What is your ideal female armor in video games?

What is your ideal female armor in video games?

123984745.jpg - 1024x765, 127.13K

Boob plate with big poofy skirt.

There's no good reason you can't write all 3 into a setting

Left except with exposed midriff.

Ornate dress armor with lots of lace and frills.

s-l1200.jpg - 1200x1037, 125.05K

I like when boob plate isn't actually molded like boobs. It's just potruding outward more and actually gives the armor a more bulky, armored, yet feminine look. I don't have any pics saved as an example. But you see it alot in Japanese female mecha design. iirc Monster Hunter has some female armor sets with the same design.

all of the above
simple as

someone explain this. if metallic armor hinders spellcasting, doesn't that mean someone in metal armor is immune to spells. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of spellcasters?

A dress. And women staying in the house doing chores as they should.

None. Women being weaker than men and obviously not participating in any combat scenarios is a FUNDAMENTAL piece of worldbuilding upon which rests everything including realistic gender dynamics, day-to-day life, the narrative, EVERYTHING.

These together.

I've seen it explained in games before as metal conducts magic like lightning, so if you were wearing armor when trying to cast, you might end up zapping yourself.

ok phew. I can finally enjoy skimpy armor again. Thanks

Armor please. If you have some other protective bs like barriers, then go crazy

left for regular women
middle for female paladins/battle nuns
right for muscular barbarians/berserkers
bonus: frilly dress armor for royalty

Everything has its place. Like I wouldn't expect to see right in Dark Souls but it can work in some games

file.png - 350x710, 266.52K

Don't trust men who claim to be into women in armor. I think they're a bit queer. It's like saying "I like women who dress like men" and that would rightly be called out as gay.

I like bikini armor and I'm tired of pretending.

356_copy.jpg - 960x1359, 248.11K

I've reasoned it by either making it harder to absorb energy or too tiring to make gestures in.

Sorry mate, only set of armor wet got left is the ol' Sad Lad Special

that just sounds lame

2025

Conan Exiles is still the only high production values game with pulpy sword & sorcery aesthetics

Pain.

Blacksmith! I require a helm that will grant me protection from even the plumpest of maidens sitting on my face!

Modern western warrior woman

Devs claim she wears historically accurate armor except it isn't accurate at all, it just looks like male fantasy armor

She weights 114 lbs but can single-handedly defeat a room full of 300-lb men with her bare hands. Also she somehow incapacitates them all instead of killing them

Witty retordt

Lady Eboshi and the girls

They have a fort and guns, fuck you

tfw no maidens give you their favour at a joust

Also a lot of western fiction:

enemy soldiers are evil

but also they would never ever even consider raping female warriors or sexually exploiting them otherwise because nobody could ever be evil to the point of sexism or misogyny

none. women shouldn't be in armor. take your joan of arc shit out.

rape rape rape

You're fat.

I think Sword and Sorcery is one of the only genres left that is only of interest to nerds and repels mainstream audiences, so any chances of a big game being produced by a major studio is slim.

This would be a good example, minus the boob shaped plate.

I think the bare minimum would be a fully covered chest and torso. There should be some padding between the metal and the skin.

Now if the character is part of an army, there had better be a good reason why the female armor looks different than the male armor.

Armor should not be scantily clad, for that, just don't use armor.

Ravness my beloved.

Game of Thrones?

le cuck helmet

I think the bare minimum would be a fully covered chest and torso.

Boo. No midriff no buy.

nrcgray_C.jpg - 1566x2212, 372.04K

Flamberge is my waifu

Armour Girls.jpg - 5728x2392, 2.5M

No armor.
Females do not belong on the battlefield or in adventuring parties.
But if you HAVE to be a female adventurer, at least become a mage. Female warriors and barbarians are just plain stupid and would die to the first large rat or goblin warrior.

A magical girl with some metal

this guy gets it

Honestly Souls games have always to me been the standard for armor that is fantastical but (mostly) not so much so that it looks impractical or non-functional. Yea I know the games have armor that is outright whacky as fuck bullshit too but I think the average gamer will know whovh examples I mean.

Middle middle middle

women don't belong in games where armor is worn, or any games really except if they are preparing my character's bath

Depends on the setting. If its made to look like a gritty, realistic dark fantasy then Armor for both men and women. If its billed as a high fantasy with ornately made armor and full of sexy people and magic then feminine. Gimme all the titties I can stand.

Point taken, especially considering that pretty much every attempt to re-introduce Conan into mainstream after the 1982 movie has always failed.

Women should not be in combat period, there is no 'realistic female armor', so if your game has fighting women, they should be cute and wearing cute frilly armor, and the reason should be that they're Clerics who get divine power from their wacky god who empowers them or something like that. Think about it, Cleric gods can make any restriction they want. Cute girls only, no pants allowed? Sure, makes more sense than 'realistic female armor' where some 115lb woman is wearing full plate and killing 250lb men lmao

right

My life for yours

Realistic as in the wearer would be realistically protected given the materials available for the time period. You fucking sperg, we're not talking about historical accuracy of women in combat. Is english not your first language?

For me it's character specific, different types of armour for paladins, knights, barbarians etc etc

fu5ism.png - 1103x1200, 542.08K

I don't care as long as they're barefoot tbdesu

I don't like rape in fiction for the same reason I don't like it if the characters curse every other word. Might be "realistic" and "gritty" but it's tacky as fuck in practice

Extremely ornate armor that would be impractical in any real-world scenario but is thematically relevant and symbolic of something character-specific

The armor is the character, completely unrecognizable without it

Peak

Armor is by design and virtue meant for men. But if you want to create a fantasy world where women are fighters (lol) then you better make armor that looks feminine, cuz otherwise that shit is gay as hell.

spear and sword is a really interesting combo that you rarely see in games

I prefer the most left or the middle one, the one on the left looks like some gooner shit than actual armour. She has her stomach exposed which leaves he vital organ open for attack, she has important ligaments in the arms, she has her collarbone exposed, this isn't even armour.

Women will not be realistically protected by the middle or left armor in the OP. That woman will walk around encumbered a bit and get smashed by the first male she encounters. There is no point arguing about relative realism, if you have female fighters taking out burly men left and right your setting is 'magical girl' and so their 'armor' should be cute and frilly

the same as the males? Women wearing less armor than their male counterpars always looked dumb as fuck.

Middle, always for the love of God middle. Left is too generic and right is tasteless.

Again you don't seem to understand the concept of realistic armor vs realistic combat. We're not talking about actual combat since this is a board about video games which are not reality.

