He bought a 3060, thinking it would last him through the generation
lol
lmao, even
Even UE5 games are less demanding than this.
Doom: The Dark Ages is unplayable on budget hardware
ID software used to be the main proponents of software optimization, and were staunch vulkan supporters
Then Microsoft bought them, made them switch to directx12 and this happened
30 fps is playable
denuvo tax
Just enable DLSS
holy shit 9070xt btfos the 5080
id software have never shipped a dx12 game.
so the game cannot be played on a card with less than 8GB vram at all?
Even if it could, the frame rate would suck.
damn, my nephew wont be able to play with his 1660 super, he was looking forward to this
3080
84 fps
3080 can be found for budget prices nowadays so what you're saying isn't true
yes it can. you just turn down the texture pool size. at default it's 2gb. if you reduce it to 1.5gb 8gb cards run flawlessly.
And you communist pcfaggots have the audacity to make fun of Pls5 and SeX enjoyers having "no games" when you can't even ruj them
what does a 5090 do on 4K Ultra? is there any card that can play it at that resolution?
misinformation??? on MY Anon Babble???
They are still far more optimized than all UEslop games
ah ok
this game still uses vulkan, retard
Every game that pcfags complain about running bad runs EVEN WORSE on console
actually true
fucking unrealslop, if only they had used a proprietary engine this would never-
o-oh, never mind...
It is more likely than you think! In fact off the top of my head on PC no id software game has ever used directx. Doom 1 & 2 were lmao dos days. Quake was software and used some opengl shenanigans for the 3d accelerated version. From there it is opengl all the way until 2016 got a vulkan patch and eternal plus dark ages being vulkan only.
More embarrassing part is 4080 mogging 5080.
yea 4070 ti almost beats the 5080 too
shitty optimization in modern games impacts PC harder you dumb macaque. The overwhelming majority of Steam users can't even run this at 720p, let alone the 10-20% who have capable hardware
Why does it run so well on the 9070xt?
consolefag cope
Perfect balance between rasterization and RT performance.
You shouldn't trust benchmarks from a known AMD shill.
t. UserBenchmark
it is totally normal that a 9070xt and 7900xtx are nipping on the heels of a 4090 when in 99.9% of other games they are slower than a 4080 (regular, not even the super)
Numbers which nobody else has either.
thirdworld steamtroon cope
consolefag cope (again)
6700XT not there
So i bought last year and can possibly get 60 FPS on medium setting on some medieval parry slop? No thanks
Ill be honest, alot of the time i hear discussions about performance, a lot of the stuff goes over my head. Terminology like vram and occlusion and vulkan
I just know I have a 3080 and I believe thay means my performance will be ok.
Why don't they make a mod that removes raytracing?
where's the 1440p numbres
im curious if someone actually will find a way to disable it
the game will probably be a shimmer fest with out it i imagine, like turning off AA in a modern game ends up with picrel
Total PC tranny death
almost fell for 3.5 meme
buy sapphire 290 instead
lasts me entire console gen and then some, fantastic card
grab shitty msi 5070 right before crypto/covid price hike
upgraded to sapphire rx 9070 for 600 bucks
I think I did alright. Keep in mind most of Anon Babble is full of retarded animeposters.
RT is the future of gaming because it's way cheaper and better than baked lighting, it's smarter to start now and force hardware to use it than to be caught unprepared by the next generation. In a few years and a few more generations of GPUs, people would appreciate ID going full into pathtracing and RT in the long run.
2070 not even in the graph
Haha... c'mon guys... the 2070 is not THAT old haha....
RT is the future of gaming
More like an useless gimmick meant to make the consumer spend more by destroying raster performance
no card under 8gb vram is on that list
Gaming is the only 3D rendering still being done without raytracing. Everyone else moved on decades ago.
If any 40 series card can barely handle your game on medium settings at 1080p your game is optimized like shit, I don’t even care what it looks like. The mere fact that games are still benchmarked at 1080p in 2025 is proof of how low optimization standards have fallen.
Because it's the only one that cares about real time rendering performance, all other kinds of 3D graphics have the luxury of being able to wait for their frames
turns on DLSS-Q at turns settings low
so anyway that's 144fps on my 5 year old entry level gpu
pre-rendering vs real time rendering
That's the issue you retard. Even the strongest gpu's still lack the horsepower to achieve rt at acceptable performance.
