GTA IV is better than GTA V

V runs at like double the fps of IV's port you dumb zoomer

indians have actually good taste

hello rajeesh

didn't really think about that honestly, they usually rammed into me from the front.
gta 4 was fun to mess around in but horrible for actual missions

Vfag projecting his poop fetish onto others

I disagree. V was scripted blockbuster bullshit while IV's missions all focused on driving and shooting. More repetitive but still way more fun than the walking sim missions in V

My gf and I played through the GTA 5 story recently and we both agreed that it was pretty bad. Franklin is a boring character and too much time is spent on Trevor being le crazy and bad and nobody shooting him for some reason. Michael is the only one who really gets a start to finish story arc.
Is the story in 4 much better?

Is the story in 4 much better?

Yes

I remember a ton of great firefights in IV. I'm playing through V right now and it's either highly scripted driving or you just stand in an alley and they spawn some enemies every now and then as you sit behind cover.

They should add another glitchy swing-set or something to 6 like how there's one in 4. Messing around on this thing was some of the most fun I've had in a GTA game.

some gta iv missions were quite fun, but the lack of mid mission checkpoints really made it unnecessarily tedious

nah they were also extremely scripted in iv, the one where you escaped with the rastaman in some docks warehouses, same thing as the lamarr mission in that factory

le unfun realistic physics are actually good!

No. Fuck off, Druckmann.

GTA5 should have had one protagonist only.

Is the story in 4 much better?

yes, very much so. it has a few twists and turns and a few choices to be done during the playthrough, some with much better result than others.

It also has 2 dlc campaigns that give context to a few parts that cross paths with the main campaign.

The easiest way to play them is trough the CE edition.

The worst part of playing V is when you're actually having fun doing something and the game makes you switch to a different character because you're having too much fun.

Would be like saying San Andreas was better than IV. The technology jump alone makes it unlikely and they've spent way more time on VI. V was literally a downgrade in many ways like this

GTAO is thirdie central in general
it's still a good time with some friends though, it's like a weird mmo

i wish i could play the story with my gtao character exclusively as some tacked on fourth perspective

What lol why bring up Cuckmann here you mind broken Snoy faggot

That impossible, unless they make 6 even worse somehow

didn't argue my comment

You know I'm correct lol

left: fun

right: insufferable dogshit

police hummers

six stars

i hope gta6 cops have police dogs and maybe even horses
and let one star pursuits be no-backup no shooting affairs for when you blow past a cop at 100mph or whatever

Nobody ever praises IVs driving for being realistic though
It's fun because of the exaggerated suspension and drifting like a 70s movie chase, not because it's realistic
V is Mario Kart

dogshit

Zoomer word, of course you like V more

But San Andreas is literally better than IV.

GTA IV good

LMAO

It's funny retard...bonus sovl points. No one wants to sit through taxi, everyone skips.

Kek and the problem with that webm is what exactly? Thats hilarious

By a mile

But it's literally not. SA does a lot but doesn't exceed at anything, while IV does little but exceeds at what it does.

i love being the taxi commanders passenger princess
love watching AI in their natural habitat

Uh...SA had RPG mechanics, planes, bycicles, a big open map, way more weapons and mission variety, better story, better characters, better vehicles. It was just way better made. All GTA IV had was TECHNOLOGY.

SA had RPG mechanics,

And they sucked because of how how much grinding you need just to see any meaningful progress. Also the game making swimming grinding mandatory just to progress the game was bad and has no place in GTA.

planes

Great, you get to fly over a big empty map.

bycicles,

This is a real dud on IV's part.

a big open map,

A big empty map where there's nothing to do. You spend most of the game driving between four cities and most of your missions are in those four cities.

way more weapons

None of which sound, look or feel good,

and mission variety

None of which are particularly good because of the controls.

better story, better characters

Lmao, the game's plot and characters plummet the second you get out of Los Santos,

better vehicles.