Picrelated is what all female armor should look like. Denying this led to the body types 1 and 2 we have today. If you disagree, then you're on the same side as trannies, fags, and feminists. FACT

Artist: Boris Vallejo

For me it's realistic armor with an out of place feminine detail such as stilettos or a pussy window

I find the rightmost's weapon more offending than her armor.

I love women bros..

Bikini armor is for people who don't actually like armor.

Axegirl my beloved...

What do you got against the clap smacker?

What i never really understood is that even if more people are playing games or involved in more nerd fantasy stuff I'd still say its like 80% dudes. So where did this hate for sexifying anything come from?

Bikini armor is for people with taste.

Souls games have the spirit of sword and sorcery (and the skimpy armor too) and they're the most popular genre of the late 2010s-early 2020s

Souls games have the spirit of sword and sorcery

Do they? I doubt that.
Post some examples.

For Honor characters look so fucking cool, I wish the game was still playable but nowadays the only people who play it have 5000 hours in it and it's impossible to learn the game

Female soldiers are absurd so why not go all the way in absurdity

Feminist on social media and their numale lackeys.

Bikini armor is for people who don't actually like armor

Two issues. First, women aren't people. Therefore they don't need armor. Second, I like armor on people.

Okay, but you've gotta admit that what you posted is considerably more creative and interesting than the generic fantasy schlock of

HIlde from Soul Calibur uses that combo

Nah, it's an unholy middle ground between bikinis and armour without the sex appeal of former or the cool factor of the later it also creates dissonance because armor is meant to be protective but the bikini element comes with inherent vunerability that its greatly appealing on an actual bikini but confusing when its meant to be armor hence why I state that bikini armour is only for people who don't actually like armour.

Based

Cringe

Socially acceptable target to bitch about.

all character archetypes are present and playable, from the dark mage to the barbarian

killing traditional fantasy monsters and dragons

exploring the ruins of fallen cities

wearing silly armor

becoming stronger after each adventure as you find ancient relics

it's like hecking creative

It's just a standard samurai-concept with exposed flesh in a typical bikini/feminine-fashion.
Both are fine, but your weeb is showing.

Depends on the setting, but I do prefer all-covering but feminine looking armor.

Agreed

Damn, whoever did this is a great artist.

Kill yourself, nigger

without the sex appeal of former or the cool factor of the later

Weird way of saying you're gay, but alright.

Bikini armor, except with fully armored arms and legs, and a face-obscuring helm.

Absolutely fucking not, I don't know how you can look at both of those images and conclude they're of equal design merit. I'm not even saying the samurai one is creative on its own, but it is in a relative way.

All these fantasy armors makes us neglect the need for sexy female armor in sci-fi.

I accept your concession.

no codpiece

None.

NOOOOO IT HAS TO LOOK LIKE MALE ARMOUR

why not just go all the way and remove female knights?

Middle, nothing against a NOT SILLY boob armor

That's the endgame of these people. It goes
no women in games (incel) -> ultra sexualised women (nerd) -> clothed women but still attractive (normie) -> fully clothed women but ugly (woke) -> no women (male feminist, that is, failed incel).

>NOOOOO IT HAS TO LOOK LIKE MALE ARMOUR

Who said that?

You know what the amount of difference is in fantasticalness between a realistically armored woman, and a woman in skimpy bikini armor? Barely anything. Because a woman warrior is already pure fantasy.

dude a woman can't wear armor

lol are you going to fucking cry?

Aligned with sliding scale of whether or not the setting belongs on an 80s metal album cover.
The rights "owners" are very litigious about this shit. Even in situations where "their" work is public domain, they'll just go at it with trademark law instead or sue based on the retarded law of some other country.
Just goes to show that IP law is a fucking obsolete mistake being pushed by globohomo lawyers.
Because a lot of historical armor is fairly androgynous or feminine already, you just need to stylize.

none women shouldn't be fighting

Either left or right, middle is retarded

typical chink slop

just slap belts on everything

do you know what our skirt needs?

belts

shoes?

belts

This is common talking point among woketards.

Why are you bringing politics into this? Either talk about female armor designs in games or fuck off.

knight.jpg - 2048x3644, 2.25M

Because that's what OP image implies.

"armor" = male armor

Armored dresses

feene.png - 1070x1040, 1.3M

But there is not armor at all on the pic you've posted.

No it fucking doesn't. Take your meds you fucking nigger. Go talk about politics on

Or else what? You'll cry?

This is subaru tier cope to justify being stylistically lazy when it comes to armour

LOL you're brown.

All the way on the right or all the way on the left but the helmet stays on and the visor is put down so I can't see the girl's face even if she's a 10/10.

What is your ideal female armor in video games?

It was nice while it lasted.

you are gay, you like men

the armor should accent the female form and still be protective
also chainmail shimapan panties with normal steel and brass rings

Simple as:

knight/paladin/battlemage type

Full plate for both men and women. Women's plate bulges outward in the chest area a little.

cleric/spellsword type

Chestplate only, then fancy pants/skirt/dress. Ornamental look. Similar for AGI light armor types.

barbarian/dancer type

Bikini armor for girls, crotch cloth for men.

Its design is a bit retarded, but that is a chestplate, along with the shoulderpads and gloves.

i don't care what they say
bikini armor and the male gaze is kino, and I'm tired of pretending it's not

This. Any girl on the battlefield would be raped.

Something like this

based

Any man on the battlefield would be raped.

truke
it's the only way for a straight man to appreciate women in armor

that feel when I think this helmet looks really cool

All 3, it depends on my mood

If they must be included:

Female armor is the most practical. They couldn't carry full armor very well.

Feminine armor is the most appealing - its retarded from a realism standpoint but fuck you, [Rule of Cool] trumps all.

Reminds me of a mosquito. I'd give it to the reoccurring, bumbling henchman.

Hell yeah.

Women in combat is unrealistic anyways so you may as well slap em in a chainmail bikini.

right

rule of cool

Wish this wasn't an Ubisoft game.

Yeah.
Left and Center look stupid.
They are, in my opinion, uncool.
Right is in the same hemisphere as cool.

Somewhere between left and middle but the woman also has dick sucking lips.

HildeSC4.jpg - 1400x1600, 325.2K

Something that incorperates a dress, skirt, or leotard. Im not that fond of helmets. On men neither unless its a hyper realistic setting. Which i find boring for games anyways.
Shouderpads are totally fine, but not oversized unless its on a Orc type being.

Middle is objectively the best looking since it hits the stride between cute woman and cool armour, right is just bikini with extra bobbles which isn't cool in slightest, attractive but not cool.