RX 6600
welp glad i swapped out that card this year
I own a 7900 xtx. Stop being poor Jamal.
RT is the future of gaming because it's way cheaper and better than baked lighting,
Billion fucking games
Lighting has never been an issue
Most budget is spent on voice actors, accurately remaking some real life city and marketing
Most consumers are poorfags that can't bear the extra costs of having RT
Its like you imagine its a solution to a problem that never existed. When in actuality they just don't give a fuck, they did it just because.
Always on RT and upscaling necessary makes it seem like they fired everyone that knew their shit there, Mick Gordon included and just hired the usual AAA slop developers.
You're missing the point, the industry is building next generation hardware to be better at RT than raster. In 20 years your top of the line nVidia GPU will be shit at playing old games, just like 5090s are shit at physix today.
Is it forced hardware RT or just software RT?
baked lighting takes months of processing to be done and adds hundreds of GB of data into the game, with hardware finally getting powerful enough it's smarter to just turn on forced RT and skip all those problems and get benefits instead.
tired of hearing this shit, games still take 6 years to make even with RT, if anything they're taking longer
you are the ideal consumer
i bought a 9070xt actually, so im chilling and dabbing on y'all poorfags
Yeah because they still have to bake in the lighting for people like you with 10 year old GPUs.
because gaming is real time rendering retardo
better than baked lighting,
not for real time rendering retardo. and never will be. what you are correct about is that it's cheaper. so publishers will get to lay off their lighting artists and save a bunch, but you as the consumer will carry that burden of having to buy a thousand dollar gpu to run games that can't match the graphical fidelity of games of the yesteryear outside of marketing stills without needing x3 the rendering power and fake frames, which again, comes out of your pocket. not the publishers
Lighting has never been an issue
you've never made a game, tard
I still remember the story of how sega had to depower a whole city block with hundreds of PCs to try to finish baking the lighting on sonic unleashed and they still couldn't make it in time
i have a 4080 super retard, stop projecting
NO SAAAR DO NOT REDEEM THE RTX IT IS NOT NECESSARY
SAAAARRR
raytracing looks like ass. baked lighting is far superior
Rajeesh projecting because he has to shit on the street
many such cases!
I assumed this was the usual 4k raytracing and upscaling chart and thought you were overreacting but it's fucking 1080p medium. How the fuck.
Isn’t PhysX a completely outdated solution from a time when CPUs were generally overloaded, so Nvidia decided to calculate some physics on the gpu instead? What would even be the point of making sure newer gpus run PhysX well? Can you even tell the difference in performance?
youtu.be
You tell me
baked lighting takes months of processing to be done and adds hundreds of GB of data into the game
Doom Dark Ages size - more than 100GB, largest its ever been in its franchise
No benefits ever found anywhere
Still pretending its the solution to bunch of problems that never existed in first place. Time to accept ID Software fired everyone and hired bunch of AAA slop devs
Doom Dark Ages still has baked lighting. Path tracing is what you use to avoid that. "Ray tracing" just means you're using ray traced light sources for dynamic lighting. Path tracing is when literally everything is ray tracing.
Is RX 6800 good? I stream to my steamdeck often. I'm on RTX 2060 atm.
Garbage engine.
It's game-specific. The new cards mog the old generally speaking. This engine in particular is a clusterfuck for Nvidia.
Doom Dark Ages still has baked lighting
It literally doesn't, it completely replaced it with RTGI and that is why RT is always on for this instalment.
You tried to justify solutions to problems that never existed in first place you don't even know what you are saying anymore.
People always cope that everyone is done for a reason and it has to mean something
levels are completely static yet still need RT
I don't get it. Surely it can't be that much work for artist to just fake the lighting? It worked in the past, why does it suddenly not work?
It's so over for me
The hardware for playable fps while doing raytracing just isn't here yet. They should quit pushing this shit already
>He bought a 3060, thinking it would last him through the generation
The 3060 was a 1080p60fps GPU from two generations ago, five years ago. If you're expecting it to breeze through every game in the next half decade you're extremely entitled.
>Billion fucking games
>Lighting has never been an issue
fuck off idiot
It should be something that can be fixed by drivers.
1.8tb
I see you were a victim of the shady practice that assumes 1kb = 1000b without telling you
baked
games mostly use dynamic lighting
Yes, it is normal for XTX to stick near 4090 outside of RT of course. Is your next line going to be "AMD has shit drivers"?
