Imagine making a western game where you can't kill indians

Imagine making a western game where you can't kill indians.

I'm not american so my sympathies lie with the natives and not the fat yanks that almost genocided them

Dos vaqueros gays comiendo pudding

Both RDR games take place way, way late in the timeline, toward the end of the Wild West.

Crying about genocide like this is faggy because literally every culture which exists today has at some point eradicated another. You only say this shit because you have a hateboner and need something to cry about.

wahhhh mean Rockstar won't let me shoot people

actually every culture has killed one another and you are the whiner for not caring about my whining

You only say this shit because you have a hateboner and need something to cry about.

It's ironic...

That’s the point OP. By this point in western history almost all the natives were in camps on reservations. RDR is about how the West is dying and “civilization” is replacing it

The Skinners have Indians.

no u

I didn’t start bitching about genocide that was you.

So you acknowledge you’re whining and have to say I’m OP to cope.

This. Before the white man showed up, America was a happy place. They had flowery meadows, and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate where the children laughed and danced and played with gumdrop smiles!

sean peen.png - 1000x753, 924.97K

Before white man show up, land black free

We need a train game where we put the real savage Indians on reservations.

IMG_1088.png - 1000x613, 927.91K

Yes that’s was the (((white))) man.

how dumb and historically illiterate do you have to be to believe the jews were single-handedly responsible for chattel slavery in the US?

i’d rather play as the native

The game is like 50 years removed from the time period

thats like ww1

almost

literally every culture which exists today has at some point eradicated another

literally wrong faggot

Name one

most tribes pushed other tribes out of prime land. not even the comanche or mexica were systematically genociding anyone.

not all tribes were warlike, like the nez perce.

literally every culture which exists today has at some point eradicated another

MODERN culture? because i don't think the diesappeareance of etruchs blamed on early romans has the same weight on italians that slaying the indians has on burgers talking about "their land and culture"

culture is a rich man invention to keep faggots like you down in the social hierarchy

Yes, the games take place in the late 1800s early 1900s. RDR1 takes place just a few years before WW1 in 1911.

the nez perce, the cheyenne, the creek, seminole, cherokee, navajo, hopi, shawnee, wichita, osages, chichimeca, tarascans, etc.

these cultures were not genociding their way across the continent. you don't read or understand history

how are things going in wasrael?

little bighorn was a little over 20 years ago by the time of arthur's campaign, so 50's off.

Look up who owned the ships, retard. Also it was recently discovered that Columbus was a jew as well and he began that shit.

perfect victim

i swear the noses just keep peeking from every corner

these cultures were not genociding their way across the continent

Yeah they were just killing rival tribes in their own areas and taking their woman and land.

it's a common trope in westerns to talk about "the old days". they did nothing revolutionary with this timeline. so what are the old days? probably the 1950s-60s. im not sure what their obsession with the decline of the west is, probably seems deeper and more mature to them.

the spanish only started importing african slaves on the recommendation of a catholic priest who protested the enslavement of the natives. at that point, the spanish had already cratered the native population in the the Caribbean, anyways. accept responsibility for your sins.

Almost like it doesn’t matter and the only reason the guild narrative is being pushed today is because someone benefits from demoralizing people and telling them to be ashamed of their history. But who would do such a thing?

Our socio-political landscape is so left wing that even far rightoids condemn slavery and try to pin it on da jooz, this is progress.

And who caused that to happen? And again who owned the ships?

accept responsibility for your sins

lol, no I’m good with you kike guilt complex shit.

not all of them, not all the time, not systematically, and never at the scale Anon Babble "historians" would lead you to believe. most tribes could barely afford to lose a dozen warriors a summer.

This is why GUN is the best western games as you can scalp indians.

the european demand for slave labor to fund their brother wars back home. you're stupid and think like a child. i won't respond to you again

well certantly NOT an opposition to someone hyping you up to convince (you) they're doing (you)r interestsin sending all your money to someone committing similar crimes.
no it's just antiamericanism, no need to look into that, we'll deport you if you do

yes. they had a deep and spiritual connection to nature unlike the average consoomer amerishart.

not all of them, not all the time, not systematically

Gotta love how they have to stack copes like this in order to act like their fantasy savage that lived as a harbinger of the land and didn’t killed their fellow man and wipe tribes is somehow real and not something they use to make people feel bad for doing what has been done for millennia.