Rule of Cool

More like Rule of Coomer

he says posting Yujiro

he cooms to Yujiro

Anything from the middle to the right is the tits (pun intended). The only time left works is when the chick is some high-ranking soldier close to a royal ally (in which case she has to look super professional) or is explicitly trying to hide the fact that she's a woman ala Mulan.

that's hardly a problem unique to chinks
leather armor continues to be a problem in both fantasy and historical fiction

For me it's stuff like picrel

What is your ideal female armor in video games?

Animal pelt.

Yes

I forgot another case where left also works: when the woman is a Joan d'Arc analogue and is fighting for religious/patriotic reasons. That also is a good usage of plain Armor for women. Otherwise, female and feminine armor is better.

Jenne D'Arc.jpg - 1560x2153, 827.98K

Chinks generally overdesigning the fuck out of characters is my biggest pet peeve about their games. A lot of their female characters have so busy designs that nothing ultimately seems to stand out about them.
Just make a hot girl, give her accessory or two and slap her to a simple sexy outfit.

women in armor with big butt is awesome

863401153269.jpg - 4000x4000, 1.91M

Like I wouldn't expect to see right in Dark Sou-

file.png - 721x845, 1017.18K

Animal pelt.

Yes.
Animal pelt loincloth to be exact.

I hate online discourse about female armor

This is so problematic, this isn't realistic, why isn't she as heavily armored as the guy in full plate???

Female armor isn't realistic, women are small and weak and didn't fight in wars

Yujiro cooms in men.

Exactly. The bigger and meaner the animal that it was sourced from, the better.

don't bother anon, he doesn't actually care about historical accuracy, he just wants more games with only men in them because he's a raging faggot.

All 3 should be avalible, but the less armoured ones offer far less protection.

In this image it should be 30% damage mitigation, 25% mitigation, 5% mitigation. For the mathematically challanged : this means that left has 42.8% more effective hp than naked, middle has 33.33% more than naked, and right has 5.26%. So left-most armour is 35% more durable than right-most.

I am 100% pro coomer armour. But coomers must pay the statistical penalty. It’s only fair.

boob plate

narrow waist

emphasize on hips

dress under the armor

You just posted a middle armor THOUGH

Even pauldrons are too much usually.

skyrim.jpg - 1546x1172, 557.38K

Middle or right depending on character. I love female berserkers in chain mail or leather bikinis and I love pretty armor sets for knights and clerics too

Yujiro fags like to pretend they don't want a bdsm daddy. They are a special kind of in denial faggot

then just say that you actually love females on sexy looking outfit. You don't like armor at all

None, the only women that belong on the battlefield are the ones getting raped.

Souls games hardly ever have skimpy armor.

medieval setting

female guards

female knights

you heavily damage the believability and immersive quality of your world if you include that

if you want to damage your world building you might as well stick them in metal bikinis because female knights are already ridiculous

Now this is pretty good

he says as Dragons tank magic missiles from warlock necromancers accompanied by an army of the undead

lacey dress armor is the most entrylevel reddit ((((look at my patrician taste guys)))) opinion, worse than coomer and WoW big pauldron-plate armor combined

I love the fantasy genre because the characters can wear literally whatever and it doesn't matter and anyone who thinks it's unrealistic is a retard because they don't know what the word fantasy means.

That thing she does where she flicks both of her swords to the sides when she goes into phase 2 arouses me to a disturbing degree.

100 year old man who can catch an arrow mid flight with his bare hands

this is fine

25 year old woman able to wear armor and swing a sword

NO MUH IMMERSION

you faggots are even worse than the "ow her spine" crowd.

All armor should be like Solange in code of princess, or that alien suit thing in xenoblade x

Conan Exiles did not repel mainstream audiences. It's just an awkward aesthetic to use because the IPs that have it are either obscure or the rights are in some corporate limbo.

a 25 year old woman able to overcome men 3 times her size is fine but it's unrealistic if she can do it in a bikini!!!

High quality armor should be clearly feminine, low quality armor should look ill fitting and clearly made for men.
No bikini armor, if you can't do sexy without making it look stupid you don't belong on a design team.

Regardless it's worth mentioning that if you have female fighters it's a fantasy game, therefore armor should look thematic and preferably also symbolic rather than realistic.

Conan Exiles did not repel mainstream audiences.

Even in Conan Exiles a lot of people who play the game mod it to be more generic fantasy with elves and orcs and fairies.

doesn't that mean someone in metal armor is immune to spells

That's assuming that for example a fireball is still just magic once it's cast and not a flying ball of plasma.

Bikini armor looking stupid is your subjective opinion.

I did say that you are a retard for not knowing what fantasy means. In fantasy, everything is free of the constraints that reality places on them, but the outcome isn't that -nothing- matters. It's just that the realistic justifications doesn't, and is replaced by personal appeal. Sexy armor or women being suited for combat do have a function, and that function is to appeal to the author's fantasy of seeing bikini chainmail warrior women perform exceptional feats. Fantasy is the opposite of generic, it's always highly specific personal appeal.

I'm well aware, but can you think of any in-character reason for bikini armor?

inb4 to be sexy

It's not any more sexy nor protective than a normal bikini but it is much less comfy, so are you arguing it's a fetish item that belongs in bordellos?

Your brain is rotten to the core. You need to get off the internet for awhile and stop treating every opinion you disagree with like contrarian conspiracy theory, you literally perpetually online sperg

have basic shit make sense like fire being hot or air being required to breathe

WHY CANT I DRINK FIRE AND SHIT UNICORNS!?!?!

the mundane of the setting allows the fantastical elements to be magical

I quite like the sunless set in DS3, especially how the chest fabric puffs out.

there is a genetic disorder which allows some women to be just as strong as men

There, fixed.

Real life is more like the left with some women wearing something like the middle of they aren't in an active battle role. So you might have a Princess or Queen dressed with Plate Armor but with a skirt while a Noble woman wanting to be part of the Crusades and being in active combat will wear the same style of armor as men only made to her different measurements as Plate Armor was tailored made.

My favorite is

I am an irredeemable evil

i genocide nations

but i would never do a racism or sexism

the hoard respects gays and pronouns

now face the wall

no you retarded faggot, i have no problem with bikini armor, i have problems with faggots trying to claim "female knights ruin all settings' despite them talking about fantasy games in the first place.
Just admit you're a faggot bro, you don't complain about the giant not dying due to the square cube law, nor do you think its unrealistic for the knight to stop the giant's massive clob with his shield. your brain is so rotted by modern politics you've reached the full homo ending where you sperg out if there's a woman on screen at all.

believability

Immersion comes from the world itself holding up to its own standards and rules, not your pre-existing expectations.
Conan has female warriors who can fight on par with men. Therefore seeing a woman who can stand on equal footing should no longer be a question of believability as it is normal in-universe.

