Before Switch 2 direct

Before Switch 2 direct

LOL ENJOY YOUR UNDERPOWERED TOY

ITS GONNA RUN AT 30FPS

WONT GET 3RD PARTY SUPPORT

after the Dircect

Getting all 3rd party games

on par with ps5

all the stupid faggots talk abut now is the price point for a machine that runs at 4k 120fps

LMAO Nintendo actually blew the fuck out of all of you. You thought Nintendo were still in their Wii mentality of releasing a system with last gen specs as a new gen system

on par with ps5

Look, I'm the biggest Nintendie on earth, so I say this with all the love I can:
You are retarded

has to post image from a more popular franchise to get people to click on his thread

on par with ps5

Smug slump.jpg - 480x360, 19.78K

CHICKEN JOCKEY

Looks like it to me? Switch 2 hate is so forced.

Show me 1 (one) PS5 game that runs at 120fps

Enjoy your underpowered AND OVERPRICED toy.

True they're screaming mad because their "pc master race" computer build that still has a 1070 won't be able to even emulate the games! Lmao

Isn't Prime 4 the only 120fps game, the other remasters are 60?

You're right, PS5 games can't even run at base 60fps lol

Tendies

"Power doesn't matter! Stop being picky!"

Also Tendies

"ON PAR WITH THE PS5!!!1111!"

You lost faggot

That's not a contradiction. Power doesn't matter. That's why PS5 is on par with PS4, like Switch 2. Therefore Switch 2 is on par with PS5.

Mario Kart World is also getting a 120fps mode iirc

>on par with ps5

They're seething because the Switch 2 will be more powerful than their 9 year old PC.

The next xeno game better run at least 90fps

You mean 2025 hardware can run gen 7 looking games made for 2005 hardware at 120 FPS? Thanks Nintendo! It only took you 20 years!

on par with ps5

That's a pretty big fib

ohnononono.jpg - 700x844, 72.38K

a machine that runs at 4k 120fps

The hardware is limited to 60fps at 4K and can only achieve 120fps at 1080p or lower. It's a hard cap in the architecture, regardless of the game.

>all the stupid faggots talk abut now is the price point for a machine that runs at 4k 120fps

It's all they got left, but it's just funny cause it exposes them for being poor fucking faggots with no job

Cawwadooty Black Ops Cold War

fanboys trying to discuss hardware is always the most embarrassing shit

a system with last gen specs

what do you think the ps5 is? only difference is that they got the timing better so it doesn't look as bad as the wii/wiiu/switch

a game

ps5 could never
yep, it's better

I see the goalposts are moving already

on par with ps5

Okay that's pretty funny. Well done anon.

No trolling, did they say how much RAM switch 2 has? If it's like 8GB this is dogshit hardware lol. You need at bare minimum double that for how retarded developers are these days

My 970 rig can run CS Source at 4K 5000 FPS, snoys btfo

there was some leak that said it was 12gb

Jesus Christ Nintendo are fucking stupid

Its 12GB

If the n64 isn't as powerful as a ps5 then how can it run f-zero x at 60 fps?
Checkmate, snoys.

but it's DDR9 running 52 cores and has 512GB VRAM, so it's fine.

But Anon, the Switch 2 can't possibly be on par with the PS5. Because the PS5 has no games.

on par with the ps4*

FTFY

Power doesn't matter but the simple fact is game consoles have hit a graphical peak and Nintendo is catching up to the point where "Nintendo consoles are under powered" is no longer a justification for 3rd parties to not port games to Nintendo's platform.

Nintendo won bigly

Seems pretty on par with me considering the Switch 2 doesn't either.

that will never be the case. because game engines (namely ue5) keep getting more and more bloated. and regardless of graphical fidelity, you need the raw horsepower to run it. which nintendo doesn't have.

Getting all 3rd party games

on par with ps5

THE PS5 IS ON PAR WITH A RTX 3090 AND THE SWITCH 2 IS ON PAR WITH A PS5!!11

consoleniggers are so fucking stupid lmao
fell for it again award

The N64 can run Pokemon Red at triple speed
The N64>the PS5

FLINT AND STEEEL

The switch 2 will have a special cartridge that makes Bing Bing Wahoo run at 4k 240fps with pathtracing. PCfags and Snoys can't possibly compete.

