No hype for the new Fromsoft game

multiplayer

Why do they keep doing this shit? I didn't want my gameplay experience relying on a bunch of mouth-breathing retards with lag problems in ACV, and I don't want it now.

nightreign

$40 asset flip made by the B-team

Duskbloods

New IP made by the A-team with Miyazaki

Acting like these are even remotely similar in quality is delusional. I know Anon Babble's butthurt over Nintendo, but being this detached from reality is dangerous.

What does Nintendo have to do with From?

Because its a tarkov, literally cannot think of a faster way to lose interest in this industry because even tarkov fans don't want to play other tarkovs.

PvPvE is boring, it's just another Invasion-like game mode where griefers stomp casuals.

Nightreign will be a massive success unlike Duskbloods. We will enter an era of Nightreignlikes, screencap this

Everyone bought a PS5 instead after seeing switch 2 prices

just a lazy elden ring asset flip

I wonder why

People are excited for nightreign first because it's coming to pc

Because Duskbloods is a Switch 2 exclusive.

multiplayer-only game on the most single-player focused community

What? No that can't be true. They couldn't be that retarded.

It's timed exclusive

it looks like an awful asset flip, like they combined every scrapped project and hoped for the best

Because it's retarded multiplayer slop.

Anon Babble's final cope.

space

Oh, no.

It looks like shovelware, like that steam punk XCOM clone nobody even remembers

Multiplayer game, multiplayer Nintendo game even, can't ask for a more miserable experience

It would unironically do very well on PC.
Not having to pay to access your own internet connection would already be a huge point in its favour.

friendslop

nsw2

This. How the fuck am I supposed to emulate a multipayer game?

Fortnite is free nobody is paying for a battle royale on babies first console

tendie cope

I can't wait for the first nightreinlike in the strand genre.

>No hype

>Forgotten

Why are threads like this made all the time?
For games that are neither forgotten nor lacking in fans?

he plays video games on a console

but im not poor, so i only play on PC.

safe edgy designs

From is dead

Except the hype did fucking die immediately. It disappointed everyone. This retarded multiplayer phase they're in was a goddamn stupid idea and Miyazaki himself felt the pressure to dogeza and apologized for it already. Deal with it. This slop is DOA.

Holy copium

Why is Yoko Taro an angel?

From fully owns it and From loves PC. It's just another MHR where tendies desperately try to pretend it's not some knockoff game only to lose it anyway.

Except the hype did fucking die immediately.

Yeah. I'm sure it'll flatline. It'll be a total bomb. It won't sell. There'll be no excitement. None will have fun. And there'll be no hype when it launches.
Surely. You are so right.

Money, maybe

What went wrong?

From Software made too many dogshit games in a row, I don't trust them anymore and they aren't doing a good job of changing my mind

franchise made famous for it immersive single player experience with highly intricate and interconnect level design

secret spice to the game is intertwining a PvE element into the single player with unique covenants giving everyone different reasons to invade or protects other worlds, each granting uniquely flavoured rewards based on the faction you swear allegation too

decide to make open field slop with copy paste asset dungeons then transition into multiple fortnite clones

PvE is watered down entirely to just killing everyone for no reason with zero faction flare or lore to speak of

tldr; soul gone

Yes

Tablet exclusive 4v4

so do i, but i dont use a keyboard like a faggot

Anon Babble is not "everyone"
youtube.com/watch?v=LURiflmrtx0

You seem pretty hyped bro, you make a thread every day.

switch exclusive

pvpve battle royale

I cannot be bothered. Fucking 70-90 dollars for this shit, meanwhile Slopreign is 50. What the actual fuck.

Elden Ring was too good

t. normalfag

Where? What was stated are objective facts.

reused assets

same reused story for the nth time

same recycled gameplay for the last 15 years

multiplayer slop

shitty art direction

terrible art design

awful OST

Idk who these games appeal to but they must be the lowest of the low.

Duskbloods

$80 asset flip made by a A-grade hack

yet another game where everything is edgy, dark, hopeless, and filled with shit

do people never tire of these From games? they've been doing the same game since kings field 1, for THIRTY YEARS

nightrein >:(

nightrein (nintendo) :O WTF I LOVE ROLLSLOP NOW!

