“Optimization” is a meme, you just own a shitbox and need to learn your place

Nobody gives a shit that your 3060/3070/AMD shitbox rig can’t run new games because they’re “poorly optimized” or because “Unreal 5 bad because Twitter/youtubeman said so!”

Get a better source of income than working at McDonald’s/Walmart or just stick to playing old games that everyone already played 5+ years ago. We don’t care. Raytracing looks incredible but poorfaggots will continue to seethe because they can’t experience the technology. It’s like a tiny fly buzzing in your ear when you’re just trying to discuss the latest ludokino. Nobody cares. Shut the fuck up! You probably shouldn’t even be playing video games if you’re too poor to be properly experiencing new titles at 4k/60fps with Raytracing.

IMG_9164.png - 300x471, 203.73K

Kill all billionaires.

I just farted and now everyone's looking at me.

Sir this is a Wendy's

Eat shit and die OP. Games are being released that stutter on 4080.

Found the scalper

I agree.
I will now buy a scalped $5000 graphics card.

actual paid nvidia shill more likely, scalper would be using much worse grammar

Why does this tomato have a beard?

trustfund babies will never not be hilariously pathetic

We can't excuse that the oblivion remaster is asking for 32gb of ram in it's recommended requirements without seeing this as an abject failure from an actual software engineering perspective. Likewise we can't defend it's performance on an RTX 5090. Maybe people in the industry shouldn't have the jobs that they have if they're willing to drop all standards overnight.

the fact that this guy is a politician proves the world is a joke

Games don't even run well on top end hardware half the time, kill yourself.

Games barely look better than they did on the Xbox One X, which is a RX 580 with a laptop CPU. Absolutely zero reasons why they should run as bad as they do on modern hardware

Because leftists will admonish you for making fun of other people's appearances, while making fun of other people's appearances.

This. Only 70 year olds that are tech illiterate should be politicians.

stuttering has nothing to do with graphics cards but what can i expect from an nvidiot

This is literally not true. The fact that game can look like a 2015 slop and still run like fucking ass is NOT okay.

Post specs. And I mean timestamped.

Ive got a RTX 4090 and Unreal Engine runs like shit on 50% of the titles I've tried. guess why?
badly optimized code from shitty devs, Sherlock.

Anon Babble defending pajeet optimization now

Have you said thank you to Microsoft or Nintendo even once since they hiked up the prices?

the card has nothing to do with how well it runs, your pc is just slow

Nobody gives a shit that your 3060/3070/AMD shitbox rig can’t run new games

experiencing new titles at 4k/60fps with Raytracing

A 5090 can't even do 4k60 with gaytracing on unless you upscale from 1080p and turn on fake frames.

Retarded take when even the best hardware on the market still can't run 4k and 144frames on these "AAA" games.

9800X3D and a 4090.
Games aren’t optimized at all and engines like UE5 try their best to make open world games unplayable even on top end machines.

If 99% of the market is a "shitbox" it becomes a problem for the dev, not the shitbox user.

2131231.png - 793x377, 34.94K

get a 5090 and a SSD poorfag

I have three NVMe SSDs for games. You can look up any DigitalFoundry UE5 video to know why none of that removes traversal stutter and god forbid if the devs skipped full shader compilation (the majority)

IMG_8773.jpg - 1179x1249, 145.84K

games run and look worse now because they expect you to have DLSS on by default.

Good morning sars

Yeah well rasheed, the issue is that poor optimization is part of planned "obsolesce".
AAA publishers realized it is better to deliver bloated games that barely run at all on recommended specs because it de-incentivizes user made content, so only the devs can release content for the game, usually paid content like skins and maybe a new gun every blue moon. These games take so much space you are taking the user device hostage which is another bonus.

It is all a happy consequence that emerged when executives from foreign industries took over the hobby and decided to run the industry like a fast food chain, all talent is seen as disposable, all programmers are now burger flippers.

Maybe you would have had a point if the best consumer graphics card available was able to run new titles at 4k 60fps with raytracing like you said.

I have a 5090 and a 9800x3D
let's use cyberpunk as an example
if I turn on pathtracing and every setting to Psycho, along with framegen, (at 4x) I can get like 200fps-240fps at 2k "resolution"
I don't think the question is if this looks good or not. It does, in motion. Screenshots are blurry and there is 4x input lag from framegen, which doesn't matter for a single player game as slow as cyberpunk at all.

If I turn off framegen, and pathtracing I can get similar framerates at native without the fancy tech. In cyberpunk specifically, I don't think the raytracing looks much better than the regular lighting. Maybe in some circumstances.

I think people are more pissed that if you told them 5-10 (how long it's been since most people upgraded their pc) years ago a 32gig card would ONLY perform this much they would be disappointed.
combine that with bad drivers, terrible launch, shit support etc.
I don't really see why I can't be running the game at 400+fps native. It doesn't make sense for a triple A dev to optimise a game for hardware like this, seeing as how such a little amount of the market has a rig like this. I should be able to over-exceed system requirements by 4x+

I bought the rig for racing/flight sims in VR on fancy high res headsets and it performs admirably for that. For flat games it's a waste because even with this pc you still get stutters and weird shit from UE5. The user experience for an AM5 mobo, new cpu, and high end gpu has been the worst of any pc generation I've had. I NEVER had weird blackscreen issues, ram timing problems, or PBO fuckery with my last few pc's. I mean I still love it, it's a beast but for the price I absolutely do not recommend this shit unless you're into VR, and even then it has to be disposable income.

suck that corpo cock harder goy

Nobody gives a shit that your 3060/3070/AMD shitbox rig can’t run new games

Me included, because new games are all garbage no exceptions.

If you’re playing videogames as an adult you most likely failed at life so you might as well have nice copes like a gpu that costs as much as a car

If you have this mindset you are an annoying faggot

get 4090

every game runs at 4k 120fps without dlss

3 years pass and I cant hit 4k 60 with some titles with upscaling

Yeah...

I bought the rig for racing/flight sims in VR on fancy high res headsets and it performs admirably for that.

Same reason i have that same combination. these ballpark resolutions in upscaling is where the 4090 falls apart in framerate: 4344x4548 5320x5568

But even your 1% lows and average framerate will benefit massively at 3072x 3216 given the right circumstances and load. UEVR is something that is very case dependent on what high res scaling framerate you can achieve.

He's right though

Don't you have a country to run Vance.

The gang member is never coming back

ban all phoneposters

my last card was 12gig and UEVR was a pipedream
I can run many UEVR games now around 90fps and it's very nice.
I mostly just use my Quest3 for gamey-games and pimax for simrig stuff. 5090 has a 3rd encoder or something like that, it handles wireless VR crazy good.
robocop at 150% resolution, almost all settings maxed and 90fps is fucking awesome. still janky because it's UEVR but it's tolerable.
I need to go back and get mechwarrior 5 set up with all the mods again now that my pc can play it above potato level