He's right you know

he's right you know

another low effort engagement bait

it's all so tiresome

True

The only to save it is to make vehicles like IV.

remember what happened with red dead?

how high do you think that guy can jump?

how long do you think it's going to take that guy to loot somebody?

Anon Babble cannot refute this

SURELY Rockstar learned from the criticisms of RDR2 right? It'll have been 8 years by the time GTA6 comes out.

lol all it has to be is more gtao and the audience for that is built in and salivating with their credit cards in hand just waiting for it.

I dislike popular thing

BOOOO get new material

why's the camera green?

someone shoot this guy

muh Anon Babble

bruh this video has 11 million views and came out 6 years ago
youtube.com/watch?v=MvJPKOLDSos

that's not what he says
youtube.com/watch?v=tzOdmSratDs

be real, would you be hype if the gameplay/gunplay is max payne like

what's the tl;dw

RDR2 and GTAV retard. Guess what both of those have in common? Top 10 best selling games of all time. People must find enjoyment out of them over your kind of slop.

youd be surprised at the kind of isolated bubble the average gamer lives in. 11M views is not at all reflective of what the average gamer wants.

green camera faggot

most dogshit take imaginable

name a more iconic duo

Thanks for marketing the game. We appreciate it here at Rockstar

he cries for half an hour that you have to approach a mission the way rockstar wants you to instead if you randomly deciding how you want to do it

The video is about how the mission design is linear which is at odds with the open ended map design.

Hey alright

gta 3 was a clunky game mostly, mission design being "linear" is better than the mess gta 3 was for example imo

Why does he look like low poly Hagrid

no questions, alright?

Basically Rockstar's mission design is dogshit and railroads the player into doing exactly what the developer wants to a nonsensical degree.

The "average gamer" will buy the game no matter what.
I bet if you asked most of them they would prefer something that actually respects the player's agency to at least some degree.

He's right...

Idk why people thing it's going to be more similar to rdr 2 than polished ver of gta 5.
When leaks and everything suggest that.
Rdr2 was slow because it world was small and slow and we'll.

HOLY FUCKING
SHIT
IS THAT
IS THAT
STREAMER MANNNNNNN
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOW

LIGHTNING
n shiet

at least $100 and 300 gig

unable to play without upscaling and frame gen

story is 5-6 hours long

90% of content locked behind online subscription

why aren't you having fun?

Genuinely why? GTAV's story was ass. You are genuinely telling me you are conisdering paying 100s of fucking dollars just to see more like it?

true
I get bored of rockstar games after a few story scenes and missions

He's going to buy it anyways

Oh boy I can't wait to listen to some e-celeb's opinion on shit for the 34252345354232525th time

GTA V's story was ass because it had three protagonists who had their own stories and there were only 69 missions so the end result was always gonna be a clusterfuck. GTA VI only has two protagonists and they both share the same story so there's no way it'll be as bad.

I bet if you asked most of them they would prefer something that actually respects the player's agency to at least some degree.

they might say this, but their spending behavior says otherwise. gacha games and mobile games are simultaneously the most predatory and the most profitable games of all time. even if u exclude whales they still take a massive share of the market.

A post containing criticism: "low effort engagement bait"

Another post of Jason abs with a caption "I'm not gay... but" : Totally new and effortful post.

4chaners are fat slob homosexuals confirmed.

I've unironically never liked GTA.

Even back in the day when GTA 3 came out I got shit because I was playing "gay games" like The Bouncer and Final Fantasy X. I gave GTA 3 a try but it was so relentlessly unappaling in every aspect.

I still play gay games til this day and I still don't get "GTA". I did finish 4 and 5 though.

even if u exclude whales they still take a massive share of the market

Prove it

I did finish 4 and 5 though.

What..?

The opinion of an e-celeb that actually plays games matters more than some faggot with a blue checkmark whose primary purpose online is to incite and scam disgruntled boomers.

it's his job to play shitty games so of course he's gonna get it

Yeah alright.

GTA 4 and 5. I "played through the single player campaign" so I could "contribute to the cultural conversation".

I didn't really like them though.

yeah they learned a lot and that's why they decided to girlboss it even more

I meant to say "And...?". Fucking brainfart. Anyway, you just answered anyway, but I still find it funny that after playing through 4 you still gave 5 a chance.

he thinks its only 2

lol.

