Why did AI bros lie about AI?

bro, we are only against the shitty artists that charge 600 bucks for porn, if you are an actual good artist you'd not be scared of u-

seen only exclusively taking away jobs of normal, honest artists like video game background artists

As a results details and easter eggs in backgrounds are a thing of the past now and every game background looks soulless

meanwhile the artists they said would eliminate just used AI to generate the fetish porn and earn even more undeserved money

Thats not what I've anticipated......I thought AI art would change the artist sphere for the better and make video games better? All I've seen is them shitting up basically everything they touched.

AIfags never said that, they always said they wanted to take over all art everywhere and artists can eat a dick for hording all the art skills. That has always been the goal of AIfags in art.

That's what happens when a technology is hyped up to the moon

but you said AI would never be used in any real games by any major companies
why did you lie?

I told you that this would happen, you didn't listen and went on about how it would be used by indie devs who have no money.

Imagine being so terrible at your job, you're replaced by soulless bytes who deliver subpar work that instantly in the public domain in most of the world.

shills I want to laugh come and protect nintendo

Bros...
nintendolife.com/news/2024/09/nintendo-to-go-in-different-direction-to-current-ai-trends-says-miyamoto

it's all about this?

retards see picture of stylistically deformed building/car

omg it's AI

john nintendo can just screencap some bullshit their 3d asset library to make a poster why would they need to gen anything.

It's generally not proper to use the term caught to refer to things that aren't criminal. You can catch someone stealing, but you can't catch someone taking a drink of water because that's a benign action. No one would try to hide water consumption from others. Not even me. I don't eat in public because that's private, but I still drink water around other people.

You to you but I'm going to buy a switch 2.

hard to say this is AI when the source is blurry as fuck

It's mid to low end background artwork. Generally doesn't matter for suits but a crucial part of a game's soul.
Of course big corps will get the AI slopper backgrounds because they are cheap while doesn't really affect the surface of the game.

MUH JOOOOOOOOOOOOBS

Stfu and dilate tranny, nobody is entitled to a job, and no you aren't entitled to a job with your gender studies degree either.

Bro, college professors already use AI to write tests, shit's already more fucked than you can imagine.

eurogamer.net/nintendo-responds-to-suggestion-that-ai-generated-images-used-in-mario-kart-world

Nintendo is outright denying these images are AI. But the bridge definitely looks fucking weird. I wouldn't be surprised if an employee used AI behind their back.

ai has brainfucked arfags so hard they are now schizophrenic and see ai art everywhere and attack and accuse each other of being ai art

That art turned out to be AI. The guy was just lying.

accusing Nintendo of using AI

when the "ai" car on the billboard is the same fucking model as the ones npcs drive

How do you call yourself a journalist and not spend 10 fucking seconds to compare and contrast?

none of these claims can be proven, regarding Mario Kart. Given the fact that the Mario Kart team has always sought to cram as many bespoke pieces of art as possible into every course, I tremendously doubt they ever considered using AI. This team doesn't need it, and Mario Kart World's development likely began before the advent of high quality generative AI.

Bear in mind, Nintendo may use it someday. But they didn't use it here.

i must lie!

stop lying

There absolutely is with the bridge. Parts bleed into nowhere. Spacing is uneven. What are those things sticking out at its side that seem to be interstate signs, but clearly aren't, and have no function?

its actual true ai broke artfags so hard they are now schizophrenic and see ai everywhere and basically now attack their own

i cant believe gta4 used ai. this woman is obvious ai generated, she has six fingers!

an artist making a mistake? no, impossible. artists are flawless heavenly perfect beings. any mistake was because of ai

You haven't looked at enough poorly generated AI art to form pattern recognitions.

Can you explain to me why the bridge looks the way it does?

This is more akin to catching Nintendo cheating by using AI instead of paying an artist. You can say it's not cheating but you can also say using chatGPT to write essays isn't cheating.

reddit spacing

Butthurt tendie

the company with the most iconic characters in the history of the industry is shit because a detail the in the background looks AI-esque

generic Unreal movie game is a masterpiece

Fuck this board

I really couldn't care less if AI is used for a game or not.

Do you care that they're charging you more while taking more shortcuts?

this depiction of an under construction bridge doesnt look like a completed bridge! i cant believe nintendo is using ai

NTA. I don't buy Nintendo shit, so how does it Effect me personally?

Look at the most trifling thing ever in the background of a racing game

Oh no, well, I guess people will vote with their wallet. Cause thats how free market works, you aint a filthy socialist, nor an obsolete merchantilistic, right anon?

They should raise the price for being smart

Would they reconstruct where the spacing the wiring goes? Are they going to, I don't know, make a final decisions on whether or not those are lights, or interstate signs? These are not drawing decisions made by a human with intent. You can like it or not like it, but it's clearly AI.

anon you are claiming something without evidence you must provide prove that what you claim is true, not the other way around you retard

QRD on why AI bros have such a hateboner on artists in general? As in not the artists who bash them but like, everyone who had ever done decent art?

The unorthodox quality of the bridge that makes it stand it which enhances my aesthetic enjoyment of the medium, arigato Nintendo-sama.

This is my argument.

The visual decisions in the image do not line up with what a human would logically choose to do when drawing. You do not make a half-way point between a light post and an interstate sign, because you're unsure of what you want or are aiming for. That's a diffusion thing.

your argument isnt prove anon you are still just claiming something without prove

Insecurity at lacking a skill.

esl

is retarded

Low IQ monkey.

How would you like me to prove it? What would be good enough for you?

Nintendo art is so good, its incomprehensible for the poor

Suck my dick, for starters

AI artist here. We don't hate artists, we hate people like you. Artists often tend to act like disingenuous and annoying faggots just like you.
It's not just us that hate you though.

I guess they're charging one dollar per IQ point.

That just looks like the kirby car innit

It's actually fucking insane how poorly people are capable of seeing obvious AI tells and mistakenly jump on things that have nothing to do with it. The amount of times I've seen an artist just get a bit of geometry or scaling wrong and people go "AI??? lol" when that's not a fucking AI tell in the first place is absurd.

I don't like much AI art, but I do enjoy people getting completely mindbroken by the doubt of something being made by computer or not
is just a picture on a childrens toy nigga

The bridge is more than "a bit of geometry and scaling."

They're libshits who get off on punishing the chuds (via deplatforming, or flatout censorship laws). Besides, there was some YouTube animator that asked people to do background voices for his animation, and all it got are people calling him a cheapstake that should pay $100 dollars per hour or something like that. I can't remember who the animator was, and googling it lead to no results.

the new manufactured drama of the day is the possibility that some random insignificant background object might be AI generated

it's just sad at this point

Nintendo uses AI>Post pictures

Nothing looks like AI

We built your dreams looks like a Splatoon stage
The Bridge looks literally like a bridge

And the fucking car
is
pic related

Literally all of these things are just cartoonish

all i ever said was tits too small.

The Bridge looks literally like a bridge

You're worming out of this one. The car is fine. The bridge does not make sense.

If the bridge doesn't make sense, you must acquit.

Bridges are like that in Japan, you ignorant

their own

art communities as prone to drama whores as any other corner of the internet, maybe even moreso. perhaps they are just looking for an angle to attack someone they never liked, jealous creatures they are.