No lies detected

kek

on par with ps5

No
It's a PS4 with a guaranteed SSD and some nvidia witchcraft (which will absolutely obliterate the PS4, as the mechanical hard drive cucked it from running games that took advantage of the whole memory).

a machine that runs 4k at 120fps

Cyberpunk will run at
720P 30FPS in handheld
1080P 40 FPS Docked in performance mode

you pay the highest price (80-90$) for the worst version of the game and you wont even own the game anymore.

it is NFT: the console, all you own is the receipt, no physical copies of games anymore.
but i guess you like getting cucked too.

The cyberpunk actually comes in the cartridge somehow.

You lost faggot

Steam deck looks better and probably has better framerates too. Who lost again?

60fps at 4K and can only achieve 120fps at 1080p or lower

You know these are still crazy numbers normally only seen on pc.

Pretty sure the 4K resolution is achieved through DLSS, too.

oh yeah thats what i meant. ps5 pro is equal to 4070
lmao these dumb fucking retards actually believe this shit

In tests digitalfoundry did, the switch 2 don't have the compute power to pull DLSS at 4k.
for 4K on the switch 2, you have to do something that runs at 900p on the original switch.
For example it can run Mario Odyssey or zelda at 4k (at 60 and 30 FPS respectively).
But a 720p switch 1 title can't go 4k on the switch 2

But is it real 4K or some bullshit upscaling from a lower resolution? I never trust console manufacturers to be honest about resolutions any more, ever since the Xbox 360 and PS3 made it normal to outright lie about them.

80% of your library being ports is "having games" now.

Grim

Well, at least it's finally on par with ps3 tho!

a machine that runs at 4k 120fps

nigga wat
not even the best PCs today can run modern games at 4k120

It is real 4k, but with really lightweight shaders and stuff.
Outputing 3D graphics with 4k is something even the original switch would be able if it had the resolution to select, but it would be shaderless stuff basically.
To be very specific, since the Xbox, every pixel drawn by a console or computer is a compiled C program that calculate the final color.
The faster the GPU, the bigger can be this program, and more texture accesses and all that it can do.

He missed the memo that nintendo themselves said that is 4k OR 120 FPS, not both.

Identify specifically what looks bad about this to you

It's not hyperrealistic like those unreal engine videos

Ohnonononononononononono

Switch 2 already has more exclusives than PS5 after 5 years. And it didn't ever release yet

It's HDMI out can't do 4k/120fps and there isn't a single game that does that at the same time, the only 120fps games will be ports or something like Mario Wonder, Switch 2 isn't on par with PS5 it isn't even on par with Xbox Series S, at least on paper, it has a few advantages vs Xbox Series S.

The point is all you guys had going for you was you thought it would have shitty specs and graphics and now it doesn't so you all cling onto price point

lmao this nigger actually pre-ordered
don't forget to tip Nintendo for the privilege

No it's largely in line with what I was expecting except I though Nintendo would be more conservative with it's handheld power and push for more battery life, lower fidelity visuals and higher resolutions while docked.

That's sick. I can't wait to race as my favorite character, Wario. Isn't he cool?

Switch 2 isn't on par with PS5

it isn't even on par with Xbox Series S

It's on par with the Valve™ SteamDeck™.

It looks to be a bit weaker than Steam deck.

Nigga what?

1000008787.jpg - 1207x637, 142.44K

nice try but I'm not spending hitler's birthday money on the new! new neo nigtendo SATAN 2: Gog and Magog edition

Hardware metrics say it isn't, I'd chalk up the better visuals to Capcom caring more about the Switch 2 hardware, they will sell a lot more games on Switch 2 than Xbox Series.

sucks down 42W to run

15v x 2.8A = 42W
I imagine handheld mode will have an hour battery life

the maximum output of a charging device is the amount of power the device it charges actually draws moment to moment

You're retarded. The dock can output 42W to allow for charging the Switch 2's battery quickly and keep it topped up while the console is in use during docked mode, it doesn't mean the Switch 2 is drawing that to operate.

