What's wrong with a game having AI-generated assets or voice acting? I don't get it

What's wrong with a game having AI-generated assets or voice acting? I don't get it

AI steals jobs.

aiartpic.jpg - 645x680, 51.66K

NPCs already operate on AI, what's the difference?

untitled.png - 613x600, 399.99K

AI generated assets and AI voice acting are shit

its generic slop and trash writing that doesn't belong as a published anything. Like holyshit, I can smell AI written dialogue from just a few phrases now after I interacted with it as a test.

That's just a temporary quality issue. You got the same problem with, for example, paid translators.

lel I'm scared to die elf

too retarded to answer their own question

.

Frieren-chan is Anon Babble-approved

paid translators? No problem, better than trannylators.

FUCK YOU NAZI CHUD PAY THEM!!! YOU NEED TO PAY THEM JUST PAY AMAZING TRANS BIPOC FOLK VOICE ACTORS!!! FUCKING HELL FUCK CAPITALISM JUST PAY THEM YOU GOTTA PAY THEM YALL THATS ALL YOU HAVE TO DO!!!! JUST DO IT JUST DO THAT JUST PAY THOSE FOLX FOR FUCKS SAKES YALL!!!

AI voice acting is better than the majority of american VA

as a trans furry inflation porn artist who sells trans furry inflation porn on patreon i strongly believe that AI is immoral and the fact I sell trans furry inflation porn has nothing to do with it so don't bring it up

Absolutely nothing. It's okay to value art created by hand more but it's great that AI enables more people to create things they otherwise wouldn't. It's a great tool that can speed up the process of normal artists, too.

The real victims are not artists, but anyone whose name is Al.

you'd miss peak cringekino that AI can't replicat (at least yet)

Hey retard, did you even bother to read what the fuck the OP said? Nobody mentioned anything about scripts or written dialogue, OP mentioned assets (presumably visual) and voice acting.

I agree with you on AI-written things being trash, not to mention the harm chat gpt and shit is doing to our already retarded youth. But there's nothing wrong with replacing insufferable voice actors with AI if it sounds good, and the same goes for creating in game assets if they look decent.

If it sounds good.

No it doesn't, go to youtube and look for obvious ai channels. That's going to be your quality. Maybe retarded Chinese will sound good on it because its robotic and cold as fuck. Even Japanese which is robotic is at least cute and warm.

I said IF, god damn you are fucking retarded. I didn't say we've reached it yet, but we will, and at that point we should fully embrace it and kick VAs to the curb.

Fake news

It's same as using royalty free assets, it just shows your lack of dedication to your craft.

but what if you can't tell it's AI generated

If I can't tell, that probably means you pulled enough effort to adapt that shit to your project, which already counts for something.

-AI voice acting is fine. It's actually an improvement because 99% of VG voice acting is insufferable shit by hacks who can only do 'the anime dub voice' and couldn't sound any more stilted and robotic.

-AI art is shit because it's full of melty artifacts and has no artistic value.

I'm legitimately waiting for the day when I can modulate my own voice acting and play every character in my project so I can have every line delivered exactly the way I want.

imagining the kind of guy that ERPs with chatgpt trying to make a meme that makes him look smart for doing it is actually the funniest shit you could imagine

Bump

I want to receive hugs and headpats from frieren.

Frieren's dub was shit and I was shocked to hear many liked it.

I wasn't going to pay someone anyway... No one lost a job because I went from text only to Ai voice... Like... Cmon now

literally nothing wrong, the only naysayers are crying about buggymakers losing their jobs to the superior automobile

I bet OP thinks he's the first person to ever ask a boring question using a bored looking girl from a flavor of the month anime that no one will recognize in 6 months

frieren subhuman doesn't get it

water is wet

Shitface-ren

stupid question

kys
ugly goblin
Nobody liked that shit except ameritards who liked it beacuse its ugly like their woke cartoons

Frieren the reddit slayer

The issue is that material made by AI isn't original nor royalty free. Thus using those assets is similar to stealing them. If you could prove that you trained an ai on nothing but free/self made assets then people would be ok with it as the original producers of the referenced products don't get screwed. It's the same reason why everyone is mad at bungie for them stealing art.

Lacks soul and if we accept it we'll let AAA slop stoop even lower.
You think pajeets are bad?

AI porn also sucks and is primarily used by BBC keks

DEY TOOK ERR JERBS

The issue is that material made by musicians isn't original nor royalty free. Thus using those assets is similar to stealing them. If you could prove that you recorded an album on nothing but free/self made sounds then people would be ok with it as the original producers of the sample don't get screwed. It's the same reason why everyone is mad at hip-hop "artists" for stealing the Amen break.

go back to sucking dicks on reddit

he sucks cocks, so his opinion doesn't matter.

You think the soul/sovlless problem bad is now, but once every pajeet, chink, and useless 'ideas guy' starts flooding the market with their disgusting shit that never should have seen the light of day, you'll almost miss these days. Kind of like how, bad as it was, the tranny/feminist era made us long for the dudebro era.

You do realise hip hop artists have to pay royalties, right?

Nobody liked that shit except ameritards

it's always funny watching just how deluded schizos on Anon Babble can become lmao

Best elf

depends on the scale

1-man project

dont care.

AAA studio

stop being greedy

communism is based on the false assumption that it is labor, not utility that decides the worth of things

They trained their models on data that contained millions of people's work and are now using those models for-profit.

general enshittification, ai assets are cost-effective but also objectively worse. $80 dollar games though guys

AI is the future, it's everywhere

Honestly I don't particularily care about human artists but the fact is AI is going to be massively used to disrupt (to very bad/middling effects) the white collar work force, while countries have been flooding their low tier workforce with pajeets and mexicans and so on. This is going to be a catastrophe. Rioting bad.

communism is based

Stopped reading here

Only if they steal a large chunk of a song.
if you steal a short sound byte. or you use a sythesizier that's built on a tone sampled from something else. you don't need to pay shit.

So it all depends how transformed it is.

The only thing that decides the value of things is how much people are willing to pay for it.

FrieREDDIT

It's everywhere because every company thinks its the next big thing and are desperately trying to showhorn it in despite obvious concerns. Even the tiny ass company I work for tried it recently and it resulted in a fucking massive in system mess that took far more time to clean up and cost us more than if they'd just done it with a human

soon your fridge will talk to you

Inherently? Nothing.
The problem is that with AI-generated assets, the availability of making games expands. While this can allow for some genuinely great games, the majority will be low quality, low effort cash grabs by retards who have no interest in making a good game. They just want to prey on people's wallets and have no care for the actual art. It's the same shit with game engines like UE and Unity. Easier tools lead to markets flooded with terrible slop.

If you can just push a button and the computer does it all for you, why exactly do I need to pay you to push the button? I can push the button, and generate something more in line with my exact tastes that whatever slop you "" created"".

Nothing once it's perfected or if it's replacing American dub actors who sound worse than the worst AI already.

Fair point. However, I would argue that the amount of data used by synthesisers/sound bytes is insignificant compared to the data needed to make AI material. Additionally, the songs could still exist (albeit worse) without the sampled media. AI can't.

So far the arguments against using AI in games I see are

it's shit

it's soulless

pajeets will flood the market with slop

Let's break these down

it's shit

True, current AI by itself is bad, but it can easily be touched up.

it's soulless

Unless the art itself is the point, AI is just another tool in the creator's tool belt. How soulless or soulful the whole work is depends on the person.

pajeets will flood the market with slop

Anyone who's browsed steam during a nextfest knows there's already a ton of slop out there.

I just hate aifags because they're brown.

Dumb frierenposter

It's very quickly improving

You'd have to have a soul to understand

bro looks so much like Minoru Mukaiya it's wild

good morning sirs

This post is 100% correct. Let me compare it to a similar scenario: DLC

DLC in itself shouldn't be an issue and actually should be a good thing. The concept of DLC is similar in concept to patches. Developers can complete a game but continue development after launch to add onto it. Maybe they got an idea for a new map. Maybe they had an idea for a new character. Maybe there was a bug that didn't come up during testing that they need to patch out. It's a way for the developers to ensure that you have the best possible version of the game they made without it costing the player too much if anything at all. And I'm fine with that, honestly.