No, chud, you must praise the people who undermined the values of traditional society and want to see you dead...

Are you literally jumping from complaining about artists to actors? You having a schizospasm, son?

If you set the tone for how an argument should proceed, then it is easy to make your opposition look insane or ridiculous.
Artists are usually firmly identifiable, whereas AI slop and shit opinions can be produced anonymously, so there is no damage to reputation on one side of the debate.
This benefits people who are invested in the bubble and spammers, since this neatly avoids the possibility of artists successfully spreading FUDD or arguing for more restrictions on SEO AI spam. It also neatly plays into the interests of Intellectual Property lobbyists who can now easily drum up support from artists to increase restrictions.

tendies are the only people that defend bad AI

Actors are artists, and AI fucks over both.

okay im listening. what do the jews have to do with this?

So do you like, just hate creativity? In general?

ai is the barrel underneath barrel whose bottom you were scraping. you have tunnled through
people program programs poorly to program programs even worse since it will save some money slightly maybe. fire more people!

Progression is advance, technologificationing is the beacon of intrinsic ontological exudations in the archeostribruxism

If you look at his “process “ post he shows his “colleague” generated 4 full figure images with back grounds but for some reason handed it off to him where he added some crows and adjusted the back ground and claims it as his own, his finished high effort works also have single digit reposts and 0 engagement because its obviously ai no
Matter if you isolate the figure from one ai and duplicate the layer 1000 times

damn anyone to hell if they put personal gain over the advancement of utopian technology.

I think that artists in general have an ego of the size of the Everest, and that AI will be good to thin out their ranks a little.

I would trade both for a faith-based moral adjustment.

prove its ai you stupid cunt dont just make more empty claims with no prove also lol at this

he has 0 engagement that means its ai!...y..yeah we claimed its ai with no prove and then banned him b..but thats not why he has 0 engagment!

fuck you retard

People can't even tell if it's AI or not. Who cares if some random poster is genned anyway?

Almost every media company uses some genAI now. I don't see the big deal. It seems more concerning that cutting-edge AIs keep trying to escape lab conditions. I don't know what to make of that, but it will be hard to put the genie back in the bottle if one escapes and copies itself.

The bridge is very obviously AI, and people are trying to distract you from that by pointing out the car isn't. The "who cares" part comes from Nintendo denying any AI is being used, and from them specifically saying last year that they won't use AI.

Hey goy! You should support [IMMORAL THING] out of spite for [PEOPLE YOU HATE]

hehehe sweet hell yeah [IMMORAL THING] rocks!!!

*uses [IMMORAL THING] on [PEOPLE YOU LIKE]*

aaaahhh no how did this happen?!

What

AI artist

What do you actually do?

make art

Corporate shills manufacturing an enemy that can be "disrupted" using this new Cutting Edge, Revolutionary technology.

whats the biggest tits youve ever made?

100% AI.

AI bros

you will never be a woman

about pyramid sized but round

average artist who wants 1,488 USD per hour for their hard work

How?

> can you prove it in a court of law huh ?

Lamo damn bitch autism is rough for a korean

with my computer

see smudge on computer screen

it's AI!

It really blows my mind that people on this site see random people saying dumb shit, and that that means all people who do creative things should suffer. This nigger isn't even an artist, he's a voice actor. This thread is about drawings, but you're so politicsbrained that it all blends together for you.

homies... it's over

But that's a snapshot from a video, you flaming nigger.

What are those things pointing out on the side of the road? Can you tell me what the artist intended them to be?

why are you attacking le hecking wholesome artists we never did anything wrong!!!

some retards on Twitter said something stupid

better base my entire idealogy against the group they are in!

There's people in Twitter who hates everything, retard.

And those people are hated by everyone else as a result. Leftytroons is the best way to describe them.

You're right, visual artists never do anything remotely similar.

the desperation of snoybois for any kind of win is palpable

Your argument is "I hate creativity, because some people partake in it that politically disagree with me." Maybe hate the politics, and not the medium?

No one said anything like that. We hate annoying retarded faggots like you who do nothing but lie and whine.

what else are they hiding from the public?

some

Besides, it is not relevant, because as artists know very well, the average AI art has 42,069 errors, so their job security is not at risk.

if you can call everyone that plays a videogame that you dislike or voted for a politician you hate a chud nazi incel we can also bundle all of you artists with the deranged leftist troons

political bullshit

So it's again Anon Babble retards saying AI art is good because le evil lefty artists are btfo'd by it?
Genuine question, why don't they just learn art? Everyone can learn how to draw.

all people who do creative things should suffer

This coming from someone that hates AI which is the largest democratization of art of all time. What a joke.

What am I lying and whining about specifically right now? You are the one bitching and complaining about "artists" as a concept.

I don't say or do these things.

When have I said that?

you're the one saying AI art is bad because le wholesome lefty artists are btfo'd by it

disingenuous piece of shit

utopia is even everything is slop controlled by tech megacorps

Artists are cucked woke niggers even though it's basically the biggest outlet for free speech ever, and it's open to anyone with a bit of dedication

let's just rely on the cucked woke censored programs made by the big globohomo with 70 dataminers to make art instead!

......what?

No? Do I need to prove I'm enough of a /virgin to play ball? I was the first person in this thread to say nigger. See That's gotta give me some street cred, right?

Where lol, it's a regular ass bridge

its not even inconveniencing you. youre just mad people are happy with it.

A "regular ass" bridge? What are those things jutting out from the road? Are they supposed to be street lamps? Interstate signs with no signs?

Read the fucking thread.
The lefty artists you hate just continues doing what they do, and maybe even use AI in their work to be even lazier.

It's Mr Yamada , some 30yo honest and hard working background artist who already got piss pay that you are ruining the lives of in favor of lazy,untalented fuckers spamming AI.

spend 10,000 hours to master a skill I will never use because I'd rather be doing other shit

spend 25 minutes telling a computer to generate something that is 'good enough'

they learned to use AI instead

The lefty artists you hate just continues doing what they do

Seething violently about AI lmfao. While now defending it because Nintendo is using it.

You don't need to master a skill to make art, idiot-

10k hours

Oh, I get it, you are the type of guy who gets nothing in the apple test.

Are they supposed to be street lamps?

Yeah? Some of you guys got your brain burned by AI lol.

and it's open to anyone with a bit of dedication

Whoops, is that blackface in IASIP? Better get those episodes delisted, chud.

Are those transphobic and homophobic jokes in Crocodile Dundee, which were common at the time? Better remove those scene from the 4K remaster.

Are those heckin' racist and sexist moments in works by Roald Dahl and James Bond books? Let's start pretending they never existed, shall we?

Is that a Confederate flag? Better burn it out from newer re-releases.

Tranny jokes in GTA V? Not anymore, sire, they're gone now.

Wow, the arts really are the biggest outlet for free speech, and definitely not the prime fertile area for subversion of traditional society.