And now the kike jumps from pretending to be a trad cath to pretending to be a white supremacist in order to find the right niche for which he can use to claim that I am wrong.

won't respond to you again

See how he loses faith so quickly and runs.

it's a fact that not all tribes were warlike, and many entered into longstanding alliances, like the comanche and utes for about a century. do you think subsistence tribes were fielding and losing thousands of warriors a year like the europeans?

they were not perfect

the white muttrican is perfect

hence things --> better

POLU.mp4 - 640x572, 1.87M

I’m not sending my money anywhere since I don’t pay taxes. But please tell me how you fund them? I mean why should i support anyone else when I can support my home?

it's a fact that not all tribes were warlike

Bullshit, war is a part of being human, acting like a people that have existed for centuries never entered conflict or killed their fellow man and destroyed culture is asinine.

Aren't some of these from america? Weren't indigenous from that land of nothing killing each other or making human sacrifices all the fucking time?

name one

Ancient Egypt
Ancient Persia

I remember hearing some of the more consistently generous and passive tribes ended up just getting betrayed by white people.

Way to go FAG. You really made a difference didn't you FAG?

Notice how the jew has to attempt a gotcha by saying that calling out his attempt to blame others for their actions for things a perpetuate conflict and distract from his ill doings is somehow left wing.

no, it's just retards like you assume reality is supposed to conform to your ignorance, instead of the other way around. i'm sure it was the jews who told the first new englanders to strip the east coast of all that virgin wood. it's silly and unserious

war's also expensive. you go into conflict when you need to.

no

lmao, you are literally falling into the good old "I'm an evil bastard, so other people must have been evil too, and I can't fathom anyone being better than me so it isn't possible." cope some people push to excuse their own evil actions.

You tell me, I’m sure mossad has you working in overdrive to pull as many psyop as you can.

First of all, what history? There is no known history before Europeans came.

Are you saying they never went to war with each other? Are you implying the impulse to conquer is European?

There is no known history before Europeans came.

there is very little
and i wonder why that might be

kike comes back after saying he was leaving

drop seconds larp

tries to change subject

Really can’t help yourself eh, vile schlomo?

Ehhhh GUN already did that. And the story in RDR2 benefits from being so focused

Yeah almost like any remains of those other tribes were destroyed? But how there were plenty of people living peacefully? How could they die? Man famine must be hard especially the kind that leaves blunt force trauma.

you can, they're just all wearing sombreros

First of all, what history? There is no known history before Europeans came.

semantics. they had oral traditions, and a sense of who they were and where they came from. something the american will never know or understand

Are you implying the impulse to conquer is European?

the impulse to dominate and domesticate the wildernesses of america was uniquely european, yes. even the comanche, who were beginning to produce a proto-capitalist class of their own before their decline, never thought to eradicate the buffalo strictly for profit

imagine a western game where you can't even go to mexico

i mean i get it that they were going for more of a marlboro commercial theme, but that red poster baits you to believe it's some gritty italo western in the sierras and then you get... this

you're just a retard living in his brainrot mirror ball. i hope one day you pierce through to the real

paddles back on the perfect victim rethoric

*yawn maybe i shoud just visit vg

something the american will never know or understand

This is a uniquely retarded cope due to the fact it’s very easy to find out one’s origins. Honestly I’m curious where you come from? Seething eurofag? Third worlder? Or actually godamn Indian.

no

Source? You said so?

I'm kind of surprised that there weren't more Indians in RDO, but then again they fucked up RDO support in general it seems so there's little content there compared to the updates that GTAO gets. Then again, apparently there is some sort of RedM modding (parallel to FiveM) for RP servers with custom content, so who knows if someone there added Indians, or playable KKK or whatever the fuck else.

Notice how when called out on his lie the like will start hurling insults and go into a frenzy.

What victim rhetoric? Is it victim rhetoric to point out reality and human nature? Or how tribal warfare occurred?

