NVIDIA confirms Switch 2 uses DLSS and Ray Tracing and 10x stronger than Switch 1

blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nintendo-switch-2-leveled-up-with-nvidia-ai-powered-dlss-and-4k-gaming/

Custom NVIDIA processor featuring an NVIDIA GPU with dedicated RT Cores and Tensor Cores for stunning visuals and AI-driven enhancements

The new RT Cores bring real-time ray tracing, delivering lifelike lighting, reflections and shadows for more immersive worlds.

Tensor Cores power AI-driven features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS), boosting resolution for sharper details without sacrificing image quality.

10x the graphics performance of the Nintendo Switch, the Nintendo Switch 2 delivers smoother gameplay and sharper visuals.

DLSS is now good

wtf I love DLSS now!

10x stronger than a Switch
Wow! So its almost as powerful as the base PS4!
In this pace, maybe the Switch 3 will be on par with the PS4 PRO.
Nintendo is always breaking new boundaries in gaming.

Custom NVIDIA processor

Custom

bros... how are we going to exploit this thing?

No shit
Useless thread

10x stronger

means 11x the strength. this is a misquote. he said 10x as strong.

10x the graphics performance of the Nintendo Switch

as for how they are getting this increase in strength, DLSS is the answer. it will turn every 1 pixel into 4 pixels so a 4x factor is just DLSS.
10/4 = 2.5
DLSS aside the hardware got 2.5x stronger. if you turned off DLSS or if a game is not compatible with it for whatever reason (backwards compat titles?) you'll get 2.5x Switch 1 graphics. that's enough to take a 720p30 game to either 1080p30 or 720p60, assuming the CPU is also 2.5x stronger to allow for an increase in framerate.

For a handheld? Sure.
For a end game PC? it should not be needed

ha, ironic. I made the same error I corrected:

2.5x stronger

no, 2.5x AS STRONG.

The Switch doesn't have zero power, numbnuts

4k 60 fps is 8 times 1080p 30 fps so the numbers seem right

It's mandatory for raytracing doesn't matter what kind of rig you got

10x the graphics performance of the Nintendo Switch

Could've fooled me. Based on the games shown it looks more like the jump between the Gamecube and the Wii.

According to NVidia's current metric, being 10x stronger means you get 10x more frames, as long as you reduce the original resolution and create 3 fake frames for every 1 real one.

I don't think they're doing fake frames. it's only upscaling according to the patent.

Switch is 0.39 tflops docked and if NVIDIA is being truthful and we take the statement at surface level that means the Switch 2 is roughly 3.9 TFLOPS docked

For comparison:
PS4 1.84 TFLOPS
PS4 Pro 4.2 TLFOPS
Steam Deck 1.6 TFLOPS
Xbox Series S 4 TFLOPS

Nvidia also confirmed that the 5070 was basically a 4090, didn't they
And that a game running at 29 fps could run at 300 if you just enabled DLSS 4, I mean these guys are just so funny sometimes

3,9 TF it's more than what I expected after leaks. It's basically a Series S.
With more ram. And physical games.

it's using 3:1 fake pixels just to leverage UP to the level of the Series S

AAA devs are going to cry.

those claims are both the same claim based on fake frames. Switch 2 is doing upscaling only, no interpolation.

DLSS is better than native. You don't need to respond since I know you don't own a modern GPU.

If the 2 main components of the system are made by Nvidia (CPU/GPU) then why don't Nvidia just release a "switch" ?

What do Nintendo actually provide besides game studioes to create games?

Lol Switch 2 is not SS level.

a customer ("fan") base

in brute force it's a quarter of it. in final image quality it will be close though since basically every game on S uses some horrendous, blurry upscaling without machine learning.

They tried, it was called the Nvidia Shield.

You dont remember what Wii games looked like

direct (1).png - 6360x3080, 3.52M

Too bad almost all of the third party games are using game key cards so there's no reason to play multiplats on it. Even then Cyberpunk is confirmed for 30/40 fps and 1080p docked/720p handheld.

so this is for third parties who cant be assed to optimize their games got it
I wasn't planning on buying third party games on this thing anyway I have a PC but man i cant wait to see how its used and how fucking bad it'll look

What does the Steam Deck do in Cyberpunk 2077?

