, are say, how easy it is to understand, how easy it is to learn, how easy is it to read, how easy it is to write, and so on, because, its a, language, and the whole point of one, is to communicate.

The achievements or success that arose from the language, are contributed not by the language itself retard, but by its people. Actually now that you mention it, there is probably some random African language that had some insane ideas that got erased by time. Does that make it a successful language?

So by your logic you can say that Hindi or any Indian languages are good languages because of the contributes they gave to the world, despite their country being a few millennia backwards. You could also say that a majority of languages, are by default shit because they didnt contribute anything, but thats literally, not how it works. Maybe they just simply didnt have the resources or they werent smart enough to implement their ideas. Not only that but this makes no sense because 99% of countries never had the power or influence, or even the peace of mind most english speaking countries had.

Take your whole paragraph. Now replace "English" but with some random country, say Mexico, and imagine Mexico being the most powerful country to have existed, and Mexico created the internet and took over half the world. You would get the same result where their influence is felt across their globe, and their 'contributes' and achievements are also felt everywhere.

funny you say that because the current mexican president is a jewish woman

baffled americans are retarded

??? The best metrics of a good language, are say, how easy it is to understand, how easy it is to learn, how easy is it to read, how easy it is to write, and so on, because, its a, language, and the whole point of one, is to communicate.

see, once we get under the hood we immediately find out you're a fucking brainlet. accessibility is not a good metric of whether or not a language is good. at least it's not the only one. another factor is how aptly the language can communicate precisely, or what level of poetic imagery it can achieve, or how apt it is to communicate strange metaphysical concepts. calculus/algebra is impossibly dense for a math brainlet like me, but lacking accessibility doesn't make it useless as a language/system of symbols. ironically, that one anon earlier who chalked up complaints about english mainly being foreigners bitching that it is difficult was right in your case.

The achievements or success that arose from the language, are contributed not by the language itself retard, but by its people.

more idiocy. language is a part of your psychology. it doesn't exist in a vacuum, how well it can communicate or engage with certain concepts will actively change you as a person, because you will be necessarily limited (at least in most peoples case) by the ideas that you're capable of expressing. language isn't just pure output, it is also input. what a language is best at or capable of expressing will shape your psychology. language is also a part of and extension of it's people. you hear polyglot poets talk about this, how Faust couldn't have been written by anyone except a german. how the ideas and manners of expression in whitman could only come from an american.

So by your logic you can say that Hindi or any Indian languages are good languages because of the contributes they gave to the world

im disputing the notion that it is poorly designed, and that the concept of "poor design" can apply independently of the achievements and cultural scope of the language

English does not have an official centralized institution dictating grammar norm afaik. Therefore to call it "designed" is incorrect altogether. English hasn't been designed and it evolves constantly, unlike spanish.
Also, who is saying that "good design" and
"achievements and cultural scope" are interlinked? Are you making arguments up in order to prop up your point of view? lol

Knowing how to speak inefficient, poorly designed languages is not a virtue. Growing up with them as your first language stunts the mind.

I thought THIS was your original point? It clashes directly with your notion that "design" is independent to "achievements and cultural scope", so no wonder you ditched it. Unless you are two different anons I guess.

yet very curiously still eat paste and masturbate to pictures of horses

Alright, i'm done talking to a schizo retard.
Also I noticed your intentional grammar mistakes in order to bait me into stooping to your level of intellectual shit flinging. jump off a building or smth idk

not dure which was is one is worse, that or spaniards being replaced by negros

cont.

are by default shit because they didnt contribute anything, but thats literally, not how it works. Maybe they just simply didnt have the resources or they werent smart enough to implement their ideas. Not only that but this makes no sense because 99% of countries never had the power or influence, or even the peace of mind most english speaking countries had.

a good tree bears fruit. if all you can build with your language is, in the case of hindi, an obsession with scat, h1b visa slave labor and pollution then your language is just defacto worth less. maybe a language lends itself well to a quiet, goodhearted people who care strongly for close relationships. that would be a merit. im not saying anything except english is shit. but the merits of english are self evident, so calling it "poorly designed" because you have a hard time learning it is just sour grapes.

