You gotta admit this is pretty fucking amazing if it actually can hit these numbers. 4K 60 FPS in docked mode...

You gotta admit this is pretty fucking amazing if it actually can hit these numbers. 4K 60 FPS in docked mode, so it's basically as strong as a PS5 or Xbox Series X. The fact that we can now play first party titles at 4K 60 FPS is great in my eyes considering most Nintendo Switch games were locked at 30 FPS and 720p-1080p. We're talking a massive upgrade in resolution and FPS, also not to mention HDR support.

Nintendo fanboys don't realize how great this is because they were okay gaming at 30 FPS 720p in handheld mode like drooling mongoloids.

Also something I forgot to point out but Nintendo claims you can get 60 FPS IN QUALITY MODE, as in it doesn't lock itself/drop to 30 FPS like console quality mode does. You can now play a game in quality mode and still get 60 FPS, so realistically the Switch 2 is stronger than the PS5 and Xbox Series X, which I find insane given it's compact size but somehow Nintendo was able to make a console that can do more than a PS5 and Xbox Series X, and charge less money for it. How is nobody recognizing how amazing that is? If you play on quality mode on PS5 or Xbox Series X, the game locks itself to 30 FPS, but on Switch 2 you can get 60 FPS in quality mode. We're talking PS5 Pro metrics, if not beyond that for $250 less.

PC faggots need not reply or respond, as I'm well aware of their thoughts and what they'll say. If you're a console only gamer, then you should instantly see the massive value in this.

gaem looks gay

Considering how bland the games look, I mostly believe it. People forget that the switch 1 is ancient technology

Because the games are vastly easier to run than real console games, dumbass. It’s going to shit the bed with any demanding third party game

PC is irrelevant because of how overpriced it is.

You're better off JUST getting a console.

I'm probably going to do 1080p120fps.

"4K"

retard

Did you not see the elden ring trailer? That thing ran neither in 4k nor stable 30fps

Because Elden Ring wasn't well optimized to begin with

Retard

We go through this shit every new console and people still believe the lies.

Nintendo will pit the entire community against PC gamers?

Neither will any other 3rd party you dumb fuck, thats the point

The majority of first party switch games run at 60fps. It's very funny seeing snoys get uppity about having high frame rates like they didn't gladly swallow down 25fps cinematic bullshit for 4 generations

if it actually hits those numbers

If you look sky at the im sure it will hit close to them, maybe.

60fps

I shiggy diggy in >2025

Useless looking at publisher numbers, wait until there are proper benchmarks at release before you look silly in retrospect.

my TV goes to 1080 though, this provides me zero benefit. this all reeks of spend more money to spend more money to spend more money
INSTEAD of just having a a good fun game.

what fucking benefit does playing a slow tanky lock on search action at high framerates even provide? nothing

And it's not just a Switch game running at 4K60. Switch 2 version has much more detail
youtube.com/watch?v=2JgkLdmoAy8

It’s going to shit the bed with any unoptimized pajeet slop

I don't buy those kind of games.

Digital Foundry said it looked like they took capture of the game running at 60FPS, converted it to 30FPS and then streamed it on a 60FPS stream. Someone fucked up while preparing the trailer.
The game should run at 60FPS

LE UPSCALING

Is that your argument? Is that what you're coming at me with? As I've told dozens of other retarded anons on here, almost nothing nowadays is running on "native" resolution. Almost nothing can run "native" 4K, so 90% of people have learned to live and accept upscaling technology/resolution. I get what you're saying, yes, it's not "native" 4K, but also, I don't give a fuck and neither should you.

I don't need 120 FPS. 60 FPS is all I need from my games, and the only people who NEED 120 FPS are usually first-person shooters or competitive style games. An RPG or action-adventure style game doesn't need 120 FPS; it only needs 60 FPS.

I think it's a bit overkill that Nintendo decided to go for 120 FPS when they could have just stuck with 60 FPS and used that extra resource space for something else, like an OLED screen or some shit.

Are you seriously saying that you don't see the benefit of playing a Metroid game/action adventure game at 60 FPS VS 30 FPS? Have you never played games at 60 FPS before? The animation speed/fluidity alone should be obvious to almost anyone. You can easily tell when a game is running at 30 FPS VS 60 FPS, and in games with a lot of motion and animation; 60 FPS is always a better choice. I don't know how to describe it in a way you'd understand.