Better in IV because of TECHNOLOGY.

empty map where there's nothing to do

Just admit you didn't feel the game in your heart retard. GTA SA map is one of the best open world maps considering its era. Full soul.

accurate depiction of NY driving

the problem?

You sound like you never played the game. Everyone who went from SA to IV admitted it was better tech, but it was boring and unmemorable. I don't remember a single song, I only remember one mission which is the wedding, maybe one or two characters. IV was just so forgettable and bad compared to SA.

tried gta 4 on pc and got motion sickness and now every time i see footage of the game it comes back...

NTA, but man, I always get stuck trying to decide which one’s better.
They’re so different but both amazing in their own ways.
SA gave me that wild, chaotic energy. It was nextlevel crazy back then.
But then IV comes in with those physics… I still launch it just to mess around with the ragdolls and car mechanics.

You say that but everyone here was suddenly pretending they didn't agree with this when we were having all those threads about VI.

I could still zone out for hours on IV.

sitting at my desk makes me motion sick

consult a doctor

I just prefer how much bigger and heavier the cars feel in GTA IV. Also the cars had more difference between them, in 5 almost everything just feels a slower sports car.

Massive influx of zoomers around that trailers release

Why can’t SAfags argue for shit?

probably because room temp IQ toddlers who actually grew up playing V (and weren't even born when san andreas came out) are old enough to post on Anon Babble now

Contrarian opinion

but it was boring and unmemorable. I don't remember a single song

That's probably because you have a terrible memory and taste.
youtu.be/4hms3O2krwM

That kinda shit happens in 5 too. I like sitting through the taxi rides but sometimes it just gets fucking stuck.

V was a phoned-in cash grab game, and from what little is known about VI so far, it looks like they're actually putting a modicum of effort into it. That alone means it likely won't be worse than V.

The story is way better, yeah. Even people who like and defend GTA V still tend to concede that IV has a better story.

im tired of comparing GTA to GTA
where the fuck are the GTA clones at? Are we doomed to only being able to play GTA?
How come GTA clones are more technologically dated than fucking GTA 3?

don't forget to run the the de-enhancer so you can get the original songs on the radio.

It's kino

second rate devs cant poach the real talent
for all the praise ive seen Anon Babble praise on leslie benzies i expected better from mindseye
but who knows maybe theyll fix the gunplay in the span of like two weeks lmao

welcome back GOAT

for all the praise ive seen Anon Babble praise on leslie benzies i expected better from mindseye

the guy was a fucking retard trying to get in the Roblox/Fortnite game inside a game shit with Everywhere and trying to get on the NFT hype trainslop on top of it all
Should've just put more effort into creating a brand first with a GTA competitor but whatever

also forgot to mention, similar to San Andreas there's an armor spawn directly in front of your first safehouse in IV. You and your girl may be used to the regenerating health and large health bar from V, but IV caps your health from the start.

It's fun, but a lot of the little ragdoll moments can chip away at your health so grabbing this armor is going to make easing into the game a whole lot better. The game also wont vomit money into your bank in the first half of the game, there's no Diamond heist 10 missions in, so it's imperative to spend as little on armor as possible.

youtube.com/watch?v=PmebXJrDrdM

trying to get in the Roblox/Fortnite game inside a game

I thought they are still doing that with Mindseye? They called it AAA Minecraft or some shit

mission editor might be robust but what really irked me was the pretense of it being an original idea

I thought they are still doing that with Mindseye?

Are they? fucking crash and burn then
Meanwhile Dan Houser is writing VNs or some shit and only god knows what Lazlow is up to

RPG mechanics

The RPG mechanics in SA are awful, and RPG mechanics don't belong in GTA anyway.

planes, bycicles,

It's a bit lame that 4 didn't have these, fair enough.

a big open map,

I like 4's map better. The countryside was fun, but it didn't really make up for 2 of the cities being boring as shit to do anything in.

way more weapons

All of which feel terrible to use

mission variety,

Most of the missions in SA outright fucking suck, the early missions in LS and some in the countryside and LV are fun but the mission quality goes right down the shitter in SF, not to mention all the filler missions dumped throughout the game that drag the pace down.

better story

lol

better characters

lmao

better vehicles

rofl

All GTA IV had was TECHNOLOGY.