Video games???

they were factually not killing each other all the time, and to believe that subsistence tribes who were on the brink of starvation almost half the year were constantly engaged in warfare for its own sake was ludicrous.

a mutt getting told his great great grandfather was a czech who settled in chicago is not the same as having a cosmological vision of who you are as a person and people. like i said, you don't understand and never will. all americans are the eternal orphans of history, it's why they're so miserable and aggressive. deep down in their flouridated hearts they know they don't belong anywhere

This is an RDR2 thread, it’s just Anon Babble run off that could cut it so have to come here hoping that things will be easier. And they’re discovering it isn’t.

i'm sure it was the jews that made selling buffalo hides profitable and led to the near-extinction of the species in less than decade, not eastern industrialists or british tanners overseas.

yeah, like the nez perce who were pushed off their land without provocation. the cherokee were also dead set on assimilating into white culture, and were pushed off by land-hungry southerners.

i can't be fucking bothered with this retardation
have a chatgpt explanation:
The "asking for a perfect victim" rhetoric refers to a pattern of argument or criticism where victims of harm, abuse, or injustice are discredited or dismissed because they do not meet an unrealistic or idealized standard of behavior, character, or credibility. It’s a form of victim-blaming that demands victims be *flawless* or *morally pure* in order to be believed, supported, or seen as deserving of justice.

### Key Characteristics:

* **Scrutiny of the victim's actions** more than the perpetrator's.
* **Highlighting irrelevant flaws** in the victim’s past or lifestyle (e.g., drinking, clothing, sexual history).
* **Implying that only “perfect” victims deserve justice**, such as those who never made mistakes, reacted calmly, or immediately reported the harm.
* **Used to undermine credibility**, particularly in cases of sexual assault, domestic violence, or racial injustice.

### Example:

* If someone reports being assaulted and the response is: “Why were they out so late?” or “Why didn’t they go to the police right away?” — those questions may be rooted in “perfect victim” expectations.

This rhetoric is often criticized because it distracts from the perpetrator’s actions and deters victims from coming forward.

Would you like examples from media or public discourse where this has been used?

Noticing you haven’t said where you are from. So I’m assuming you’re some shitskin having a tantrum over the states due to your inherent inferiority complex.

you don't understand and never will

Oh I know who I am quite well. A great spirit of freedom and self determination runs in my veins and I am the one who stands on his own yet am never alone. But you wouldn’t know what that’s like because your heart and mind have been poisoned both by your own ingrained self loathing due to your physical, mental, and spiritual inefficiencies. And your own societal insecurity. So you lash out and look for anything to make you feel bigger and better to cope with you own failing and short comings. I would feel bad for you but it would be a waste of time, given you don’t want to unfuck yourself.

Funny how you try to change the subject yet again after going ape shit. Almost like you know you fucked up.

this mindbreaks the mutt mind: the violence that europeans were capable of was orders of magnitude greater than a few tribal skirmishes every summer. to say nothing of the ecological devastation. the mutt cannot comprehend differences of scope/severity/depth. such a strange, childish people

Because they couldn’t read or write

the impulse to domesticate a place that Europeans domesticated is uniquely European

No shit. Every culture develops an impulse to domesticate their surroundings, and Europeans had the technology and will to make their surroundings a lot bigger. No one can speak to what native Americans would’ve became had they become sufficiently civilized, but you can look at the rest of the world. Aren’t there rivers of plastic in India & Southeast Asia? Why is Africa such a shithole?

He’s a simple answer to that. Vae Victis, don’t cry about losing when you did the same shit to everyone else and felt no remorse.

these kinds of psychologizations are so effeminate. americans always act like this

the jews were single-handedly responsible for all the sins of the white race in the white world

bring up cases where believing something like this would be absurd

you keep changing the subject

you're stupid, man. just fucking braindead

This, men create war and women create life. That's why you should respect women.

Don’t talk to yourself son, I know you think it will make it look like people agree with you but it just shows how desperate you are for validation.

few tribal skirmishes every summer

Yes tell that to all of the burial mounds and mass graves. I’m sure those children with their skulls caved in who died centuries before the columbian exchange just got sick or succumbed to the elements.

is not the same as having a cosmological vision of who you are as a person and people

Yeah you’re clearly Indian I mean that in a good way

now you're jsut making assumptions on a history yourself recognise lost
i also fucking wonder how that "don't cry" mentality would be upheld when the mutts get scrathed in the slightest

again.png - 714x483, 631.34K

No one can speak to what native Americans would’ve became had they become sufficiently civilized

i can. the comanche were, for all intents and purposes, an empire, and they did not immediately begin envisioning themselves as conquerors of nature, or become serial hoarders. comanche chief who hoarded their wealth were looked down upon. so this chud teleology you're assuming has no basis in reality. read a book and stop getting your history from Anon Babble, ingrate. pic rel was written by a finnish historian

meant for

So you are samefagging, good to know the kike is still as pathetic as usual.