LOL. its 3.

Either post proof or gtfo

Many enjoy the slower pace of these games and yet there's a solid number of absolute low IQ retards that keep buying and, without fail, complain about them being too slow and boring.
Has it ever crossed your mind that not every game is made with you in mind? It's like if someone kept buying every Street Fighter, and every single time complained about the story not being cinematic enough, or the campaign not rich enough.
Or that in ArmA you can wallrun like in Titan Fall.
It's baffling.

How high can this guy jump

Go play Super Mario if you want to jump, moron.

Rockstar is capable of doing better gameplay with less clunky bullshit and It's more fun that way

Go play mario nigga

retard

Have they showed any gameplay yet?

the whole point is red dead 1 was really fun and red dead 2 is complete tedious dogshit
there's a difference between a game being slow and the game randomly unequipping your fucking weapons every time you get on a horse and forcing you to slowwalk through every fucking camp

nope

No, the fact that you ask for faster/instant looting and higher jumping, means you don't understand what they're going for in a game like RDR2.
It's like the people asking for Dark Souls with free fast travel because muh backtracking and muh convenience, and it fucked up the whole thing.
Not everything has to be turbo snappy, convenient drop in drop out, because ADHD kids can't sit still for 2 hours without checking their phone.

You only play as Jason and Lucia on the tanker at the beginning and after that you play as Raiden for the rest of the game

t. playtester

the whole point is red dead 1 was really fun and red dead 2 is complete tedious dogshit

The opposite is true.
RDR1 had all of the simple mission design, uncreative horde mode missions, go from a to b listening to the dude talk, but none of the immersive open world aspects that at least gave those slower elements a design sense and context.

but red dead was fun, and red dead 2 was so fucking tedious and shitty to actually play I never even finished it
and I'm autistic and only buy games I KNOW I'll like, if I drop a game that means it's EXTREMELY bad
the level of tedium in rdr2 is fucking asinine

too lazy to go get the leaks, but the black guy in the first trailer that has the gold chain, sunglasses, and dreads, is called Kai. In the leak, there are 4 strings bundled. Lucia/Jasion/BILLY(all caps, its the kid and probably place holder) and Kai. Then its just like generic_female_NPC1/2/3/4/etc...

People found Kai is customizable with clothing, and is playable. Not just some model swap. Remember the leak was a real alpha.

Rockstar did do a good job making people forget the alpha was leaked. I would give anything for someone to leak the final game before release. It would literally kill the entire video game industry single handedly

So you're thinking theyr doing a whole Bonnie and Clyde thing, and then add some random third wheel Nig for no reason? They would be retarded.
Unless they pull some RDR2 epilogue type shit, but that only worked because people already loved Marston from RDR1.

I mean they went after the autistic teen which saved him because he got no jail time like the autistic nintendo leaker.

No, apparently Kai is connected to Lucia before she went to jail.

I'm autistic and only buy games I KNOW I'll like, if I drop a game that means it's EXTREMELY bad

Opening this statement by saying you're autistic and then immediately launching into a textbook example of how autists are often struggle with the concept of people having opinions on things that differ from their own perspective is really fucking funny to me.

game delayed a year

faggots on all sides can't help themselves but click bait

tiresome

just watch the story in YouTube

I play more video games than you, I know more about what makes video games fun than you
I am objectively right, and it isn't even a controversial opinion
the fat faggot stoner in the OP literally says the same shit and Anon Babble was flooded with complaints about how much shittier the actual GAME felt to PLAY
there's even that normalfag youtuber who made a video bitching about how stupid and annoying the gameplay is that got over ten million views

Rockstar never recovered from this

meanwhile normalfags have no empathy and cannot fathom anything that challenges their world view because they are completely incapable of logical or rational thinking
I'm autistic and literally all I do is consider every perspective of every situation

this trailer that showcases absolutely zero gameplay proves the game isn't fun to play

Interdasting

The Bouncer

There is not a single thing The Bouncer does that GTA 3-5 don't do better

$60 and 50 gig

super sampling instead of TAA running at 60 fps on a 4060ti

story is 50-60 hours long

extra content in the free online mode over the next decade

holy shit they won so hard, no wonder rockstar keeps winning

This has been said for years. Gta isn't fun as a game, only fun for rpfags, because it's just a nigger-sim with movie functionality. Look at the rp losers right now too, they all play pretending to be niggers running dope as their second-life.