Wow, look at this fucking bullshit picture
This oddly shaped building with unusually large window and strangely oriented floors and pathways is 100% AI
Shame on you, Theodor Geisel, I thought you were better than this!!!!

learn to use AI

There's nothing to learn.

what a retard

Where are the lights on them? They have none. They're just steel girders pointing out from the ground, with some kind of metal partially filling in the corners on one of them, but not on another. And one seems to have some sort of metal filling in and materializing in the background, which does not make any logical sense, or is anything a real person would do.

talks about problems caused by the higher ups

decided to gang up with the higher ups against people who are against them

Wow......you sure owned those wokies.....by providing data for their AI models so they could replace artists and focus on hiring more censoring people....

There's also flags on the top of the bridge
Unless you're so fucking retarded you don't know that a suspension bride has cables running vertically

tell that to kazuma

I hate him for being a warmonger that mocked Charles Lindbergh for not supporting the entry of the USA in WW2, despite the fact that when it happened, Lindbergh fought in the lines, while Seuss got a cozy propaganda job.

You are literally listing off political activists censoring television, movies, and video games, as a reason to hate the concept of doodling things with a pencil.

I'm sure than that comic was generated by AI, and not by an artist that gladly supported all of that censorship.

Yeah he was a shithead but he certainly didn't use AI
Maybe I should've used an MC Escher drawing

spend years learning to draw

get job drawing

draw WRONG THING

life is now ruined

vs

use open source AI

make whatever you want

life not ruined, you didn't waste time

You know that person who drew that breaths as well.

I just wanted to express my hate for Dr. Seuss, don't worry about it.

hurr car is stylized, therefore AI

3D model of the same car on the road

this is the kind of nitpicking snoys have to resort to now

Kek

The car is drawn. The bridge is AI.

the xenoblade ai schizo moved on to mario kart

interesting

Doesn't change the point that many artists fully support that censorship.

the AI bros turns out to be the weird political people they hated all along, just in a different faction

Oh the irony

nobody has said they hate creativity yet you keep saying they have. I hate the people that call themselves artists, and I hope that AI enables people that don't call themselves artists to create new and awesome works

Yamada-san would have been canceled by you people anyway because he touched a woman's hand by accident ten years ago and she's now crying rape or because the liked the tweets of the wrong politician or any other excuse there is to remove him from the industry and give his job to a purple haired troon

I hate people with more talent then me and I hope they all fall down to my level!

Way to go

The car is a red herring so idiots like you can avoid talking about real problem, the bridge. increasing engagement and giving the jew more clicks.

These are the people who asked Rockstar Games to remove tranny jokes from newer releases of Grand Theft Auto V.
outmaking.games/aboutus
All of them billionaires that never worked in a single game, evidently.

see again all you can do is make up words someone didn't say and beat the shit out of that man of straw

So hate the people that support it, and not the concept of creating things? We used to call them tumblrites.

I use the term "creativity," because that anon was having a spergout posting takes from voice actors. I don't what else to call it. An actor is not comparable to someone drawing with a pencil. So like. I guess that guy just hates creative stuff.

AI bros

weird

Nice tranny buzzwords freak, forgot to add incel there somewhere.

I can visualize shit in my head fine you faggot.
What I cannot do is translate those images into art that I deem an acceptable quality without an investment of time and energy I don't want to deal with. So instead I'll just describe my ideas and have my computer make them instead.

Using AI is like roids. It's only shameful if you get caught.

AI bros

the weird political people

lol
how low does your IQ have to be to think you're fooling anyone here

but not concerning

praising the anonymous nature of AI art

Ah yes. AI bros are advocating for more Indians and Pakis getting into the industry. Ah yes.

So hate the people that support it, and not the concept of creating things?

How does the existence of AI stops (You) from creating things with a pencil?

Jeets lied to push their soulless agenda? No way, that can't be right

no you see all the other billboards are clearly drawn but they used AI for just 1 picture because... Uhh.. TRUST ME CHUDS!!!

k, wasn't to whole point of AI not to hire artists? what would be the point if you clearly have a bg artist already on pay?

How is the bridge AI? Point out the tells.

It doesn't. I'm not specifically arguing or am mad at AI. You seem to hate the concept of people drawing in general. Which is fascinatingly weird.

I don't want to speak for him but I would argue that they are comparable in that they are both about to be replaced by AI, and that that's a good thing

How does the existence of Artists who absolutely despises slopniggers makes ever single guy that ever made art bad?

This is what I think happened. See these posts.

Is OP posting a screenshot of Anon Babble post?

LMFAOO

I don't hate the concept of people drawing in general. I hate annoying dipshits that cry about AI 24/7, who generally also say that AI will never be good enough to replace them.

if you can visualize shit in your head fine than it surely doesn't take 10k hours for you to learn art, no?

le investment

so you are just a lazy faggot who doesn't even want to spend a sliver of time on things you love and wanted to consoom instantaneous products right away, right?

truth nuke

Now we've moved on from talking about tumbirite politics to talking about pro AI vs anti AI stuff. You just seem like you're probably a frustrated individual mad at many things.

Pretend I'm a fucking idiot and circle the tells.

dood someone snuck AI into the nintendos and nobody noticed except me!!!

or maybe it's not ai

wait, i thought they were saying it didnt take enough effort to count as art. i guess theres no real logic behind their hatred. just animals flailing their limbs as they die.

Says the projecting troon having a passive aggressive meltdown

People clearly noticed it, and several articles have been made about it, which is what this thread is about.

Those annoying dipshits tend to be leftists, who would get glad if all chuds were to be killed, and want all existing media to reflect current liberal values. Patterns exist for a reason.

What are these things?

You're right. Maybe some artist chose to make a nonsensical bridge to make it look like AI.

I spend my time converting and rebuilding cut apart historic firearms. I want to jack off to my specific fetishes and make funny pictures. Art is not my passion, but yeah, instant gratification is pretty cool too.

Tendies will eat it anyway

Street lamps. NEXT

I am not saying there aren't annoying leftist artists. We used to just call them tumblrites, or whatever name fit at the time. The absurdity of hating art as a concept though is just what's funny.

Cool AI gun bro.

Street lamps you giant fucking imbecile.

They don't have lights. Why do they have metal triangles in their corner. Why does the one in the far back have a metal triangle seemingly starting to materialize out of the ether?

would make more sense than your achizo the theories, which involves professional artists still being hired to draw them but one of them suddenly going full retard and then his supervisor not asking any questions? Occam's razor and all that

its not ai

reminder the ignorant luddites trying to tear down the glorious AI future that is about to arrive are the modern day equivalent of these guys, or the guys crying about how cars will destroy the lives of the buggymakers. I'm eagerly looking forward to all the great games that will come out that could never have happened without the boost of glorious AI

Tard wrangling an AI to generate a perfect Bren Mk3 (with a MK1 barrel), let alone doing it at 4032x3024 on my 3070 without burning my house down is physically impossible. Whether you're being sarcastic or not I have to point that out.

Oh, and why is the one in the far back a different length?

Boss says to draw a picture of a bridge

You're crunched for time

Say "fuck it," and get AI to generate it

No one will notice

It's like getting ChatGPT to generate your email to your boss.

It's an stylistic choice artlet schizo

No, it's just something you typically see in diffusion.

The absurdity of hating art as a concept though is just what's funny.

Going back to the original point, I don't hate art, I hate that you pretend that it's the biggest outlet for free speech when that's simply not the case. In general terms, only liberal artists make a living out of art. And for works that no longer reflect current liberal values, they get censored to do so, often with support of other artists.