Just because something is fantasy doesn't mean it doesn't have to make sense. One of the most common issues people have with bikini armour is that we're meant to take it at face value that its suitable and capable as a piece of protection but it logically doesn't make sense and thus causes dissonance that impacts how properly immersed somebody can be in the scenario because that instrusive thought is there.

You could say "Oh it's enchanted!" but then you'd have to come up with more reasons as to why it doesn't look different but with the same enchantments and then it spirals into "just because"(or author's personal taste as you said) which also impacts immersion. Most fantasy series that feature bikini armour just make it so that everybody is in equivilant apparel like Conan or Golden Axe, or just restrict it to a few character types specifically like a tribesman, a barbarian or a gladiator

Fantasy is the opposite of generic, it's always highly specific personal appeal.

This is objectively not true, if it was we wouldn't have tropes specific to Fantasy as a genre

In fantasy, the material matters a lot. Dragonscale, Mithril, Adamantium etc.. Now if, like in D&D, characters can only wear a few enchanted items at once, it would make perfect sense to wear bikini armor.

Baldur's Gate 3 made bikini armor obsolete by adding the option to wear any outfit underneath your armor and swap between them at will. Now you can have realistic armor and skimpy fantasy outfits on the same character so there is no need for skimpy armor.

Actual medieval people thought that stories about amazons in armor are cool, therefore I declare that it is perfectly fine in medieval fantasy.
Pic related is from 15th century French book Le secret de l'histoire naturelle.

12398754523.jpg - 1280x1915, 1.18M

A lot of real world armors had details that didn't make sense. Rule of cool exists in real life too.

And pic related is from the Nuremberg Chronicle written in 1493.

amazones.jpg - 521x435, 291.9K

The only reason wearing bikini armour (or pajamas) in D&D and other similar systems like Pathfinder is because AC is just an abstraction of how well your character can avoid damage and takes into account a combination of defense gear, enchantments and your agility/ability to dodge. One of the most infamous complaints about the Owlcat pathfinder games is that Pajama tanking is more effective than wearing armour.

I don't remember seeing female guards in the conan movie, and I remember that chick being an exception not the rule.

it has been a long time since ive seen it tho

Baldur's gate 3 made bikini armor obsolete by... making all armor potentially bikini armor

what the fuck are you even trying to say here anon?

Real World armours with impractical bits were either still practical as warfare protection or just a symbol of wealth. People still took painted armour to war because it was still practical as armour

for me it's girls in historical platemail
just platemail
and no faulds

this is not a dress

Left for regular soldiers.
Middle for nobles and royalty.
Right for non-humans and fucking huge women.

as it is normal in-universe.

it's not normal at all in the conan universe
just because something happens sometimes doesnt mean it's normal

Skimpy armor with a full face helmet.

Really? It would make perfect sense to wear purely performative armor in the shape of a bikini as opposed to a billion other more comfortable types that cover just as little skin?
This without even considering the fact that bikini armor is almost invariably shown used on its own and would not typically be called out as such if worn over other gear.

What does this area look like?

bikini armor series in skyrim

Go too far right and it doesn't really count as "armored", might as well call someone with metal belt buckle a knight at that point. If it's just for aesthetics then sure, but gameplay-wise the protection should be completely inferior to the left, and making it the female counterpart to standard "men's armor" is retarded.
Middle is pretty good. In a fantasy setting it's reasonable to suspend belief that there are some superhuman or magical women that can fight as elites, but there's no goddamn reason to draft average women as footsoldiers. My argument is that female armor should never look so generic as the left picture, but fully armored ladies in cool fantasy plate are awesome.

Women don't belong in melee combat roles

They belong as healer/sorcerers

Preferably no armor at all because bitches shouldn't be anywhere near combat in any scenario.

He's saying that there's no need to make porny gear with gameplay value when you can make proper looking armor and then transmog it to whorewear.

imagine how sweaty that ass is after full plate march, never wanted to be a squire more

They belong as healer/sorcerers

But men are better at that too.

Gameplay-wise, right has higher AC due to her dexterity.
Full plate is stupid and slow as usual.

I feel like in a medieval society sending your women to die in war would be counterproductive

You're correct in either movies not having female guards, however that one girl wasn't an exception as the first movie also had the blonde chick who later appeared as a valkyrie or whatever.
I don't think warrior females are really that unbelievable, if maybe a bit irregular.

It happens in both movies, so it's definitely not a one-off thing or an extremely irregular happenstance that just occurs. We may argue all day on its rarity or its in-universe implications, but it's definitely there. The two movies (because I disregard the reboot) didn't allow enough information to conclusively link warrior women and commonality, however both movies featured them for a notable part of their runtime which -if nothing else- leads us to the fact that warrior women exist to a larger degree than our own world.

I'm saying the reason bikini armor was a thing in the first place is because characters in fantasy media were usually locked in to one armor or outfit or whatever for the duration of the movie or game. In games especially your character always just wore full battle armor 24/7. So designers had to figure out a way to have sex appeal when the sexy female characters were going to be stuck wearing armor the whole time. BG3 has every character wear layers, so they have armor, civilian clothes, and underwear on at any given time. The ease of swapping between these layers makes it unnecessary for the armor to be sexy.

same as middle but no gambeson

women belong at home raising children!

ugh, chuds

Nah, they should be kept in breeding caves, separate from the kids.

you're just a falseflagging faggot that should've been aborted

that's a really weird conclusion to reach, if the point is "transmog makes the gears appearance unimportant" then it's just as valid to say "pervy gear with the best stats in game is fine, since you can just transmog it to some low level platemail that you like the look of".

believability

lol who keeps writing this shit? Guess we can't have dragons and trolls now. Are you fags actually threatened by a fucking cartoon?

now this is a setting I can get behind

LMFAOOOOOOOOOOO

BUT MUH DRAGONS EN SHEEITT

that's a whole lot of assumptions with very little actual basis. plenty of games have multiple different armor styles including bikini armor, there's no reason to think its "only a thing because old games only had one sprite per character".

>BUT MUH BELIEVABILITY AND SHIT

It's so easy lol

Original Conan novels had plenty of action chicks and their existence was not really questioned (such as Belit and Valeria) but the society at large was still portrayed as patriarchal and mostly male dominated.
It was kinda normal kind of Robert E. Howard's portrayal of women and was the same in his historical short stories too, most of his background female characters were implied to be in traditionally feminine roles but heroines were allowed to be exceptional. His Dark Agnes de Chastillon stories are about a swordwoman adventuring in Medieval France after escaping an arranged marriage and being trained by a mercenary, and original Red Sonya (making her a Hyborian character was a latter idea for Conan comics) was originally a sexy wandering gunslinger babe who just joins the Austrian army in their war against Ottomans without anyone objecting.