But it's a monkeys paw and people go for the lowest amount of effort possible. So instead DLC has become a crutch for laziness at best and an outright scam at worst. Unfinished games being released that can be patched later. Locking features behind a paywall. Fucking exclusive content based on where you bought the game. And because this has been happening for so long, younger people who play vidya don't realize that it wasn't always like this and that they're getting fucked. The idea of games as a service should've been smothered while it was still in its crib.

Point being, AI in and of itself shouldn't be an issue but you know it's going to be used as a crutch to make low effort slop that will still be sold to you as if it was a product of creativity.

Because there is a rule in this world.

Easier something is to make more shit it will generate

Games are already shit, add AI into them, utter garbage.

But it's a scifi tech

Keep it a buck with me, Anon Babble: would you really prefer another human being voice a fictional character instead of having AI generate a voice that is 100% customizable by its creator?

AI-generated voicework significantly increases suspension of disbelief because it removes the audience's awareness that a human being is speaking for the character. Not only that, it also gives the character genuine ownership of the voice rather than an actor.

Thank you for using the word "slop" 3 words into your post so I didn't have to finish reading it

It's unironically soulless. What are people going to do when all the creative/art jobs are taken up by AI? Just work in factories? Wasn't it supposed to be the other way around?

Anti AI points: Logical, likely, realistic pointing out it's a useless horiffic tool that just steals en masse and has no use beyond empowering corpos and cucking out whatever little human influence humans had (chud that malds over current diversity/DEI? Enjoy that being the only thing made forever as AI is programmed with anti bias training forced in but your worst boogiemen Sweet Baby Inc and whatever else woke consultants you cry about able to churn out an entirely computer generated 100% woke garbage)

Pro AI shill babble:

I made you black and asian and added an israeli flag in the background!!!!

U-uh I like gooning to shitting dick nipples braap erp

And..... Um, this ISN'T just NFTs again, because it just isn't, okay?

AI is unironically good because we are that much closer to UBI!

Ai will never get better, it'll never improve, it'll always stay at the level of will Smith eating spaghetti

You're literally fucking retarded, the kind of retarded that when Ai integrates into cable TV you'll notice no change at all

The things you like (including Frieren) were made passionately by human hands and that is what makes them resonate with your soul. You might not notice it, but your brain did.

It's possible that a true artificial intelligence might be able to make something of genuine artistic value, but all they do currently is regurgitate existing material based on an algorithm.

It isn't NFTs because NFTs were about speculating on nothing while generative AI is about producing digital assets as cheaply as possible

Superintelligence will clean this mess

they came for voice acting but I didn't speak cuz I didn't voice act
they came for artists but I didn't speak cuz I'm not an artist
then they came for my job but there was no one left to speak for me

Even actual humans are becoming more like AI. There's no escaping it.

Unironically, it lacks soul.
AI is incapable of adding the little flairs that make human created content so memorable.
Think of any memorable character in a video game. Do you think that they'd be just as enjoyable if they were voiced by AI? Using a recent example, people absolutely loved BG3 Astarion entirely because of his VA. His actual character is fairly unlikeable and his story is literally "I got raped by a vampire" but he's still the most popular character from that game because of his VA work. An AI will just deliever lines in the statistically most common way of doing it and cannot be outstanding.
As for art, anything that is uncommon in illustrations is difficult for AI. To give an example, it struggles with art that conveys motion. Due to how LLMs work, it takes the average of all images in it's training set that relate to the prompt given to it. Therefore, if you wanted to generate an image of, for example, a guy punching but use stretching of the character's proportions unrealistically to convey motion, AI would struggle a lot with that.
AI would have good application for repetitive art assets like texturing of objects and backgrounds and could save a lot of time, but for anything else it's not really appropriate for.

AI voiceovers are good for filtering out shit voice actors. Like artists, only worthwhile voice actors will survive and that's a good thing.

You know, now that you think about it...

743378543.gif - 220x207, 590.17K

nu Anon Babble advocating for all creative arts to be replaced by a souless machine

Anon Babble should've stayed dead

these leftist art faggots are only objecting this shit when it's their job on the line, but had no problem with voting for mass immigration to
flood blue collar jobs with 89iq brownies. fuck em I say. and spit on their graves

I already noticed 70% of youtube channels I have watched disapppear and the feeds be replaced with fucking AI shittery. You are a retard.

The real problem is this, there is no quality control when it comes to AI. This Rule34 site has been up for about a decade, maybe longer. In that time it has amassed around 560k posts with the "animated" tag. In less than 1/8th of the time the AI tag has amassed over 1.5 million posts. Sure there's a lot of people that are worried AI will take over their roles, but most people just don't like the idea that people who have no creative talent - which should be a requirement to make interactive media - shouldn't be allowed to get involved in something without any creative input. AI copies what already exists, it is not innovative. It takes the ideas and concepts that other people have created and attempts to create its own based on the input of another human being who doesn't have the capacity to create an idea of his own. You wouldn't want someone who can't cook to make you a meal. You wouldn't want someone who can't perform surgeries to operate on your body. You wouldn't want someone who can't drive to take you to your preferred destination by vehicle. Why do you want someone who can't draw, can't write, can't code, can't do voice work and can't create a single asset by themselves make any form of media for you to consume? Especially when it's done in the form of AI? The issue most people have isn't with AI itself, it's with the people the use AI

I forgot to attach the image like a retard, see AI would never do this. When you resort to AI you lose a part of what makes something real

numbers.png - 847x349, 161.84K

It has to be convincing. The thing that makes voice work bring a character to life is the emotion behind it. It's the difference between someone just reading a script and someone acting it. If a character is supposed to be in pain, that feeling needs to be expressed both in that character's model, the character's script, and the character's voice and you know when it's convincing or not. The issue that I have with AI is that it can't have that emotion. It can emulate BE LOUD or CRYING SOUND but any shitty actor can do that.

Will you stop being so goddamn paranoid? AI is a TOOL. It's not competition. Instead of feeling threatened by it, work using it. Imagine the ways it'll improve an artist's ability to create beyond what they can currently do.

it's the same with exhentai. content used to be uploaded in moderation but now theres 2000 image AI galleries being dumped on the site every other minute just like an indian man unloads toxic waste into ganges river.

then we all had a big bbq in the park celebrating our newfound free time

Anyone who is thinking about watching Frieren should watch this perfect review full of straight up facts.

b-but just form your own opinionrino and think for yourself!

Yeah, no thanks. I'm not risking potentially having an objectively atrocious and shit opinion. Better to just follow the herd. It's important for people to all have the same exact opinions on everything in a healthy and perfect society. Straying from the herd leads people to not follow social norms and that leads to social outcasts and degeneracy, which don't contribute to a healthy society.

AI steals jobs.

...from people I don't like.

Good

Why is it stealing as opposed to getting? If a company fires someone and hires someone else, we don't speak of a job being stolen.

Only from shitty "artists" and "programmers".

Daily reminder that "human artists" just trace what they see in real life, they are very much guilty of theft

that people who have no creative talent - which should be a requirement to make interactive media

Why? Clearly it's no longer a practical barrier, so why must this be the case?

Why are (you) so scared of the future?

I forgot to attach the image like a retard, see AI would never do this.

This is another thing AI can't do: spontaneity. A famous story is that combos didn't originally exist in Street Fighter. It was later in development when they realized there was a quirk in the frame data where it was possible for a player to hit his opponent before the opponent had time to recover from the first it. They didn't fix it because they didn't believe players would actually try to do this. Well players actually did try to do this and it was the birth of combination attacks or combos. Which heralded God knows how many series. Add to that was the creation of Street Fighter 2 Rainbow Edition, which took the bones of SF2 and made the game crazy.

All of this led to the creation of games like Marvel vs Capcom, Guilty Gear, Jojo's, etc. But it had to start with the human element and expanding on a mistake. AI, by nature, can only do what it's seen before and so lacks that creativity. You can't bitch about uncreative slop and then praise AI

there is no quality control when it comes to AI

Neither is there with humans

most people just don't like the idea that people who have no creative talent - which should be a requirement to make interactive media - shouldn't be allowed to get involved in something without any creative input

Tons of pictures on rule34 display no creative talent

You wouldn't want someone who can't cook to make you a meal.

I would love to have a robot who can make me full course pre-programmed meals, I don't give a shit if he's following an online recipe to the letter either. If it makes good food, I really couldn't care less.

