Holy FUCK this mogs Mario 64

Fix your bot retard

more control options = automatically better

Holy shit you are a midwit subhuman. Must be a zoomer too

arch.b4k.dev/_/search/text/>dial a combo system for platforming/
I knew it was this guy

Generally speaking yes the more options you have the better a game feels to control, especially if all those options are equally useful like they are in Mario.

dogshit camera

nonsensical physics

slippery ass movement

Fuck no

What are the best Crash-likes? I didn't like Goin' Quackers or Kao 1. It feels like all the effort back then went to SM64 knock offs.

I don't understand how you're complaining about this stuff in a comparison between Mario and Crash lol
Mario actually accelerates and, likewise, needs time to decelerate from a full sprint.
It feels incredibly natural, the physics are on point.
Crash on the other hand has no physics, you immediately run at full speed the moment you hit any direction on the controller and he's able to just turn and stop on a dime.
You can argue it makes Crash easier to control than Mario, but it doesn't feel very good - Crash has no weight.

I agree here. Mario 64 feels so dated, I could never even bring myself to finish it. Crash Bandicoot is timeless fun.

Crash is designed for actual gameplay. Mario is designed for a gay tech demo and the actual gameplay, level design, enemies/bosses are dogshit.

Crash is the natural extension of the 16-bit golden ages. Mario 64 is some new gay easter egg hunt faggotry genre and falls flat because everything aside from Mario's movement is awful, and even Mario's movement only feels good to fuck around (like a tech demo) not during actual stages

I love Crash, but come on now

Mario 64 is unplayable the camera is so atrocious.

Not like it matters because each level is just a dull, empty environment where you easter egg hunt for bullshit, except you get kicked out each time your find an egg

Mario's movement only feels good to fuck around

Which is the first and most important step in making a quality videogame. You can elaborate all you want on a pile of shit, it'll just be a more bloated pile of shit. That is why Mario is still here while Crash is completely irrelevant.

Based and Crashpilled

You already said that in a previous post, macaco. We know it's you.

Crash is an actual game that adults can appreciate
Mario is an easy no substance game for kids and a tech demo for adults.
Both extremely soulful but comen Crash is the GAME,the PLATFORMER

dogshit camera

a problem only for retards

This board urgently needs IDs

You made this thread yesterday
Back for more humiliation I see

mario 64 is a really ugly game

but Crash isn't a collectathon.

Crash is better because I want to fuck his sister

DAMN STRAIGHT

another samefag post by the same brazilian

Jesus fucking christ, this board is dead.

I re-completed OG Crash 1 at the beginning of the month, it's still just as fun and the music and scenery are pretty comfy, they still hold up
youtube.com/watch?v=jqtLvuVPpTs

Macacos need to be rangebanned.

Things that are true

better level designs

more challenging

less padding

got 2 sequels in the same gen

better characters

Things that are bullshit

Better controls - maybe more responsive due to instant feedback but only having a jump and spin is pretty lacking

Things that can be argued or aren't comparable

miles better camera

more gameplay variety

more creative

more soulful

t. An Anon that's cleared the entire Crash trilogy over 10 times(100%, 100%, 105% respectively)

notice how people can just have a thread about enjoying mario games but every time a crash or spyro fag starts a thread its screeching about "UHM ACKSHUALLY ITS BETTER THAN THE BEST 3D PLATFORMER EVER MADE"

The only character I want to fuck from Mario is Yoshi
Meanwhile Spyro and Crash have a lot more fuckable ones
Add SEAs to it as well

Best 3D platformer ever made

I'm not seeing it in this thread though

nah crash suck ass. this isn't the 90s anymore so you don't even have to pretend to like it because your parents bought you a playstation instead of the 64.

level designs

It's literally Penguin Adventure for the MSX, except with a Bandicoot instead of a Penguin.
You run forward and jump over the occasional hole.
There's as much "level design" in Crash Bandicoot as there is in Final Fantasy X.

It's the same with Switch threads, or anything nintendo. There are genuinely people out there with a condition called Nintendo Derangement Syndrome, or NDS, a mental disorder I expect to be recognized in the next edition of the DSM

That's not what controls means. Retard.
Controls refers to the handling of the character. In this case, as much as OP is a shitposter, he was actually correct - because mario 64's controls are awful due to how slippery they are.