I believe all games and movies should have a 50/50 ratio of female and male guards, gender identities should also be represented.

the myth of male "strength" should be dispelled and its up to creators to make that a reality.

Ai slop

The one with the best stats

All varieties duh, why would I settle for only one type?

Well talking specifically about bg3 it doesn't work because your whorewear options don't come from normal gear but from your uhh lets call it civilian wardrobe.
In every other game you'd have a point though.

Eternal reminder.

All three of these are great, depending on who the female wearing the armor actually is.
More sensible armor is cool on female characters who actually take the role of combatant seriously. Bikini armor is great on female characters who lean into sex appeal/exoticism.
Imagine a Human female Cleric in heavy plate armor in a fight with a manic Dark Elf slut in a metal thong.

dreadfu.png - 811x930, 514.55K

Ideal? Women should not be forced into combat.

Frilly dress with plate pauldrons, rerebraces, couters, vambraces, gauntlets, cuisses, poleyns, greaves, and sabatons is peak female aesthetics

IMG_4037.png - 320x470, 30.26K

The bikini is enchanted and grants its wearer the strength and fortitude of 50 men.

Maybe (I'd love it more wholeheartedly then lol), but I'm describing when it makes sense to put a woman in just plain armor rather than something more fitting.

And why does the enchantment require a bikini as base?

we're meant to take it at face value that its suitable and capable as a piece of protection

No we aren't, you're still resisting the idea of fantasy and demanding that authors explain why and how something works. But the why and how are the domain of grounded fiction, in fantasy the why is "because it's what I want" and the how is not important. This actually brings up the point of how fantasy authors who come up with magic systems or even need to refer to magic to explain things just don't get it. Good fantasy is psychological, not scientific.

Actually, consider Tolkien: he wrote extensive lore for families and history and events but he did not write extensive manuals for how magic works in his setting. Supernatural feats are extensions of the characters and their psychology rather than a science they master. Sauron was really good at crafting rings but the actual process is totally irrelevant. Eru created the universe by singing! Things happen because it makes for an appealing story. Tolkien was an environmentalist so his trees can uproot and go beat up Saruman, that's fantasy.

lol why do you faggots keep bringing up reality? Who the fuck cares?

when you're so contrarian you just HAVE to have the opposite opinion to the already-contrarian one

lmao

Middle for regular oens and bikino for classes like beserkers

That's a stupid question when magic is involved. Why do we need copper instead of wool for wires? It's simply needed for the magic to work because the blimpo glombo glorble shmorbles.

slutty bikini armors because why not

counterpoint: the first attire gives you a lot more to work with in regards to making eye candy than the fourth
unless your idea of eye candy is just more skin is better, in which case just draw them naked.

Frankly women should not be combatants at all.
Its just as stupid as adding blacks to European fantasy games.
pretty much this, if you are going down that path, your worldbuilding is trash so who cares

file.png - 480x374, 278.24K

It's made from an incredibly rare material and its creator had a bit of an impish streak.

Not him but everyone has a line for that, even you. It's just different for each person. Do you want Honda Civics in your otherwise low-tech magic fantasy setting? Most likely not, though you might say yes just to be a contrarian faggot.
But just blanket complaining about female warriors in magical settings is retarded to me when you can easily use the means of the setting to offset any physical prowess difference, and physically weaker individuals are more likely to accumulate such things.

Sword and Sorcery style not just because it looks better in my opinion but because it usually features people in touch with their sexuality. In those comics a woman can be sexy and swing a sword without being a literal whore. It's like how women in the old days could turn a man on with a look or a sway of their hips but nowadays they're twerking naked and it's just grotesque.

It depends on what sort of character and tone the game is trying to create. Why do you feel the need to unilaterally impose rules upon artists? If you're going to make a goofy fantasy game where characters have chainsaw swords and hurl penguins at each other, why not have bikini armor as well?
why does it make more sense? You know no woman has ever worn plate armor in the history of the world. Not even Joan of Arc.

setting requires all female warriors to be naked

interesting, do go on

his magic is the pic related kind

no themes, no symbolism no nothing

Direct admission of wretched incompetence as far as I'm concerned.

its creator had a bit of an impish streak

Ah so it's stupid on purpose, which means it's objectively stupid as opposed to merely subjectively.

You can easily tell who is a real brainlet by their inability to separate reality from fantasy and how they bring in arguments for mundane as though they are applicable to fiction. In reality dragons never existed and no living thing on earth breathes fire so by their nitwit logic no fantastical settings should having fire breathing dragons in them either.

Lord of the Rings literally had a woman fighting in it in armor. What a stupid fucking image.

Wow this guy fighting a dragon is believable

lel

All of them are neat.

frilly dress with plate armor combined

Armor. Visor on helmet down. That's is perfect for my gaze, and it's sexualize females for me, like no other option.

Lord of the Rings literally had a woman fighting in it in armor.

one woman
and tens of thousands of men

Stronk womyn hit harder than any material can endure
Stronk womyn therefore fights naked and unarmed
Oil extra for bitches with bad skin and to attract men with shit taste.

Fighting a dragon can be believable if the setting justifies dragons. A Honda Civic becomes believable if the setting justifies it, I just wouldn't enjoy it most likely. Dragons are easier to justify in fantasy settings than Honda Civics but you'll pretend otherwise because you don't want to address that you're being a retarded shit.

one woman, so rare that she was basically a saint martyr (and over-emphasized in the movies of course)
why do you people use the most obvious BS arguments

Lord of the Rings literally had a woman fighting in it in armor made for and stolen from men

ftfy

My mom asked me if I knew who this was. I’m not really sure how to feel about that.

Like I said above:

1) If the chick is some part of the royal retinue, she can't break the dress code just because she's a woman. It would be unseemly.

2) Hiding the fact that she's a woman from the other soldiers ala Mulan

3)She's some stereotypical archetype of goodness, piety and patriotism. She can also wear the middle with no problem, but it would look a bit off form my perspective.

You know no woman has ever worn plate armor in the history of the world. Not even Joan of Arc.

There was literally a Spanish woman that faked being a man so she could become a conquistadora. There's like several others too and I imagine they would've had similar gear.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_de_Erauso

he could tell the genders of ten thousand individuals by a glance

face it, half the army were women

1236985.png - 680x696, 180.77K

And by your logic a woman swinging a sword is more unbelievable than a giant flying lizard that breathes fire and just as believable as a modern day car? Retard.

