Well?

Average western RPG moment

Hunger. More potential hot teens walking around, more chance to fuck them.

Cancer victims are weak and should be culled.

Feed hungry

More niggers survive

Cure Cancer

One less thing to debilitate rich faggots
Neither, put it towards our debt to lower it to a much more responsible amount, also cut our global policing fund and withdraw any support for AIPAC.

World-hunger is harder to fix, simply because it's often a local issue (natural disasters, but often more so war, insurgencies and rebels using hunger as a tactic, bad logistics). If you only drop cake on them for a day you haven't fixed shit. You basically need to correct the entire third-world to stop world hunger. Frankly, if these countries stopped being radical and socialist shitholes, they could fix that problem themselves.
Fixing cancer is more of a first-world issue, but it's a legit threat to public health and ends many people early that could have lived a fulfilling life. It's also an issue that unites many countries and people across the globe.

Cancer because fuck God and his mysterious ways.

Fuck cancer.
Hunger is quite literally only a "problem" because of too many people, which actually causes several other *real* problems.

Can I choose neither?

Isolationism in an era where the US isn't even able to produce penicilin to match local demand, a bold move

Now I want to replay. Should I reinstall SR3 or SR4?
The rich already know how to cure and prevent cancer, and are hiding the cure. Resolve to cure cancer for everyone and the rich will have one less up over the common man.

NIggers are cancer so fuck cancer

Cancer easly

Cure cancer. Mostly because cancer sucks, but partly due to me hating the "Let them eat cake" phrase as well.

3 if you like STAG vehicles, 4 if you like superpowers

God will probably disapprove & won't protect you from cancer if you insult Him.
Watch your words...

how many people die in India because of hunger?
because i can't imagine the overpopulation it will have without it

cancer. feed the hungry mostly effects 3rd world trash.

Extremely few, actually, fewer than a lot of other countries.
Hunger deaths are largely a logistics and shipping issue, India produces and provides more than enough food to feed all of its own.

Yahoo they eat those cow shit cupcakes for spiritual reasons, not out of desperation.

Tell that to the supremely ultra rich CEO Steve Jobs who died at 56 in cancer

b-but that doesn't count

Your delusions are shit.

Cancer. Right-side would only benefit Africa and India so they could actually live long enough to get cancer.

Fuck Cancer

I loved collecting all the clusters in that game

Cancer, fuck big med.

Change nothing but make sure all the people currently alive have enough food

You're not changing the conditions and cultures that cause people to reproduce beyond their country's ability to feed them all

All the kids who would have starved instead survive and breed at the same rate as their parents

Food supply outbred again, you now have an order of magnitude more hungry people

Solving world hunger for more than a moment requires the kind of change that most of the people who want it would call you racist for saying is necessary

wanting skele-teens

Im a man who prefers more meat on them bones

joke's on him, i want to die.

Steve Jobs was a vegan and holistic nut. His eccentric ass didn't pay any attention to the actual elites.

Cancer. It's a far bigger risk to me personally than starvation.

Triple the world hunger and make cancer completely incurable (even on early stages).

The ideas who would rather throw money to solve a temporary problem, than to teach people how to solve the problem themselves.
Which in turn creates a new problem as they breed further like you mentioned, and then spill out into other countries that don't want their kind.

Moment when Saints Row died

more people die from cancer than from hunger/starvation... and more people die from heart diseases than from cancer

Cancer is far more dynamic than starvation.

Curing cancer fucks over the global pharmaceutical companies and stops them from profiting off of other's suffering.
Ending world hunger removes a necessity from the world and brings it one step closer to an ennui-induced debaucherous end.

Eliminating all cancer forever is way harder than solving hunger which is honestly something we could already do and is a logistical issue.

Cancer actually kills more people than hunger too. Cancer kills like 10 million people globally, Hunger kills less EVEN WHEN the numbers for hunger also include comorbidity from hunger-related illnesses and disease and not literal starvation as the cause of death.

no true scotsman's it immediately

Predictable.

I played both 3 and 4 co-op with my brother back in the day.
3 had connection issues, would crash a lot and such. was the better game of the two though.
4 was still fun, but it leant too hard into the "LMAO so randum xD" wacky shit, but the superpowers were overpowered but cool.

my bro and i would take one power each, he could run really fast and I could jump really high or something like that.

i wish both the games got an actual remaster. i'd play thru them again if there wasnt crashes and issues with widescreen resolutions, alt-tabbing, multi monitor etc.

fallacy doesn't apply when you can point to a specific reason why that is, dumb fuck.

Cancer and it's not even close, chemo can fuck right off

fuck God

enjoy hell, faggot

It doesnt matter and the game is terrible.

well time to cull yourself

Cancer, world hunger is a meme

Year 2025 and people seem to don't have a clue on how to cure cancer. It's easy... stop eating rubbish (including meat) and applying 'sunblock' onto your skin. Dumb motherfuckers.

more useless people breeding

vs.

bankrupt pharmaceutical corpos

This is an easy question.

Hunger

doesnt effect me at all, pure thirdy problem, can be fixed by them being less savage and corrupt tribal nations

Cancer

Can effect me and my loved ones, cant be fixed without some medical revolution

How is this even a question?

48395464.png - 860x974, 14.25K

Listen here faggot, your 'loved ones' are probably fat as fuck and consume sodas daily

uh-oh, anon is projecting

Cancer because one of my friends has been fighting it for the last eleven years

Who gives a fuck? They did unhealthy choices and now you're crying? Grow the fuck up

why are you a cunt?

Cancer impacts everyone and only needs to be solved once.
Hunger would be an ongoing problem and is mostly logistical.
We have enough food to feed everyone. We just choose not to for political reasons.

How is pointing out people who eats like a pig and not exercise then later wonder why they suffer from cancer? You're such a loser lol

nice projection faggot

Why are you feeding it?

who eats like a pig and not exercise then later wonder why they suffer from cancer?

that's diabetes you retard

Anon Babble trannies sperging because I told them the truth

Same shit

It died after 2 was released and all the good writers left.

Thinks I'm talking about obesity

Cure cancer
Nobody is hungry in US and look at the unholy stuff their people are doing
Suffering is necessary

but what if it's for the purpose of procreation?

Cancer, longevity for those that can is better than handouts for those that can't.

getting rid of disease is a more pertinent task with many more long term positive effects, fixing hunger is something that isn't really a big deal in the modern age for most places, cancer on the other hand is wildly out of control so getting those rates down to 0 would be a massive boon for society.

cure cancer because childhood cancer and young adult cancers exists

God gives bone cancer to children because their existence is insulting to Him or something

you cant "cure" cancer
it's like saying you can "cure" autism

I would rather solve rising wealth inequality. These houses are getting too expensive

I'd rather solve the decline of high trust society.

Where's the option to rid of all wignats?

I hate that 15 years ago everybody got a hate boner for black-and-white moral choices in vidya. I preferred when moral choices were presented to the player to let them choose what sort of character they were playing, rather than something for the player to mull over. The average WRPG now is a conveyor belt for virtual trolley problems.

Wait this is from saints row? I assumed it was from some David Cage game.
I guess that explains the purple jacket.

I prefer my midwit dualism

We know

than to teach people how to solve the problem themselves.

No need when you have extremely intelligent scientists (western) introducing crops and farming methods that can be followed by any dummy.
I bet you couldn't tell me at a physics-level how your computer works but you use it just fine.