Not that chatgpt is any actual indicator of truth but when I asked it to analyze the image this was their response.
"So, while it's not absolutely definitive without metadata or source info, it is very likely this image was AI-generated or digitally stylized for use in a video game or simulated environment."
"this specific image absolutely resembles AI-generated artwork, especially something from tools like Midjourney or Stable Diffusion. If you showed this to a group of artists or designers familiar with AI tools, most would likely agree it bears those hallmarks."
I did remark it could a be a "placeholder asset" or they contracted out to a third party. So its technically true that Nintendo themselves did not make the AI asset.

I have generated a fair bit of AI slop myself, I would say with pretty high degree certainty it is very likely AI. And if it isn't they are particularly low quality and should replace them regardless.

You have to be a retard to have to "learn" how to talk to a ai bot yes

imagine using that dogshit site in 2025

starts writing more fanfics as "proof"

well if you're just gonna schizo about it with 0 proof more outlandish scenarios then I'll play ball and assume you yourself are an AI programmed to make dumb arguments

no one said that
fact is AI been used by companies long before you've seen it go public

glorious AI future

AI and all it's supposed innovation usefulness has created nothing but complete slop and made every aspect of yours and my digital life objectively worse. You cannot point to a single thing that someone has done with it that has made your own life observably better despite it being accessible to everyone on earth with any kind of computer hardware and an internet connection.

it's just something you typically see in diffusion

diffusion is an aggregator, so logically most art is something you see in diffusion, therefore most art is AI

your brain must be diffused

keep crying bitch boy

I'm giving the benefit of the doubt that it's just one employee fucking up, rather than Nintendo lying. Because Nintendo themselves are saying they don't use AI.

No one asked.

Pretty sure that is the filter they put it through. The design is almost identical to the bridge from the game to the point it would have been more work to have an AI do an image then it would be to just slap a filter that makes it look like a postcard photo

NTA. I find AI memes and songs amusing.

Shouldn't the ai shills worry more about getting drafted before the nukes start falling on your face
Why are you still here?

That just means you're a shit artist. Newsflash, jap artists don't know how to draw anything other than anime.

lol coping snoys absolutely fucking ethered

I dunno chief, I've been able to simulate affectionate contact with my waifu, generate my specific fetishes, make fun songs and pictures that make me laugh, code specific applications that no autist has gotten around to yet... Honestly it's improved my life greatly.

Delet this, chud.

aaiiee what are those posts???

b-but them weird triangles

welp imagine being an AI schizo right now

AI post

you can't point to anything that's actually been made better despite its wide availability

lol u mad??

youre so kind spoonfeeding this guy instead of letting his blood pressure rise

perfect

The clip is on the wrong side. The handle makes no sense. The lines on the floor are too straight. The lines on the wall are too curved. The white wall on the right turning into wood makes no sense.
The drain on the floor makes no sense. And what are those random bits on the """gun""" supposed to be? AI artifacts, that's what.
That's what retards would claim. And to be honest

doing it at 4032x3024 on my 3070 without burning my house down is physically impossible

You can actually do that.

Why do the suspension bridge's cables melt into the ground, rather than descend below into the water like in the in-game shot?

and you're just a schizo that sees AI on everything that isn't, see

is she offering me her breast milk?

See

2 AI art scandals thread going on at the same time

everyone bullying the SMT artist for doing AI slop

everyone defending nintendo for doing AI slop

Oh wow I totally didn't see this one coming!
Nintencultists are some fuck

5/10. You got me to reply.

artfags in 2022

AI IS GARBAGE, IT'S SO OBVIOUS AND IT WILL NEVER LOOK AS GOOD AS "REAL" ART

artfags in 2025

IF YOU ZOOM X10 TIMES AND LOOK AT THIS PIXEL WHILE TILTING YOUR HEAD YOU WILL NOTICE THAT IT MIGHT BE AI (turns out being a false positive 4 out of 5 times)

Oh, so first the lamps were a dead giveaway that its ai, now its the way the suspension cables are attached? Touch grass, retard.

The bridge is also asset from the same game.

filtered screenshot in a screenshot of a youtube video

clip

Anon, the anti-AI schizo wants to be mad at the megacorpo. Let him be.

The lamps still look weird, yes.

No, they're melting into the ground.

709372709

coping snoyfaggot

Wow didnt see that coming.

That might be the end of the rail since it is a grind rail.

artists can eat a dick for hording all the art skills

how the fuck do you hoard art skills. nevermind that the act itself is practically impossible, it literally became impossible as soon as the internet became a widespread thing. how do you pajeets expect anyone to believe you're not just gullible retards playing with toys you don't even know how to use?

Isn't it more fucked up if it was not AI?
I mean if it was AI, I guess they are deadlines and there is a petty argument as to why such crappy in game ads exists and yet I would still side with the schizos on this one.
But if it isn't AI...that's worse, we have come to expect better.
There isn't even a pun or alludes to anything, it is so sterile and poorly drawn.
AI can definitively do better.

nah

But if it isn't AI...that's worse, we have come to expect better.

It's probably temporary art.

has to move the goalposts because the lights got explained and is now pathetically floundering

first, they don't melt, the picture just ends at the ground level, second the monochromatic silhouette makes it harder to see, third, even if they are the fact that the lights and all the details are taken straight from the game bridge just the way the car billboard was makes it incredibly unlikely it was made by AI regardless

hoarding art skills

hoarding

art skills

Genuine 55IQ moment.

snoy out of fucking nowhere

Saw that one coming since I am interacting with mentally ill nintencultists
I'm a PCfag btw, feel free to delete your post and remake it so you look less stupid

The way the cables descend is not like in the game shot. It's not hard to prompt "suspension bridge with red lampposts," and get something shitty like this.

Bro it is not hard to prompt "lampposts." If you look at the in-game shot, the cables are not anywhere near the metal of the bridge like that, so using the in-game shot as a point of reference weakens your argument. The cables just hit the ground, and aren't suspending anything.

hording all the art skills. That has always been the goal of AIfags in art.

What does this even mean? Do you think art skills are like proprietary code and hardware? Do you not know how easy and cheap it is to get a full college education's worth in art and painting with youtube and google? I'm an artfag and I am genuinely confused by what you said.

But if it isn't AI...that's worse, we have come to expect better.

It's just a perspective shot of a bridge with with a monochromatic silhouette filter, it's fine but it triggers the AI schizos for some reason

its probably hard to prompt one that looks exactly like the one in the game though

My favourite is when someone draws a character but accidentally leaves out some small detail like jewelry or a specific part of the hair is not the right color and people jump at them for being generated

im a pcfag

Imagine playing a weebshit rpg on a pc.

Does anyone have a shot of the top of the bridge with the two flags? That would kill the anti-AI paranoid schizo for good.