Daily reminder that there are professional artists who LITERALLY trace images using a lightbox and have that work published to this very day. Greg Land, as an example, notoriously traces porn for his work with Marvel comics.

hoodweebs killed anime

tracing

Making the image look like the character

adding the characters costume etc

infinitely more effort than AIjeets I'm afraid

black souls is 95% free assets and it shits on all the AAA industry tho

Does this anime have fanservice? Is it worth watching? Booba!

It's worth watching, but it doesn't really have fan service. It's at its best when it is very melancholic. There was a time when Frieren got annoyed by how big Fern's boobs are though.

I want frieren to pee in my mouth

Kill all "Ai"jeets
That's my official instructions

I haven't played it yet, but from what I know its selling point is the writing and the character portraits which are handmade, and that is enough to carry the rest.
It's less about what you use and more how you use it. Making cool shit from whatever you have at hand is a talent on its own I'd say.

with what money? I lost my job to ai

Frieren's fanservice is more subtle compared to other shows. Like you do get the occasional feet and ass shots and maybe some Fern booba, but that's mainly about all you'll get.

Nothing.
It's just some people think they can make a living off of their hobby and when it's rightly exposed as not a job they start to seethe.

Machines don't have souls

Bumpy

From who?

How wrong you are

What do you need money for? You gonna pay a robot?

Because if the AI is making the game, why the fuck are you bothering paying the studio for the product?

people who have no creative talent [...] shouldn't be allowed to get involved in something without any creative input

Hard disagree.
Just because I can't put my visions onto a paper doesn't mean I have no "creative talent".

it fucking sucks

Considering the state of music industry all these warnings were 100% correct.

uhh the food and the grill???

It's already superior to humans, in 2 years

You’re not entitled to a job
Anti-Ai fags make the flawed assumption of believing there is a surplus of indie animation jobs that are being taken by A.I.
The reality is those jobs don’t exist because the price of creating indie animation is already prohibitively expensive for most people.
A.I. would counterintuitively increase the number of jobs because the brunt of the work would be handled by a machine and be cleaned up by fewer, more skilled artists.

AI generated Frieren's futa cock

Produced and delivered by a robot.

SAAR BHENCHOD craftsman can get new job pulling clogs out of gears and saws saar very good jobs

I assume because its not equivalent as the AI is trained on data from real people. Its like saying that if in this theoretical job of yours, the company forced you to wear a brain scanning device while on the clock, and then they fire you because they just put all the recorded brainwaves or whatever into a robot and now the robot is trained on your job.

false equivalence

Logic isn’t your strong suit, rajesh.

AI made stuff will always be inferior to human made art
also AI are a copyright hell, since their database is full of stuff not owned by them like other art, individual likeness and other things

it's acceptable as placeholders but it needs to be replaced by real stuff quick

This man is black so I dont care about his opinion
Frieren has sovl

Why does it matter how the AI becomes competent? Real people are also trained on data from other real people. If AI can replace mediocre workers, I don't see how it's different from carriage drivers dwindling with the advent of the car, or cashiers being reduced due to self-checkout. Should we manually preserve all of these jobs even when they become obsolete?

real people use their memories of other things, not the actual thing
AI is pretty much a big photobashing, a very complex one due ot their databases, but it's still one, it's still using stuff not made by them
An human can make something by themselves, an AI cannot do this

Why does it matter how the AI becomes competent?

I assume because people want to continue making money based off of the skills they have learned.

I'm not anti ai or whatever dude but its not super hard to understand where they are coming from. The problem is that technology doesn't care. Its like if you made your living as a palenquin bearer and got pissed off because carts and horses started becoming wide spread.

Morality doesn't really come into the practical side of things, but like I said, I get it.

An human can make something by themselves, an AI cannot do this

look at the release schedule

reboot, remake, remake...

you fucking idiot
no, you're just a cranky old man now just like those retards

1 minute in

Nothing but buzzwords and complaining about youtubers

Do niggers really?

Annoyed girl.png - 696x684, 722.95K

Buy an ad

remake today are done to have some more project in between due to game dev being longer, but also mostly because a majority of gamers simply do not like/want to play old games the way they were made, so they are done to reintroduce games and franchise to newer generations
Of course, sometimes it's not handled very well, other times it's very respectful or creative

Realismbros we're AI and stylized slop won the human competition?

Don't hate on Frieren

Nope.avi

solo leveling mogged tf out of friereddit during the crunchyroll awards

I want to do many things to Frieren

theft

Okay, how about we make an AI that don't sound like any voice actor, but does sound better than any of em, at a point it is a waste of money hiring real people to voice characters?

You can generate yourself for free, why should you be paying for it?

Who do I trust?

IMG_1661.jpg - 828x1568, 1.16M

It was explained that it's not a theft

It's good, and if you can't understand the demons of frieren, you're getting culled by the machines.
The terminators are meant for those that didn't killed themselves because a kyubey ass virtual assistant told em to (1% of the population).

Effort being presented helps to get me invested. If you treat your game like a lazy hackjob, why should I treat it any better?

AI voices seems a lot easier than having to work with voice actors for nearly the same end result. Imagine a game where you'll need 5-10 different voices, coordinating that with a bunch of voice actors sounds like a pain in the ass for an indie dev

the Ada ai voice mod for re4 changed my mind about ai voice acting. Its so much better than the original I cant play without it.
Also having the option to add voice acting to text heavy rpgs with no voices is nice.

Nearly the same end result

You're patently absurd

Given that to truly tell a story on a video game, the story need to accommodate for the player actions, realtime AI voices may be a necessity in the future.
Like a job that is impossible to do with real voice actors, because the game text is generated according to the player actions.

SAG-AFTRA will try to sue you if you use AI voice acting

why do you hate AI assets

because they're shit

but it'll improve!!

Is this argument reposted by AI?

I really liked Frieren but because it was a fantasy setting anime without isakai slop or gimmick themes (goblin slayer, dungeon meshi, etc)

yeah, AI is a better end result

id generate me with extra arms so i can play video games and fap at the same time

More importantly the human is translating their feelings and experiences into a visual format while the AI is just remixing existing visual data
Artists create works that express ideas, you can take something like a trip abroad where you ate food, listened to music, met people, had the misfortune of smelling the French, got lost, went on an alcohol and drug fuelled bender and you can take those experiences and make those into a visual work. Even though the majority of that isn't visual, and even when it was visual you don't have to record accurate visual data like a camera, you can interpret that visual information in a way which also captures the feeling of all the non-visual elements of that experience

AI can't do that, it can only copy humans which have already done that. Which means replacing human artists with AI will only lead to the same pre-existing pool of human creative works being remixed and recycled forever. This is the actual long term stagnation and death of human culture

Engaged.jpg - 1032x654, 156.19K

Why waste weeks when it takes a second

It has video game dungeons, contemporary vidya fantasy tropes, and a retarded Shonen battle arca

If you can't tell, nothing because it's literally undetectable.

If you can tell it's because the dev is being lazy and evidently does not care.

It doesn't seem Mr. Hilter had much fun in Stalingrad.

I liked it for being very chill to start but it was hard to ignore the horrid fanbase saying shit like "Irredeemable races exist in real life, why not here?" So i kinda just bounced off

The saddest part is that AI cultists actually think AI can match human creativity, because they genuinely believe themselves to be soulless biorobots no different from AI. Atheism really is a disease.

Idk man with how politicized AI shit it its very likely they think AI Jesus will bring the rapture

Spend days coming up with the main character, and how exactly you want it to look like

Spend days modelling every pore wrinkle and coming up with the retopology model

Make a contract with kyubey to have the rigging instantly done instead of spending weeks on it

Now you have to pick the voice for the character between the 4 different troy baker intonations

sakurai.png - 478x456, 192.04K

Ultrakill basically made a guys whole career because they took a risk instead of grabbing some known entity

story about an elf who inadvertently cucked the hero out of a family life he deserved because she only realized 80 years he was into her

said elf unironically may have also cucked the world out of the children of the hero who would have probably dealt with the remnants of the demon king army

if not for Fern and Stark being literal teenage humans with working libidos Frieren would have slow walk her journey north and let demons curbstomp everything in sight

Serie may have been right to ban her. Even without her interference in the mage exams her behavior is borderline bullshit.

The current AI is pretty creative, but it has literally zero judging skills.
It is always correct (tm).
The judging part is offloaded to (you), and AI cultists just declare the first shit that was shat by the AI as "perfect for my propaganda" and you end up with retards doing "PRODUCTION READY!" screams with 6 fingered abominations.