these kinds of psychologizations are so effeminate

More like you don’t have a connection with yourself, your blood, or the greater world at large due to being part of a transient race with no land and nothing aside from endless grudges and bitterness so you have to project that onto everyone else. You brag about ways to spit in your own god’s face and the cry when he abandons you.

you're stupid, man. just fucking braindead

It’s good to see in the end all you can do is just wriggle around and argue with yourself. You ended that argument about sin when your larp failed and you tried to run off. Restarting it isn’t going to change anything and just shows you need to run in circles just to stand get by. Rather neurotic, which is common among jews.

On the scale of Europe, conquering America was akin to a tribal skirmish. Europeans being capable of it isn’t a fault of their character, it’s a testament the technological / civilizational level they attained

snore

on the scale of europe, the dresden firebombings were a house fire

faggy word games. get a grip

that's a valid justificaiton

Real men join the military and die in wars, that is we as a species are doomed. Also how dare you be anti-war and real play video games instead that is pure cringe!

Not only that, if you start firebombing their cultural sites a rainstorm magically appears and puts it out.

now you're jsut making assumptions on a history

I’m not, and you know it? Your entire prerogative so far has been to either lie or act as if Americas problems are specifically unique in order to paint them as being especially egregious when that’s not the case.

i also fucking wonder how that "don't cry" mentality would be upheld when the mutts get scrathed in the slightest

Yes I’ve seen this before. If I say I don’t care you’ll call me a psychopath and just resort to ad hominem while painting me as a monster that doesn’t care about his own people. And if I say I do you will say that I’m a hypocrite. So I will simply say this. It is as it is for all people that I care about my own. If we fall then we were not strong enough to survive and thus time will take us. If we are harmed and live then it is a lesson to learn from and grow. If we are able to pay back those responsible for the harm, then we must do so in a way that we will not have to again. It’s simple shit.

kike has to pretend he doesn’t care after getting btfo

Your spirit can’t match mine. Enjoy an eternity of self loathing with the rest of the spiteful mutants.

they were especially egregious, not even the ottomans or chinese were committing ecocide a hemisphere away. you lack all perspective. a single homicide doesn't justify serial murderer.

You could say the same about much of ancient Europe. Thats where American Indians were as a civilization. Thousands of years behind Europe

Impotently posting passive aggressive shit like this isn’t going to stop you from being a spiteful mutant.

history isn't linear. i don't measure progress by the destruction of the natural environment. new englanders were forced to export the choicest lumber to the britain because anglos had already deforested their entire island. you're just bloodthirsty locusts

if you had a masculine spirit you'd stand your ground and defend your points calmly and rationally instead of assuming things about me and my life like a woman.

Notice how the kike has to yet again change the subject to ecocide while avoiding how there was a small ice age caused by forest being burned away for farmland by the Indians.

Notice how the kike has to say I’m not a man for not allowing him to get away with running in circles and using his underhanded tactics. Insults are all he has. He needs to attempt to provoke me into making an emotional decision in order to prove myself to him. This is coming from the same person that will say men can get pregnant of course.

no tribe on the continent was practicing agriculture on a scale large enough to change the climate. the only ones that even could were confined to the eastern forests. or do you think the ancestors of the lakota were all farmers? the apaches only became sedentary after the comanches pushed them out of buffalo territory in the southwest. i keep dabbing on you with historical facts and knowledge and you have nothing to say

Your entire prerogative so far has been to either lie or act as if Americas problems are specifically unique in order to paint them as being especially egregious when that’s not the case.

believe whatever you want to, no matter the written conversations being proof of anyhting

painting me as a monster that doesn’t care about his own people

now that's just not somehing i said, are you ok anon? are those your thoughts leaking out?

ad hominem

i guess drawing parallels to undeline bias in the application of mentalities is "ad hominem" now

If we fall then we were not strong enough to survive and thus time will take us

it doesn't HAVE to be like that, someone can just decide not to kill you for your land and there you go, you survived. convincing oneself that this is how things are and there's nothing we can do about it is not a happy way to live, it's not a provenly right way to live, and it won't make things better by definition

A bombing during a world war?

