GTA6 looks at same as the last GT-

GTA6 looks at same as the last GT-

still falling for promotional footage

you saw ONE image where the promotional material didn't match actual ingame light setup and completely shat your pants

00:15 on the watch

at night

okay, i can appreciate that

i can bet money that as soon as this scene ends and gameplay start you'll have the exact same quality lighting, model and texture

good morning sirs

half of it is the lighting (it's shit in the top image)

Fuck off shill

Always has been

NOOOO stop ruining my ragebait

Shan't buy

Chad 20" versus cucked 14"

Rdr2 had slightly better lighting in cutscenes
It'll probably be the same, same textures but worse lighting that the players WILL NOT notice

Can you guys elaborate on why you care so much about graphics and not the setting? Is this a Zoomer generational thing?. It was exciting when they gave you a GTA with a different perspective of an era or age, so you could sandbox that time like the 70s, 80s, 90s, but now it's just keeping with the scope of the current modern age. Is there not more drive in Rockstar to try new stuff? Or they saw big profit pandering to modern age society, and just trashed the idea of having different stuff.

LMAO

Who do you think you're fooling? Everyone on this board is buying it.

Can you guys elaborate on why you care so much about graphics and not the setting? Is this a Zoomer generational thing

No it a turbo normal faggot thing
these threads are unironically less caring of graphics than normies are

lighting does a lot. they hide a lot of the shitty details with rim lights

i never bought a single gta game

Graphics have stagnated!

there's no way it will look like this in game, not on consoles and not even on PC

that's mostly because cutscene are directed with best lighting and positioning bein hand picked
you can't have same in free camera game with dynamic lighting

there's no way

there's a way
Old white programmers

Looks a bit better than RDR2

I don't like it.

Why

anyone got that old mspaint comic of the kid complaining about SA before he puts it in his ps2 "but i dont wanna be a nigger" then 2 panels later is screaming "grove street 4 lyfe!" with a gat? because its kinda relevant here and i can't find it kek.

Looks plastic.

but you can drive your car through them as much as you want

how come Jason has a perfect hairline? is it achievable natty?

256MB vs 12GB

Granted that image of GTAV was likely taken from the PC version. A shot from the 360 version would be too unfair

the same boring gunplay for toddlers that every Rockstar game has

Yeah it does

i have never owned a gta game

Indeed, but it's still a brutal difference in average VRAM, and 12 years of difference? It would be pretty ridiculous if it looked the same.
Specially taking in account we have RDR2

RDR2 was downgraded from the promo stuff. That game fortunately still looked great (though downgraded again and messed with for really no good reason post launch), I wouldn't be shocked if gta6 is less immersive and downgraded than the sense you get from the glimps they've given us a glimps of as well.

GTA SA > GTA Vice City > GTA 4 > GTA 5 > GTA 3 > GTA 2 > GTA 1

It doesn't matter how good it looks if it's degenerate. The artists they poached that improved it wasted their lives and talent and don't deserve to work on anything unconnected anymore.

I literally don't care about GTA 6. It's going to be mediocre at best.

oh wow modern hardware can fit more polygons than 20 year old console?

Damage control if shoddy quality.
I will not buy your game.

It feels like were in a perpetual loop of being advertised the bottom and receiving the top for the last decade this industry is so dogshit

Can you guys elaborate on why you care so much about graphics and not the setting?

Because it otherwise looks exactly like every single Rockstar game since GTAIV. Even RDR and RDR2 are just GTA with horses and slight Western accents, in the same boring open worlds. It's a tired and dead formula, and it was tired and dead over a decade ago. Graphics are literally the only reason to upgrade, because all that nonsense you said about "different era and setting," is just that nonsense. They don't feel like different eras or ages, they just feel like a typical Rockstar game. And if it is going to be a typical Rockstar game then it should at least be eye candy.

It's actually
GTA IV+DLC>San Andreas>GTA V>Vice City>GTA III

Once this is out, I simply intend to roleplay as pic related upon coming across melonated characters. They all commit crimes anyway so it meets the code.

All built for BWC

Has there not been any actual gameplay footage?