Well, enjoy Zanzibart: lag edition tendies

chatgpt wrote these posts

Dark Souls 3 and 4.

It's reused assets and multiplayer slop. I'm more excited for a new Larian game than any low quality rollslop simulator that would be shat out by Fomslop factory at this point.

TENDIE ARE YOU OK?
TENDIE ARE YOU OK?
TENDIE ARE YOU OK?

Make a From Soft souls game

Make it exclusive to the Switch 2 when the audience for these games are on the PlayStation and PC

Also make it a multiplayer PVP game

It's really not that complicated

Keep coping.

I dont care about switch games

This is the worst type of game
It looks like "there's something for everyone to like" at a glance, but in reality, it's "everyone is forced into shit they hate"

I didn't like Bloodborne and from the sounds of things multiplayer is the focus/mandatory? I've only ever bothered with multiplayer in Souls games when I felt like trolling with invasions; working together with retards is absolutely not my idea of a good time.

online only game for nintendo
Nightreign is coming out
visually it looks worse than BB 2016

get good

same reused story for the nth time

same recycled gameplay for the last 15 years

These are good though.

shitty art direction

terrible art design

These are plain wrong.

awful OST

You can't know this yet.

Nope, I love it. I don't think I'll get tired of these games any time soon.

It's the equivalent of From shovelware, what is there to be hyped about? Nobody asked for this.

"get gud" says shitter who EXCLUSIVELY "PVP"S with casuals

It's on switch so it's bad.

It's on switch so it's bad.

it's an online only game on a platform with terrible track record with online gaming.

so, what am i supposed to notice here except it being redundant as fuck?
guess the machine translation is to blame but still

It's published by From not Nintendo, it's From's own IP, they can do with it whatever the fuck they want like put it on PC. So basically the same as Square Enix and Octopath Traveler, Triangle Strategy etc.

It's the equivalent of From shovelware

That's Nightreign.

B-But the B Team!

Duskbloods is being directed by Miyazaki and the A Team. You won't be getting your next Elden Ring until 2030.

another fromslop game with """deep""" """edge""" lore

will they ever evolve their art style and game direction

They're both blatantly shovelware to pad things out between their next real release, but keep coping.

singleplayerfag cope thread

Lmao, I'm gonna be enjoying this game very much while you seethe.

space

I want more Armored Core and I hope this game flops which it will if its not a timed exclusive

grimdark edgy game

on the bing bing console

It simply doesn't fit

isn't even releasing on switch 2's launch year

pricing situation (it's crazy)

I'll wait for a year, the pricing killed the hype for me to be honest, I just know it's gonna be scalped to shit

thread full of the usual ugly spergs seething about nintendo and being in denial about it being exclusive

par for the course

no hype for yet another jap cod

egads

PvE is gay, give me pure single player or pure 1v1 combat.

Hyping games is allowed on /v? Everyone is here to mindlessly shit on games.

I do not have faith in multiplayer.
I do not have faith in Muhyazaki.
I miss when From made more than 1 game.

This. Its like with Platinum Games committing suicide to the point even Kamiya ran away

Tendies need to defend From now (until they go multiplatform again)
Remember the anti yakuza0 spammer disappeared as soon as the new y0 edition was announced for switch 2

yeah imagine not being hype for this

kirby

zelda

mario

who is pajama man?

could you perhaps loosen the shoes on her please?

No pc/ps/xbox which is where most of the souls audience are

this kills the shitter

rollslopware was never good, but i should thank nintendo for making Anon Babble show their true colors finally

no one is buying the switcher price tablet for $600+tip+dlc

fpbp

/thread

I'm NOT buying nintendo's new scam

her

that's a boy

Fromsoftware will be free to publish on other platforms as long as whatever timed exclusivity agreement they have expires.

Fromsoftware has full ownership of everything associated to The Duskbloods, unlike actual exclusives where Nintendo has copyright.

The timed exclusivity is likely to support Fromsoftware's first self-published game.

literally my thought process wtf are you me?