It doesn’t need to be justified. It gave birth to America, a country that led the world into the era of massive progress that we’re living in. Seems like it was a good thing

BUFFALO DIARRHEA

i back up my claims with facts. all you have are headlines and these really effeminate normie deflections and presumptions that you think make you sound cool and stoic but just make you look like a dweeb.

Notice how all the kike can do is deny the facts while naming off a few tribes and acting smug so to make it seem as if he isn’t losing himself over his narrative failing. Slash and burn farming was extremely common in the Americas and there were more groups than just the tribes you listed doing this shit.

America, a country that led the world into the era of massive progress that we’re living in

surely that's america's definition, don't ask any country who dared TRYING to elect a non altright "all-gibs-to-the-US" kinda guy, surely only the good parts are america's product and everything bad is because of the red antichrist or smth

you’re just a bunch of bloodthirsty locusts

Now do modern China

they didn't practice slash and burn farming on a scale to trigger an ice age you loon. even if they did, why didn't the new englanders deforesting the east coast in under a century trigger a worse ice age? all you have are these 9th grade social studies factoids, kek. fucking retard.

believe whatever you want to, no matter the written conversations being proof of anyhting

Here he can’t argue and has to say that nothing he says will matter due to the fact he knows he cannot argue. Yet he tried so hard to say otherwise. This is how you can tell he has little to know faith in his own words and his beliefs are hollow.
now that's just not somehing i said, are you ok anon
Notice how since his original plan was called out he has to now paint me as being mentally unwell, of course this fails as well due to the fact that he is currently pretending to be multiple people.

it doesn't HAVE to be like that

It does, it is the nature of mankind and the world itself. You cannot fight yourself. You may try but you will end up in a grave or killing those that tried to take advantage of your passiveness. But you know that.

there's nothing we can do about it is not a happy way to live

Not really, I know where my priorities lie, I know what I must do, I am not fighting myself to live up to a standard that leaves me weak. But of course you want it because you need for people to be weak to do your bullshit.

A bombing during a world war?

yes, a bombing during a world war that the europeans - because of their complexity and technological advancement - were uniquely capable of. there is nothing in the archaeological evidence of the americas that even hints at a conflict of similar scale. it's thermodynamically impossible. the europeans were able to extract more energy from the earth, hence they were able to expend more energy in warfare. same principle that led to the rise of the comanche as an equestrian society: their horses were able to exploit all the energy contained in the prairie grasses which, previously, they had relied on the buffalo for.

just stop with the faggoty narration, bro. it's cringe.

Progress is the only definition. In 200 years humanity got trains, cars, phones, the light bulb, the internet, AI that can pass the Turing test. Like 60 years after the first plane flight, humanity landed on the moon. The defining actor here is America. After America, it’s the Europe you seem to hate

Your claims are those of someone that gave up and is trying desperately to reignite something out of desperation. You lost when you said you wouldn’t reply again and now you’re just throwing a fit in hopes that you can somehow change that fact. It’s over. You may continue as you wish but that won’t change the fact you tried to run after larping failed.

effeminate normie deflections and presumptions that you think make you sound cool and stoic

You once again try to taunt me into engaging your attempt to reignite what you lost, and if you are the one that believes these things. I have not said anything about sounding cool or stoic. A slip of the tongue tells more than you know.

Did new englander burn down the forests? Also why is it that you insist on pretending to be multiple people like this?

So, not a skirmish then?

It's a shame that they had to ruthlessly kill the other people who also had a deep and spiritual connection to nature to take their belongings.

Once again all the kike can do is hurl insults. He mocked my spirit and blood yet he himself can not stand up for himself when his is called into question. Say what you will but it was not I that started this, it was you, if you do not like it then you should have said nothing and gone back to your hole.

in fact, they did during the winter - their need for firewood during the winter decimated the new england forests. and do you think every square mile of the continent was on fire because of the indians, or something? what a completely ridiculous picture

i dont adress false samefagging alligations, that's just wasting time on something that is somehow supposed to undermine the core arguent but just doesn't.
i also don't have the capabiliies of waking up someone who's pretending to sleep, i can sure try to not make fun of someone appealing to emotions and be charitable (oh retarded me) just to get another walltext of irrelevant debatelord jerkoff material of course.
i think i'll go do something productive now you have fun in that banana republic tho

burning logs is the same as starting massive forest fires

Is dishonesty the only weapon you have? It seems you are unable to actually engage normally which you yourself said was feminine.

it was mostly warriors fighting warriors. killing women and children routinely during horse raids or something would trigger reprisals that weren't worth it, and there was little honor in killing women. not that they couldn't be cruel to their enemies, but again, it comes down to this: americans backreading their pathology into every culture on earth.

