Why would you purposely make characters that aren’t pleasant to look at?
Why would you purposely make characters that aren’t pleasant to look at?
curves
supportive
into tech
autist
Symmetra is far better than her street cred
She was always an underrated waifu. Cute poojeet.
Because variety. It's insane to me that you would want a game were every character is beautiful.
cute indian girl at the gym smiled at me...twice
wtf am i supposed to do ?
Propose to her parents
villains
this. plus its better if they own a convenience store/gas station. passive income where you dont have to show up to work is peak neetdom
MDK dog fits into funny/slapstick, which might be ugly but is done so in an appealing way. Not sexually, of course, but still appealing.
“Pleasant to look at” doesn’t have to mean “sexually attractive”. The worst thing a character can be is bland or ugly in a boring way.
You need to balance it otherwise you end up with this weird disconnect like you see in some JRPGs, especially Final Fantasy where the main cast literally look like they might as well be a different race from the npcs.
They really fucked up her face in the final game by making her always have a stern expression.
ugly in a boring way.
If a character is ugly in an interesting way, it is still an unattractive character.
bot reply
Sym began as a close-range ambush character that can also set up laser traps and tele/shield generator
main her because I'm an aimlet
then blizz completely "reworks" her into a hitscan with a super fucking shit ult
quit and never look back
seeing the state of the game now, I made a good choice
It's her resting street shitting face
bot reply
Thematic purposes. Horror. Player misdirection.
I once ran a Pathfinder campaign with a player who was too weird, socially awkward, and horny for his own good. He kept trying to fuck NPCs so I started making more of them hideously ugly. A stronger player would have continued, undeterred.
OP didn’t say “attractive”, he said “pleasant to look at”.
This character is not pleasant to look at, therefore it should not be in a game.
Does being pedantic make you feel smart? Obviously we’re talking about game protagonists.
OP didn’t say “attractive”, he said “pleasant to look at”.
Does being pendantic make you feel smart?
This character is a protagonist that is not pleasing to look at, therefore it should not be in a game
Literally retarded.
That’s not what OP said, that’s what the image said.
Not a good comeback. He literally didn’t say the thing you claimed he said.
this s why she became worst girl
Are you all seriously saying this isn't pleasant to look at?
I'd understand if you said "not pleasant to listen to" but come on now
Does being pedantic make you feel smart? >Obviously we’re talking about game protagonists.
Try to actually make a point when you post next time, sweetie.
Say hi
This character is a protogonist that is not pleasing to look at, therefore it should not be in a game.
Self awareness isn't your strong suit i see.
What makes you think they want to make a game with a non white lead that sells well?
At one point you have to set everything aside and look at the results and then infer the scope or wishes of the creators.
They made them fugly on purpose so the game fails.
Use pepper spray.
Yes it is. It’s a unique design.
Fresh out of arguments, I see.
Carrion is the most attractive protagonist ever created/
oh my god are you fucking retarded? like actually
You are assuming they can do it.
Maybe the character isn't supposed to be sexually attractive
These retarded semantics make me think you should kill yourself
“Pleasant to look at” doesn’t have to mean “sexually attractive”
It's a shame that they absolutely gutted her in OW2 because... I don't know turret bad. They literally turned her and mei into zarya but DPS while missing why anyone liked them. The most I can say is that she was a fun flanker for about 2 seasons when she could use her teleporter to and survive long enough to get a kill. Too bad they nerfed that too in return for standing back and holding alt fire into the enemy
Let me explain this in simple terms.
The image is saying that if you’re going to make a game with a minority female protagonist, you should at least make her hot. A fair point.
OP is saying that game characters in general should be pleasant to look at, i.e. not bland and boring. Also a fair point.
Some of you have mixed these two points together to a new statement “game protagonists should always be attractive”, which nobody made.
Thank you for your time.
Yes it is. It’s a unique design.
So it's ok for a character design to be unattractive if is is unique?
Are you? Why does carrion get a pass? It is not pleasing to look at.
All future replies will be directed here
actually all op is saying is
Why would you purposely make characters that aren’t pleasant to look at?
Carrion is fucking incredible, I love that fleshy teenth-gnashing nigga like you wouldn't believe.
Game protagonists should be hot
except when its unique
and when its not boring
and when its not intended to be
that’s what I said.
literally meaningless post
literally meaningless post
bros, there are so many indian qts at my bay area gym
Post pics.
if you can't see the difference between carrion and picrel you're either retarded or don't know how arguments work
one is a cool monster going on an rampage and the other is some vile agenda being pushed by jews
video games are supposed to be a fantasy setting where only cool shit exist
monsters and big tits are both cool, dei agenda isn't