That's still a woman fighting in armor. God you are just dumb. What is the matter with you?
Yeah except in the lord of the rings there was a woman who did fight in armor.

I wish the game was still playable but nowadays

don't worry, you're not missing out on much. they keep releasing overtuned dlc characters while refusing to buff legacy characters like my wife nobushi. They also won't make any new maps so the game is basically dead in my eyes

for me it's sword and board. I love these types of wide bladed arming swords.

based. love using this set but with the fire witch leggings and the alva helmet

Fixed what? She was in armor. You're just silly.

Nobody needs detailed explainations of how abstract concepts like magic work and since how its expressed inTolkien's work is tied to the characters themselves instead of being a general phenomena nobody questions it, however something objective like armour, as in something that exists and can be physically interacted with irl, will always cause questions depending on how its depicted because the primary purpose of armor is protection we already know how armour works that's why the immersion breaking question of "Why bikini armour tho" arrises in the first place.

That's why it doesn't make sense to compare a magic system to armour, it's not complicated or abstract in any way shape or form like magic is, that's literally the reason why you never see people complain about magic systems outside of the cases were how it works is integral to a story being told, like how it is in most battle manga.

And again to reiterate, just because something is fantasy doesn't mean it doesn't have to make sense.

Ah so it's stupid on purpose

stupidly forgets anon's point that the enchantable material is incredibly rare

If it reacts poorly to other materials or the enchantment is disrupted by other things besides the wearer that the enchantment is bonded to then that actually gives you a lot to work with narratively. Elite guards would typically travel with squires who would carry other things that are necessary but would disrupt the enchantment, or a traveler would make sure to have things carried on them in bags or sacks that are easily removed from their person if they needed the boon of the enchantment quickly. This would make them easier to pickpocket and they would get attention from the ostentatious armor they wear, which would make them more wary and distrustful.
You have no imagination or critical thinking if you can't use your fetish to enhance your setting.

it's stupid on purpose

Who's to say that it wasn't sourced from a tropical island where full plate and the like would only drain your stamina?

Yeah except in the lord of the rings there was a woman who did fight in armor.

there's also a car in the lord of the rings movies

Eowyn didnt even fight, she was just awkwardly flinging around the place until she stood up to the Witch King.

Why do you niggers think women are so weak they can't even tie their shoes? They're WEAKER than men, but unless they have cerebal palsy or some other physical deformity, they could probably wear a light suit of armor and holster a sword or crossbow just fine.

Even the Sarmatians/Scythians made use of female archers in their battles along the steppe, which inspired the myths surrounding the Amazons. It's very uncommon for a woman to be a armored warrior but it's not impossible, unlike fucking dragons (which you seem to disagree with deeply for some reason).

Why can't a game just have all three?

Anon discovers that every rule has exceptions

congratulations, your parents failed you but at least you have Anon Babble to teach you basic concepts.

1st society puts their women on the front lines

2nd society at war with the first doesn't do that and sends men instead

2nd society gets to exist while the 1st dies out

having a single women wave around a sword doesn't break a world, but an army of women starts to raise questions about how a society that retarded could exist.

Most class based games already do

No they didnt, Slavs/Iranians are just such twinks some of them were mistaken for women.

women armor is silly in this fantasy setting that had a women in armor

Go to bed anon.

First two can both be good. Third one is a cosplaying succubus. Also for second.
How has this never crossed my mind before?

These people are just shitposting for (You)s, anon.

3th line

Fanfiction

1st society win due to numerical advantage

1st society take survived members of second society as sexual slaves while destroying 2th society culture

repeat til 1st society control rest of the world

If your fantasy is about amazon warrior women then its fine to have them be warriors. Because you are emphasizing that is a fantastical part of the story.
For example a story about giants where the women are bigger than the men and more dominant, that's obviously a setup for this kind of situation.
If you are just trying to slip in women warriors without any kind of explanation, thats shitty worldbuilding.

bamboozling

getting bamboozled

Bruh...

a woman swinging a sword is more unbelievable than a dragon?

No, I never said that, retard.

just as believable as a modern day car?

I never said that either. Learn to follow reply chains.

except in lord of the rings

I don't care about lord of the rings specifically. There's a shitton of magic in that setting, women could use that to fight better or just be worse fighters and only fight when it's necessary for them because they'd be more likely to lose.

Why do you niggers think women are so weak they can't even tie their shoes?

I never fucking said that, why are you all so fucking stupid? Whether or not women are much weaker than men, and what they do with that physical difference depends on the setting, which is case by case basis. As I said earlier in my post, women in magical settings would probably just be more likely to use magic, or fight only where it was necessary if they couldn't do so because they would be more likely to lose.

The "tiddy armor" argument is kindof midwit permantly-on-twitter-femcel shit imo. I remember being in highschool art class and the teacher (an attractive young woman) had us draw a portrait of her. I fucked up her tits because of internet brain rot making me think it was sinful or some shit to give this girl honkers. She grilled me for it. As in looked at me with disgust for how I represented her. Women in the real world don't have this fucking delusion that men should just totally ignore everything feminine about women.

Is tiddy armor dumb? Yes. But we're playing fucking video games, it should be dumb.

pic

That's imagine is made for my male gaze.

the teacher (an attractive young woman) had us draw a portrait of her. I fucked up her tits because of internet brain rot making me think it was sinful or some shit to give this girl honkers. She grilled me for it.

wtf?

I'm fine with the girl, but that shortsword looks retarded.

I always thought the female steel plate armor in Skyrim was so sexy. Just steel boobies with swirly nipples

You are so stupid

enchantable material is incredibly rare

And the material requires you to craft it in bikini shape why again?

its creator had a bit of an impish streak

Therefore stupid on purpose.

Who's to say that it wasn't sourced from a tropical island

The fact that it's a bikini and not the least material you could get away with.

except... that doesnt work
there's a reason no one in history has done that, because it doesnt fucking work, any society like that would have been wiped out

numerical advantage

doesnt mean anything when those numbers are made of women who are a bigger hindrance than they are help

My wife is an athlete and I can overpower her while I'm eating a sandwich and also I don't work out

funnily enough I also was in an art class where a guy drew the model as an anime girl with huge tits and he also got grilled for it lmao
Personally I was very good but just didn't want to draw dicks so I got called out for that once or twice but I'm just not gonna do it

keep sending women out to die

not enough women to form army/rear children

1st society you enslaved rebels

women are required for population growth, having a bunch of dead/injured/old women is a terrible idea

Excellent observation

Tits exist and not everyone is afraid of admitting that when they aren't terminally online

You are so smart

professional female athletes get BTFO by amateur teenage boys EVERY TIME
so yes they are that weak

And the material requires you to craft it in bikini shape why again?