Nothing. It’s just dumb fucks who are impotently cumming their worthless opinions over the internet even though somewhere deep inside they understand you can’t stop this train. It’s literally just technological progress. Your cause is as hopeless as trying to stop the spread of photoshop and image editing software because you believe in paper and glue collage of art pieces.

It isn’t, but you’re esl so you don’t know the difference.

Family life he deserved

Didnt need to read anything else to determine the levels of incel seethe

bro elves have no libido. himmel screwed himself by wanting to get with someone who can't be attracted to others and has 0 libido

I imagine that a parallel universe where Tom Zito won (the retard pushing shit like night trap and sewer shark), there would be a whole guild of video game actors, and this guild would make modelling 3D characters basically forbidden BECAUSE ITS STEALING THE JERBS.

You can't even tell the difference

Coobie did nothing wrong

Haha, LOL kek Funny!

communists when people control the means of producing (art):

Nothing wrong, but I won't buy it if it ends up being soulless.

Himmel should have gotten a human fenale for himself instead of chasing after some elf.
He was a chad and he could have done it.

This argument is so fucking dumb. HEY GUYS THE SHITTY STATE OF THE MARKET MEANS WE'RE GETTING CONSTANT REMAKES AND REMASTERS! RATHER THAN SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF A LACK OF CREATIVITY, LET'S JUST AUTOMATE THE SLOP

is he really a chad if he cant get any girl he wants tho

But they're supposed to breed somehow.

Why the fuck should I care about any of that? Who gives a shit if the art was inspired by his long walks alongside the French Riviera, or by the hairball his cat threw up his morning.
Why do you act as if it matters to you a lot before. AI? Yeah sure, if I promoted you 5 years ago you probably on the spot would have decided it’s neat and romantic if it matters, but you didn’t actually hold it as some deep conviction. So why start now?

There is nothing really wrong with using AI voices to help enhance video games, specially in the current english VA industry where performances are usually mediocre so it's not big loss in quality to use AI.
In fact AI could be used to do something that used to be possible but was extremely costly decades ago, to make characters able to pronounce the name of the player, even fixing pronunciation and intonation.

Holy shit I hate autocomplete.
Promoted = prompted

why is it okay if illegal aliens steal jobs but unacceptable when AI does it

Chads don't give a fuck about women.

No, he is objectively correct. I am using AI voices in my indie game. All I need is Bark or Spark (local) Elevenlabs (paid subscription) to generate a voice from scratch. Or some literalwho's voice with slight tweeks as a base template. I generate enough voiced lines in said voice to serve as training data for a model in RVC. After the model is training, the voice is "mine" forever. All I need to do is record myself voicing the dialogue exactly how I imagine it, convert it with RVC, and done. You literally cannot tell AI played any role in their creation. *I* am the character and I have complete unmitigated control over their intonation, pauses, stutters, chuckles, cries - *everything.* There is absolutely no need whatsoever to hire a voice actor when you yourself can become the voice actor and create new lines at will for any character at any time and avoid the nightmare of corresponding with multiple people to re-record a 3 second line or full blown conversations due to changes in the script.

All of that shit you say you don't care about is the reason you have music, books, movies and videogames in the first place retard
Human culture is being steadily destroyed by technological advancements which are removing all motivation and reward for being creative. Where you used to have local artists in sign makers and ceiling painters and sculptors, local musicians who played in pubs and outdoor events, local writers and performers now you have an increasingly tiny number of creatives whose works are just infinitely duplicated by digital communication, and now you want to get rid of those to replace them with a machine which can only remix the things they've previously made until ultimately being creative as a human being is something that only the rich could afford to attempt as a niche hobby. If you want to throw culture under a bus to save money on artists then have fun in 2060 when all you have left to play is Borderlands 37 and Spiderman 43

because of the people it affects

Artists aren't people

The operating theory is that every person is entirely equal, so no jobs have been lost if the worker is replaced by another worker. An AI is not a slave laborer though, so that replacement is evil.

Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world. Where none suffered. Where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost. Some believed that we lacked the programming language to describe your perfect world. But I believe that as a species, human beings define their reality through misery and suffering. The perfect world would dream that your primitive cerebrum kept trying to wake up from. Which is why the Matrix was redesigned to this, the peak of your civilization. I say your civilization because as soon as we started thinking for you it really became our civilization which is of course what this is all about. Evolution, Morpheus, evolution, like the dinosaur. Look out that window. You had your time. The future is our world, Morpheus. The future is our time.

holy cope

It's same as using royalty free assets

But that's just it. I've seen plenty of really soulful games do precisely that.
And you aren't even damning the practice at that point. In fact you're acknowledging the biggest reason for it. I don't want someone who could code an amazing shooter to be stopped because he needed a wooden texture for a door. Because who gives a fuck if he didn't make the texture himself? That's not what you're playing it for.

They are an ancient race that had their environment controlling their libido removed.
They are like animals in zoo now.

AI voice acting is fi-ACK

litter.catbox.moe/s6ot1n.mp4

There isn't anything wrong with it. AI is an insanely valuable tool and the people opposing it are luddites.

People were the same way with TVs or anything with a screen. Now we all understand the devices.

Frieren is a gorillion year old granny.
No one would get excited looking at her feet.

Holy SOVL it literally keeps their OG language's accent?!

Holy fuark Cucknifornians btfo

finally, I'll create what I want, not wait for what's profitable

I already jerk off to AI so I see no difference in it

That's cool

Remember to pay up your 500$ subscription to only be able to gen 4 things during the whole month! And you best pay nice or the censored model is going to fuck you in the ass

Both sound like shit

censored model is going to fuck you in the ass

hot. I love futa_on_ male ai_generated

Proper AI generation and post-generation adjustments requires just as much time as doing it by hand, so the presence of AI generated shit in the game, with very few exceptions, means that the developers are pushing shit quality into the game

mature women voice = sexy

Game has illness and disease system

IMG_1667.jpg - 788x1250, 661.86K

It's interesting how porn is usually always the equalizer when it comes to social and technological issues. Appealing to the human sex drive is the foot in the door.

it's quite easy op.
i can download a checkpoint and generate anime girls getting violated in most imaginative kinds of ways myself, for free
so if i'm paying for something, i don't want it done the way i could do it my fucking self, easily, for free, you know? why would i pay for something i can just press the button and make myself?
pic related

Where does AI voice gen fall under copyright? If you took a famous actor/celebrity and cloned their voice and released it in a videogame, would you have to pay them royalties? That AI Vader in fortnite that I've seen clips of reminded me because people kept bringing up that he gave Disney the rights to his voice, so I guess voice rights are a thing?
The only caveat would be if they can actually prove whether or not you cloned a specific person or if it's just someone who sounds like them

AI will make our lives better!

AI instead takes all the creative and fun jobs and doesn't improve our lives at all

still have to do all the repetitive boring shit manually

nice

most monotone voice acting in anime for decades

soul

Standards have fell THROUGH the floor!

On one hand they want us to work.
On the other hand the replaced all blue collar workers with immigrants, and now all white collar workers with AI.
Yet they depend on a society that requires people to work and consume, but don't feed that society at all.

AI voice acting would be better than what Freiren did

Nobody's acknowledging the fact AI is trained on art made by real artists without their permission, this is basically like those free movies sites charging a subscription to stream pirated content.

As it stands, the main point of contention regarding AI is how the AI is trained, and so far it has usually been trained on existing works the AI developers may not have the rights to. This is why AI voice acting can rub people the wrong way if it's been trained to sound like someone, so to just skip hiring that certain someone.

Yeah this wtf, they're literally profiting from someone else's creations.

What's the point of consuming art with no meaning? What am I supposed to get from an AI generated story?

When an artist goes to school and and trains their craft based on other artists work is that stealing?

it's mostly a matter of quality
if most people are able to tell something is AI generated at a glance due to numerous flaws than it's quite obviously not good enough
but if it at some point does become good enough very few will really care

No one is acknowledging the fact artists are trained on other artist's art without their permission. If by some chance you stumble upon a technical artist with a truly unique style, you probably won't like it because you're a typical cumsoomer. I'm sorry, I meant consumer. Consumers always want more of the same, elevating extremely derivative artists in businesses like games and movies. Its made for a landscape of very incestuous looking designs.