It doesn't look exactly like the one in the game, though. The road in the picture is red, unlike in the game. The cables its being suspended by are melting into each other. The AI probably has a literal billion reference points to make a golden gate-esque bridge like this.

sex

This is an AI bridge similar to that one, it looks much better than what's in the game, allegedly.
Not sure why they would choose such a crappy picture for a temp image when they could had reused assets from the previous games if they wanted a placeholder

dood the lampposts are generated

they are the exact same style used on the actual bridge and as much as you try to deny it you can't just dismiss the fact that they were your main argument so far and the "cables" weren't even mentioned until you got BTFO by the game pic

nooo the cables meld

they don't, the monochromatic silhouette style makes it look like that but that's standard for that type of art, is every minimalist art now AI?

artfags are leftists.
Go hug a rapefugee, AI making you homeless is well-deserved.

It doesn't look exactly like the one in the game

aaaand at this point you are just in denial

Thanks, I tried very little to write that shitpost.
But the last part is true. This garbage was generated with my 8GB 3060. I just had to remember how to do it.

it's literally nothing

Wow, what a surprise.

NTA but it has similarities to the point that it by no means can just be prooompted without using a Lora or something, but if it was using one it would be much closer to the real one so that doesn't make sense either

Hmmm... sweaty... that image cannot be AI because it has the N-word and, as we all know, AI is much more censored that art. That's what artists say, as they get ready to remove problematic scenes from a 2010 movie to re-release it in 4K.

nooooo stop playing vidya

Tendie threads are the fucking worst holy shit. How did the discussion even reach this fucking point? All I stated was that tendies were defending AI slop because muh Nintendo while literally a different running at the same was all shitting on AI slop

Fuck it, call me a snoy, call me whatever will help you sleep tonight

wow the filtered picture has a red tint? wtf!!!!

Guys you laugh at this Anon but he's right. I've been stealing the world's supply of pencils for decades. AI came just in time to ruin my plans of controlling All Art Forever.

defending AI

but it wasn't AI tho

Wow, didn't know you could pull that off. Not sure Flux could do it though I've heard it gets weird at higher resolutions.

some guy did a real or ai quiz for 11k people, average AI detection score was 60%.

astralcodexten.com/p/how-did-you-do-on-the-ai-art-turing

Notice how the AI bridge doesn't have that big space between the tower of the bridge and the rest of vertical cables that the in-game model does have?

As long as it has some kind of tiled diffusion I'd assume it can.
Stable Diffusion can do it with SD Upscale.

Because its not "aislop" you titanic retard. This thread is quite literally one schizoid arguing that a picture with a filter is ai when everyone else can plainly see that there's nothing that indicates ai usage.
Go back to your gayrpgs, its all you can handle anymore.

reminds me of how a lot of artists ditched the touhou fanbase for kancolle shill money. did everyone forget that? of course they have a bit of an ego if theyre weaponized like that.

but they do? are you that desperate after being proven wrong?

They hate what they can't have

Pixar movie characters have unusual shaped heads. I bet they did AI stuff the whole time.

With "AI bridge" I was talking about . It's the biggest evidence that Nintendo didn't use AI.

I dunno, until we see it in a format that isn't a compressed youtube screenshot at a skewed angle there's no way to know.

I can't wait until every aspect of my life is completely Indian AI slop

Shut up mudslime, go rape a kid

There's some pretty damn good AI hentai. Most prompters don't have any artistic sense and prompt garbage, but as long as you know how to check and judge material fast, the amount of good content has gone through the roof.

it's literally nothing

bruh. this didn't deserve a thread much less 279 replies
want to see some real ai shit? see Kaneko

Literally the only difference is the tint of the picture and the lamp on the right being fucked up due to an incorrect clip mask to tint the whole thing red, and the cables near it looking too thin and weird.

Now, did a person make this garbage, or did they take a screenshot and then ask an AI tool to "make it look cool"? That's harder to say.

Genetics annon.

every low effort photobash for some background shit that everyone will look at for .0001 nanoseconds will be a controversy now

We need to create laws to forbid humans from making art anymore. This will incentivize the perfection of superior AI art all the sooner. Human artists will be identified, arrested, blinded and then have their hands chopped off. They will then be released on the streets for the public to laugh at. we cannot truly call ourselves civilized until we finally do this.

You can't stunt ai. It was bound to happen wether you like it or not

the solution is to not treat schizo anti AIfags as humans, they are desperate to treat everything as nonhuman so let them lead by example

defense of AI art is swamped in strawmen and false dichotomies, set up by "people" that can't even speak basic english, nevermind arguing in good faith

none of it is even a defense of AI art, it's virtually all an attack on The Opposition(tm) using said strawmen

the actual defense that is very few and far between is just commie rhetoric that they claim to be against along with the supposed people that make up their opposition

examples of their opposition aren't even actual artists, just leftists in the creative space being dumber than a bag of rocks that you already see everywhere

perplexing. bends the mind, even
no, seriously, WHY are you retards engaging in these non-arguments in earnest? why do these very obviously bad faith arguments need to be pointed out in the first place?

examples of their opposition aren't even actual artists

I thought that all people who created drawings with their own hands were artists, or was it a lie?

Catch 22. You let morons run their mouths long enough, and they control the narrative. Soon, you have kids who grew up on nothing but morons talking and they can't know better.

Argue, and you immediately validate the seepage leaking out of their skulls as something at least worthy of debate.

There is no winning.

This shit of "AI Art is deformed objects and Jesus Crab" is obsolete. Modern LLM Engines are more powerful, if people stuck in 3D Jesus is entirely a skill issue

ITT: troons obsess over 'artists' instead of protesting for UBI

I doubt it's AI, but even if it is I don't give a shit, go find real issues to whine about

ill dismiss this argument while also giving my two cents on it

nigga please.

yeah, that's what i said. are you conceding that artists aren't a left leaning monolith?

Once you understand that the use of LLMs are essentially spiritual Dalits and midwits raging and attempting to get revenge over other people's talent and technical mastery, you will understand all AI discourse.

So, the "examples of their opposition" are actual artists, then. Good to know.

argument

nigga the AI schizos already got BTFO, read the thread

Love her 5 fingers. I bet they'd feel great in my anus.

democratizing art just means more justification to outsource more and hire h1bs to do artists jobs. aifags are either elon bots or self cucking retards

i seriously hope one artist having views you don't agree with is what fuels your irrational hatred for an entire medium and skillset

You monster! It's your fault I'm a nodraw even though I have plenty of supplies and totally legit PDFs from before you stole and hoarded all teh pencils and art skills!! Boo, Anon, boo!!

ChatGPT, tell Anon he's a poopiehead!

*Grins* Alright, here goes: Anon is a poopiehead! *Snickers* There, all set.

Yes, he's a poopiehead for hoarding all the art skills!

*Laughs* Oh, Anon, you mischievous poopiehead! Hoarding all those art skills like they're some kind of treasure—tsk tsk—that's just not fair! Maybe you should share some of that talent around, huh?

one

LEL.

When AI can make a meaningful contribution to threads like these, I will concede that AI bros have finally developed a way to pretend they have a personality.

yes, drinking water IS bad because leftists drink it, too

AI is a good thing

not him but the only time I see artists acting normal are artists that are new and have less than 1k followers

honestly, when you put it that way...
this was just another pandora's box that we shouldn't have opened. i hope we find that glimmer of hope in the bottom soon enough before it gets worse

but dude how can you make a 30 minute essay about a background poster in tendie videogame when it's all AI generated without a genius soulful thought behind it?

woah this game for children really says a lot about capitalism with this dystopian poster about a bridge the bowser is building

based af

I'd like you to notice that despite the insistence of saying how art as a talent has been completely deprecated, none of them have ever manage to show anything they view meaningful, nuanced or inspired that they couldn't have done otherwise without AI and instead only ever speak about how spiteful they are. Every single post mentions vengeance in some form.