That was the minimum amount of this expensive material required to hold the enchantment. It is already established that the material is rare and expensive, why waste extra of such expensive resources? This is basic problem solving, did you really not consider this obvious next step when you typed out that dumb post?

there's a reason no one in history has done that, because it doesnt fucking work

Exept it's unknown if it's work as no one tried it, unlike communism, that was tried multiple times and proven to not work.

women are required for population growth

Womens from destroyed societies cover it.

Detest total replications of real-world armor because it's literally non-design, just placing a real-world counterpart into what is almost uniformly a work of fiction

Detest bikini armor because it's basically the most pathetically limited design concept you can put together, and in almost all cases is less of a design than actual lingerie

Everything else is fair game. If you're going to take me into a new world, take me there with your own flavor and style. Realism is for Redditors who want to pretend to be more educated than they actually are, and you can make alluring and sexy designs without sacrificing any and all frameworks of design like Bikini Armor relies on.

42265436.jpg - 2462x1740, 2.83M

What are you wtf'ing for?

as someone pointed out in this thread it was, the Scythians allowed women to fight with them and they went extinct

there are likely more examples, but good luck finding what is left of them

What the hell is wrong with that dog?

not when you force them to into military service, you just get old/dead women from that

That was the minimum amount of this expensive material required to hold the enchantment

Why is it a bikini rather than a single plate piece like a mirror cuirass? You're just spreading the metal to protect you less.

inb4 it needs to be spread over

Why not make scales out if it then? working it in bikini shape is a waste of effort

We can go on all day. You're just a retard in denial.

I was trying to give it an honest go, I'm a musician and dabble in 3D but my drawing skills have always been shit. I gave this girl some square boobs and her response snapped me back to reality and is permanently seared into my brain. Never got tasked with drawing nude but I think in that context I would have been fine embellishing.

Weird corgi anatomy mixed with stylistic fantasy-dog aesthetics.

file.png - 1000x667, 1.18M

Scythians

Never tried to chain annex societies and use captured womens as sex-slaves at same time.

having the option of all 3 and the ability to mix and match is the only right decision.

more customization overall

gives players the choice to be armored juggernaut, skimpy amazonian, or a combo of armored juggernaut mixed with skimpy amazon

makes players invest more time into your game to unlock all appearances to enjoy the wide variety of customization

win win

If the setting has barbarian men fighting half-naked then there's really no excuse it can't have women in bikini armor.

70-95% population of both men and women still be in backline due how economy work to supply army, and ammount of females lost in battle will be well compensated by captured females as my enemy don't used them in battle. So for every 1 women that die, 10 will be captured and breed kids.

Got a tag, anon? Or you could add mine: bnuuy3223

retard

chain conquer without fail

having breeding caves

we have our female army gentlemen

A teacher telling her students to draw her and getting mad when she isnt drawn hot enough isnt normal.

or you could just be normal

Katana for me, just like IRL.
Honorable mention to axe girl for having a nice, shapely axe

Why is it a bikini rather than a single plate piece like a mirror cuirass?

If the amount of material barely forms a bikini then that would make it useless as an actual piece of armor, retard. Which is irrelevant anyway because the protection granted by the enchantment far outweighs whatever physical defense it would provide. Spreading that minute amount of material over the essentials is the least "stupid on purpose" way to design it because it allows for the most modesty, or you'd end up just exposing yourself entirely.

why can't they work with it in this entirely different way?

The material does not allow that, deforming it in such a way or spreading it too thinly ruins its enchantable capacity.
Again you seem very low IQ if you couldn't envision such solutions to problems as shallow as the ones you provided.

And then your society immediately falls apart as your ethnic stock is completely bred out by the “defeated” enemy stock as resentful mothers raise their mixed sons to have no loyalty to their nation

Barbarians almost invariably fight half naked because their basic trope is being borderline primitives.
Nobody should claim they do it because it's optimal.

Why do sword and arrows go through armor like cardboard? Why are mages wearing robes instead of armor? Why do darker ornate armors protect more than the steel you get early on. You're selectively bothered by bikini armor because oh not le male gaze.

Armor is cosmetic for roleplaying, just like in movies armor is are good for visual communication and not much else.

Mandatory. Public. Education. Also slaves don't have to keep them.

I'm the original nigger. It wasn't that she wasn't drawn "hot enough". That's 0% of the problem. It was that she did in fact have boobs, and I did not draw them. In art you go under critical review that kindof supercedes what the rest of us idiots are yapping about most of the time. Not drawing tits when they exist is scrutinized the same way it would be if I had left out her nose or eyes. It is normal if you want good art.

I like how you guys are forming the vilest race of female rapists and conquerors in order to justify female guards.

The Scythians were very successful for many centuries. Their use of warrior women is probably exaggerated though; I seriously doubt they made a habit of putting their women in harm's way.

Their basic trope is based off of Celtic and Germanic tribes, who did in fact use armor.

Justify female guards?
burgers.jpg

Why not just make it so that in your setting women are actually strong?

trump had female guards and he got shot in the head

working it in bikini shape is a waste of effort

Three triangles of material seems pretty efficient to me.

it allows for the most modesty

You could just wear actual clothes and put a mirror plate or any kind of symbolic armor like a late modern gorget on top of it.

deforming it in such a way or spreading it too thinly ruins its enchantable capacity

Ah yes, mirror plates are too thin, but a micro chastity belt is alright. Totally not just a fetishization.
You absolutely don't sound delusional anon, believe it.

Again you seem very low IQ if you couldn't envision such solutions to problems as shallow as the ones you provided

The fucking irony. You're the one presenting problems and I'm giving you alternatives that make more sense.

Not drawing tits when they exist is scrutinized the same way it would be if I had left out her nose or eyes. It is normal if you want good art.

Not him but that's up to what your purpose was in drawing the piece. If you wanted it to be as 1:1 as possible then sure, but you can use a reference as a foundation for something else and it is a useful exercise to be able to believably create a variation of something, or you'd be forever stuck drawing 1:1 from references. I'm guessing you were just trying to get it as accurate as possible but if you intentionally left out the tits then that was your choice as the artist. The piece is not the person, the person is just a tool for making the piece.

i can't say no to a bitch with a sword longer than she is tall

French

So it's 100% fake and gay.

Kill yourself.

D&D barbarians are based more on Frazetta paintings than any real world culture.

Depends on the setting

I for one am sick of women soldiers in general, since it tends to get pushed even in settings it doesn't belong like dark fantasy.

hats.jpg - 1058x948, 213.28K

Which proves my point

Actually it proves my point!

using the complete and total control that you over your fictional setting to have it however the fuck you like

Anon, no! That's insane!