If Elden Ring was Fromsoftware rehashing as much of their previous stuff to make the best they could, Duskbloods is them rehashing stuff to make the shittiest thing possible.

fromsoft isn't on switch

neverending shitposting about elden ring mogging zelda, tendies supposedly being the only ones criticizing from, never ever bait etc

fromsoft put elden ring on switch alongside an exclusive new IP

now fromsoft is trash

this board is a caricature of itself

I’m pretty fuckin’ excited. I appreciated that they published that interview and didn’t just show us a teaser.
It’s over a year away, so there just isn’t much to talk about. Plus, most of the posters on Anon Babble aren’t really interested in having any good faith discussions about this game because they can’t afford the Switch 2.

Tendies spamming fromslop until it came to switch

Tendies shitposting yakuza 0 until a new edition was announced

Fromsoftware has full ownership of everything associated to The Duskbloods

yeah like sega with bayonetta lmao

bayo 2 and 3 on playstation soon sisters, two more weeks!!

This board is mentally, if not physically, sixteen years old.

Is that Oedon?

Nintendo owns Bayo 2 and 3 (and they can keep it since the whole ip is dogshit)

And that's why bayonetta died

multiplayer

why wouldn't they emphasize this in the trailer? Now I know to skip it.

Anon Babble hates Fromsoftware because they got popular and threads are spammed by people that never liked their games seeing them become the most important industry releases
It has nothing to do with console wars

This.

this.
we need a dark souls 2 team revival.

invasions in a pve world is what made these games unique and worthwhile. miyazaki finally admitted he doesn't care for pvp, what a joke...

t-they can keep it I-Idon't even want it!!!

lmao

and no they don't own anything, it's fully sega's

>t-they can keep it I-Idon't even want it!!!

Yeah

and no they don't own anything

Yes they do

Fromsoft have lost the plot, they are not slop makers.

Switch 2 exclusive

PvPvE (fortnite)

Looks like an asset flip instead of a setting built from the ground up

Fromdrones now reacting to all from content like that guy did to that star wars trailer

I mean, pick your poison

I'm wondering, if they were really married to the idea of doing a multiplayer heavy thing, why not make something cooperative?
Maybe modelled after that Elden Ring Multiplayer Mod that literally everyone and their dog was using?

n-nu uh!!!

concession and dilation accepted

enjoy both pretending this isn't a real exclusive and seething about it while calling it trash

Do people ever tire of these Zelda games?
They've been doing the same for 40 YEARS

hero battle royale

Hard pass

that could mean anything, technically Demon Souls, Dark Souls, Dark Souls 2, Dark Souls 3, Elden Ring, ect could all be considered that due to the invasion system.

sure Nightreign is doing something different i suppose but that is a different game.

I play dark souls games in offline mode

fromsoft pvpers are gluttons for punishment and the devs know pvpers will buy their game if it has pvp

that is because those pvpers don't want a fair fight, they want to jump into someone elses game in an attempt to grief.

why else do you think there was such a meltdown of people using the continuous co-op mod for elden ring since a side effect of it broke the invasion system, it was less people to invade.

Why not have PvP, but they play as regular mobs not their character?
Kind of like L4D versus.

concession

It wasn't a debate, retard.
Nintendo owns Bayonetta 2 and 3 (the shit ones that killed the IP)
The Duskbloods is a timed exclusive

Can't believe I'd ever say this but I want the Dark Souls 2 team to make new games instead of Miyazaki. Miyazaki has completely lost the plot and is now focused on multiplayer slop instead of what made his games great.

oh fuck no, Dark Souls 2 was irredeemable trash

nice photoshop

also

spanish

lmao it's some brown goblino from guatemala

there was a meltdown when the game came out in general because of how invasions worked
i dont see why not. that actually sounds interesting and is reminiscent of shit theyve tried already like old monk and halflight

nice photoshop

of course, harder to grief if you can only invade people already doing co-op

using a single schizo Anon Babble poster to portray some grand outcry.

You people are pathetic.

Elden ring was just that bad. Plus it's on the console most people overlook. I've yet to finish a single game I've bought on the switch.

it was about as loud as the people who insist dark souls 2 was a good game.

I wanted to be invaded without doing gay co-op though. Wish they had an opt in option for someone like me.