Path tracing is what you use to avoid that.
No it isn't. You don't even need ray tracing at all to avoid baked lighting.
They took away all the fun movement so 30fps should be fine for this game.
It is not normal.
Wtf is this shit?
I paid £1000 for it.
based 4080 owner
15fps is fine actually
I have a 5700xt.... How fucked am I?
OP:
119 vs. 137, +15%
Your graph:
112 vs. 133, +18%
The game is definitely AMD-favored, but not by THAT much.
The game is hardcoded to not run on your GPU (pre RTX cards for Nvidia, pre 6000 series for AMD) purely for planned obsolescence.
Is this with or without ray tracing?
Some form of raytracing is forced. Probably with the lowest RT settings is my guess. The lowest preset doesn't perform that much better than medium in any case.
in this thread we cling to outdated solutions
You can force software Raytracing on Linux. Indiana Jones is also technically "unsupported" because it requires RT accelerators, but it runs fine even on Vega cards: youtube.com
No idea if you can do this on Windows.
Raytracing is enabled by default. Path tracing isn't available yet.
mfw proud owner of a 3060Ti rugpulled by Jensen
global illumination doesn't replace baked light you mongol.
is this you? you ran from the other thread to cope here?
Given we know AMD cannot into ray tracing I think it is clear that OP's chart should be held with suspicion.
wtf why's 9070xt so strong?
4070ti super as fast as the 5080
nvidias 5000 drivers must be fucked
it should be able to handle 100-120 fps on low + dlss, as long as there is not 8gb bottleneck
Good ray tracing
Death to nvidia
Didn't expect my slop card (4070ti super) to go head to head with the fucking 5080
Then i won't.
code of the game is optimized for consoles running on AMD
I'm not playing in those conditions, id will get my money in 2-3 years once I've upgraded.
Kek I spent near 1K on a 5070ti only to get mogged like this, not that it matter since I don't play parryslop
Clearly they can, as long it's not Nvidia specific RT code that is.
Feels good man.
stuck with fsr2
oh no no
And why does it beat the 5070 Ti which has slightly better theoretical performance across the board.
stuck with fsr2
I'm not.
Loving the generational leap from a 4070S to a 5070Ti
Absolutely ebin
What the fuck are those completely random numbers lmao
Also reviews are saying the game runs well
Not that it matters since I wont play this trash
Yeah right. Hard pass for me. I'll probably try it on sale when I get my new PC in 2 years from now.
Driver devs must have been replaced by vibe coders at Nvidia
i also have 7900 xtx. how's the latest driver going? i keep hearing bad shit, im still on 24.8.1
Works for me. It isn't like I can play every game extensively to test but i've not had any issues in my use cases.
I never understood why the system requirements keep getting higher and higher? This will only exclude more people from buying and playing your game. Shouldn't optimizing be a priority since it will at least run on a system that meets the bare minimum requirements?
What are the developers thinking?
I never understood why the system requirements keep getting higher and higher?
You know what is bullshit? Far cry 1 won't run on my voodoo 2 sli setup.
isn't the pc port literally sponsored by nvidia?
Hoping for software solutions such as DLSS to pick up the slack, notice how the shittiest examples like MHW barely mention native resolutions in their recommended specs. This is compounded by the fact that DLSS also works well to attenuate problems in modern engines such as dithering, shimmering and others.
There is going to be breaking point where the hardware at "reasonable" prices isn't going to keep up with modern AAA visual fidelity+incompetence, but for now unoptimized garbage is perfectly fine because people standards are quite low (again, see MHW's massive success).
watched a youtube video of some guy who had a 5090rtx
Couldn't run borderlands 2 with physx (ran below 15fps) because the card lacks the component that is necessary to run it efficiently.
What a joke. As the years go by, all we get are diminishing returns.
3060ti should still serve you well for this game though
youtube.com
the guy is playing on low settings if you want to skim thru. doesn't look bad to me. and as long as you're upgrading, don't buy nvidia shit. they are basically trying to kill gaming in 2025
Yes.
Then why does it run so poorly on nvidia?
You don't need 32bit hardware support my guy. The only good thing about this is nvidia did actually finally open source all of the old physx library so at least if someone wanted to fuck around with it and possibly make fan patches they can.