I recall the GTA Online and Red Dead Online missions in future updates being extremely open ended after this video dropped. Might be a sign they're listening and pulling away from the extremely on rails mission design for GTA 6

Definitely not true, but keep riding your faggot oppressor MK2.

GFYS GFYS GFYS

That gives me hope that fun will be allowed again in GTA 6, if that happens I might have to kneel

shooting people is fun
driving is fun
side activities are fun
engaging in a good story is fun

Do you have to play as the female?

I've got news for you buddy, your "objective" criteria are, in fact, subjective, and video games are a highly subjective medium. Not everyone places the same value on the same aspects of a game, as evidenced by the fact that there are multiple posters in this very thread arguing that they enjoyed the slower, more simulator-like approach of the second game and also the fact that RDR2 sold incredibly well and got heaps of rave reviews from users.

normalfags have no empathy and cannot fathom anything that challenges their world view

That is literally what you are doing right now, someone disagreed with your opinion about a video game and you started ranting about how your personal opinions are somehow objective universal immutable truth.

Yes. They're trying to force you into thinking of yourself as female so you'll get yourself castrated. It's literally a grooming tool.

dang I didn't wants to get groomeded

No GTA game is fun.

This sounds like something that could come from both a retard and someone that knows exactly what they are talking about. If the ladder and there's more to this, please tell me more. I know about the Proteus effect.

He used to love story heavy games, what changed? He liked Xenogears ffs

Rockstar games have played worse and worse since they left the PS2. Not because "oh my god older is better" but because it became more and more sim-lite. San Andreas already started some of it, then GTA IV was dreary and shitty with a big emphasis on Euphoria physics. Then Red Dead Redemption took a side step as did Max Payne 3 - and GTA V comes back with even shittier gameplay despite trying to Saints Row itself lightly for tone. And then RDR2 played like festering dogshit heavily focused on immersion over gameplay fun.
If GTA VI is anything like RDR2, or even doubles down on its ideas, the game will be a misery to play.

Wahh so tedious. Maybe rockstar needs to put subway surfers on the side for you zoomers.

Weed vision

No one ever found out the nig was playable you're just regurgitating lies

singlehandedly normalizing the word "retard" again

How does he do it?

Being an Aris fan is not for the retarded of heart. His opinions usually have some truth to them but very often he'll do a hit or miss opinion so you'll have to sift the truth out from a dogshit take. He compares both GTA V and RDR2 to VI as negative examples. While V sucked shit, RDR2 was actually pretty good (yes, even though Arthur had some long animations in that game, it was done pretty competently).

Game will be good if they dial back some of the humor from the previous games to a tasteful degree and actually design the protagonists to be likeable, with V it was very hit and miss. As for the gameplay I'm expecting something in between V and RDR2. If they stop with the 'lmao plan a very linear heist and then execute it to get big moneys' shit and do something more interesting, it's going to be way better than V.

Thank you for reading my blog, have a lust inducing image.

RDR2 was if you play it right.
you are not going to enjoy system shock if you played like an action fps
or dishonored if you played it like fps melee game

Looks fun to me. I'll buy it on PC.

Yeah gta 6 should play like heckin ps2 spyro with glowing pickups and shit
Imagine if nostalgia boomers like this designed aaa games

I'm not even gonna watch that video, I already have a very strong sense his take fucking sucks. We've seen very little of the game so far, the trailers and screenshots only tell you so much, BUT I THINK they WILL make this game a lot more fun and dynamic gameplay wise, and I think it will be even more feature rich. I get the sense there is a group of people who are straight up braindead who don't even want there to be a second allowed in a game where no action is taking place. People who can't even conceive of a relaxing drive just appreciating an environment. I'd be willing to bet it's people who don't just want more fun and more dynamic gameplay, but rather are straight up anti-innovation. Not every game has to have explosions and crazy shit happening every 30 seconds.

This söycunt is retarded and everything he said in that video sounded like faggot talk

They have bad shooting, mediocre driving, mediocre story, and bad sim elements, so yeah. I have no idea how it's the most popular thing ever either, probably the same sort of third-world normalslime that play fifa games.