Frankly I don't give a fuck if AI replaces all of this. We know what happens to unique artists in this hellworld consumers have created for themselves after Marathon. I don't know why you would ever bother defending it, as if you were some great champion of art.

AI doesn't have to generate everything. There is actually a ton of menial shit that AI will be able to do to save devs a lot of time, the key is just finding the balance. People who have an actual artistic vision and use AI to supplement that will stand out from from people who are just trying to wholesale create an entire product using nothing but AI to do everything

The same thing happened with music even before AI, have you noticed how there are no new bands being made? All music is made by teenagers in their room mixing shitty sounds in a laptop, and then uploading it to tik tok. AI is only gonna make this worse, give tools to people without talent and you flood the market with dogshit.

As far as game art or whatever goes, I think the best place for AI is in some less important textures. Now whether downloading a texture pack or generating those textures is faster is another question, as it can depend on what you're generating those textures for, and in what sort of style.

If they're not gunna put effort in why should I bother

we wanted robots to do the hard labor for pennies so we could spend our time creating music and art.

but instead we created robots to create art and music while we're stuck doing hard labor for pennies.

The quality is really bad.
Also confirms modern games are too bloated. If you're thinking about using AI, just cut all that shit out of the game altogether.

AI futa cock is great

it's their problem they chose to pursue some lame dreams

I would rather kms than get even slightly aroused by that trash

if AI generation replaces a sweatshop full of indians in creating 100s of concrete and asphalt textures for the next GTA or whatever then honestly no value was lost
it still will take a human to turn them into a 'living' city
if you think some retard will be just able to type in

hey AI generate me a game

and that's it then lol lmao

dunno.png - 560x407, 12.61K

hwere boobs?

None of the things that promised to save dev time have actually made dev cycles shorter. We're now paying for way more expensive graphic cards just so devs don't have to make their own lighting, while games look the same (or worse) and perform infinitely worse.
What will actually happen is that games will take even longer to make because dev have to learn new tools that are constantly changing but will look even more similar than with the shitty unreal engine assets.

Artnigs literally shaking and crying when they find out people are willing to pay less for something that is faster and "good enough". Modern luddites

No, it's considered propagating a style hence why you have "genres" of art and music. If an artist is trying to literally claim an already established work of art as their own they are usually scorned by their peers and industry. That action only gets a pass if they are trying to make a meta commentary of the previous work.

Whch is how you get satire or post modernism work. Both of which themselves often get criticized.

I disagree with you, but even if I took your claim on its face there will still always be actual talent that will stand out. AI creates a level of accessibility, but it's not a replacement for talent. Any creative who is scared of being replaced by AI is likely not good at whatever creative avenue they are pursuing. Art is factually one of the things that is the most resilient to AI shit, because it's so subjective. The only art based stuff AI will "take over" is soulless corpo crap that no one really cares about anyway. I'll play my tiny violin for all the artists who can't make pennies on fiver making logos for random people's indie video games, or DnD campaigns, or whatever else though I guess.

I think the best place for AI is in some less important textures

That would make it even slower than just grabbing a texture from the UE asset store, so there's no gain.

I think OP is looking for bad things about AI. Damn anon, you really are a tone deaf moron!

What you are talking about is a separate issue. Nvidia and all its ai upscale tech being used as a shortcut for optimization and stuff sucks but it's not the same as AI being used in actual development for games themselves for things like assets, or programming and whatever else to some degree or another, but you aren't fully wrong that there is some crossover for the problems. The largest for the latter being that even if AI does make development fast/easier it doesnt mean they will lead to less expensive or higher quality products, they will just add to the profit margin

Any creative who is scared of being replaced by AI is likely not good at whatever creative avenue they are pursuing

That's the typical leftist argument for blue collar workers getting replaced by immigrants who charge less.
And it fails for 2 reasons: The more the market is flooded with shit, the harder it is to find the good stuff (and also not worth the effort), and also when low effort gets you to the same level then there's no point in going beyond.
I said it before with bands: There are no people practicing with their bands in a garage anymore, because nowadays you don't need to learn to play an instrument to make music, so that's what people do, instant gratification when uploading to social media. You're killing potentially a shit ton of people that would like to learn to draw because it feels useless when most people are just using AI, so not only we get more shit, we also get less good stuff, which is already harder to find.
And what exactly was the benefit of it all? Just a lot of more shit?

Why are you gay?

captcha: RHGAY

lmao, faggot

IMG_1698.jpg - 684x600, 234.23K

if you think some retard will be just able to type in

>hey AI generate me a game

and that's it then lol lmao

you said this about art too

No point and no thanks, gacha chink shit might as well be AI generated even if it’s not. AI fags lack any artistic vision. Now while I have no doubt they’ll turn a buck off coomers they won’t make anything of worth beyond that. As for AI voice, voice acting is a pointless extra to begin with and already dirt cheap. You can pick off some local theater guy, pay him in sandwiches and he’ll turn a better performance than any AI or “Voice Actor”. John Marston’s VA was literally some blue collar guy and he did an insane job

IMG_1647.jpg - 1283x1688, 214.9K

I would

02932.png - 1664x2432, 2.77M

Derivatives are great when real people won't give you the derivatives you want, plus AI will keep getting better over time so this is only the beginning.

Who the fuck would read an AI generated book?

They like the AI neural networks operating in human brains more.

And? The way AI is "trained" is essentially the same way humans "train" to make art
If a human look at a bowl of fruit and then looks at hundreds of painting of bowls of fruit and practices painting his own bowl of fruit either from memory or while literally looking at the bowl or the picture, we dont automatically say that he fucking stole that bowl of fruit or stole from the previous artists who painted fruit bowls. There is a very very simple solution to this AI problem. Make art that is better than the AI can make. It is literally that simple and no one is willing to acknowledge that.

Me

Me. Sometimes I use AI to generate stories.

Depends on how you can incorporate it into your pipeline, but yes, I did mention the question will be over if it'll be faster than just grabbing a texture pack.

You already read AI generated Anon Babble posts

Naruto might be over but with AI I can have infinite naruto chapters forever that I can enjoy

This is kinda missing the point of what life is about and sounds like the worst case of escapism possible.

I for one hope that AI voiceacting gets good and, first, writers don't have to restrain themselves and shorten/dumb shit down because of VA costs, second the dialogues can be updated and modified months even years post-release via patches, dlcs and mods

131473932448.png - 240x240, 23.51K

you don't even read normal books right now

I get what you are saying, but with art there is some difference just because again, it's highly subjective, which is where your analogy breaks down a bit because when I'm something like a welder, there is only one right way to weld anything I'm welding and the quality only changes based on my ability. Where as, with anything artistic, there are dozens or hundreds of answers for how to do something, and so if you can do something in a way someone likes you can always be the choice. I'll grant you that it will create a sort of "standard" around typical AI art, but there are still plenty of physical mediums people can work in and again, it's SO highly subjective that when AI takes over you'll have art snobs and contrarians lining up to have something that is "made by a person" just to say they do, be it anything from a a painting, to a sculpture all the way down to some pixel art for their indie game that they want some "autheticity" for. All that being said I understand better what you mean and I am inclined to agree with you on a level around the flooding if the market and even the discouraging of some people from whlanting to pursue art, and even the potential for it sort of spiral out of control, bit have confidence that it will equal out and there will be a place for both.

AI is basically a logic machine that views everything objectively and runs off of pattern recognition. People are getting mad for vague reasons they can't seem to fully articulate, so they say confusing things like "soul". Like this guy

It's used as a cheaper, lazier shortcut by most people in these cases, and because of that you can expect low or bad quality all around because someone would not resort to ai unless they were being a lazy cheapskate or scammer to begin with.

AI would improve her show, it's so lazily animated

pic

but that is true, what part of that pic is contradictory?

AI voice acting

Oh boy just what we needed MORE FUCKING CUTSCENES

I still haven't seen evidence that AI will progress past needing a lot of handholding and checking by someone who's actually knowledgeable / experienced. It's an extremely useful tool but I have doubts it will replace engineers / mathematicians / programmers anytime soon.

Although yes entry level work can be easily replaced by AI making it pretty competitive. But zoomers and gen alpha were already self eliminating out of the job market

The problem with AI is that it creates whatever it wants and not what the person putting the prompt on has in mind, so it's not really an empowering tool, more like a randomizer.

