microbursting, high RPM meta
OP vehicles (especially jets)
movement glitches
shit class/weapon/gadget balance
all-class.carbines and DMRs
microbursting, high RPM meta
OP vehicles (especially jets)
movement glitches
shit class/weapon/gadget balance
all-class.carbines and DMRs
but dude MUH LEVOLUTION
MUH LEVOLUTION
BFBC2 had way better levolution. you could level the entire map and it had a real effect on gameplay
Anything post 2142 is a shit baseline. They should actually really start over and try to find a playerbase that's significantly different than the CoD playerbase. Poaching players from CoD really isn't working out for them.
microbursting,
this beats the hell out of BF3's "now drag the mouse downwards" take on gunplay
(especially jets)
BF3 was the title with evil ass OP jets bombing you every 5 seconds, in 4 its the attack chopper than can be a pain unless you laze it
movement glitches
advanced movement in 4 is probably the most interesting gameplay element in any of the series, as long as there's no slither like 4 i'd welcome more interesting movement
all-class carbines and DMRs
giving ranged weapons is good because DICE will inevitably make some big fuck off map with huge sightlines and id like to actually play something other than recon once in a while
ill give you carbines though they're boring and steal the show from weapons that fill the same role in the class specific weapon categories
Poaching players from CoD really isn't working out for them.
I look forward to the day my youtube feed will be full of slop like
BEST BATTLEFIELD BATTLE ROYALE LOADOUT & SETTINGS & CONTROLLER AIM ASSIST (CRAZY)
because you absolutely know this is the type of gamers that EA and DICE are going to cater to
because you absolutely know this is the type of gamers that EA and DICE are going to cater to
They have tried twice already and failed both times. I don't even know if the next nuBattlefield will have a BR gamemode but I wouldn't be surprised if it does.
"now drag the mouse downwards" take on gunplay
nah, you still had to time your bursts due to spread. BF3's guns felt different unlike BF4
BF3 was the title with evil ass OP jets
nothing that couldn't be solved with 2 AA engineers or some other jetfag on your team
advanced movement
there is none, unless you count glitches like the vouzou jump. 3 had none of this garbage in casual servers
ranged weapons
ALL-class DMRs were a shit solution to the awful BF4 maps with huge sightlines and engagement distances. 3 doesn't suffer from this because the maps were better.
all in all BF3 was the superior game, especially at 60hz and suppression removed, but this never happened officially
They've already confirmed it. Why they keep trying to turn Battlefield into a BR when they already have Apex is beyond me.
Having played it, it's nothing at all like BF4. It's like current COD and has utterly terrible gunplay.
BF3's guns felt different unlike BF4
i disagree but maybe both games dont differentiate very well beyond weapon "types" within their category (e.g loong range ar's low rpm ar's high rpm pump n dump ar's) 3 had terrible balance where there was like 5 good guns and everything else you shouldnt bother
3 also heavily nerfed first shot recoil multiplier and had less recoil on long bursts meaning you didn't really need to time them outside of wasting ammo
there is none, unless you count glitches like the vouzou jump. 3 had none of this garbage in casual servers
vouzou, zouzou, bunny hopping, air strafing, mario jumps, etc. 3 is a lot more boring imo for not having any, certainly a game with a more boring balance and infantry dynamic, especially when you consider the skewed class balance and weapon balance.
3 doesn't suffer from this because the maps were better.
all admit all class dmr was not the best but it beats the hell out of having none. 3 still had plenty of maps with fuck huge sightlines and playing a class like engie it really shows just how little range you can squeeze out of a carbine.
example maps: gulf of oman, nebandan, armored shield, riverside, wake, kiasar, caspian, even more maps that while have more close range combat will still have huge sightlines on some areas and objectives. It sucks to not be able to engage enemies on huge swaths of the map, regardless of class distinctions
when they already have Apex
not that anon but they shit the bed with Apex and killed Titanfall, now EA suits are off to kill battlefield too, if DICE can't do it first.
you make some valid points but I'm tired and need to sleep
BF3's long sightlines + suppression + low damage range for weapons other than snipers actively discouraged you from engaging at longer distances unless you had the gun for it. it was simply not a good time for anyone without a bolt-action or DMR
also
defending BF4's busted movement
calling BF3's balance worse than 4
let's agree to disagree
some other jetfag
air. peace.
lol
lmao even
fucking BC2fags are so high on nostalgia fueled delusion it's insane sometimes
they shit the bed with Apex
How. I thought it was a retard proof juggernaut.
BC2fags are so high on nostalgia fueled delusion
I played that game for 10+ years and it is IMHO the best frostbite battlefield. It had its issues but it was simply fun to play.