AI is the mark of the Hylic and the spiritually stunted. It is the calling card of the midwit. AI isn't a means for creativity for him so much as it is a means for revenge towards those who are creative.

You are spiritually Indian.

us vs them

btw im smart

fpbp

Reddit spacing

Enjoy being replaced by art that literally anyone can freely distribute.

anon, the us vs them narrative is LITERALLY the hill that AIfags are dying on

you're a hylic and bad! i think for myself and am smart! that's why i'm forcing a narrative and adopting the style of my enemy!

you are a follower, not a leader

CHRIST is KING

it's all AI generated

but its not

pirate video game

nobody cares

pirate art to feed into my ai

NOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CANT DO THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

explain this faggots

I'm just kind of sad that memes are pretty much dead thanks to AI. Everything produced is just some meme slop hallucination, at least with the old drawn stuff it's rough but that's what gave it the charm.

AIfag here. This is true.

This is literally what AIfags have been pushing this entire time.

art that literally anyone can freely distribute.

What exactly do you mean by this? You can learn to draw and go to disseminate art anywhere over the internet, what about AI makes that any different besides the rate that you can produce images?.

memes have been dead since 2015 fucking retard

remember when something was a "meme" and it was around for literally years pre 2012? no? newfag?

grifter thread

why would robotos want to rape muscular artists???

What exactly do you mean by this?

cnbc.com/2025/03/19/ai-art-cannot-be-copyrighted-appeals-court-rules.html

Don't be so fucking obtuse, you know what I mean. Even those godawful soijaks and their variants have more merit than whatever DALL-E shit gets spewed out because at least the soijaks are a look into the mind of the psychotic, underage retards that make them.

ai couldn't do shit in 2019

you're still years behind

replying with wojak shit

retard tourist

i'm forcing a narrative and adopting the style of my enemy!

that's not what he said. you'd know this if english was your first language lmao. the truth hit way too close to home and your obviously fucking fuming for it

nice thread retards

art comes from the ass

all the AI shills itt

Okay? Proompts aren't subject to copyright? What point are you making here?

Kill yourself fucking decel faggot.
This board is full e/acc . We need to accerelate and embrace AI so that we can move up the Kardashain scale. God bless Nintendo for making their part on pushing humanity forward in the evolutionary tree.

petapixel.com/2025/02/12/this-is-the-first-ever-ai-image-to-be-granted-copyright-protection-a-slice-of-american-cheese/

retarded screechin art@oon, damn, it's just a filtered pic of this you got conned by Indians, kys

At first I thought you were saying AI generation was the biggest outlet for free speech and I was going to agree with you but I see what you're getting at now.

i guess if someone makes something using ai you can legally pirate it because it has no copyright to infringe?

we need to paint this shed blue even harder so that it'll eventually be painted red!

you're actually retarded if you believe this.

What's with jeet and shilling for AI? Generally, they're only the only motherfucker who glaze and dickride that shit harder than any tech bros that ever exist

strawmanning someone beyond recognition means i don't know english

lel

Corpos don't obtain any copyright protection by using AI slop, thus anyone can legally "steal" it from them without giving them a single cent. Thus, completely freely redistributable. This is not possible with art made by people.

Yeah, nevermind.

I thought AI art would change the artist sphere for the better and make video games better?

Isn't this literally what it did in the mario kart example you posted? Do you think an artist being paid 3k+ a month should waste their time on background billposter images instead of using him to create the art that the player will actually see front and center?
Look at how difficult it is to take a screenshot of this AI asset. Its a blip that a player sees. Its literally filler.

Any artist with half a brain has already adopted AI into their workflow.

Times are changing. Progress doesn't wait for anyone, so change WITH the times instead.

AI is the single most important invention in the history of our species, by far. And the democratization of creativity that it is bringing with it is part of that.

lose another argument

go for the SAAR posting

remember kikes created ai and pay Indians to shill it, anyone who blames them and do not mention US kikes...

Nothing to learn

Sure. Maybe to a layman who just wants to make funny pictures, but go ahead and explain to me anything going on in this image.

I don't understand what this would do to ameliorate anything as depicted characters, things and places that are recognizable are still subject to copyright regardless of how you made something.

Artbros....
we lost...

Corpos will generate something, send it over to an artist to clean up any oddities or change the color hues to match an aesthetic they're after and that more that qualifies for copyright.
The courts have decided you can get copyright by just doing a minuscule change.

activision uses ai to make icons for controller buttons in call of duty

you can now pirate the entire game

i dont think thats how it will work

the fact that this is the only conclusion you can draw from my reply, even if it was supposed to be an own, suggests poor literacy at the very least

computers telling biological difference is a phobia

lol

You know they have teams of artists creating assets right? It isn't just one guy making everything, this is Nintendo here. They probably have 20-50 artists working on the game.

This is the most Indian post in this thread.

you only need that becasue you want to make scam deepfakes and porn, chatGPT does a better job with natural language

are AI subjects the easiest to troll Anon Babble with
nobody here actually has any opinion they spout in a serious manner and it's just an ouroboros of screeching

most artists just lie about not using ai tools. instead of calling it ai, they will call it "procedural algorithmic noise-based smart software". half the tools in photoshop use ai-adjacent tech. 90% of the tools in blender use ai-adjacent tech. nobody is doing every single thing manually

All this to make Sakimichan looking porn slop...

it's just one of the board meta
hiromoot needs the traffic

artists that adopt ai generally don't know what they're doing anyway

Well that's the point, most everything twitter/Anon Babble drawfags screech about is just soulless slop, now the slop can be made with ai, FREEING them to make what you really wanted to before getting desperate enough to draw Pokémon vore.
If your entire art output is just fetish porn for clout and autism bucks, maybe ai art replacing you isn't such a bad idea.

short term, yes, thats what will happen. long term, there will be no senior artists left. this exact same thing just happened to a bunch of manufacturing jobs

new tech develops

companies can fire all low level employees because tech does their job

20 years later

nobody can get their foot in the industry because all low level jobs have been removed

young people abandon the industry because they cant get their careers started

old boomer upper level employee retires

theres nobody left to replace them with

business kills itself

wtf pixar was using ai in 2006

This is bullshit and you're talking out of your ass. Professional artists and those that are working at a high level do so in a way that's exacting and specific that AI can't approximate enough to be able to offset anything significantly enough.

Anon, The nature of fetish art is entirely different of that of the base level caliber of coomer that would generate a gorillion identical looking trending_on_artstation images. People patronize artists not for the traits that their work on paper but because that specific artist is the only one that creates the kind of work they do. To put it in American terms since that's what I know, the contents of store brand soda may be similar and cheaper to Coke but there is a reason why people will always pay the premium for it and it goes much further than the surface level characteristics.

godspeed
get that bread, gookmoot

Most artists are liberals so I'm glad AI is making their lives worse and piling up with all the shit going against them

Professional artists and those that are working at a high level do so in a way that's exacting and specific that AI can't approximate enough to be able to offset anything significantly enough.