'cuz id software actually knows what they are doing and have a long history of not leaning into propriety technology.
AMD still win from both nextgen consoles and devs focusing on them.
They won't rewrite the engine just because nvidia also throw them some cash.
dont listen to the retard. microjew is xbox. xbox is ayymd.
Because it's still optimized for consoles first, which are amd boxes.
that + horseshit nvidia drivers currently
I have a 3060 ti and was thinking about upgrading but I just can't bring myself to do it, I only play at 1080p and the new gpu are so bad, what games are even worth the upgrade?
finally open source all of the old physx library
Only PhysX 3, which these games don't use.
Doom 2016 ran buttery smooth on my i5 processor and 970 card. Dark Ages doesn't look any more advanced graphically yet requires stronger hardware. How is this possible? Surely game developers don't make backroom deals with hardware manufacturers to increase spec requirements artificially, they would never do that right
now compare the amount of ps5s to the amount of ps4s and ps3s
And it's bad for business when the only people who can play these games have pc's that are worth thousands of dollars. Limiting your customers.
They don't need to go down the fortnite/WOW route of simplifying the graphics but at least optimize the size of the asset files and write better algorithms for performance so that even a 1000-2000 series cards can run it. Think of the profits mr shekelstein!
wait the game FORCES raytracing??? it can't even be launched without it?
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAA
Does it run on eck
They're expecting you to play it with DLSS/FSR enabled. Enable it and it runs quite well on 5 year old GPUs.
t.
'cuz id software actually knows what they are doing and have a long history of not leaning into propriety technology.
This game literally has mandatory RT.
6600 bros...
Dark Ages doesn't look any more advanced graphically
You're basing this on compressed Youtube footage. Don't be like that.
I don't think you know what RT is or why it isn't some nvidia only technology.
Needs DLSS to run well
Not leaning into proprietary technology
60fps on a 5 year old midrange gpu using the latest and greatest technology isn't running well
Look anon, your decade old laptop is not a super computer like you think it is.
not that anon, but mandatory RT sounds like extremely lazy or incompetent devs that literally refused to do baked lighting from the outset as a design principle. if they cut corners there, where else did they cut corners? it's like hiring someone to build your house knowing that they skip foundations because it's too time consuming.
How much better than 2016 could it possibly look, which already had pretty damn good visuals 9 years ago. Holy shit 9 years have already passed
put setting on max
put 4k
put dlss performance
set lossless to 4x
oh yeah its gaming time
the game runs on native medium 1080p at 60 fps on a 5 year old midrange (3060ti), safe to say it will run double that on low + dlss.
that said it would run even better without the forced hardware memetracing shit, that is entirely on microsoft/zenimax. all their recent games required hardware memetracing.
Holy shit 9 years have already passed
latest and greatest technology
Such as?
Ray tracing
Metro Exodus is 6 years now, anon. It's not this revolutionary technology any more.
go from games that can play on a potato to games that require a 5090
microsoft definitely did id dirty after acquisition.
I 'member when you needed a pentium to play doom at 35fps - if you owned a 486 you can go fuck yourself for full speed gameplay.
35 FPS with a software renderer is basically equivalent to 60 FPS in a modern renderer in terms of latency. Combined with a typical CRT running at 70Hz, it would have been very snappy.
you are so deluded and retarded
Not that anon, but this is UE5 on a 3060.
youtu.be
The 4070super continues being the patrician choice for GPU's.
Yes but the pentium was the most powerful and expensive cpu mortals could buy at the time. The cpus people actually used ran the game like shit.
7600XT
It's all over
I bet GTA6 will run without an issue on such hardware
Can't get 144fps in new doom on a fresh 5070 on a fucking 1080p on a FUCKING MEDIUM
the 3060 on 1080p medium here averages 60fps while the image says it would average 54fps on 1080p medium
Bro why do they keep adding shit that makes the games run even worse?
Do the big publishers have a competition on who can make the worst running game?
They does even look better. But are still getting bigger.
I bet this is gonna be 120gb minimum. For a fucking fps.
all that to look and play like borderlands with a gritty reshade lmao more like DOOMED
Jesus christ, this game isn't going to feel smooth at all running a 4k 240 OLED.
Weren't 2016 and Eternal exceptionally well optimized? What the fuck happened?