CB's camera is objectively better than SM64's, I understand the free camera of SM64 was revolutionary and all but a fixed camera still feels better, if you die it's entirely your fault and not the camera blocking your view or moving in an unpredictable way that throws you off your path.

how slippery they are.

*this was fixed in the sequels.

I remember not knowing what the memory card did and so I just pulled it out or in as a kid
I'd replay this game all the time without realising you could save your progress

Pic related is literally identical to Crash Bandicoot, except crash has nicer graphics.

retard cant handle the concept of momentum in a platformer

"i-its too slippery!!"

play crash where he moves like a brick, has one spin move and one shitty feeling jump instead

honestly i prefer these fixed camera platformers way more than stuff like SM64, love that it's basically a 2D platformer in 3D

Was this an endless runner?

I tried to play Mario 64 on the Switch, oof, it bored me pretty quickly.

this, i fucking hate it

make ragebait or some random wojak thread because for some reason they still allow shartyfags to fester here

it dies or is deleted

repost the same fucking thing or barely change the wording a day later at best

it's all so tiresome.

Level design, hazard design, enemy/boss design are far more important.

I went on a gen 5 binge a few months ago. playing mario 64 again might have been more fun then when i was a retarded kid. got 120 stars for the first time and loved every second of it, except perhaps some stars in rainbow ride. was probably the most fun I had out of any gen 5 game. I also played crash all the way through (for the first time). it was alright but just felt like I was playing a shittier version of donkey kong country without any of the fast and fluid controls and bolted on 3d. comparing these games is like comparing a filet mignon steak to a bag of doritos. it was still a lot more fun than spyro however, I have no idea how anyone can say thats a good game.

that is what controls means, at least in part. I am afraid you are the retard here but I expect nothing less from a crash bandicoot fan.

Goin' Quackers would be better if it didn't repeat the level themes so much.

They just blindly slapped 2D physics on the 3D game. The physics in SMB are great. The physics in Mario 64 are trash

That's because Mario 64 was revolutionary and Crash was the same old shit.

Muppet Monster Adventure mogs crash and spyro.

Mario's model was also quite unpleasant.

I've never played this one but I believe it.

It falls short, the controls aren't as polished as they should be, but a fabulous OST nonetheless.

youtube.com/watch?v=BaPgBOkfH_g

Crash sold better and was received better at the time, it's just that the bingtranny fanbase is exponentially larger, so they fellate it even today.

Crash petered off because all his post-PSX games were a shell of the originals. But the PSX trilogy are all still stone cold classics.

crash sold better

crash was received better

wrong and wrong, retard. snoys arent sending their best.

Crash sold better and was received better at the time

none of those things is true and the playstation user base was much larger.

Mario 64

Basically useless

Only used for set pieces

!The one you'll actually need to do 50% of the time

Just the High Jump again but doesn't require two jump inputs

!The one you'll use the other 50% of the time for jumping, and constantly because Mario's fat fucking ass is too slow

Basically pointless

Exists for like 1 star

Exists because they decided you randomly have to jump on some things harder.

Crash Bandicoot (1)

Jump that the entire game is designed around

Spin attack which lets you actually effectively attack while moving in a 3D space

And then Crash 2 came out by adding a bunch of moves that are actually used well in the level design

The trilogy sold 21m combined. Seethe about it.

BASED

dood 3 games sold better than one!!!

how much did mario 64, sunshine and galaxy sell combined?

Only the Naughty Dog Crash games matter

lmao

Crash released in one gen, bingtranny

G-guys all the non-naughty dog crash games are just as bad as Crash It's about Time right?

No

I enjoy Crash 4(PS2) as a guilty pleasure its basically a Crash 3 chinese knock-off(low quality)

No, even those are terrible. When they finally stopped making Crash shit they did alright though. The first Jak & Daxter is excellent. I almost didn't buy it because of Crash Bandicoot but I am glad I did.

Mario 64 is still a good game and it was very good for what it achieved in the mid 90s but yes, Crash is the better game.

Did some youtuber claim this recently or something? I don't know how anyone could possibly believe it.

I get you got the idea that SM64 is exemplary because of 30 years of shilling, but no most people come to this conclusion if they've played both.

constantly boots you out after every star and makes you repeat from the beginning of the stage with a tiny stupid piecemeal change

This is where Banjo & Kazooie shines in that regard

God I want to fuck Kazooie

surprisingly this didn't turn me into a furry.
but yes, crash is the better game because collectathons are shit.