Also, I am going to stand by that RDR2 is actually not a bad game, and if you think it was boring shit than congratulations it wasn't fucking for you. Game is fantastic, little bit slow, has some gay political correctness, and the nakey jakey criticisms were all right, but outside from that, it offers a great experience, but I don't even think gta 6 is going to be as chill as RDR2. I HOPE is DOES offer some of the things that game did, I want the immersive elements, but I'm sure it will be packed full of action. I think they are going to make something that has substance and LETS you take that in if you so desire, designed in a way so as to not take away from being able to do that, and that's what I WANT it to do.

it's just people who didn't like RDR2 seething about rockstar

*unsheathes katana*

LEAVE. THE CORPORATION. ALONE!

Your level of delusion is hilarious.

MY OPINION IS OBJECTIVE INFALLIBLE TRUTH BECAUSE I PLAY LOTS OF GAMES

again you're struggling to comprehend there are opinions and perspective outside your own. Someone else's (likely neurotically and therefore normal) metrics for what is good can differ from yours. You're not the arbiter of quality.
Or basically, you're not the main character of life. stfu with your autistic ranting.

Yeah no way fag, this has nothing to do with rockstar, I've had criticisms of rockstar more scathing than what any faggot one yehudtube would ever give.

It's a game in development. Why are people talking about like it got released? There is nothing to talk about really.

Probably agree. GTA V and RDR2 were both wildly disappointing.

GTA V was just shit across the board. RDR 2 I'll give it was an absolutely phenomenal artificial world, almost a museum worthy recreation bar the modern sensitivity alterations. However it was still a boring game with a half baked story and very dull gameplay.

RDR1 and GTA IV were their last great games.

It's railroaded like both of those games, except now there is normie sex scenes and a stronk wymyn beating up grown 200 pound men 50% of the time.

GTA V was so bad i don't even remember if it was railroaded or not. The game ended before it even started and every mission felt like some brainless set up level waiting for some pay off later.

I absolutely loved IV so even went in wanting to like V as well.

How could it possibly be less fun than every GTA game from 3 onwards? That makes no sense.

I've seen this sentiment a lot on Anon Babble and didn't understand why. I figured it stemmed from some idiot on youtube. rockstar missions are big set pieces, not immersive sim sandboxes. what freedom are people expecting?

They want it to be an "immersive sim" where you stack boxes. Or maybe they want it to be like le Witcher so you can choose between multiple dialogue options

They went backward since San Andreas. That game had some lite RPG stats. They should have expanded on those RPG elements.

While Rockstar did pioneer the open world genre, they've lagged behind in terms of mission design making use of said world. Most other games would give players the freedom to approach missions multiple ways while R* stubbornly refuses to let go of the leash and just fails the player for attempting to be creative.

There's a few particularly interesting examples in RDR2 where this is an exception. In one sidequest where you have to sneak through a courtyard patrolled by guards while carrying a corpse, you can do it the hard way by listening to what the game tells you to do... or you can put the corpse on your horse, haul ass over to the destination on foot, and call your horse over. In a more story-related scenario after getting back from Guarma, you can choose to (or accidentally) go straight to the new gang camp, and completely skip the shootout in the swamp villa.

For what it's worth, people have been picking on RDR2 about this a lot more than they have for the other games, so with any luck they'll listen to the feedback they've gotten for GTAVI.

if you actually enjoyed the clunky slop of rdr2 you need to kill yourselves so retarded developers stop having an audience for their mechanically dogshit games
you have a literal 40 year old complaining about this shit and you're still spouting oomer buzzwords
you have no intelligence

Watch vid for 5mins

Camera cut every 3-5secs

Randomly interrupts his own explanations by inserting a random meme or skit

I hate vids like these, they're so obnoxious
can't watch this shit

the problem is rdr2 is a direct sequel to a much more fun game
I can directly compare my experience to the original and feel how much shittier it is
undead nightmare is some of the funnest shit rockstar ever made

you're making no sense. gta iv has the same slow ass boring gameplay from rdr2.

my thoughts exactly
it's a beautiful tech demo, but if I don't see any buttons or a character being moved around manually it's basically an animated movie
no gameplay = no game, simple as

Rdr2 is a masterpiece

I was 15 when GTA IV came out

He's a sad little basement dweller who will never get pussy you know.

Rockstar ate Tekken 6 and will shit out GTA VI next year

that fat fuck gets more pussy than you've seen on the internet
being funny and charismatic does wonders

GTA V was pretty fucking boring, so likely true.