And the best city design, core gameplay, and story in the series.
I like SA, but the game is severely overrated. Both Vice City and 4 are much better in a number of ways.

Don't need to argue, the game speaks for itself.

Meanwhile Dan Houser is writing VNs or some shit

I would read a VN set in the gtav map to be honest

and only god knows what Lazlow is up to

wonder if 6 will even include a talkshow radiostation

The way npc's and your character fall in gta 5 always annoyed me. It looks dumb and it's so slow.
I didn't play gta4 but I did play SA and RDR1 and the way your movement is so slow in RDR1 is awful. It'd be nice if gta6 your base level of movement is a jog instead of a extremely slow walk.

RDR2 is a good indicator 6 will be amazing because you have the knockout mechanic back in RDR2

beat someone

they fall down - not dead but knocked unconscious

after about 2 minutes they get up dizzy and wounded trying to walk away

The RPG mechanics in SA are awful, and RPG mechanics don't belong in GTA anyway.

Agree, SA's rpg mechanics was just grinding a progression bar and being locked out of content until it was maxed. I don't want to drive a vehicle or shoot a gun for more than half the game to only be statistically decent at it, fuck off. Most people never beat San Andreas anyways, they just played the San Andreas missions or got bored by the time they got to San Fierro anyhow.

wonder if 6 will even include a talkshow radiostation

almost guaranteed as a parody to the infinite amount of worthless podcasts that exist now
but will it be good tho?

RDR2 is a good indicator 6 will be a

-bysmally written with constant TDS and virtue signaling shoehorned in so jarringly that it takes several months for me to hear a coherent opinion on the characters personalities and motives

I'm hoping that your movement is "gta" like until you enter combat, then it goes full Max Payne 3 refinement mode. Also hoping the ridiculous ragdolls make a comeback, gta v felt too scripted all around.

been praying for a Joey Diaz talk show, Cuban criminal from Liberty City going bananas over this new generation of gentiles in Vice City

Far less people beat IV. Notice how you actually remember the missions and locations in SA. Nobody remembers the missions and locations in IV.

not my fault kiddies didn't understand IV's nuances, but notice the uptrend in zoomers beating and praising IV. All they've known was "wacky crackhead and boomer being irratating for the whole story". By the time they're halfway through IV, they make a video essay praising it for what it was

Notice how you actually remember the missions and locations in SA.

I remember them for all the wrong reasons. I don't remember anything in IV as bad as driving school, flying school, stat grinding, Amphibious Assault, Zero's toy missions, forklifting.

GTA7 should start with an official MC and have a secondary MC that's just your self insert. Main character starts as the Mafia Kingpin and he trains you from the ground up how to run shit. By the end he gets assassinated or something and you take over.

Far less people beat IV.

There's no way to prove that.

Notice how you actually remember the missions and locations in SA.

Nobody remembers anything in SA after you leave LS.

Nobody remembers the missions and locations in IV.

I can rattle off a bunch of missions I remember from IV (even besides stuff like confronting Darko or the final chase onto Happiness Island), nobody remembers anything from SA except Wrong Side of the Tracks and the Fast Food mission.

I think Lazlow joined back up with Dan

gta has been the same game since gta3, literally nothing has changed

And that's a good thing

it's fine it just makes gta nextversion hype fucking idiotic

no it doesn't retard core game stays while we get new things and innovations. It's a cultural event

cultural event

how characteristically superficial

retarded tranny fag is mad no npcs said the n word

grow up little faggot