The first Jak & Daxter is excellent.

Shut the fuck up. It's boring ass collectathon trash for toddlers. 3 and especially 2 were better in every conceivable way

no one came to that conclusion except people who were too poor to afford a ps1 and n64 as a kid so they made "nintendo bad" their entire personality.

I AM the person who had a ps1, n64 and a saturn as a kid.

No, almost everyone who played both preferred Crash. Mario was cool as a piece of tech, but Crash was a much better, and more fun, GAME.

How was playing on the Saturn?

Pretty alright.
I liked Panzer Dragoon

mario 64 regarded as one of the most revolutionary and best games in its genre

most speedrun game of all time, entire communities thriving around shit like the a button challenge

yeah no dude EVERYONE liked this 6/10 scrimblo game more, trust me bro

Crash is a hallway "3D" platformer. It did nothing worthy of note that 2D platformers before it didn't. There's a reason that most platformers out today are either super mario bros style or super mario 64 style. That'd because crash is trash.

so you were a spoiled faggot, I knew a few of those. maybe you were one of them.

I still want to fuck Coco more than I want to play M64

Mario 64 fan

look inside

diehard tendie drone

speedrun tranny

Every time

lmao pure delusion

No he was a lucky kid who likely plays scmup’s more now, N64 didn’t have many

Crash 2 > Crash 3 >>> Crash 1
Crash 1 has bland controls and shit level design. Mario 64 has far better levels than Crash 1 and better controls than any of the Crash games. CTR is better than Mario Kart though

Going forward and up is pretty noteworthy if and 2D platformer does this.

It's called 2.5D you zoomer dipshit, and there are loads of great games in that subgenre. And yes, Crash was still very innovative for its time while ALSO being a very fun and well designed game with competent level and enemy design instead of boring, empty levels with gay easter egg hunts (oh, and you can only find one egg at a time before being booted out)

Except they're made for two totally different styles of game. You should be comparing Mario 64 with Spyro's camera. Crash's is made to fit a linear path not an open area.

2.5D was something like mischief makers. Crash was 3D with shit levels because the designers couldn't see outside of the 2D paradigm they were used to.

MM

2.5D

when it barely utilized the Z axis

Klonoa and Crash are 2.5D in gameplay, MM is just 2.5D in aesthetics.

No, they even deliberately talked in interviews about how they wanted to change things up, but still stay very much stay true to 16-bit classic design. They experimented with different stage layouts and cameras, but ultimately settled on fixed camera as it was important to have tight and responsive controls, be able to see what's happening at all times, and a focus on strong level design (all of which Mario 64 failed at miserably)

pick up items, enough of said items give you an extra life and resets the counter

So, Mario is a collectathon, nigger ?

Yeah and Crash 4 which is also good and canon
The rest suck dick

3 > 1 > 2

2 leaned too much into collectathon crap

No it doesn't you faggot snoy

Tbf crash 1 save system was kind of bullshit, you could only save after finishing certain levels, however i don't know if im missremembering but i think it had both a normal save and a password save.

You can only save if you clear bonus levels and/or collect gems.
Saves were available in password or file format.
It's pretty notoriously bad and it was basically a "we never bothered getting this cleared up before launch"

3 had the best controls and levels, but half the game was filler. 2 has good controls and levels with barely any filler. 1 has bare bones controls with shit levels with its only plus being no filler.

all these niggers who dont know what 2.5d actually means

gameplay is 2d but has 3d graphics. like kirby 64.

It's called 2.5D you zoomer dipshit

And it sucks ass. Why play this barebones garbage when you can play DKC?

B-but guys, multiple choice hallway platformer has superior level design!

Woah

Crash's gameplay is 3D, just not open-world/open-level

But that's wrong, even in side scrolling levels, you can jump towards the screen. We're using it right.

i've always said this was better than mario 64 and it's not even close. it's basically taking 2D platformer design and adding a dimension to it, but not changing the basic design. where's mario 64 is a boring collectathon where you run through big empty levels doing chores

frankly mario 64 was the first step on turning games into some braindead gacha shit where you do a chore to get a roll. instead of a roll it's a star, but it's not far off. fuck nintendo. zelda is boring & gay too

half of 3 was shitty gimmick levels that were miserable to play. it also introduced relics which were the start of crash being an intolerable collectathon. you don't know what you're talking about if you think 2 was worse in this retard (sorry, freudian slip, i was thinking about you)

it's basically taking 2D platformer design and adding a dimension to it

Yeah, a very bad 2D platformer that a 10 year old could design. Just say you have no fucking taste.