Take your whole paragraph. Now replace "English" but with some random country, say Mexico, and imagine Mexico being the most powerful country to have existed, and Mexico created the internet and took over half the world. You would get the same result where their influence is felt across their globe, and their 'contributes' and achievements are also felt everywhere.

but they didn't take over the world. the english speaking whites did. this hypothetical is useless.

you couldn't even follow a basic reply chain. your assessment about "design" being a stupid metric is exactly what i was originally arguing. you're agreeing with me. also, how the fuck did i intuitively KNOW you were a furry?

Knowing how to speak inefficient, poorly designed languages is not a virtue. Growing up with them as your first language stunts the mind.

that's some other anons post dumbfuck.

707750093

faggot accuses others of confusing separate anons while doing just that

wowza.

all those mad beaner replies

which anon are you, the furry or the other one? I quoted two anons and replied to them individually. if you're the furry, then you're just backpedaling out of fear because you're a retard and a coward. you said yourself you were

done arguing with a schizo

either way learn how to quote

Mexico

Dragon Ball and tacos country

Spain

????

Dragon Ball and tacos country

i take it back mexico is based. they should stay on their side of the fence though i dunno why they have such a problem respecting property

>>either way learn how to quote

You’re confusing ignorance with indifference. Americans don’t care about keeping track of every one of your inconsequential little shitholes, least of all fucking Spain. I mean, who the fuck even cares about Spain? We’ll talk about France, Britain, Germany, maybe. But Spain? You really think anyone gives a shit about those people?

another factor is how aptly the language can communicate precisely, or what level of poetic imagery it can achieve, or how apt it is to communicate strange metaphysical concepts

... Thats literally the point I made. That the best metric of a language, is how well it can communicate. By that metric, English is a fine language and I dont disagree.
A big reason why Englishmen managed to create and push up their ideas, is because they had enough power, freedom and peace of mind to actually do them when most other countries were just too busy struggling to survive. Example after WW2 America could do all kinds of shit but Europe was struggling in pretty much every aspect.

but they didn't take over the world. the english speaking whites did. this hypothetical is useless.

Yeah and the whole point im trying to make, is that the level of impact English had, was not necessarily because of its 'design' but because of the level of power and influence the 'Englishmen' had, to spread over the whole world. English is pretty much necessary now, when many other languages fall short because they nearly as important. But take English and replace it with Spanish just like in my hypothetical, then English would also fall short and Spanish would have equal or more impact. This is the whole point that I have to reiterate since the beginning because you kept mentioning something about global scope.

I dont actually disagree with most of the other paragraphs and they are true. But you have moved the goalpost so hard that I honestly forgot what the argument was for for a second.

I'm baffled by how people still fall for the world's most obvious bait

I wonder why

Based. Fuck Spaniards

Mexican women sure did

When I imagine spaniard spanish I imagine some high energy sales announcer:

BUENAVISTA MI AMOR PASAQUENCHA DE LA SOYA AMBIEN

meanwhile, Mexicans, with their sleepy nasally voices:

Heheh... siiiii, señor, rancho de los hueevos...

dude you got outed as a furry and are defensive about it, it's fine. just admit it and move on. it's not my fault you popped your first boner to sparkledash or whatever

Thats literally the point I made

no

how easy it is to learn

how easy it is to read

how easy it is to write

your emphasis, three times, was on EASE. a language adept at communicating complex concepts will not be easy.

a big reason why englishmen managed to create and push up their ideas, is because they had enough power, freedom, and peace of mind

they had those things because their people fought for, created and defended their ideas, power, freedom and peace, and it was done in part with ENGLISH. that's what makes it a good language. they didn't just trip over all those good things, they created them. other cultures fell short and did not.

Yeah and the whole point im trying to make, is that the level of impact English had, was not necessarily because of its 'design' but because of the level of power and influence the 'Englishmen' had

they had that power because they were capable, intelligent, industrious, inventive and a whole host of other virtues. the english language in part embodies AND helped facilitate those virtues because language, people, and culture are inseparable. you are STILL trying to separate your concept of "design" from how successful a language is. they are intertwined.

But take English and replace it with Spanish just like in my hypothetical, then English would also fall short and Spanish would have equal or more impact.

spanish didn't have equal impact because they couldn't rival the english. the english didn't conquer the world by accident, it was a contest and they won. the spanish language could never be as important because its people were incapable of besting the english.