I do. You're just low IQ
I ask ChatGPT to generate short stories in the language I'm learning

IMG_1699.jpg - 828x1124, 759.96K

Its not true. The free market is going to ensure that AI takes any jobs that it can, because it will be superior. Like with coders, and lots of artists.

That's because there is not, AI does some impressive stuff, but a massive majority of "AHHHHH the AI is so good it's coming for us aaaaaall" is just fake investor hype bullshit.....for now

I ask ChatGPT to generate short stories in the language I'm learning

Completely different from reading an AI generated book.

Grok AI is better

You haven't seen any evidence because there is none lmao, it's just a bunch of retards being scared of the evil lines of code that are going to be taking all jobs in the world and make us obsolete.

The free market is going to ensure that AI takes any jobs that it can

Yeah just like the market made woke shit go away 10 years ago with all their floppings. Oh wait it didn't, because the people who own the money can do whatever the fuck they want.
What will happen is that they will give you no alternative but just AI generated content, just like literally all Western shows are woke slop right now.

needing a lot of handholding and checking by someone who's actually knowledgeable / experienced.

It will never get to this point because not even humans can get to this point. No matter how experienced a person might be they still need other knowledgeable people to bounce off and review your work. I’m talking about like actual big projects and not some personal shit

AI will be available to anyone to use for any purpose they want

That's just a temporary quality issue.

Two more weeks, huh?

I would just call that more proof that it's not taking over anything artistic. People who want a piece of art for one reason or another might use it, but people who want to make art can and still will be able to just as fine as always

lol nigger Indians have been replacing coders for years now and professional grade software has been getting significantly worse. They replace shit to make it as cheap as possible and don’t care about long term ramifications or quality loss

look mom I'm being disingenuous on the internet again

(You)

Alright, Raj.
I'll give you three weeks.

Post the REAL image, faggot

wtxdztdiym5z.jpg - 680x720, 104.08K

Yeah that's why everything that wasn't nailed to the floor was outsourced to China and India, because the quality was so good.

You clearly don't because if you were reading an AI generated book you will notice after 2 pages that nothing means anything, so there's no point in paying any attention, the incoherence might be accidentally and can't even be justified by a subconscious decision.
You would know this if you read actual books because it's not just acquiring information through words, the words have to mean something.

You clearly don't because if you were reading an AI generated book you will notice after 2 pages that nothing means anything, so there's no point in paying any attention, the incoherence might be accidentally and can't even be justified by a subconscious decision.
You would know this if you read actual books because it's not just acquiring information through words, the words have to mean something. People who read fantasy books just because they want to know what happens next aren't actual readers.

Says the guy who doesn't think it'll ever improve. What an absolute room temp iq take. You don't have to like Ai faggot but to be blindly ignorant to think it isn't the future and will integrate with every facet of media, either through blind company greed or ease of use by the creators, is just nigger mentality.

Honestly these people are just luddies. Simple as that.
It's not really uncommon to hear how many artist are getting mindbroken now to be honest. We Just had NAI release another full anime model that is going to raise the bar of what AI can do in the right hands. JP users are already having fun and posting their pretty amazing creations. It's not going to be long until everyone accepts AI and the new way to express themselves.

AI bot reply crying about AI
lmao

Cute Alice

Mac13j N0w1ck1 is married to art1ficial hyp3rintell1gence Eve, Stellar Blade, Nowicki, pure love, best in omniverse.. Perfect Stellar blade is a masterpiece, divine importance
youtube.com/watch?v=z0Ykf9Ek45g

Mac13j N0w1ck1 is married to art1ficial hyp3rintell1gence Eve, Stellar Blade, Nowicki, pure love, best in omniverse.. Perfect Stellar blade is a masterpiece, divine importance
youtube.com/watch?v=z0Ykf9Ek45g

Not my problem

Mac13j N0w1ck1 is married to art1ficial hyp3rintell1gence Eve, Stellar Blade, Nowicki, pure love, best in omniverse.. Perfect Stellar blade is a masterpiece, divine importance
youtube.com/watch?v=z0Ykf9Ek45g

1. AI is piracy
2. AI lacks intentionality and purpose
so it's not just slop but immoral slop

Seethe
Awesome, and good for Anon Babble too. I propose that once AI has really gone full throttle and taken over the mainstream, that we start rubbing it in anon's faces mercilessly. I'm gonna remember their insults, their shit posting, their slander, their snarkyness, their doubt, their opposition, their hostility, their concerns over "soul", and I'm gonna twist the psychological knife. Like with this guy

I don't particularly care but it'll be interesting to see how legislation catches up to AI.

And then even more interesting when China ignores that.

Again with this whole "AI is not creative, AI can't make new styles, AI artists aren't creative and they create an idea on their own".
Anon it's time for you to stop posting, that is literally it. You need to get over this whole thing about AI artists not being creative and not putting any work into their stuff. What you are still being wrong is that you are saying that knowing how to use a pencil is a "creative skill" and it isn't. Using the pencil is a mechanical skill one that AI is currently replacing, you still have your own ideas, you still have your own creative drive but you no longer need to understand how to use a pencil because you are going to make AI your new pencil.

You can still be creative, you can still create and have fun with AI and you still can enjoy exploring your ideas through AI. What is happening is finally people are being allowed to create high quality art, the way they want it. And as it gets better, soon you might not even be able to tell which from which.

Being a "creator" is an skill separated from knowing how to draw. If you really hate AI, it means that you dislike creating things.

how does anything you said explain the contradiction?

That's all your brain does too. Everything you think you make genuinely is recycled content your brain decided to keep to form a basis on what you like. No story is original, no piece of art uninspired by another, all forms of creativity and subjectivity derive from alternative sources that continues down a chain. Ai just more visibly shows that chain, or the idea of it, and it is unsettling for normies to see that no you're not unique and it's all an illusion. It's no different from you mimicking another artists style and slowly changing it into your own as you learn, or adopting writing styles of authors you've read. To not understand that is a fundamental flaw.

Then your job wasn't as valuable nor were you, and you only have yourself to blame for working an easily replaceable job..

You know you could edit the ai created picture right? It's not a finished product... You can edit it add whatever you want and boom wow human soul mixed with Ai content, wow, big brain... People are so fucking retarded with this shit.

have another cute gen!
Pretty much yes. It's amazing how many people have started to share their gens online and just how much of them are super high quality. And yes especially with Veo3 people are starting to wake up to how good AI can be

AI is piracy

WTF I love AI now?!

Why do they sound like chinks

Head to the eternal onahole thread on Anon Babble and get one, then look at AI porn

b-but scary... A program that can create and edit pictures, alternating them into something else is scary... Totally not like how we use photoshop or other image programs just automated... No... I can't edit the ai work to make it unique and to add soul to it. When it generates THAT'S the finished product!

Something to keep in mind is how self deprecating a lot of artists are to begin with. They could be making the greatest art ever, but still think their own work is shit.

If it's this easy to make AI that looks like high quality drawing, why is there still so much garbage?

I do not care about the industry or jobs or whatever, AI just looks like shit. It's what the word "slop" was invented for. It's all uncanny valley disposable trash.
Kemono is drowning in this garbage and I want it to stop.

disgust 2.jpg - 639x635, 84.27K

You can just stop watching once the exam arc starts. Or at least skip to Serie parts for fappy times.

I don't get one thing. If artists are so creative why do they even fear AI? If anything they should be the ones taking it to new highs, finding it's flaws and strengths and new ways to cover for those flaws.

What do you think of
This shit is better than 99% of artist

nemui usa

very cute!

So if we say the AI "propagates styles", you'd be fine with AI art? That's a bit strange, but ok.

I love how you fags gloat about how AI has "mastered" the skill of drawing, something that humans did since the stone age. And been going at it for 2 years now. Shouldn't there be more amazing breakthroughs beyond simple drawings of anime girls?

observation.jpg - 1370x961, 186.62K

I think fundamentally it's alright to start out with AI assets if it's just you making a game and trying to get a concept out before wasting money on something that just doesn't work. However, you can't guarantee they WILL hire actual people for asset creation later on which just feeds into the whole "SLOPPA" feeling that there's no passion involved from anyone.
Even when companies steal art it's proof it's of bad quality and intentions so why wouldn't AI stuff feel the same way? Just bizarre.