So what is it that high level artists do that the AI can't? Like all it is your just feeding data into a machine so if you feed enough data of professional artist works into it then it can still produce it.

good thing it was a koopa who drew it.

this guy is based
x.com/DougTenNapel/status/1910880000376512539

I just think it's neat how you can just feed an AI 20 images and you can steal someone's style.
Then you can combine artists to further dehumanize them and get interesting results.

welcome to the future nigger, get used to it its never going away. Companies will never pay for artists again when they can click a button. They already pay for pajeet models.

If they actually had passion to draw this wouldn't bother them
What they're mad about is that they can't monetize their drawing anymore
This is basically what all AI BAD! rhetoric from Xitterite/patreon 'artists' (grifters) boils down to: feeling entitled to an income from their hobby.

Find an actual job faggot, accept that you learned a useless obsolete skill.
God, I can't wait to see all these arttroons going homeless.

steal

style can not be copyrighted, it can not be "stolen"

artists rip, imitate and copy each other all the time, it's essential to their growth

i just draw because i find it fun
i am not very good and don't make money from it and that's fine

based

based true artist

The mistake imo is to think that art is like linear algebra and it can be solved with enough information fed into a machine but this excises the context of the artist's workflow and the decisions that he does and doesn't make to achieve something specifically. You can feed AI enough of Yoshitaka Amano's work to give an approximation of it but it doesn't have the process and the technical skills not just in how he paints but the motor skills and choices of tools based on the knowledge that he has amassed over decades of drawing and painting and the sum of that can't be factored with enough algebra.

An example that I think I could think of is self driving cars that are able to get you to the majority of the way to your destination and what you want it to do but anything that's more complex than following basic traffic laws and following the speed limit becomes logarithmically more complicated and despite everything, stops being useful when it comes to actual taxing decisions and thought you have to make.

I think artist choice is kind of irrelevent in terms of skill expression, if you just feed enough of an artist's work into a model it'll produce basically anything you want 99% of the time. Art is complex, sure but at the end of the day we're talking about a still image, something that the AI can replicate with enough data. Also self driving cars are an entirely different thing altogether and is 100,000 times more complex than a drawing. But the point still seems to remain, with enough time, advancement and data AI can practically make any artist 1:1 regardless of how high level they are.

I do this but with AI

as long as you're having fun, anon

i like both ai art and human art

it's okay

its unexpected to me that image ai is easier to run than text ai.

Anon I say this as an artist myself who has tried to use AI to supplement. When you work long enough and develop a style with the tools you have, you can't get an AI accurate enough to match those specifics that you yourself are trying to get specifically. It's like proompting chat GPT to create python functions for you without the context of the entirety of the code you've written already in that it'll create something that is technically a function that does what you asked but it doesn't fit or work in the body you've made it for.

I went from liking to hating ex33 and it's not a movie game. It has gameplay and that part's really good.

What things? The streetlights?

Yeah but that's what I'm asking. What is it specifically as artist that you can do that the AI can't? You're not telling me what it can't do, you're just saying that some artists have super special skills that just can't be replicated like if it's magic.

post your art

Because you just want to create anime art, LLMs are designed to output everything and anything in every language, including complex code, a model just for ERPing can be 7B and smaller just like the art models.

asking to dox yerself on Anon Babble

silly
you won't post your brown hands and he won't post his art

I want to see the art you make, I want to see what your brain wanted to create that a person using AI couldn't
you're proud of your work aren't you?

anonymous site, sorry sweatie, you are not at Reddit

this whole site is brown, SEAfags arguing with Hindus, lmao

This the AI thread? Been testing some new (to me) models. This one is kinda nice. Star Galaxy is good too but struggles a lot with fingers, surprisingly.

so you're not an artist

there is lots of empty space in that image that could be more boob.

it's 2025, no model should be struggling with fingers

I dunno anon I like that size

Right? It's interesting, it looks a bit like 1.5 too. Maybe there's some of that in its blood, and that's why the fingers are busted.

It's not magic, It's just exacting preferences from working with a specific set of tools for a long time. When you generate an image, it will invariably be too small and need resizing which will lead to artifacting, it will have a lot of AI noise, patterns and inaccuracies that are inconsistent with your normal tools and workflow and to fix it and incorporate it fully into your work, it takes a lot of tweaking or outright tracing and painting over which really doesn't save you much time or effort at all and I guess that's what I should have lead with.

post something so I can dismiss you out of hand

I even kept it vidya

you're just bad at prompting

Nobody wants to be associated with Anon Babble, even sloppers

It's not magic, It's just exacting preferences from working with a specific set of tools for a long time. When you generate an image, it will invariably be too small and need resizing which will lead to artifacting, it will have a lot of AI noise, patterns and inaccuracies that are inconsistent with your normal tools and workflow and to fix it and incorporate it fully into your work, it takes a lot of tweaking or outright tracing and painting over which really doesn't save you much time or effort at all and I guess that's what I should have lead with.

so you're bad at drawing and bad at AI...

Bold of you to say I'm the one bad at drawing, anon

isn't that your art?

Based and honest. So tired of you fags pussy footing as if the goal of tech isn't to trivialize tasks.

nintendo quality so bad people think its AI

They will finally get a job like the rest of us

It's fine to be pro-AI just to see tech advance, but this line of thinking is retarded see how many AI patreons there are.

it will invariably be too small and need resizing which will lead to artifacting

You are stuck in the past, anon.

i think about it sometimes, and im not ashamed of this place so much as i dont want to lead people here. theres too many younguns here as it is.

kek

Midtendo scamming tendies non stop

The joke is that you're an AIfag because you can't draw in the first place

You are stuck in the past, anon.
I gave it an honest attempt at incorporating it but it was not worth the effort. I don't see how proompting harder is going to help with my workflow specifically.

It's less about the connotations of posting on Anon Babble and more about not wanting to attract a handful of unemployed people on government benefits that will autistically fixate on you because there is nothing else going on in their lives.

it's funny because you don't draw

what's funny about this?

If they actually had passion to draw this wouldn't bother them

There's only so much passion to go around when they're being shat on for pretty much as long as the internet has been around, stsrting from people just reposting your shit everywhere with no credit and any potential watermark scrubbed off, so there goes any hope of growth. Most xitter artists don't and have never made enough to subsist purely on commissions, butgot to see people make money off of them time and time again

comic artist? Fandubs on YT raking in way more views with minimal effort

xitter artist? Everything you upload immediately gets turned into merch on taobao/temu/amazon/random shirt company on the other side of the globe and sold off

NFT wave with its own brand of "if you don't monetize yourself, I'll do it for you", including minting NFTs and making money off recently deceased artists

And now the rhetoric is that ifcoyu complain in any way about AI, you're a luddite in the way of humanity's progress, and besides, you're irrelevant and getting replaced anyway. I don't get it, people just selectively pick a few artists to get angry over and claim they represent all of them, without actually looking at how or why we're at this point.

people on government SALARIES

fiddy

I'm actually a pretty well known artist. I draw only for myself really since I'm not into doing commissions but I don't want to post my stuff since I'd likely get doxxed to fuck.
a.i sucks ass either way. I don't care if you want to use it for memes or coom material (even if I do think the quality of real porn art and hand made memes are better) but it's when a.i bros talk about replacing art all together is what I have a serious problem with.
Humans can't stop creating art. making art is the most fun part about making art. having a machine just fart stuff out just takes away all the fun. and I can have no pride in "art" that I didn't even make.