Some celts did fight naked, not all of them obviously and probably not even most but it was a thing they did

I'm forced to conclude that your point is that I'm correct.

Kenedy had male guards and he got shot in the head.

women soldiers

in dark fantasy

the fuck?

So this is way they were losing that hard.

Yeah, but it wasn't due to lack of technology or access to armor.

What are you one about? What's a dark fantasy without at least one instance of naive rape bait overestimating herself in the forbidden cave of thorny-dicked trolls?

You could just wear actual clothes

Established that you can't in an earlier post due to how the material reacts, which I showed was an opportunity for narrative variety.

oh so you just can't stretch it too thin and make it cover as much as I want it to?

Correct. All materials have limitations.
It's been established at this point that the material is very expensive and troublesome to work with, so you need to work around the material and that's the best solution. You can say "I think it's stupid" and be on your way, but you're acting like there's no way to justify it. Because you lack basic problem solving owing to your double-digit IQ.

exactly

What’s the point of having a nation if the denizens genetically represent the enemy more than the original inhabitants? Your kind is essential wiped from history regardless

muh realism fags

women in armor

realistic

lol shut the fuck up autistic ass niggy

This was a entry-level highschool course, I think 1:1 was kindof the goal. There was no instruction on abstraction or anything like that, just "draw me and get the proportions right".

Consequentially I was dating a to-be painter at the time and she drew that shit like it was a photograph. Which probably contributed to how memorable it was. The jokes didn't end lmao

After it happens enough times why wouldn't women just stop being soldiers?

For me, it's Cecilia.

cecilia.png - 814x943, 531.48K

Why would they, all women crave it even if they don't always admit it.

It doesnt matter
the correct opinion should be "who cares as long as she's attractive"
anything else is just retarded sperg tier nonsense

Yeah like I said it depends on the goal. Your teacher was not being a good teacher for publicly demeaning you at a creative pursuit if it wasn't obvious you were trying to be cheeky about it or anything though. Things like that make people never pick up a pencil or brush again. She should have checked her baggage and been more patient with someone who was there because it was an entry-level course.

No armor, just a uniform.

325qw;'.gif - 540x560, 3.23M

Le quirky Anon Babbleeddit opinion

Women being sensible would be too much of a detriment to the audience's suspension of disbelief.

speak the absolute best truth

get called retard

now I know how jesus felt

All three should be available.

They hated him because he told them the truth

Krynn.jpg - 900x893, 295.04K

I have maney hats also but did not bring them.

Is this that time period's equivalent of the "sorry I don't have money" people say to the homeless guy today right before they go and buy all kinds of worthless shit they don't need?

That statement in that picture is someone bullshitting and trying to front that they've got the hats for this situation but they just got left at home, like insisting that you've got a girlfriend at the other high school when your friend is lording his having a girlfriend over other people. And you hope your friend backs you up because he's your friend but you're about to find out.

I don't think so either since we only have the a handful of kurgans in Russia with female remains compared to the numerous other Iranian burial mounds with regular male remains.

Still, they did it at one point for one reason or the other.

It depends on the setting.
Armor in fiction is different from armor in real life.
In real life, practicality, utility, cost, and culture all play a role in how it looks.
In fiction, it is the creation of the artists intent and desire, which makes it function more like an expression of a character, narrative, or some other purpose. This is before marketing and monetization are included as variables which can lead to more sexuallized designs to get people to roll or buy them.
The fundamental problem of the female armor question is that no one starts with the frame that the telos of armor in fiction is radically different than it is in reality, making realism arguments contradictory. True realism would require real incentives, not imaginative simulations of them, and so all armor design defaults to the artistic-marketing incentive structure of fiction.
To answer your question, I think that a middle ground between the middle and the right is perfect, since it emphasizes femininity while maintaining the idea of armor with symbolic hints that it is meant for combat; thus representing the idea of the woman, the warrior, and acknowledging the preferences of the artist and the audience all at once.

Every single reply to this post was a BMWfag

Do you think people become soldiers just because they have nothing better to do?

I see your Boris Vallejo and raise you a Larry Elmore. Keep posting more vintage fantasy kino.

fucking dragons is as realistic as fucking any other animal (which happens in the real world)

Kardia is a miracle of the universe.

Me on the left

All of that takes less effort to explain than "Why bikini armor tho"

no game where I can drive my bmw while in full armor fighting dragons

who is to blame for this? the patriarchy?

8763256565.jpg - 2000x1333, 372.37K

Asking "why bikini armor" takes more effort than just not bitching about it like a faggot, thoughover.

Kingmakers will be released this year.

Recently western male fantasy authors have been very keen on pretending that there are zero functional differences between males and females. Like gender doesn't exist, only pronouns do, and they just flip a coin to decide which a character gets. And also that children spring up out of the aether or something, because there are homos galore and pregnancy is never even mentioned, let alone seen

But there is a game, anon.
Modded Skyrim

I accept your concession.

cameltoe

perfection

file.jpg - 1588x2224, 520.85K

Fantasy and scifi authors have been doing this since the 90s.

Women warriors are inherently stupid and unrealistic, so they may as well be eye candy because nobody is taking anything seriously at this point.

But Anon, that's how I feel about the poofy dress armor.

It's another thread of millennials seething at bikini armor

You accept my dick in your mouth. LMAO.

retards shitposting for attention is the same thing as [group I don’t like] “seething”

You got played, retard

H-game parasite armor

Dude, it's been going on for decades but it's just le funny joke XDXDXD!!!

Speak.png - 367x238, 4.78K

Sort of. It's always been feminist, but in a way where the yin/yang of male and female was actually celebrated. Now? Every character is functionally androgynous

good, bikini armor is shit tier

This, but the armor is you, the protag, after being transmogrified.

Based.

Yeah, it's for people that like bikini armor.

Yeah, it's for people that like bikinis

due to how the material reacts

That makes the material basically unworkable due to the amount of limitations it puts on the other gear the user would use.
Not to mention you're trusting the bare material to be comfortably wearable. Not to mention your skin is a material too, so you need to find a decent reason why it doesn't react ot it to begin with.

All materials have limitations

Of course they do, when you're too low iq to work around them lmao.

you're acting like there's no way to justify it. Because you lack basic problem solving owing to your double-digit IQ.

It's the opposite, there's no way to justify it because your scenarios require turning off your brain to not seek alternatives or objections.
This without even considering the fact that the more you try to warp the world around your need for bikini armor the more the result stands out as immersion breaking anyway.

Right but actually good looking center ala works too. Left is for gays and women who hate their age.