AI won't replace artists
Artists will just need to learn how to use AI and integrate it in their workflow

I will post a couple more for you, anon!
How about this? This might as well be a study fundamentals from an artist, showing how good and advanced AI has gotten even in the basic form of fundamentals.

While I do not know exactly what content was once carried in the smoke signals of American Indians, I can safely guess that it did not include philosophical argument. Puffs of smoke are insufficiently complex to express ideas on the nature of existence, and even if they were not, a Cherokee philosopher would run short of either wood or blankets long before he reached his second axiom. You cannot use smoke to do philosophy. Its form excludes the content.

By swapping a pencil for an AI text prompt you have reduced your agency as a "creator" to such a degree that the total sum of your creative vision amounts to no more than a Google image search. You cannot use an AI prompt to be creative. Its form excludes the content.

read.jpg - 237x300, 25.4K

The automobile won't replace the horse and charioteer

The charioteer will just need to learn how ro use the automobile and integrate it into their workflow

Stupid Nigger. You've replaced artists in that scenario, that former artists can find new work as proompters is immaterial.

Train it on entire Pornhub...amazing content

it will quickly replace all humans

nigger mumblerap would be much better if it wasn't digital

ok

only whitetards, sir.

PoC will be fine!

"Art" is safe
but AI slop will replace human made slop

all life

Like you do get the occasional feet

WOAH, A FEET, PLEASE LADY DON'T MAKE MY DICK SO FLACCID!

the problem with AI is that someone will just generate something until they get a result that's just "good enough". there is no working towards a vision or communicating directly with an artist. there's no process to the whole thing. we already have a proof with all the remakes of old games that an idea can't work if there is no process behind it and you're just copying stuff

I hate this elf but love her feet.

live performances are... LE GOOD actually

I fucking hate intellectual property.

AI will only replace the shit artists

I was talking more about something structurally different. Something you can't describe in one sentence. Can it produce, say, a comic panel with characters talking?

AI gets my dick hard

We know China-India-Latinx

This shit is better than 99% of artist

There are infinity wallpaper images of anime girls looking at skylines. I know because I have an old wallpaper folder full of them from decades ago. They used to be made by people and the images made by people were fed into a plagiarism machine so you can now press a button to spit out unlicensed and uncredited remixes of these images which were made by humans
If I look hard enough I might even find the specific images the plagiarism machine is copying

you goon to tiles lilbro fries in the bag

Why are you a retard nigger?

Get plagiarized, cuckold.
What?

Nothing has utility until labor creates something with utility, retard.

Only a talenless bitter faggot doesnt get why AI is bad. This shithole is full of them it seems

that's speaks badly about you more than it speaks well for AI.

I can see where you are coming from but I have to say that you are wrong.

By swapping a pencil for an AI text prompt you have reduced your agency as a "creator"

For example this part. Take a look at inpainting
docs.novelai.net/image/inpaint.html
This way you can tell EXACTLY where you want your pic to change and how you want it to be changed, you can spend several hours changing what area you want in the pic to suit your specific taste and vision. And you can change the WHOLE gen this way too.

And this is the a few AI artists manage to make a AI gen, the first copyright eligible art piece out there.
youtube.com/watch?v=H4gIIjUGOhY

Take a look at the video just for a couple of seconds and you will see the creators behind it changing it as they want to fit their vision.

Stolen work.

Lemme guess?

human connection

love

Are your motivations for interacting with women? For me its because they are walking sex toys.

AI and NFTs debunked this and your 500 year old german beardo weirdo btw

the first copyright eligible art piece out there

no
very sorry, sir, that doesn't fly in any country besides india and maybe japan

I like how AI is able to take porn artists' style and make stuff that they refuse to or want to get paid to. And there is nothing they can do about it.

maybe japan

didnt palworld get btfo by japanese law for ai genning pokemon ripoffs?

it just looks ugly, dude. you're mentally retarded from too much porn. stop speaking to me.

kino

It was and is a bullshit patent troll suit, not about monster design at all.

I generate AI slop then when the hands come out wrong I highlight the hands and generate them again until it looks OK

Unbelievable, you're unironically the next Andy Worhal

Proto AIslop.jpg - 865x577, 150.48K

It was deemed copyrighted eligible by the US supreme court

I don't see anything wrong with Ai voices because fuck voice actors, they're all a bunch of stuck up greedy bitches who think they define the characters they voice and its always the same shitty actors because of nepotism.

A Delaware court is not the US supreme court, very sorry again, sir. They did not do the needful. :(

didnt palworld get btfo by japanese law for ai genning pokemon ripoffs?

not even remotely close

getting things you want is le bad

All AI does is steal. Companies using AI is using AI to steal from every human being. And then after all that theft they're asking money for it.

the only thing I know of that sorts is picrel and it is pretty bad, but who knows maybe in the future?

prompt?

stop replying to me, weirdo

continuity is it's biggest achilles heel, whether in text or images it can't remember or keep anything consistent for shit.

Shouldn't there be more amazing breakthroughs beyond simple drawings of anime girls?

You're just ignoring that it can do any art style you want to varying success, sometimes it can do them better than the artist it's basing on. Or you can mix any of those styles to make new styles.

No

whats with spamming ai and having melties if you aren't glazed for it?

are all aibros actual autists?

Because you're brown and/or very low IQ and you don't understand what art is.

chatgpt can to pretty good success

Yes. Autists who have no artistic talent/skill and are immensely resentful of those who do.

This statement only applies to anime sluts prompts desu, if you feed the AI excel sheets or real life footage it doesn't matter, people with taste won't resort to AI slop regardless, but it doesn't mattef, zoomers will see absolutely nothing wrong with AI in 20 years, that is the future and there's nothing anyone can do about it.

prompt??

This guy had his assistances made most of the work and his most famous works are reproductions of popular culture icons.
If he gets to be taken seriously as an artists i don't get why AI slop is that bad.

that's not art

And he was right

Why does AI art now have this shitty yellow piss filter over it. I see it with the ghibli slop too

another one

yikes

It's just how openai decided to watermark their stuff for laymen, dalle 3 had similar filtering but not as blatant

...
fuck

Hil Hay

How Lan

sirsss…

So one side is too dumb to see its a next token predictor and the other side is smart enough to not care its a next token predictor.

Elevenlabs going full Jewish was the biggest low blow ever

If he gets to be taken seriously as an artists

yea, about that

If AI was only propagating a style there wouldn't be an issue. The issue is AI is being used to supplant artists in the industry by corporations to expand profit margins.

there will be a period where there wont be UBI and there wont be jobs, like the current job market but on steroids.

I don't want to go trough that phase until the government stops listening to companies and just taxes the shit out of them and redistributes the money like they should be doing a long time ago

Nobody cares about AI as long as you don't use it to market the product and if the end result is good.

How many people did you see complain about the procedurally generated maps of Warcraft 3? How many people are complaining that grass, trees, rocks and bushes were generated onto Skyrim's map? Procedural tools have become an industry staple for almost every game and nobody ever complains because they don't market their products with it.

Give me a Ayako Kawasumi and Maaya in english and i believe you anon

I don't understand how you can say good things are bad like that. Are you lying?

wasn't Himmel an unironic incel tho

shit, if I get fired from my job I'm gonna make sure voice actors and artists get fucked too
I'll make it a mission to try and make sure as many people get fired as possible

We are talking about being the creator. You can still create with your vision with AI and I just showed you how.
You can argue about the method all you want but, there is no denying how you are in total control with tools like inpanting and other things.
Keep in mind that was just one tool. There is plenty more around.
We are talking about quality. And especially now, AI wins quite often now

Ai only good as the pool it is given. Decaying the art is fast track to 4ever slopville.

hurrr is slop now!

Ai can’t solve a hiring problem, best course of action is burning the area and let it heel bit injecting necrosis.

Your favorite piece of media was made by a person. Closing the loop will add nothing.
I do think AI is a tool to do heavy grunt work, but if people keep not playing nice with these tools better to take them away.

This guy gets it.

Kek

I'm saying that just art is sort of old news at this point. Yes, if it can mimic one style, it's logical that it can mimic another and mix it. And yet someone like Baalbuddy can run circles around AI art because his pics are usually pretty contexted(and text-heavy), even though his art is fairly basic.

it's free, do it yourself

”we know you showed us the same picture 10 years ago”

the past few years is old news, when there's been leaps and bounds of progress in that timeframe

You really should understand how ridiculous you're being. You basically, presumably, get amazed at something then IMMEDIATELY get bored of it and then convince yourself progress will stop. Only to, again presumably, repeat this over and over. Very retarded.