Europeans weren't capable of more violence. Violence is in human nature. Europeans had just better technology and nothing more.

war is a part of being human

not all peoples are equally human

The kike knows he cannot beat the allegations that have been put before him, so he ignores them while also making an excuse as to why if he was it would not matter. Which seems counter intuitive to what he said about not addressing allegations.

i also don't have the capabiliies of waking up someone who's pretending to sleep

How would you know they are sleeping? That is a very odd assumption to land on when you don’t know what timezone they are in and don’t know who they even are? Unless you do, but this seems more a red herring to make this seem like a raid and not you pretending to be multiple people

just to get another walltext of irrelevant debatelord jerkoff material of course.

Notice how the kike tries to dismiss what I have said by crying about the volume and saying I am irrelevant but still replies anyway.

i think i'll go do something productive now you have fun in that banana republic tho

He once again pretends to leave while giving a smug retort he will either come back or simply pretend to be someone else in the next reply.

they didn't practice agriculture on a scale that warranted "massive" forest fires. woodland indians were not converting millions of acres of cleared forest into plantations. there is no evidence in the ecological record for it. you have simply no idea what the fuck you're talking about. the europeans were orders of magnitude more destructive and wasteful, and they had to be because they were not mobile bands of hunter-gatherers like the northern new england tribes or part-time agriculturalists like the southern tribes who had to change their food sources depending on the season. read a book

There is more to genocide than killing everyone, like if you breed them out of existence, and war brides are always popular no matter what group takes them.

europeans weren't capable of more violence, they simply had the means to be capable of it on an unprecedented scale

retard

tl;dr word salad, apply brevity to the volume of your insights if you want them to be read
try something like "shut up jew" for the next one for the same effect at a hundredth of the wordcount

name one (1) tribe that the comanche, arguably the most warlike of any american indian tribe and the most powerful west of the Iroquois, systematically genocided/bred out of existence. was it the Utes? the Apaches? the Osages?

Notice how the kike has to fall back to his previous argument after comparing burning logs to a Forrest fire failed. Also note how despite making that big scene in his last reply he is still here like I said. He will most likely try to feign ignorance and claim that I am mentally ill for saying this and use it as a method to deflect away from his current debacle of an argument.

there is no evidence in the ecological record for it. you have simply no idea what the fuck you're talking about

Notice how he has to attempt to bring up ecological evidence now when prior he tried to equate a forest fire to people cutting down a forest and burning logs. And it would make sense given slash and burn farming deprives the soil of nutrients quickly so it needs to constantly occur and be done. It is not millions of acres but just enough to cause something bad to happen.

nta

indian history is so tightly 'curated' in a bottle of censored script that this discussion is basically pointless without either side having legible documentation available to prove their points
and this is the videogame board
you're deepdiving a little too hard for content that's just going to be janny'd if it reaches any meaningful conclusion

tl;dr word salad, apply brevity to the volume of your insights if you want them to be read
try something like "shut up jew" for the next one for the same effect at a hundredth of the wordcount

kek, you're a waste of my time. dude judging the ecological practices of tribes who had millennia to adapt to their environment vs. retarded new englanders who cut down so many trees so fast that the spring snows melted faster and caused catastrophic floods. braindead mutt. i'm tired of this.

i'm only asking these armchair indigenous historians to put their money where their mouth is. i'm by no means an expert but my knowledge vastly outweighs theirs. it's why they can only default to culture war scripts

Notice how the jew thinks himself clever by trying to trivialize and act as if my words do not bother him. Notice how yet again he returns here to complain despite claiming to have better things. He can not leave for he has seen his greatest fear. One that he considers cattle standing its ground and causing him to not just stumble but shatter.

apply brevity to the volume of your insights if you want them to be read

If you did not read every word you would not feel the need to return and continue as you do, they hang in your mind and linger causes you discomfort and anger the more you let them stay unanswered.

What ecological practices? The tribe did not record what they did and not all tribes did the same thing, you’re currently trying to argue on something you have no evidence for while claiming there is evidence to back you up.

retarded new englanders

A people of spirit and heritage, you hate them so because they show you what you will never have. They built a nation, you seek to destroy and subvert.