Shalom!

I think most assholes on Anon Babble are either on Government money or they live with there parents.
I highly doubt most prompters have full time jobs.

I just don't want some giga autist to latch onto me. You look at this board and see people like ACfag at it for like 10 years and realize there's a lot of turbodamaged people just drifting from one day to the next.

ai slop is just another thing we have to deal with, like the internet when it was new and how now kikes took over social media to 4 major sites

you are so mad

prompters

it's not a job or an identity, it's just gacha with the image generator and jerking off (optional)
blame modern games sucking so bad it's more fun to slop than to play slop

Designing and refining AI prompts takes a hell of a lot more creativity and finesse than artists just unloading all their premade brushes.

having a machine just fart stuff out just takes away all the fun.

In your opinion. Using AI to make art is the most fun way to make art for me.
Now post your art so we can laugh at you.

I'm not even an artist, I've just been on the internet long enough to have seen these things play out

Shadiversity post

photoshop monkeys are still monkeys in the end
graphic designers get no respect, ai art is just that

nintendo saving money on their games using smeared slop, they are so smart, what a good corporation, I love Nintendo yea

on the internet long enough

it's less than 30 years old, and only truly popular for less than 20

this but unironically

The industrial revolution took jobs from people too, and here we are, still here
Let artists be a dying profession like lamp makers. They will find something else to do.

How can you have any pride in something you didn't create?

You know, for all that talk about greedy artists and paywalls, there sure are a lot of AI art patreons. The only difference is they post like every other day instead of every 3-4 or weekly.

How the internet being flooded with absolute slop made by mouth breathers and Indians comparable to the industrial revolution?

the image wouldn't exist without him, how can a photographer take pride in clicking a button?
you are just being silly because you feel maligned by the technology personally, which is understandable but nonetheless irrational

AI will never be in a significant amount in big games because you can't copyright it. If they change that law, then we will see it in front and center. Until them, it will be just hidden in the background.

You did create it, you're just a drooling retard.

petapixel.com/2025/02/12/this-is-the-first-ever-ai-image-to-be-granted-copyright-protection-a-slice-of-american-cheese/

anyone is free to do as he pleases, the scammer is a human after all ;)

It means that "artists" who just spent all their time tracing and airbrushing are now going to have to learn some actual skills and get an actual job.

the pedal has moved back again

art-bros...

A.i fags love to shit on photographers when that still requires more effort than a.i
You have to find a target to take a picture of you need to set up the perfect shot you need the right angle and view.
a.i doesn't do any of that.

Comparisons to the industrial revolution are retarded, because a lot of those people could reasonably retrain (often with minimal effort) and find employment afterwars. The AI hype is pushing the total white collar death, and even people retrain, there's only so many places they can go. If anything it's more comparable to mining towns once the mine shuts down.

FUCKING CHEESE

photag has to creep around minors to take pictures

sloppers can generate all the minors he wants

He is the founder and CEO of Invoke, an open-source Enterprise platform built to empower creatives to co-create with custom/fine-tuned AI products.

Really feeling the AGI

Man I can't wait for the future, we're gonna get the AI equivilent of mining towns and (probably) AI Pinkerton as well.

reddit comment

I'm so confused why the fuck would you guys be in support for Mario using a.i? you guys wouldn't shut up about how expensive it is and now that they are using a.i you are ok with that? shouldn't the prices be lower if they are using cheaper tools?

it isn't ai
it's just Snoy shiposting

AI is objectively infinitely more skill based and complicated than photography retard.

You're bald.

It's because... ahem... STOP ASKING QUESTIONS, TRANNY!

And it's still ugly. I think humans are safe for a little while longer.

tendies are fucking deranged

AI is objectively infinitely more skill based and complicated than...

You are incredibly insecure

Extreme cope. That article says that millions of AI generated pictures are able to be protected since everyone inpaints and stuff.

art has to be "beautiful"

lmao yer 120 years too late for that kind of cope

He isn't wrong about AI wanting to automated every single white collar career out there. Like what happens once we reach that goal? What kind of careers do we even get to look forward to at that point, Amazon warehouse employee? Retail? That's the one thing I never understood about the hype with AI, it sells the shittiest future.

The difference is that Nintendo uses AI ethically and in an attempt to future-proof themselves and empower the company to make better games in the future, not as a cost cutting measure. When you pay for Nintendo, you're paying for genuine quality.

only reason I don't mind ai shit it can make more image of obsucre waifu, the good JP artist all draw latest gacha trash and westoids are either gross or furry

it sells the shittiest future.

not having to work anymore

not having your worth tied to your job anymore

receive UBI and be able to live a fulfilling life actually doing what you enjoy

post-scarcity where your needs are provided for

ACTUALLY THAT'S ALL BAD

Fuck off. I don't understand how people can go against their own self-interest with such fervor.

>receive UBI and be able to live a fulfilling life actually doing what you enjoy

>post-scarcity where your needs are provided for

this part is fiction, btw

Post-scarcity will never happen, without that you're just advocating for a future where you're constantly getting robbed of your time, money and worth.

desu I've zero issue with people just want to finally get stuff for the obscure waifu they always liked
at the same time they're rarely the people who go on the TOTAL ARTIST DEATH tirade

the billboard of the automobile with cartoony proportions

"HURRR DURRR IT'S AI AHHHHH!"

You know what I take it back. Online artists, especially twatter artists should be replaced by generative AI slop only because of how fucking stupid they are and how easy it is to rile them all up.

You're paying $80 for one game

There is no future without UBI, so it has to happen

What happens when there are more robots than people and everyone owns one?

Nintendo uses AI ethically

1. it's not ai
2. at most they'd use adobe who claims they are "ethically" trained (you must take their word)

it has to happen

I wish I was as young and optimistic again as you, anon

There is a future w/o UBI, and you are looking at it, see china and India, that's us in a generation.

"ethically"

Why the quotes? Adobe has a fairly good track record if I recall correctly

what happens when [made up scenario in your mind]

China

Rising prosperity and a burgeoning middle class? Oh no. The horror.

a work-in-progress skyscraper, with strangely-orientated floors and pathways

That’s not a skyscraper, that’s DK Spaceport, one of the other tracks in this game. It’s a spaceport. It looks like this.

the road to rare waifus is paved with the bones of shartists. not that it has to be, they just insist on making asses of themselves and diving in front of my steamroller.

Pedophile snoytranny eryc

506 post

I shan't post anymore.
I only get paid to bump live threads.

If orange cheetoman in chief in burgerland didn't popularize AI on his soap box over on elon's app with those stupid ghibli ai pics on the whitehouse page, this ai shit wouldn't happen

It's annoying, but I consider it a small price to pay for the two of them finally fixing things. Elon's cost-cutting alone has done a lot of good already.

thread's over
anyone pushing this as AI is fucking braindead

get this angle fuckin bozo

AI

That would feel so good on my dick right about now.