Well this is from the latest techpowerup review data.
techpowerup.com
GB means RAM or VRAM?
I ave 4060Ti. my RAM is 16GB but VRAM 8gb
Depends on the model. There were 100MHz 486's that were miles ahead of the low-end trash.
forced raytracing on
looks the same as doom 2016
this industry is a scam
Id tech engine supposed to be BASTION of good optimization above all this 20FPS DLSS Monster Hunter Wilds tier slop. It has fallen. It's all over. The future of 12 FPS DLSS OFF > 60 FPS (RTX 9090) UPSCALE from 240p DLSS ON is real.
It is a gpu benchmark and is listing the vram capacities of the test cards.
it's like hiring someone to build your house knowing that they skip foundations because it's too time consuming.
Keeping a legacy render path is like building a stone house but adding some wood between the walls so you still need to worry about it rotting.
Around 60% in the Steam HW survey have an RT capable GPU. But I assume they know what percentage of people on non-RT hardware buy new full price games and wouldn't do this if it was a significant portion.
forced ray tracing in idtech8
literally cant get 144 frames with low settings and dlss/fsr on performance no matter the hardware, even top tier
Games aren't getting less optimized, hardware just isn't keeping up.
Doom Eternal also didn't shine on then 5-year old hardware. The difference is that upgrading actually meant something. What do you get with a brand new card for $380 today? A measly 128-bit bus with 8GB of VRAM. What's the point?
Games aren't getting less optimized, hardware just isn't keeping up.
Games don't look visually impressive despite their hardware requirements. And not only graphically but physics and AI are all dogshit compared to old games.
Meanwhile people are playing Clair Obscur at an average 49fps on 1060s
1080p
medium
RX 7900 XTX
24gb VRAM
can only muster that many frames
Grim.....what the fuck happened?
For the visuals games deliver they require retarded hardware
And not only graphically but physics and AI are all dogshit compared to old games.
Except they literally improved that in this game.
If you for some reason have a GPU with lesser than 8GB VRAM then you may have way bigger problems than just that. You probably should wageslave until you can get a used bare minimum PC. Eternal running on your GPU was nothing short of a miracle. TDA likely wouldn't have been able to run on it regardless of forced raytracing.
The poorfag whining Steam is going to be glorious.
I just upgraded to a RX 9070 XT, so I will be running the game with fantastic frame rates. See ya later, poor fags. :)
with fantastic frame rates
Literally can't hold 144fps on 1080p MEDIUM
1080p
medium
WHAT THE FUCK?
i bought one too
that's no excuse to let your standards slip so hard you accept rayjeet slop performing this badly
1% low is 121 FPS
So literally perfect for a 120Hz lock that modern TV's support? Feels good.
20 years later and we're still at crysis 1 destruction level
I refuse to believe my Sapphire 6600 can't run 1080 medium at a locked 60
Let me guess, you *need* more?
yes i want my rocket launcher to carve a dent on the ground so i can launch another rocket and crouch inside it to evade enemy fire
Doom Faction
better than doomk souls parrying
is this the first id game that doesn't run well lol
Doom Dark Ages still has baked lighting
That's a lot of knowledge about the game that didn't even come out.
Which exact part of in-game lighting is baked in Doom DA?
3080 10g already this low
ugh
I hate ray tracing so much it's unreal, bros
Boy I sure love ray tracing tanking videogame performance since its inception while not even making them look better at all.
Yes.
If u hate ray tracing u hate reality. Stop this escapism. Touch grass and breathe light.
optimization in gaming is dead
hate reality
stop escapism
you hate being smart
muh never obsolete 2060
There will be a driver release better optimized for the game. Have some faith.
nvidia's shitty drivers aren't the biggest problem here, at most you'll see a 20% uplift for the 50 series
it's entirely on microshit for pushing it through the door
It's not just GPU, games are becoming much more CPU demanding
RT is the future of gaming because it's way cheaper and better than baked lighting
AC Unity has better lighting than today's games, and it came in 2014. I'm playing Tlous Part 2 right now, and that shit is better than many RT games.
the x3d effect, amd has managed to make a masterpiece of engineering and now everyone is getting sloppy
retard
If PS6 has x3D then yeah, it'll only keep getting more demanding. I just hope GTA 6 is optimized
that would seem like a major waste of amd's resources, consoles never target anything above 60 and that's why you want x3d
4070 Super
running at 4k
66 fps with quality upscaling
that's actually quite good; 4k is a complete meme resolution that got pushed by TV manufacturers because they could finally make 4k screen for affordable prices despite GPUs and consoles being unable to deliver that
the entire industry should have done the same thing when they went from 720p-1080p and just made 1440p the new target resolution, which interestingly enough is the sweet spot between FPS and visuals for most GPU's in the current year despite 4k launching several years ago
if a 12GB card is able to hit over 60fps in a brand new game running at 4k then that is good, upscaling or not
I just hope GTA 6 is optimized
Rdr2 runs on fucking base PS4. Rockstar is probably cooking again.
