So which one are the actual good guys and why?

LOL. no good guys. The least bad ones are tencent.

Is there just a list of shit that gpt can't talk about?

I checked out with AC3 since I unironically thought they were building towards a modern game with Desmond and was bummed that he died and that it was so stupid.

Last thing I remember was that the templars won since in AC4 they were using assassin memories to create a fucking game or some shit.

ask gpt

Why would you ask chat gpt anything about anything and then post what it says online. Why would you do literally free manual labour for a bot. What the actual fuck.

the templars, since they are christians

So which one are the actual good guys and why?

They are both bad, the good one is actually the new Witch faction in the Assassin's Creed: Hexe because women are always right.

renamed jews vs jewish goy slaves

Who cares

In AC1? Assassins with caveats. After that game the ideological conflict between the two factions becomes irrelevant.

"Something something too long have the squabbles of men thrown the world in chaos"

I can see it

The Assassins allied with Karl Marx for God's sake.

Only the modern day stuff was good and they ruined it after desmond

Templars because I can't play as Hassan of Serenity from FGO in any AC game so the order of Assassin's means nothing to me in that universe.

AC1: True Bad Guy was an Assassin

AC2 + Brotherhood: Templars were the Bad Guys

AC3 + Rouge: Everyone except Washington were the bad guys

Black Flag: Everyone but the pirates (except Kenway) were bad, Kenway redeems himself at the end

Unity: Everyone is a retard

everything after: no one fucking cares

There you go

Oh

Revelations: Everyone is a retard

Assassins are jews

depends if the story is actually well written or it's for hollywood tier eziobabs

Assassins are The Resistance™

They exposed too much with glyph puzzles in AC2 and were told to (((shut it down))).
Modern ACs are a dumbed down parody of the first few games.

Is there just a list of shit that gpt can't talk about?

(((Assassins))) & Templars
The Synagogue of Satan and anything involving them (JFK assassination, 9/11 etc etc etc)
The Holohoax and MRNA "vaccines".

At this point I don't even know what the Templars want. They've basically more or less won and succeeded. After Desmond dies the modern day plot basically devolves into

You are Templar working for Templars

You are ex Templar recruited by Assassins

You are Assassin Jr who's just on the run from Templars or doing Assassin Jr Intern things for Assassins

Even all the modern day Isu/Juno shit got resolved offscreen in a comic.
The franchise just feels like it's going through the motions with it's actual original plot points of Templar and Assassins and just wanna be pseudo-historical simulators and has increasingly felt like that since Black Flag.

Templars are a threat to our democracy.

It's all just Star Wars. Everything is Star Wars.

youtube.com/watch?v=I_To-cV94Bo

Five minutes watch. Then we can talk.
Take the history pill.

Sooo what do the templars even lose in the new modern scenarios?

This is pisslam, keep in mind they always left with slaves. Always.

It basically boils down to the Assassins keeping new games Isu McGuffin out of their hands.
But as major conflict is concerned. The assassins have been on the losing end of the modern narrative since the beginning. With only the Desmond games feeling like you're seeing any on screen progress against the Templars

And this is The crusades, meant to protect Christian in the Middle East, not loot.

All I know is which one makes my dick harder

It's easy to forget, but the setting of Assassin's Creed was quite a bit different in AC1. Highlights include:

Abstergo being investigated by the US federal government for bio-terrorism

parts of the US are implied to be uninhabitable due to american migrants flooding the mexican border

Africa being almost entirely depopulated by a plague

an increasing frequency of natural disasters

Abstergo wasn't all-powerful, and Vidic was being rushed because the templars appear to have lost all their previous "apples" which puts them at risk of losing their influence. Vidic only claimed that Abstergo can't be stopped to intimidate and demoralise Desmond.

It's less about good and evil, and more freedom vs order. Both sides do undeniably evil things because they believe the end justifies the means. Assassins safeguard people's right to choose their own path, even if it leads to chaos; templars believe there can only be peace when they have total control over the world, but this also necessitates war and bloodshed.

Neither side is immune to the temptation to abuse their position for personal gain and greed. Assassins have been shown to put tradition and code above their purpose, at the expense of innocent lives. Meanwhile, templars exploit their control over society for personal gain, instead of merely seeking stability. At the same time, both sides have also noble figures that recognize the issues in their own.

In short, it depends on the time and place

The ezio trilogy soundtracks are overrated.

then post at least 1 (one) memorable track from the sequels

sequels

Those are even worse, AC1 has the best OST.

It had all of one memorable track
youtu.be/LLMpQJK_ugc?si=GbeoFzmHoGv_gPkz