I think the game will be a bit more like Sekiro but with a selectable cast of premade characters with some talent trees (massively making balancing easier)

And then the game is just that: linear Singleplayer only that every time you enter an area there's like up to 7 other guys with you that may end up going against you or cooperate.

Basically just like the prior games only that invasions are ALWAYS enabled and you just don't get notified if you get invaded (or invade someone) since you are matched with them seamlessly.

wasn't there an item in the base game that enables that?

i wont bother speculating until additional info actually comes out, while it was a neat trailer it really didn't show that much.

Impossible, the Dark Souls 2 copers have started an industry trying to rehabilitate the image of that mediocre and clunky souls game.

No.

pressing space

samefagging this hard

And both of them are asset flips, delusional, retarded nintendo toddler.

Zelda was never good

There was a Miyazaki interview about the game, and a website now I believe.

is a timed exclusive

The announcement trailer says only switch 2, if it's a timed exclusive then where the hell is Boodborne?

which is wild when there is undeniable proof the game was shit, they rebalanced the game and changed enemy placement in areas with the Scholar of the First Sin version, it was still ass and in some ways made even worse.

Taunter's Tongue wasn't that item?

He means it will eventually be emulated.

Pretty sure Bayo 2 and 3 can be emulated

the bloodborne IP is owned by sony

Taunter's Tongue wasn't that item?

I've not once gotten this thing to work while solo. Only seems to work while already co-oping, so it's a glorified ganker item.

your supposed to just turn it on and forget it, it enables invasions while solo but doesn't put you at the front of the list, just makes it *possible* to be randomly invaded.

i feel like people want something from miyazaki that he doesn't have. he's not really in control because he doesn't own the company. I doubt this is his choice

And it has never worked while solo. That's the thing.

this
and this

the multiplayer is pretty restrictive, it probably needs to be reapplied if you enter a new multiplayer zone.

if all else fails use the Duelist's Furled Finger and shut up, not everyone wants random hackers bricking their save files or griefing in general, the elden ring system just gets people who would just play offline anyway to continue to not be bothered by red retards.

Will outsell Bloodborne

I do not wish to play Fortnite and giving it a Bloodborne skin won't make me want to.

I think some are forgetting when Elden Ring and the DLC came out. They aren't putting out a full blown Souls game so soon. They gonna be doing these little interval games until got some full fledged game to show off.

I saw dude in fart power armor and my dick got flaccid, also it's nintendo exclusive.

Most Tarkov fans refuse to play Tarkov let alone other tarkovs

red retards.

Stay mad seethe harder, casual faggot.

sorry to hear nobody wants to play with you

red retards.

Git gud.

pvpve is upsetting people

Wasn't souls always this?

reddity passive agressive tone

I am not sorry that you are such faggot.

see

They fell for the "Fromsoft games are getting stale, they need to do something different!" meme and now they're shitting out games that their fans don't want to play.
They got where they are today by making memorable singleplayer experiences, not fucking Tarkov/Fortnite clones, these retards listened to people who don't even play their games.

too retarded to back up saves

Sounds like a skill issue to me, and i've not experienced any egregious hackers since Dark Souls 2 anyway. I've used all the methods you mentioned btw.

It's PvPvE so I'm not really interested.

fromtrannies hate this game because from what we know of it the gameplay is more complex than press the iframe button and then R2, also the fact it's multiplayer and that you fight against actual people instead of autistically learning patterns by heart means that they can't larp as le hardcoer gaymer now since it's going to require actual skill to win

And yet it hasn't seen a single re-release despite the demand

PvPvE does not appeal to me, especially as an $80 console exclusive

I will buy a Switch 2 for him.

Why do you act like random people on Anon Babble magically care what your thoughts and feeling?

I just want another demon souls/darksouls 1, man.

then why was Anon Babble wrong about elden ring

PVP shit.

red retards.

Someone got low skill issue.