Exclusives don't mean shit if they suck. So again, neither has any games.

That could be the RAM too, The Xbox SeX only has 8GB of RAM, while the switch 2 has 12.

120fps while the screen sharing is in single digits

I think we are overestimating the power of this machine and not questioning the marketing enough.

The primary reason for the low fps screen sharing is probably bandwidth and lag, same for the shitty camera quality.

>on par with ps5

I mean, PS5 games look basically identical to PS4 games, so anon isn't wrong. Every generation the gap gets smaller and smaller and smaller. This is just a fact.

If anyone still thinks there's a noticeable visual gap between the PS5 and Switch 2... well, there definitely won't be by the time the Switch 3 is released against the PS6.

I...what?
A fucking cellphone can do video recording/playback while also playing a game these days, how the fuck would a Switch 2 not be able to do the same?

ironically enough, it's better than the PiS5 given it runs trannypunk at higher framerates, while being a portable

Why would Nintendo want to reduce the bandwidth being used on their network? No clue.
Why would Nintendo want people with shitty internet connections to have less lag automatically so they don't complain or cause problems for other players? Yup, still no clue.
Also, it's designed for sharing up to 3 screens, which is equivalent to a lot more than just watching one video while playing a game.

A fucking cellphone can do video recording/playback while also playing a game these days

Anon, you are pulling stuff out of your ass. All mobile phone games are Chinese gatcha games or vomit like Fortnite made for 10 year olds. Phones run games like shit and touch screens are clunky and unresponsive.

Putting aside the latency and frame rate issues, how would it even be possible to stream while playing a game on a tiny phone screen?

That image is pretty dishonest considering there's a 3 year gap between those games (A 3 year gap where technology for games was advancing pretty rapidly too)
Also Donkey Kong 64 wasn't nintendo, it was RARE
and Tomb Raider wasn't Sony it was Eidos

That image is pretty dishonest considering there's a 3 year gap between those games (A 3 year gap where technology for games was advancing pretty rapidly too)

Well that, but also the fact that the N64 was much more powerful and the geometry didn't constantly jiggle and wobble.

Sony and Nintendo were the publishers and the console manufacturers. Most people really don't care about details past that.

Anon, you are pulling stuff out of your ass.

Retarded or iToddler?
Who am I kidding, that's redundant.

Go back to Anon Babble.

"iToddler"? You're the one claiming you can stream and play games (what games exactly? Chinese gacha Clash of Clans? lol) at the same time.

Tell me anon, how do you stream a video at the same time as playing a game on a tiny 6 inch screen? Fucking retard.

FlINT AND STEEEEL

on par with the ps5

Why do you make a thread just to lie

You know tomb raider wasn't only a playstation game right?
It was multiplatform and released on sega saturn and PC as well
If you wanna argue "this looks good because N64 was more powerful" that's still kind of dishonest
Yeah N64 didn't have Playstations weird fake 3D that caused all their polygons to recalculate and wiggle constantly, but the PC versions and shit didn't have that either
And yes, the N64 WAS more powerful than the playstation 1, it also came out an entire year after, again in a period where the tech was rapidly advancing
This is still blatantly wrong
Eidos was the publisher for tomb raider
Sony had nothing to do with tomb raider
The playstation was just one of the platforms it released on.

It's easy for it to run a game at 120 fps (even though like 5% of the swotch 2 library will be able to run at 120fps) when your games look like they are from 3 generations ago

I don't remember people being this out of touch with reality when doing console wars, are you zoomers retarded?

finally took care of the horrific performance issues

as a result, now games are stupidly expensive, and the actual gameplay problems remain persistent

Don't believe me? Look at BOTW and TOTK. Instead of fixing any of the fundamental and underlying issues, they give you a GPS and a phone so you can follow a line to your destination. No addressing of the terrible content scattered around, no addressing the abysmal dungeons (or lack thereof). Remind me, does the BOTW upgrade even include the DLC? Or do you still have to pay for that?