Why are you writing in third-person?
Yeah crappy 30 FPS and checkerboarding, today that plays even worse on high end OLED tvs/monitors. They never patched it for current consoles neither.
RDR2 is the most barren empty world in any video game ever. Of course it'll run on dogshit hardware. fucking GTA 5 has more NPC's and more buildings than RDR2 and that game ran like ass on its original platforms.
We have nothing to do but wait for china to release a 1024bit bus GPU with 64-128gb VRAM. We will never see real innovation from AMD or NVidia ever again that isn't gaytracing delusions.
Yeah crappy 30 FPS and checkerboarding
Standard console experience. It still looks great. meanwhile shit like cyberpunk can't even work on base ps4.
Differnce is PC release is delayed to who knows when and console players don't even get any update for next-gen consoles
I have a 2080 and I preordered it. Did I fuck up?
Weird decision. Only zoomers play Zoom, and they're also completely and utterly inept about technology. The chances of them having a machine capable of playing this are slim to none.
medium native TAA
51fps on a budget card that's 2 generations old
But that's not too bad? Just go from medium to low and turn on DLSS.
It's a 4 year old entry level graphics card
People in 2007 couldn't even run Crysis at all in 4 year old cards, and people who bought a 8800GTS to play it got like 25-30 fps.
aifags get 10000 dollar cards with 64 gb of vram but you'll never see this in gaming because Nvidia has fostered a defense force of onions creatures who say le 8 gb is enough to defend paying 2000 dollars gaymer cards
preordering digital games
yes you did
Crysis actually looked amazing in comparison to everything else. Doom looks identical to all the other AAA slop in terms of graphics. There are no more leaps in progress anymore.
Crysis really shouldn't be the standard to compare anything, it was unique in a lot of ways when it released. UE3 games were coming out at the same time and ran pretty well on potato hardware.
AAA on PC gaming is unplayable for anyone on a budget
We've known this for years. Also PC GPUs are going up in prices again tweaktown.com
PC GPUs going up! 16GB VRAM from 600 dollars to let's make it 800 dollars!
If even Rockstar (A team) fail it will be total downfall of optimization for entire AAA industry. No any hopes will left.
These AAA games that look and run as good are they in the room with us now?
is preordering a digital game and worse then buying a digital game when it comes out? Minus waiting for reviews I dont see the issue
They should offer better highest quality textures. Can't even fill 12GB VRAM. lol.
being a guaranteed bag of money is the most self hating position you could take
allowing even the slightest amount of negative press about the game can alter your position
If it saves time and cost why is the game more expensive?
Negative press? Wait what the fuck happened, I've been offline for 3 days what did they do to my doom!? This was a guaranteed GOTY nominee, what happened??
Njudea pushes for RT to be a requirement
gets BTFO by AMD
What's the next step of their master plan?
The path traced version with unplayable framerates will restore their relative lead.
There is 100% a conspiracy that developers are being paid off to purposely unoptimize games. If this industry had real journalists they would expose this rampant faggotry
will run on 1050ti i3 7000
eternal did and 2016 did
otherwise its shit
That chart is for comparing video cards, not getting to know how well the game runs on your video card. Because any sane person would turn on upscaling and increase their fps by 50% instead of using fucking TAA
medium 1080p
Can consoles even run this gayme
This game is an odd one.
It eats up way too much VRAM so the 9070 XT loses performance whereas the 7900 XTX breezes through it.
But it also has RT that can't be turned off so the 7900 XTX also loses performance.
Nu-games are slowly but surely becominf inaccessible to the majority of the population.
41fps
unplayable
what
Yes, upscaled from 576p and with fake frames.
Consoles will get 60fps. It is potato pc users who are seething.