Yeah, imagine being third party game on Nintendo console
Rip

No i won't.

paying $70 + tax + tip for an inferior port of a game released several years ago

4th fromsoft seethe thread of the day

just blind faith that it will flop at this point huh

dark souls remastered on switch sold half of the steam numbers

Nintendo exclusive from a studio that's always been Sony or multiplatform, multiplayer-focused on a system that charges a subscription fee for online play, released on a console that has like five other major problems, announced right after a previous multiplayer-focused Fromsoft game, will most likely be using From's usual netcode.
Making it a Sony exclusive probably would have killed a lot of interest too, but now even Snoys who already own Playstations have to buy a different system for access, which only makes the overall hype even weaker. Doesn't help that Nintendo holds on to their exclusives even harder than Sony has with Bloodborne and never puts their games on sale for much less than initial release price. Most From fans probably gave up on ever playing the game on their preferred system the second they heard which console it's coming out for.

Imagine liking souls pvp

That's Nightreign. I think both games sound underbaked and uninspired, but if you're looking for a game built around co-op, Nightreign is it.

I think it probably won't ever release on PC, but I won't deny that doing so would be a massive boost to its popularity.

there's 8 single player Fromsoft games that have came out in the last 14 years

How fucking dare they make 2 that ate more multiplayer focus!!? Reeee!!!!!?

Grow the fuck up.

RED MAN BAD has been catastrophic for the opinions of retards on the internet. Gankers and hosts with phantoms have had the advantage since the first Dark Souls you shitter.

but doesn't put you at the front of the list

Yes it does, actually. If someone is using a taunter tongue you will invade them over and over and over until they turn it off or you block them.

Dual Vyke's War Spears spamming the running L1 at RL15 with significant latency in Limgrave.
Just figured I'd recount for you one of the "reasonable invaders" I've encountered.

Switch 2 exclusive

Loose 2026 release date

Wonky cinematic trailer

You're just as bad as the people asking why there is zero GTA vi discussion. Like wait for some gameplay and maybe people will talk and be hyped

It seems too self aware or too try hard on the wacky stuff; I can't really get a feel for what the fuck they're trying to go for thematically/tonally
Not to mention PvPvE and Nightreign clearly attempting to be some weird kind of battle royale/trend chasing

space

PvEonly cucks lost, enjoy your B-team slop while PvEgawds get Miyzaki-directed kino.

Its an a Extraction shooter like game on the switch 2.
Its the equivalent of Making a Warriors games out of your favorite franchise.

So like most of their games? Clueless newfag.

Its a switch 2 exclusive.

Because I want a real game, not multiplayer shit.

inb4 BUT THE SOULS GAMES ARE ALL MULTIPLAYER

They're optional multiplayer games for jolly cooperation with bosses or getting invaded. This and NR are both multiplayer focused games.

This just refers to invasions and official co-op support. Invasions will probably be mandatory , they be expanding the influence of covenants probably.

No hype

In what world

I might have to buy a switch 2 ™ for this. I want to rip around with a fart-pack killing lovecraftian horrors.

This, you have to be a lot more skillful than the squad to win as an invader. Most invasions are an uphill battle, you have to be somewhat of a masochist to enjoy it.

if there aren't ten threads in the catalog at any given time there's no hype, if there are threads it's shilling and spamming

at this point this board should just be deleted

why are you like this, nigger
they already said what kind of game it is

noooo muh negativity

Positivists get the rope.

The dinosaur guy is an old man

you're indian

You might even say prehistoric hon hon hon

I am hype but there's not a lot to talk about past the aesthetics and the fact that it's some kind of PVPVE. I guess we could all sit around and guess shit?

i'd still exercise caution when it comes to hype because of how specific they are in mentioning the PvPvE
just shows they're following and chasing trends instead of innovating in their own sphere

The rocketman and the dinosaur were the best parts of the whole trailer.

Fromsoft didn't innovate in singleplayer games either but you don't give them any shit for making those. How many PvPvE games with souls combat are there? Zero.

there's a handful of things that are interesting gameplay wise, like the vastly improved mobility or the fact projectile weapons seem to be much more focused on

it'd be very funny if the game actually used gyro aiming, seeing soulsdrones completely shit their pants about it would make my day

dev whose games have notoriously shit netcode

purely multiplayer focused game

Their netcode is actually really good, it's their matchmaking that sucks. If they can properly region lock this game we won't have any issues besides choppy Nintendo wifi-connections.