I lost track of which side you’re on and I stopped caring about this retarded argument anyway but you type like such a fucking faggot

Thats literally the point I made. That the best metric of a language, is how well it can communicate. By that metric, English is a fine language and I dont disagree.

also, you have conceded the entire argument here. the whole reason i started posting was because i disputed the idea that english was "poorly designed" and you jumped in because you were pissy that i cited success as a metric of quality. you have now capitulated and admitted you're wrong, and moved on to saying

well the englishmans success was an accident born out of their luxurious circumstances

which is fucking retarded modern doublethink that enables you to sit and harbor resentment about the defacto culture on the world stage. it's pathetic, especially because you vehemently accused me of moving the goalposts myself which you have now done.

the argument i made was that "design" is an idiotic metric for judging a language. language is not "designed", it's an organic expression of it's people. a better metric is it's achievements which are proof of it's quality, which english has in spades, which you yourself admit. when pressed for what makes something well designed, you offered

how easy it is... etc

then ended up agreeing with me that english is successful by the metric of how well it can communicate.
you should not go around getting into passionate involved arguments because you have no idea what you even mean

i have to go shower and take a shit. if this dumpster thread survives long enough ill respond to the next dipshit reply

no

It literally was tho. Sure if you wanna head into faggotry and talk about specifics then yeah I didnt, but the whole point (which I also wrote) I had in my mind is that the best metric of a language is how well it can communicate.

you are STILL trying to separate your concept of "design" from how successful a language is. they are intertwined.

Not in my mind it isnt and I already made it clear how and why English spread and why others didnt.
Im getting real sick and tired of this shit and I need to head to bed anyways and this is pointless so fuck it you won and good night.

It is kind of funny though because the reason why I posted is that you are just a shit arguer which still stands funnily enough.

the whole reason i started posting was because i disputed the idea that english was "poorly designed" and you jumped in because you were pissy that i cited success as a metric of quality.

Which is even more ironic because thats what im trying to argue about the whole time that success is just not a good metric of quality or atleast not the best one. It is actually genuinely funny because if you follow the reply chain you'll get:

>ah, so english actually a really bad language

>Where the fuck did I say that??

>well the englishmans success was an accident born out of their luxurious circumstances

which is fucking retarded modern doublethink that enables you to sit and harbor resentment about the defacto culture on the world stage. it's pathetic, especially because you vehemently

It is not an accident but it is not modern doublethink its quite literally what happened. A majority of the world's advancements all happened in the past 100 years, English was not as widespread as it is now before WW2.

especially because you vehemently accused me of moving the goalposts myself which you have now done.

I made that point literally since the fucking beginning. Mentioning goalposts, coming from you, is hilarious also.

americans are retarded, news at 11

Spain is almost 3x your GDP/capita bro
They aren't much behind total GDP either, despite your country being 4x bigger and being glued to US.

DETRAS DE TI IMBECIL

One more thing though that you seem stupid enough to miss.

spanish didn't have equal impact because they couldn't rival the english. the english didn't conquer the world by accident, it was a contest and they won. the spanish language could never be as important because

its people were incapable of besting the english.

This is genuinely great irony and I hope you'll find it.

the best metric of a language is how well it can communicate.

right, and i think that conquering the whole world and becoming the most widespead language in human history is indicative of being a good form of communication. it enabled its native speakers to do all of the shit they pulled off. that counts for something and that's the reason why i wrote

>ah, so english actually a really bad language

because you jumped in to say that success and good design had nothing to do with each other when i called the other anon on calling english "poorly designed". i am saying, and have been saying, that the worldwide scope of english in art, design, politics, poetry, etc HAVE to count as being a language with robust communication. to say that it is poorly designed in spite of it's success is silly. THAT'S why i wrote that line, because you missed, and continue to miss, the main point that you have to pull some mental shenanigans to insist that english is "poorly designed" language and that it's success is completely irrelevant.
why, did you guys win a war once or something? because right now your legacy is bad wine and a mangled version of your language in central/south america. if there was any irony in my statement we'd be speaking spanish and not english. blow me