All Battlefields from 3 and onwards are objective shit except BC2
This is objective
2142 was fucking GOAT. I miss playing that with buddies back in the day. I crashed every damn copter. They knew not to let me get in the cockpit, but I did it anyway.
you make some valid points but I'm tired and need to sleep
valid get some sleep anon, BF discourse will always be happening no matter what unforutnately
actively discouraged you from engaging at longer distances unless you had the gun for it
that's a good point. My argument against that it that it encourages stacking a lot of recon players which is annoying to fight if you lack those range options and that suppression is probably the worst part of 3. Having your screen smeared in vaseline and weapon accuracy go to shit because someone shot at you makes encounters less interesting and come down to whoever shoots first will probably win first. (all things considered might not matter much considering TTK is so short
defending BF4's busted movement
probably an acquired taste more than anything. I like movement shooters and find movement the most interesting aspect in FPS games. Perhaps there's a happy middle ground to be met between "movement tech" and total boots on the ground. BF1 was pretty good at that imo
calling BF3's balance worse than 4
weapon balance yes, vehicle balance fuck no 4 sucks ass at that. The jet is still the spawn of satatn in 3 and any jet player worth a damn can evade ground missiles but 4 is worse by far.
I just find that 3's infantry meta is dominated by weapons like the AEK and M16a3, leaving little options for others. Probably a bit more balanced on other classes but then again Assault's ability to do everything but restock ammo and fight vehicles means those weapons are even more skewed.
I find at least 4 tends to have weapon types that dominate more than others but individual weapons are more balanced (i.e high rpm guns tend to be better as it is in 3 but there's more options within that category to use where 3 it feels like there's 2, that and the differences between them feel like they matter more when bursting is required more often, it makes lower recoil weapons also stand out)
Anything post 2142 is a shit baseline
name ONE modern game with BF2's outdated 2005 mechanics that did well in the last 5 years.
you literally can't because BF2 was already outdated dogshit by the time CoD4 released
Battlefield 2142 was the last real Battlefield game. Everything afterwards is consolized.
If you weren't there for the glory days of PC BF1942 you don't know what quality is(was).
outdated dogshit
Spoken like a true codnigger transplant who shouldn't be even playing Battlefield games and trying to change them into cod-lite
3 had terrible balance where there was like 5 good guns and everything else you shouldnt bother
stopped reading right here
actual shitter or simply delusional
Bold of you to imply any CoDnigger could comprehend a Battlefield game.
idk man when the aek and m16 do everything theres not much reason to bother with anythihng else
idk man when aek and ace do everything theres not much reason to bother with anything else
BFBC2 annoying cunt is hiding in a house, I delete said house
BF3/4 annoying cunt is hiding in building, too bad, best I can do is perhaps allow you to blow a small hole through it
I understand why you can't bring entire apartment buildings down in 3 and 4, the tech probably couldn't really cope with it but arguing that the destruction was better than Bad Company 2 is pure retardation.
I am a former jet/heli whore and general shitbucketeer, thus I am qualified to say the following with authority: if you play new battlefield games you're absolutely, legitimately and clinically retarded. There is hardly anything that's not a better use of your time. EA deserves nothing but spite and ridicule and if you still throw money at it in [current year], you're terminally domesticated debtcattle. Your hobby isn't gaming, it's consumption.
I stipped playing BF after 4, so it's a good baseline actually. 3 and 4 where the last good ones.
aek ace and F2000*
Fuck off Gen Z shitskin.
^seething bf1 negro
This. Joining a server and being able to tell for how long people had been playing simply by how destroyed everything was is a true TECHNOLOGY moment
Bad company 2 is the peak of the franchise, you can stop deluding yourself.
32 players
BC2 had no ''''''''''leveloution''''''''''. It had destruction and it was good.
Literally fuck that homo gay shit where the same thing happens over again with little to no player input.
Battlefield 3 was almost there with ground deformation, it was pretty fun in beta.
Too bad they sucked cock and was unable to make it work properly.
fuck bf labs it's cod warzeone
Russia being depicted as a serious peer threat in fiction in 2025
lol, lmao.
I was a real good pilot.
Were you at least a good A-gunner bro?
Remember when we used to pretend that Russia could single-handedly invade both Western Europe AND the Eastern United States and then found out that they couldn't even reach the capital of a Eastern European shithole in three days?
It is oddly disappointing.
bf fans deserves everything bad that is happening to them
BF4 is a shit game in general besides fundamentals(90% directly lifted from BF3).
Shit maps designed for vehicle farmers
Shit balance(100+ guns, people only ever use same 3-4 weapons)
I have no idea why people overrate it as much as they do.
What's funny is that baseline of BF6 isn't BF but nuMW. Shit's fucked. Series is dead. Series will be a battle royale slop from now on.
BF4 was the last multigoyer game I ever played. Can't be assed to play with the shit these days.
for not having any
BF3 had gazelle jumping and jump boosting. I don't think you can jump boost in BF4 at all.