I hope this game manages to convert some singleplayer-only autists, PvPvE is a genre with great potential, you just need great developers (like FromSoftware) to bring it out.

extraction shooter

Switch 2 timed exclusive

why would we care

No, the game is a pretty much a battle royale game like that Nakara bladepoint game but with pre-made characters and there's like a number of things to do in a round. The goal is to make number go up so that you win but your number goes down if you get killed. Also, there is a sub-class system where you can pick a specific quest and then you get a randomly assigned partner, either a coop bro or a dedicated victim to bully for victory points. It's fromsoft's first multiplayer first pvp game.

It's definitely not a conventional shooter, it's gonna have lock-on and souls style melee combat. It might feel more like Armored Core.

Two pvp games back to back. They're done.

it's extraction souls, excuse me, the whole setup is just Tarkov with swords and magic

Nah, one is 3 player coop and PvE only, the other is 8 player, PvP focused with some PvE

I was hyped for exactly 1 day, until I learned it was a multiplayer game. Sorry, but I want to explore an interesting world on my own. Maybe summon or get summoned on occasion. But for the bulk of my experience, I play alone. I don't want to play a multiplayer combat oriented fromsoft game.

Nah it's more like a free for all and you get rewards after the match based on the tasks you complete. The goal is to be the last man standing but there's also secondary goals like defeating bosses and shit.

2nd time that a game i was interested in turns out to be by fromsoft and my interest plummets

so it's Tarkov with swords and magic, with optional bosses. so they're high geared SCAVs.

You get rewards after the match in Tarkov? That's not very extraction-like.

not listening to a Fromdrone, its still Tarkov with Swords and Magic despite not matching 1:1. This type of gameplay is awful and I will not participate in it, I'm sure I'm not the only one who hates this format for multiplayer games.

Multiplayer slop
Nightreign too.
Pass on both just like fallout 76

multiplayer games

I don't care about this shit. I've never played a From Software game for the multiplayer.

Fpbp

like Nightreign, it probably started as a potential sony back project when they were gargling the games as a service everything multiplayer cock, and after all sony's fucking flops they're now saying no thanks to shit like this
likely true headcannon, we didn't get Automata followup because of Babylon's Fall, and Bloodborne 2 was probably nixed because of this
fuck you fucking Fortnite fags, you did this

You don't even know how to tell genres apart from one another, your opinions are worthless.

a fromdrone calling anyone's opinions worthless

lol, lmao even

Shitpost harder please

purpose of the thread was to ask "why do people not talk about this game" and I responded with "nobody cares about extraction shooters" which this absolutely is despite having some changes. Miyazaki hisself stated he was inspired by Tarkov and other extraction shooters. You're deluded by not thinking this is just From's twist on the genre.

There is a trailer and he has given an interview on the game and revealed a lot of information about it, you're clearly not up to date given you're referencing such an old article instead of the new info.

why would I pay attention to a game that is obviously not catered towards my interest? I found out it's inspired by extraction shooters and everything I'm reading and seeing says it's an extraction shooter. Why would I continue to invest information into something when it's not really going to change. Why are you so invested in making sure I learn EVERYTHING about a game I don't like when realistically I'm just discovering more information I won't like about the game turning me off from it harder. What's the tactic here? To make me play it less? Because it's working.

Fine, if you want to remain clueless then go ahead, I won't stop you.

remain clueless

because it's 100% normal to keep consuming information about something I have no interest in, ah yes. I better keep up with Madden and Call of Duty to make sure I hate it correctly!!

If you were a fan of Fromsoft games you would be interested in knowing what they're making. You're clearly not so I don't know why you're still arguing with me.

I'm a single player fan and this is confirmed not single player. I don't know why you're still defending it.

Ah, too bad Fromsoft primarily makes multiplayer games.

yet I can turn online functionality off and still have an experience and full game. So weird that I can do that with Dark Souls, Dark Souls 2, Dark Souls 3, Bloodborne, and Elden Ring. So strange

experience the full game

You wish lamo, you're ignoring half of it.

how so, I can play the game from beginning to end without activating online once. you're being hyperbolic by saying I'm missing out on half the game when I get to experience 80% of the content. The only stuff I miss out on is "LE FUNNY MAYMAY" messages, making boss fights trivial by summoning and covenants. OH NO.