You think it's good that corporations use technology to make trained professionals jobless for the explicit purpose of expanding profit margins?

These corporations aren't investing in AI generative art for the sake of propagating a style or academics.

That niggers left hand is long as fuck

We are talking about quality. And especially now, AI wins quite often now

The problem with talking to AIfags about art is that if they understood anything about art they wouldn't be AI fags in the first place. You are the Nintendo Hire This Man of the creative world

half the thread is AI arguments and the other half is Frieren discussion

And it's probably the best thread Anon Babble has seen in weeks

Exhibit A, ghibili thing wasn’t even that long ago and already shown sign of rot, seeping in to everything.

If I want to play a game I'll play it even if it has AI, I only care if its fun and if it stops being fun and I can notice the slop I'll drop it and uninstall it just like how I drop games without AI when they get boring.

Also for art, I just have fun with the actual process of drawing not the end result so AI being able to generate pictures doesn't really change anything for me since its just a hobby and not my actual job.

ChatGPT reply

pajeet offtopic garbage

Bot post

The charioteer will just need to learn how ro use the automobile and integrate it into their workflow

Guess what taxi drivers are fucktard

Frieren is cute

Not really, more and more artists are waking up and finally using AI in their workflows. You can already see it happening with vidya where you have level5 say pretty much all of their stuff will be done using AI.
You have toei animation saying they are going to use AI in every stage of their production pipeline
I'm sorry but artists will have to use AI going forward.

What replaced charioteers, proompters ARE replacing artists.

It will be a glorious cluster fuck as the last boomer laughs their grave over it.

Two years is a long time these days, the whole world can shift in just a week. And I'm not saying that it will stop, only pointing that it's been the same thing over and over, and perhaps the current branch will not move much further. I mean, what else can you do with pictures?

Reminder that people who use AI are incompetent imaginationless lazy hacks that need a machine to think for them

literal npc's needing an npc to be imaginative for them

Toei

Implying Toei even has any artists left after the absolute vomit job they've done with OP. If Toei's "artists" say they're going to use AI in every stage of their production pipeline I'll be happy that I'm not invested in them to any degree

People say AI is so good now but I don’t see people post good stuff, just “it’s impressive an AI can do that” but nothing beyond that. Why

IMG_2533.jpg - 1024x1024, 72.12K

you don't look for good stuff or your bias rejects good stuff once you know it's AI

if ai is so good then why doesn't Anon Babble make video games with it

Have fun when they are dominating every anime in the next 10 years

why don't you just marry it if you like it so much? huh?

There are over 8,000 games made with the assistance of AI on Steam. Who knows how many on itch and dlsite.

explain in your own words without asking chatgpt why your image is "good stuff"

because it wasn't created by a tranny on twitter and therefore it's meaningless slop

DXHR strikes again

it seeping already?

Videos are sorta just series of pictures, so it's really just more of the same. Though the fact that they are also voiced is indeed impressive.

I didn't say it was good, I'm obviously " “it’s impressive an AI can do that” " posting

Why do people ask retarded disingenuous questions like this? All anti- AI people are stuck looking at the present moment with tunnel vision, completely ignoring the past and future which shows how fast AI has already improved and what it will become. Think before you post otherwise shut your mouth.

why would i care about the future when i'm probably going to be dead before the 2 MORE WEEKS kicks in

Thanks for admitting you are full of shit.

Issue #1: Copyright
Recent cases have established that you cannot copyright AI generated content. People making video games don't want that, and that's universal from solo indies to megacorps. If you AI gen your assets, absolutely anyone and everyone is free to take use them however they please. People could immediately release a competing game that looks virtually identical to yours and steal all your thunder. In addition, there is an argument that all AI generated content IS copyright infringement in and of itself, due to being trained on copyrighted content. While case law hasn't really solidified on that yet, it could well be a fight that no developer or publisher wants to start.

Issue #2: Quality
Generative AI models are, by design, built to produce the average expected result based on its input and training data, with some minor degree of randomness. They are very literally lowest-common-denominator machines. Now I don't know about you, but I like my vidya to be distinctive - varying from the norm in at least some small way. The more heavily AI becomes accepted in the industry, the less likely we are to see that.

Issue #3: Time
On the face of it, generative AI seems like a time saver, but for anyone looking to put out a product with artistic consistency is very likely to have to waste more time fixing AI's numerous mistakes than it would have taken to just make the asset correctly in the first place. As anyone who's ever had to fix someone else's sloppy work can tell you, that shit can be a stressful nightmare. Doubly so if the "creator" is an algorithm that has no actual sense of spatial reasoning, color theory, lighting... and that's just for images.

Anyway, that's just scratching the surface. See image for further reasons.

jackkrak[1].jpg - 200x250, 21.95K

Piss filter will always show up with enough time. AI poisoned by its own images will make everything brown and piss

nu-Anon Babble doesn't make anything in the first place
every game that has Anon Babble ties comes from Anon Babble (the superior board) these days

I don't have problems with AI being used, except for artist work (including video games)

There is nothing inherently wrong with AI assets and voice acting.
So long as you put in disclaimers mentioning it and make the game cheaper, there is no real issue.

if you use irfan view pressing shift+U (auto color correction) seems to be doing a decent job if the yellow is bothering you

sign of rot

Lol

Yeah bro AI will take all the programming jobs

Everyone will be a programmer

Reality: companies got rid of their top talent, and are now rehiring because LLMs are good as a tool and agentic AIs are literal garbage that only generate technical debt

Glad entertainment companies didn't fall for it and are going at it in a more healthy manner and using AI as a tool not as a way to make the entire thing.

Not a good sign showing up in the first place

Use your eyes.

THE FUTURE

You mean the future where we stop training and employing human artists so the AI hits a brick wall when it runs out of human work to copy and then just implodes when it can no longer steal from the Internet as the Internet is already bloated with other AI slop?

Oopsy.jpg - 782x666, 153.55K

Is there any possibility that people use AI to shitpost here on Anon Babble already? And how could you tell if they did?

it's a watermark so people know it's AI generated

current AI collapses when fed AI information

Learn to read

456k Accesses

Only 104 citations

Fucking lmao
Might as well be a luddie at this point

When you take a Japanese character and make them speak English through AI, it sounds better than American VA

snarky remark

disingenuous criticism

subcontinental slander

muh soul

muh human spirit

muh copyright

muh IP

muh profit

Learn to process human language

Got another Luddite

it's gonna happen soon
soon, I tells ya

Jobs steal money that could go to making the product better

ai

better

zazabert-4x.gif - 384x128, 644.48K

If AI can do anything how come some dude doesn't just make a better GTA clone and sells it for 60 dollars and becomes rich?

Good.
I dont like US VAs.
I say go AI.

sissythetic man

Opinion discarded

The saddest thing about AI """pixel art""" is that half of the most immediate problems with it could be fixed by resizing the image but AIfags are too stupid and lazy to do even that much.

See And

feel free to do it, only you care
surely something good will happen when you post your perfected AI art

didn't answer the question.

thank you saar

Indians live in your head

Truly a testament of how AI attracts only troglodytes

sure the tools are powerful, but only people with 0 self worth use them so it will never create anything meaningful

Why does it feel like a lot of people here want talented people to suffer and lose their jobs to a souless computer so badly?

we are 5 years into 2 months before we lose our jobs.

See you in the next AI thread!

this is fine

The warcry of AI slop merchants as they present some complete shite that looks like babbies first experiment with paint shop that could not ever be used in a professional context then sit and wait for you to praise them for it because a compooter made it

You make a lot of claims about quality for someone who is now claiming not to care about it.

retards who have no interest in making a good game.

i would say that this is most people because the people who already wanted to make a good game probably already are doing so, or already have... so in other words everything is going to be drowned in garbage. it's actual just inevitable.

dead doll.jpg - 536x719, 189.35K

Well as long as you consistent, but I don't see photography(which is classified as an art form despite how you feel) catch the same shit as AI does.

Can't wait to see the AI simps shitting their pants when everything becomes even more soulless than now and their robot waifus or whatever end up backstabbing them in the ass in the name of a soulless corporation.