If you had played a game like Fire Emblem Three Houses or XBC3 at 60 FPS then you'd know how much smoother and nicer it looked in action compared to the locked 30 FPS. Most people played those games at 30 FPS and we're okay with it because that's all Nintendo could offer. Yuzu/Ryujin was able to push those games to 60 FPS, and the difference was night and day. If those games ever get "Nintendo Switch 2" upgrade packs that boost them to 60 FPS or 4K resolution, then it'd be a completely different game for the people who played it at 30 FPS.

For sure bro

see the benefit

nigger, there's no fucking benefit. Prime is a slow trodding game. Your new fucking abilities are to come to a halt and guide your fucking missile while the enemies wait for you to finish.

What the fuck is 60fps scanning gonna do for you

Why should I be impressed that an empty hallway simulator has decent performance

Do you're eyes not work right or is 60fps not inherently better looking to you in motion?

it provides no fucking benefit numbnuts, the game is not a quick twitch shooter. does your brain work

Switch 2 can play Switch 1 games at higher resolution and framerate

Wow, astounding. So can my PC.

upscaled 1440p to 4k

Nah

I'll be gaming in 1080p, like god intended

Well, it sounds like you don't want 60 FPS gaming, so maybe you should stick with consoles that provide 30 FPS gaming? The game is coming to Nintendo Switch 1 and it's capped at 30 FPS, so enjoy on that I suppose? Odd logic/choice, but I guess we all have our preferences.

I believe I said PC faggots need not reply

Your PC isn't running games at native 4K either, Larry. Don't get a massive ego.

Your PC isn't running games at native 4K either, Larry

Are you implying 4090 users can't play native 4K?

It has series S performance.
However having DLSS is a huge deal. DLSS can make 1080p looks like 4K in many cases.

kek, this

I'm implying very few PC games have 4090 GPU's, if anything you're in the top 1%, so I wouldn't factor people like you into the "upscaling" argument. A large majority of PC gamers are using DLSS, and when I say a "large" majority. I imagine at least 90% are using it. You personally might not be, but I'm looking at the greater whole, and not the 10% that are capable of running "native" 4K.

It has Series S performance

I'd actually wager it has better performance than the Series S, which is laughable for Series S owners and Microsoft in general. A lot of Series S games have asset cuts and can't target/hit 60 FPS, so you're really undervaluing the Switch 2 by saying it has Series S performance.

That's really just because it was first designed for single analog (not that dual analog is any better) and then for the Wiimote with edge of screen turning.
Now that the Switch 2 has a mouse, most of Prime's gameplay will be reminiscent of Source engine surf maps and arena shooter bunnyhopping to better approximate the speed booster in 2D games.

What's the point if exclusive developers can't reach the proposed benchmark? Retro Studios are a potential exception to the longstanding rule of incompetence by Nintendo. Even their inhouse developers are incapable, let alone their lack of quality control in games they publish.

Prime 4 was designed around Switch 1 controls

I don't give a fuck and neither should you

Actual fucking cattle, kill yourself.

nigger look at that graphic quality
You can run Rimworld in 4k too

Nope

That still means gyro aim, which is a substantial improvement over the single analog tank controls of the old games and the pointer turning of the Wii games and a much more massive improvement over dual analog slop.

Rimworld

Low quality bait; didn't even try.

All upscaling = downgrade from native.

No matter what you do, upscaling looks like complete blurry shit.

look how powerful this console is! it can run the game "Pyramids vs Cubes" at 8K240!! And in quality mode, where they use 128x128 textures! wow!

t.retard

Enjoy TAA blur on your 1080p tn monitor

Well good use to it, goyim. The future is upscaling and AI, and I'm almost positive video game developers and the industry as a whole acknowledged that years ago. You don't have to like it, but you also won't be able to stop it or avoid it. Oh sure, you can choose NOT to use upscaling technology like DLSS, but you better pray/hope you can afford a $2,000+ GAYMING PC that doesn't require upscaling. That's about the only way to avoid upscaling tech, is to get a PC that can play games in the native resolution that you want without suffering performance drawbacks.

PC is the only platform that will let you escape upscaling tech. Upscaling tech is automatically built into console gaming, so you'll never get away from it if you game on Xbox, Playstation, or Switch since it can't be turned disabled.

I believe I don't care, I replied anyway. What are you going to do about it? :^)

This looks more like a badly scaled 1080p resolution on a non 1080p screen

I'm at least glad that nintendo is including fps as a selling point

This poorfag excuse isn't used by anyone in any other hobby space.

Fuck no that's wrong, the switch 2 is definitely more efficient at rendering than anything that the xbox series S can render but it's not better in raw numbers.

UPSCALING IS OK WHEN NINTENDO DOES IT

i knew it would happen LMAO