Third party exclusives and such will do fine, stuff made for the hardware, same story like always. Honestly I think a lot of companies should just dial down for the next 8 years. Some of these companies are making games that only run well on RTX 4090 and it's like who is the target audience for those games? Children of billionaires?

come on, my 3070 is still new...

40 fps at 800p, i think it dips into the mid 30s at times though.

So similar performance.

i don't understand any of these words

It's close enough, yeah.

At this point I want someone to get a final release kit and open up the fucking thing and video tapes what's inside. All this shit means nothing to me until we see the PHYSICAL HARDWARE.

Basically, the Switch 2 uses AI to massively upscale performance that it makes even the PS5 look like a joke. You'll get smooth 4k/60fps BUT the frames are AI generated and not actually processed. Which you shouldn't be able to tell I think. At least I can't tell

The specs aren't really amazing desu. Nvidia hit the cap of what they can output. Their new hardware is barely stronger than that of 5 years ago. This is why it doesn't really matter that the Switch 2 has old cheap hardware because DLSS is the way to go anyway

if third party devs develop for switch 2 and not ps5 xbox first and scale down than yeah I can imagine it'll be better i agree on that point.
It's an optimistic view but im not optimistic it will happen the way we want with rock solid 60fps games at a good resolution.
I don't trust third party devs to focus on performance, we're seeing so much crutch on DLSS and AI Frame gen already on some PS5 and PC games already that I don't trust devs to not fuck up, cap the framerate at 30fps and also slap on AI bullshit

raytrace this bitch

flashes cock on switch 2 camera

rivals the PS5

4k60

frames are AI generated

triple wrong. stop posting.

That's not what it means. It means that the device is rendering the image at 540p (as described in the patent) and then upscaled to 1080p in handheld. That's what the AI is used for. Upscaling. Not frame gen. For docked, I would guess it'll be rendering 1080p native, DLSS to 4K.

file.png - 1693x1108, 838.01K

Oh
But is that actually better than full frame generation? Or worse?

Switch 2 doesn't support DLSS frame gen.

I fear that's already happening. On PC it feels like developers never cared too much about performance unless it's a PC exclusive title like Total War, a lot of developers seem to take a "PC hardware gets better who cares." The framegen thing is only going to make things much worse.

3,9Tf Switch 2
10gb ram for games

4Tf Series S
8gb ram for games

How it isn't superior?

besides game studioes to create games?

As if that was nothing

Technically, every frame you see is a real natively generated frame. That natively generated frame is then upscaled through AI. Still a real frame, it just basically got ran through a fancy anti-aliasing filter so it looks better when blown up from 540p to 1080p.

Nvidia TFLOPS are different. Switch 2 is more PS4 level with some modern additions like VRS, DLSS, RT support.

Nvidia TFLOPS are different.

Elaborate.

On PC it feels like developers never cared too much about performance

The framegen thing is only going to make things much worse.

Took the words right out my mouth, fucking hate frame gen and ai bullshit like you couldn't believe.

And is that better or worse?

Subjective. Rub those little braincells together and form an opinion.

Nvidia TFLOPS are different

Stop regurgitating things you don't understand.
A TFLOP is a TFLOP. Its a simple calculation of the theoretical maximum throughput of the ALUs. ALUs x frequency x ops per clock
This never changes. You're too stupid to understand this so you're conflating this with direct game performance.
Don't listen to a retard.

gamecube and wii both output a max 480p, wii just allowed anamorphic widescreen. theres a far more noticeable difference here in resolution and clarity thats difficult to gauge because of video compression. As for what the games themselves actually look like, that im not too sure of. MP4 looked really similar in a comparison I watched. To my eye, kirby looked sharper and obviously was running in 60fps, and even through compression I could tell DKB was running at higher resolutions and looked more crisp than Mario Odyssey’s dynamic resolution that would often make it blurry. the games are at a higher quality on switch 2, thats for sure.

If they want they can make it work. They made fucking Hogwarts Legacy work on the Switch because they knew the female game market was there. I don't think there is an excuse to not put a game on the Switch 2 if you wanna make some money now

The upscaling in Switch 2 is the same type of upscaling as in emulators.