Agreed with everything, but Zelda NES is a lot of fun, nuZelda is trash though

mario sucks cock. do something about it. btw in real life i'd absolutely beast on you, bitch.

all i know is i played a bit of link to the past and thought it was worse than alundra on playstation. then i tried one of the n64 zelda games and got bored before anything had even happened. i do have ADHD though so whatever

Quality > quantity

You know it's the truth. Crash is barebones fucking garbage only liked by people who don't play many platformers.
It would have been completely forgotten on N64 as that audience actually played videogames (as opposed to the new gaystation audience who hiherto only consumed movies ...well that still has not changed)

Hey guys.
Remember the 90s?

Remember the 80s?

Remember the 70s?

The 60s?

50s?

Fucking 300 BC?

Trash bandicoot

quality

Must suck being a snoy, where you have to put the most uninspired, shallow platforming game ever on a pedestal.

got 2 sequels in the same gen

Anon, that's because the game is slop that any retard could make.

Also applies to CTR vs Mario Kart 64

it worked for nu vegas. maybe OP really can meme crash into being better than mario.

took a jumping flash, bubsy, and mario 64 to get to that point

any retard huh?

Schizo spamming giga-chad-bad-game threads and samefagging in them with wojak comics, it didn't "work" Fabio.

is this even english?

op is a massive queerfaggot for not even posting the right crash game. implying you own a ps1 cumguzzler

You fell for one (1) schizofag's astroturfing campaign.

What are talking about? The only schizo here is you.

Raped and groomed.

bot or retard?

Fabio is a retarded bot, you're right.

I'm leaning toward retard on this one.

spyro mogs both

You have to be retarded to think anyone genuinely likes 3 over New Vegas. So I agree again!

pretending nintendofags don't make nintendo their whole personality

lol you are just sad people don't worship nintendo anymore now.

Who said anything about Fallout 3?

i feel like people don't understand what platforming even is supposed to be, crash is platforming at it's purest while mario is more like banjoo kazooie.

platforming in crash is shit. the cameras angle makes it hard to judge jumps and most of the obstacles are just trial and error with no real thought or skill.

crash is platforming at it's purest

Yeah, it's at its purest like filtered water is a meal at its purest. That piece of crap is a regression of the original super mario bros. Multiple choice shitstation slop.

complaining about camera in fucking Crash

lmao, shut the fuck up you tendie drone, the camera is 10x worse in Mario 64. It's absolutely fucking atrocious, constantly getting stuck on terrain, spazzing out, facing the wrong direction, and refusing to go where you want it to

He's talking about the angle, which does fucking suck.

Better controls, better level designs, more creative, more challenging, more soulful, better characters, more gameplay variety, less padding, miles better camera, got 2 soda cans in the same fridge

Crash is trash, has always been.

It's not perfect, but miles better than Mario 64's dogshit camera

You're just bad dude.

the basis of the platforming is challenging

Maeio 64 is a baby game

both are good

dpad game vs analog stick game

calm down lol

be mario 64

literally try to move

3 second input lag

lol

lmao

I loved SM64 when I was younger but yea it's full of padding. Every time I try to play it again I get bored by the time I get upstairs.

nope, not even a little bit. shit movement will ruin anything else good about a game, case in point, Mario Galaxy.

The Kao remake has huge amounts of slav jank but its enjoyable.

you're right, but i always thought that was retarded. 2.5d should've been for games like Battletoads, Ninja turtles, or most other beat 'em ups like pic related.

arcadeshit

It’s the N64 in general. Shit low res textures stretched to the shithouse.

Mario 64 didn’t leave as big a cultural impact as speedtrannies would have you believe.

Jumping Flash is better than Crash.

damn, you can't handle a camera designed for babies? you admitting you're stupider than a baby?

Controls aren't shit just because they don't have a dozen different extraneous bullshit moves