It seems that the kike has been broken, he has nothing and is just flailing into the void. I do not pity him for he suffers because of his ego which is what got him into this situation in the first place. Now go back to your hole and tell your fellows you failed. They will see past your lies, you are clearly not the best they have to offer, if you were you would be on Anon Babble.

If you did not read every word

i didn't
skimming and reading between the lines to gauge context is pretty great, it lets you determine contents without processing them
i'm not the alleged jew you were replying to, sorry for interrupting

CUBHZxh.png - 252x234, 26.91K

we're starting to lose, deploy the AI

kek

post a book where these practices are explained in detail and with evidence

it is unthinkable that the colonists documented the practices of the tribes they came into contact with

abububu, what practices, bro?

all right, I'm going to get some chores done

it's a discussion that only has one 'objective truth' because all we know is what we're allowed to know, eg. massively edited wiki 'history' pages that are so up their own ass with indigenous favoritism that they're borderline pointless or outright indoctrination at worst

i think topics like these are really easy to 'high road' people on and you're just taking advantage of that
maybe that's not such a bad thing

The kike now has to continue his lie while he acts as if he does not care. He also fulfilled what I said before and claims in a way he thinks is off handed that he is another person despite he is the only one that would be this enamored with what is being posted and that he posted it twice for two separate posts.

because all we know is what we're allowed to know, eg. massively edited wiki 'history' pages

or books written by relatively unbiased, serious historians. cozzens, the two i posted, ambrose, others. never once in this thread have i argued that the indians were pacifist tree huggers who did no wrong. they were terrors when they drank, the comanche raped their captives, while the shawnee had a religious prohibition on rape. the reality is always more interesting and complicated than these pre-digested culture war scripts.

that he posted it twice for two separate posts.

i actually don't know what that was about, maybe the original guy really liked what i typed up
maybe he's just a bot or really lazy

32U2iwU.png - 173x411, 18.49K

A book where the practices of many people throughout centuries without any written languages were shown? At most it is speculation or what little could be transcribed by colonists. You know that yet you still declare it to be the truth.

the practices of the tribes

Yes the tribes that existed and died before their arrival were definitely documented by them.

all right, I'm going to get some chores done

The kike for a third time pretends to leave, he gives up on yet another argument and acts smug in order to make it look like he is unbothered. He will return wearing a different mask as he has already.

Notice how the kike now shows he is posting from his phone and tries to feign ignorance when there are many ways to explain what occurred. The simplest would be he posting from a private browser and a regular browser, more complex would be kuroba, and even more complex would be posting from two devices such as his phone and computer.

you can snipe them from outside the camp, or even trample them with your horse

imagine RDR2, a cowboy outlaw wild west game

in which you cant actually do any cowboy outlaw wild west shit

all you can do is go fishing in a river

if you try to shoot somebody, 900 cops with GPS satellite thermal navigation will immidiately pop up 5 meters behind you and ruin whatever fun you had planned to have

thanks rockstar.

accusing me is the phoneposting is the most offensive bullshit you've come up with yet
you are a scoundrel and a wretch, good day

First RDR was peak, last good game rockstar made.

all we need to know is that rdr2 is a trash pozzed woke game, doesnt matter if we're replying to a jew or not.

go to where you find the Warped Brindle Arabian

go to the top of the hill

pull out sniper

start massacring indians

profit?

but the screenshots look kinda pretty! blurry and pixelated, but kinda pretty!

rdr2 is a trash pozzed woke game

it's more accurate to place this accusation on rockstar itself as a developer/publisher studio, otherwise you're ignoring the disease to spite the symptoms
gta4 was arguably the last game they ever made that was free from modern globalist ideology

there was no genocide, they had weak immune systems and that's why they died

What PC formats screencaps like that? And why did you crop out the ui?

saar pls no kill

Da jooz is sponsable fur all da bad fings dat eba happun, da toofbrush man sed so.

Because it's not a western but a game with a western setting with an ideology

i've been using an unupdated version of sharex for years

And why did you crop out the ui?

are my porn tabs really that relevant

they had immune systems that weren't adapted to european pathogens on account of being isolated an ocean away.

RDR2 is a downgrade from 1 in everything but graphics and people ate that shit up cause they're retarded.

It is downgrade in graphics too as far as aesthetics go.