I'm not paying an online subscription to play a FROM game

>No hype for the new Fromsoft game

ok sonier

Never mind the fact that all the games are pretty much balanced around PvP as a baseline because the majority of players interact with it, if you haven't faced an invader during one of your playthroughs and come out on top you haven't experienced what these games are about.

It's stuck on a console that costs more than a PS4 for less performance. But other than that it looks good. I just unfortunately won't play it.

you're being hyperbolic again, your arguments are invalid and pointless now. even more so than before

THEY'RE POINTLESS BECAUSE I SAY SO

Whatever fag, I'm done talking to you

Multiplayer only

Their netcode is actually really good

The only Souls game with tolerable netcode was the Demon's Souls remake, and that was due to Bluepoint.
PvP's always been a massive afterthought to them, but considering this will be their first multiplayer-focused game, I hope they'll put in the effort with the netcode.

Bluepoint had matchmaking, the netcode is pretty much the same

Longshield + lance and you're set for life

no hype for the new fromsoft game

Hype

It's gonna be the best game ever

need porn of this sexy magical boy

Shovelware filler in between real releases.

Nightreign is the shovelware, Duskbloods is the real release

Why does Dark Souls 3 pvp feel more alive than Elden Ring?

It could've been the most interesting game in the world and no one would still give a shit because it's an exclusive for a 500 bucks kid console
The fact that it's just a Nightreign reskin means no one will ever care about it and the servers will shut down after 3 years

how big is his dick? I'd say a solid 14 inch

Nightreign is a 3 player PvE game and Duskbloods is an 8 player PvP game, it can't be said enough. No one seems to get it.

You need to understand, people don't want to inform themselves, they want to pretend they are mad.

I want to believe in the good of humanity, but they're making it so, so hard.

90% of all video game players are PVE cucks

Then why is Fortnite the most popular video game in the world?

it was years ago now it has a lower playercount than most pvp games

Then why are none of the most played games in the world PvE games?

they are

Sure if you move like 6 spaces down on the list you might find a PvE game, the point is, PvE games aren't the most popular games in the world.

yes they are

Delusional

claiming the contrary and not supporting your claim with any facts isnt going to win you this argument

alright there is a couple of PvE games, so what, the overwhelming majority of games is PvP.

Your turn

Because of this not this If the game was confirmed SP focused people would be ripping their hair out to this day.

But because its PvP focused, which was always a MINORITY of the fanbase that enjoyed it, it killed any hype they had.

only 2 explicit pvp games in the top 10 best selling games of all time

not looking good pvp cope sister

Sure you might have sold a few games but are people actually playing the games? No, there's no reason to play them after beating them. If we were to judge this as a competition I'd judge on the criteria of hours played, not copies sold. Like any actual video game enjoyer would do.

erm i know the sales of singleplayer pve games far eclipses pvp games by far, and that the collective hours played by said players far eclipses the collective hours of pvp games... but.... PVP GAMES ARE STILL MORE POPULAR OKAY... THEY JUST ARE!!!!

i accept your concession, not even any more "stats" to back up your claims ...!

Shadow of the Erdtree killed all of the goodwill they had built up, to be h with you fami.

and that the collective hours played by said players far eclipses the collective hours of pvp games

It really doesn't though, there's no reason to lie, this is an intellectual discussion between two rational human beings.
The point you bring up is interesting, do we judge a game's success based on the sales or on the amount of time that players actually play the game? Sales sure does fill your pockets but the amount of time definitely benefits the player more than the developer.
I'd say enjoyment > profit.

underrated post

they didn't set expectations right away so people spent the first two minutes thinking it was an actual mainline not-bloodborne successor. then the player character did the nightreign spirit spring jump and all the excitement turned into disappointment. past that point, people spent a couple days engaging in performative hype because the purpose of all media now is to just serve as an excuse for youtube videos and twitter community circlejerks, and everyone had to make their posts and videos to pretend to be happy, but now it's all petered out. the Nintendo guy probably should've said "and now, a multiplayer focused title from one of our partners" when introducing it so people didn't experience that initial moment of actually believing it was a successor to bloodborne in the way they'd been wanting for years.