Actually it's
GTA IV>VC>SA>5>3>LCS>IV Gay>VCS>IV Lost>2>London>1

Vice city > 5 > San Andreas > 4 > vcs > lbs > 3

no floridaman uses 24 hour time thoever

Jason has a military background thougheverbeit

But does it make the game fun?

There like an hour of it that leaked

muh fun

Shitty buzzword

/thread

Florida really looks like that thoughe

So delusional.

R* does really lie when it comes to visuals. At most some of the NPC will be reduced but RDR2 has some pretty good ped density while staying detailed. Granted it would kind of tank the framerate

600 gb install

Damage control if shoddy quality.

brown hands typed this post

Yeah, i miss when each game had a distinct tone

I didn't like the three protagonists. It would have been better for Frankling to be the only protagonist. Make the story about him climbing the crime ladder. Getting into harder and harder heists.

did they have to add blur to the background? all the buildings look like they are smeared in vaseline.

2>all
get fucked secondaries

It's set in Florida, massive retard

The USA is ugly, now.

I can't fathom caring about this.

UHHHH IT ONLY LOOKS BETTER BECAUSE OF THE LIGHTING!!!!

yeah thats the point, lighting is finally getting good

BETTER (breaths in) LE GRAPHICS!

Zzzzzz.....

13 years and 2 console generations later

things should be... LE SAME

Even the black guys?

Well, it *should* look substantially better, since GTA V was developed around PS3/X360 limitations.
But really, the graphics jump is arguably smaller than the jump from GTA IV to V lol.

Proof? RDR2 looked better than anything I saw pre-launch.

Yes, until 1 frame later and the game switches from quality to performance mode

ingame vs bullshot

yes it's the same game but reskinned. You also know that gta 7 will be the same as gta 6

How bad is the spergout on Anon Babble gonna be when the game is good and successful?

I will be purchasing GTAVI, because Rockstar makes quality games.

Those shots are GTAV at its most charitable. You're seeing GTAV after what is essentially 2 remasters.
360->PS4->PC

Isn't a huge chunk of this board unironically excited? The 'log was filled with Jason and Luciaposting when trailer 2 dropped and overall reception to the trailer was positive. I can't imagine most of Anon Babble is upset about us getting a 2 billion dollar polished game.

doesn't matter, the core visual make up of the game is still present on Xbox 360/PS3. The remaster is the same game running at higher resolutions with some higher quality settings and effects. Original release still looks great on a small TV displaying 1280x720

Believing bullshots

expecting games these days to be polished

no they're setting up for full GTAO2 integration where you need to log in atleast TWO accounts to even play the story mode.

I would hope not after 13 years

Show RDR2 bullshots then

Why do people still use consoles?

He can't. It'd literally be impossible since the final product looked better than the trailer and that is an objective fact.

I mean the game doesn’t multiple 5 times its original file size for nothing. They have likely implemented an improved lighting engine and higher quality models. And yeah the effects that come with it matter in making a game look better

$500 for a box that plays your vidya

$3000 for a high end PC

time spent deciding which parts and making sure they're compatible

plus time spent building it

plus waiting for parts to get shipped

plus tax plus tip

PC gaming obviously mogs but you're downright retarded if you don't understand why consoles still have appeal.

thanks for being the only one here not doing mental gymnastics to validate their opinion

wrong
rdr2 promotional material looked worse than the final product.

Shhh, shush. You'll destroy their narrative with factposting.

Only subhumans buy mainstream games.

That is one small and sad hill to die on. So contrarian you can't even let yourself enjoy something because it's popular. Obviously you're being ironic but there is actually people here who do this.

saar please redeem the shark cards

Gta v graphic used to be too real for me

uh
uh
white boy summer

that was the point to vice city, liberty city and los santos, being an Italian mob, a nigger gang member or a just a dude from the city in the 90s. Not the graphics.You are probably the target audience for this stupid shit. Glad for you.

What is even your argument? That the game shouldn't look better?

i'm not avoiding it because its liked by normies, i'm avoiding it because normies like shitty video games and i have better things to spend my time and money on.

should I watch chibidoki play it?

that's optimistic given CoD Warzone is like 150 gigs man. times are changing rapidly for storage space

2025

american protagonist still not using the c-clamp while holding a rifle

Immersion ruined.