Is Anon Babble capable of separating games from devs?

Is Anon Babble capable of separating games from devs?
Should a ontologically and objectively good game be considered bad due to the beliefs and identities of the developer?
No matter if the products they make good and enjoyable for all audiences no matter their creed and ideals?
Is culture war politics and contrarianism the only ideals to hold firm to when assertaining one's enjoyment out of things?

If the game is bad, and the creator is too then there is no moral dilemma. The answer is clear.
If the creator is bad but the game is good does that equal the same scrutiny?

tl;dr?

Culture war tards can't enjoy a game made by people that hold opposite views.

As an example, Roadwarden is a phenomenal game but some people genuinely go "Couldn't play it because it had gays in it"

seethe faggot

Will you play a fun game if the devs hold ideals you don't like?

I remember when Anon Babble freaked out over Disco Elysium when half the devs were literally mentally ill commies

I don't see why I should care about the ideals of the devs. I just don't man

even a broken clock can tell the time correctly twice a day. its still a broken clock I'm throwing in the trash.
although I would probably use The Division as an example that makes me a hypocrite. I absolutely despise Ubisoft, but if they announced The Division 3 I would probably be down. Good thing they haven't stopped updating Division 2 and are about to add a new expansion soon even though Ubisoft tried to push two separate titles before they started that.

Signalis is dogshit though

fun game

made by faggots

lol, lmao

Do you have any examples in mind or is this just a vague statement?

Disco Elysium
Prey 2017
Resident Evil Remakes
Indie games made by autistic gays (50/50 either way)

Genuinely, if you played a game you enjoyed but found out that the dev or a character is a fag. Was it a good and fun game to play or is the fun invalid now?

Never happened bud

That's not a creator with opposing views that a creator adding literal shit to a game. Very very different.

So you say. I dont believe you. You have a false sense of superiority and a aura of arrogance.

What makes a game bad even with solid gameplay just because a developer was a raging faggot? Compared to aaa slop, a single person with passion would have made a better product on paper. Why isn't this the case then, explain. Make it make sense.

if you're anti-faggot, no matter the quality of the game, you're supporting faggotry by buying the game albeit it indirectly

solid gameplay

developer was a raging faggot

lol, lmao

Those degenerates despise beauty and quality. A fag making something good is just never going to happen.

people that care about irrelevant shit like that don't care about videogames, they care about politics and all the mental issues related to it

Provide genuine examples, I don't see your reasoning. What makes them incapable of making a fun and soulful video game experience? Would they have magically made a better product if they were straight instead of being molested into faggotry in childhood?

I can see the reasoning behind this for political ideals. An anti Christian would hate a completely faithful and biblically accurate film dedicated to traditional Christian conservative morality Ona fundamental level. It could be the best film of the year and they would still proclaim it as a inferior and poorly made product due to tribal and ideological reasoning

if they announced The Division 3

Apparently it's in the early stages of production.
I think they also announced some sort of division battle royale spinoff but it ended up being rightfully canceled

source

correct, I'm glad you understand
I've been keeping an eye on 3 and it looks like it's been super pushed to the sidelines since they announced a new expansion with updates to it for the future, but who knows how long Ubisoft will actually let them just work on the game they seem to enjoy working on

There are no examples because faggots don't make good games.

Death of the Author isn't separating art from the artist so much as inventing new meaning and symbolism that can even go against the creator's established intent and then claiming its just as valid

see Alan Moore's The Watchmen for example

Anon Babble is not capable of any type of critical thinking at all, stop taking it seriously nigga. This is the worst possible place to listen to game criticism.

If the creator is bad but the game is good does that equal the same scrutiny?

It's a moot point because the marxist brats you're referring to don't make anything good anyway. There's a reason these people tend to take a subversive approach to sneaking their politics or fetishes into their works and it's because they know it's bad but still wish to mark our hobbies and cultural influences as their territory. There's no making good on that. It's a cartel industry at this point.

None of those are good.

I hope you don't pay taxes then either

a video game publisher doesn't have an organization explicitly dedicated to make sure I buy the game though, what is your argument here. I won't be jailed for not buying a game I disagree with. I will be if I don't pay my taxes.

I'll pirate it, sure.

I don't give a shit about muh woke but roadwarden sucked ass

I never bother to even remember dev names in the first place, unless it's something I really liked. A good game is a good game.

Should a ontologically and objectively good game be considered bad due to the beliefs and identities of the developer?

if they let it poison the game itself to make it some kind of political message then it should be considered fundamentally compromised
VNs aren't games

I don't use social media, i've no idea what retarded shit devs are doing till v tells me fourty thousand times.

ontologically

Tranny buzzword.

Anon Babble is not capable of any type of critical thinking at all

only because worthless breathers like you are technically a part of Anon Babble

remakes

why would you cite a remake/remaster? that's thoughtless jeet level work

depends on the developer. idc if theyre a liberal retard as long as their game isnt lecturing me constantly. i wont play games made by trannies though

Is Anon Babble capable of separating games from devs?

It is most certainly not.
Let them catch a whiff of a tweet a random guy that wrote two lines of codes for a game about how he'd like to add a gay dude in a game one day and they'll spam about that shit for weeks and say the game's garbage and then it's gonna be tow weeks extra of SteamDB threads to laugh every time the game loses 10 playercount.

I love this. There will be some dustborn level pandering in a game and troonoids will be like

you need to learn to seperate the art from the artist

like dude when some dyke pops up on screen to give some hamfisted political commentary that's now the game, i AM judging the product itself, the retard that made it is tertiary.

It is most certainly not.

true just look at the meltdowns Anon Babble has over notch

oh and that's followed by

the game just wasn't made for you. :)

...

WHY AREN'T YOU BIGOTS BUYING OUR GAME?

this is the funniest shit in modern games now

WELL IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT DON'T BUY IT

ends up not selling

NO NOT LIKE THAT

I can seperate the devs from their games.
But when devs start making their games about themselves it's really hard to do that.
A tranny dev is going to shove tranny shit in their game 9 times out of 10 because that's how trannies are.

It's simple, if your game is good and I like the dev, I'll buy it.
If the game is bad, I'm not interested no matter what.
If the game is good and I don't like the dev, I'll pirate it.

Deus Ex MD.