You're on the wrong site, negro slave shill.

bro you're on Anon Babble arguing that pvp games are more popular because you personally spend more time getting farmed in csgo. that's not "intellectual", that's cope.

if we're talking actual popularity, pve is king and has been for decades. more people buy pve games, more people play them, and more people remember them. you think grandma's out here grinding ranked in overwatch? no, she's playing animal crossing.

even your own argument admits it—sales fill the devs' pockets, and almost every best-selling game ever is pve. mario, minecraft (yes, mostly pve), skyrim, rdr2, witcher 3, gta, etc. these aren't just flukes. they're massive because people actually want to play them.

and the "hours played" meme? again, you're just wrong. skyrim has millions of people with hundreds of hours. same with minecraft. gta online? still going strong, and yes, mostly pve. the idea that people play pvp more "because time" is reddit-tier logic.

pvp is flashy and loud, but it's niche compared to the global appeal of pve. your average gamer isn't trying to sweat in ranked, they're just trying to chill and enjoy a good story or explore a world.

you lost, just take the L and go back to queueing with russians in counter-strike.

Most grandmas out there aren't young enough to have experience the boom of multiplayer games, young grandmas that actually have experienced them definitely will reminisce over them. MP games simply weren't possible for a very long time, it's only in the recent 20 years that we have been able to have them.

hepra-dur the most sold game is SMB

Who fucking cares, nobody plays SMB anymore, it's a different time. And it will keep changing for as long as you're alive. It's human nature to be social, playing games is a natural extension of that. Multiplayer games will always be the most popular games going forward, it's just human nature.

$700 tablet using 2016 tech

fromtsoft netcode

nintendo netcode

can't imagine a worse experience.

Normies don't like the pvp aspect so it's a flop.

people don’t buy games to get screamed at by 12 year olds in a matchmaking lobby, they buy them to relax, to explore, to experience a story. not everyone’s trying to sweat in ranked or chase some imaginary clout on the leaderboard. most people just want to play a game and enjoy themselves, and pve actually delivers that consistently.

you keep bringing up some hypothetical future where multiplayer is the default just because “humans are social,” but that’s not how it plays out in reality. if that were true, singleplayer games wouldn’t still be topping sales charts every single year. elden ring, rdr2, cyberpunk, hogwarts legacy, zelda totk—all recent, all pve, all massive. meanwhile most pvp games have a shelf life measured in months unless they’re propped up by an esports scene or constant battle pass updates.

and let’s not pretend “nobody plays smb anymore” somehow invalidates the point. the fact that it was the most sold and most played game for literal decades still proves the reach of pve. you can’t just hand-wave that away because it doesn’t fit your narrative.

pvp is popular, sure, but it’s a niche within the gaming landscape that mostly appeals to people who want competition. pve appeals to everyone. casuals, hardcore gamers, old, young, doesn’t matter. it’s accessible, it’s immersive, and it doesn’t require you to deal with other people’s bullshit. that’s why it wins. every time.

South Americans should've been cut off from the rest of the world and genocided.

It's not true that everyone wants single player! Look at Elden Ring the single player game! That was successful! Checkmate!

You're a fucking retard holy shit

i didn't read but you should post more

karfex.

God damn why are you making your posts so fucking long? I'm trying to relax here bro. Those games are still selling well despite having to retain a playerbse, devs are taking less risks by creating singleplayer games.

pvp is popular, sure

Yeah that's all I really wanted to hear, thank you. I'm gong to bed now.

fair enough man, sleep well. just saying though—if pve games weren't more popular, they wouldn't keep dominating sales, awards, and long-term player interest. it's not about risk, it's about demand. devs make what people want, and people want pve. simple as.

make a game on a console your fanbase doesn't care about

make it for the PvP audience of that fanbase

What could possibly go wrong?

Fromsoft games are the new doom eternal of eternally filtered seethposting.

This.
And this.

It looks like AI generated Bloodborne. Nintendo fanboys spent over a decade shitting on Fromsoft and soulslop. Obviously, the fanbase isn't on Switch, so this game being a switch exclusive means that very few people here are going to be interested in it.

pvpve

fromsoft netcode

most likely p2p

switch 2 where everyone will be on wifi

kill me