You guys are gonna be disappointed if you think this is series s level.

Not quite.

cyberpunk.png - 608x309, 31.99K

For docked, I would guess it'll be rendering 1080p native, DLSS to 4K.

you were on the money until this part. there's no way they go from 540p internal res up to 1080p under any circumstance (in the same game). Chance of (DLSS) upscaling to 4K is existing but small given they sent out some dev kits without any 4K support. don't count on 4K being supported with anything more than integer upscaling from 1080p.

it's nowhere near as bad. frame generation is garbage that produces tons of artifacts and increases input lag. the next "true" frame has to already exist for interpolation on the fake frames to begin, meaning the device is holding back a finished frame at, say, 20 fps while pumping out intermediate fake frames that lead up to that true frame. with 4x fake frames you can get 80 fps that feel worse than 20 fps. it's a complete non-starter for actual gaming and only exists as a marketing trick. perhaps in something barely interactive like a strategy game fake frames could be acceptable. like a strategy game with thousands of units on screen and your PC only needs to render the action at a quarter of the framerate. that's the only valid use case I see. and even in that use case it's complicated because one would want the UI and mouse input to run at a much higher rate of course. 20 fps for the whole game wouldn't be acceptable. the GUI and "world rendering" would need to be completely separate, similar to how some games upscale the action but render the UI natively.

it's not subjective in the slightest, you dunning kruger victim.

120hz

vrr

4k

dlss

rt

nintendo literally made the console everyone wanted and then fucked it up by making games $80
fuck those greedy cunts

Switch 2 has 10gb ram?

You mouth breathing retards are missing the point that the whole point of owning a $450 Switch instead of a $450 PS5 is HANDHELD MODE and in handheld mode it's weaker than a base PS4
Tendidiots on suicide watch

oh they will make it run on switch 2 for profit
its just a question of how shit is it gonna run and how much fake frames and 30fps cap we'll see

file.png - 1280x720, 1.68M

targeting 30-40 FPS

targeting

So right now it's what, 20?

Most games aren't hitting 120 fps or using 4k, it's like how the PS5 says 8K on the box and 1 single awful looking minecraft looking game actually displays in 8K.

I just asked you to elaborate on how they're different. No need to be so hostile if you can't answer the question. Just say so.

You won't have either 4K or RT in handheld mode

I mean sure they can, the same way games like Tunic and Bloodstained struggle to be playable on the switch, but hey, "the switch runs them".
The amount of shit that console cannot properly run is absurd to me. I don't remember nintendo giving so little of a fuck about games performing close to good that they'll just accept porting anything in any state whatsoever.
I'm sure the switch 2 will get AAA games released by 2030. Oh for sure you'll be able to "play them", in such a state that you'd rather eat shit.

I'm not that anon. Of course that's a stupid assertion too. But the point remains, why buy a $450 console that's 1.8 TFLOPS handheld and 3.9 TFLOPS docked when you can buy a $450 PS5 that's 10.5 TFLOPS or a $400 Steam Deck that's 1.9 TFLOPS handheld without $90 games

the alley of doom will be hilarious. does the Switch 2 have CPU speed comparable to 8th gen? especially in mobile mode.
they'll hit 40 fps in cutscenes, 30 during walking around, 20 during combat and driving and even less in the alley of doom.

I'm sure the switch 2 will get AAA games released by 2030. Oh for sure you'll be able to "play them", in such a state that you'd rather eat shit.

Reminds me of that Shadow of Mordor PS3 port

Because I want to play first party Nintendo games at launch day.

Steam Deck that's 1.9 TFLOPS

I keep seeing this when the TFLOPS was said to be around 1.6-1.7 at best.

Dishonorabru anon-kun. I will be your second. Commit sudoku-san.

I enjoy eating shit

Okay

now

it's better than TAA

it was obvious that Switch2 is technically going to support, but the rumors claimed it's going to be 20xx series hardware so this is literally first gen DLSS or something?

So aggressive for no reason.

realistically indieshit games will do 120fps, and games will be able to have 4K hud/ui, which is better than what we have with switch 1.

Nothing good has come out since around that time anyway

Even then it would be equivalent performance in handheld but a cheaper console with an open platform and cheap (read: free) games
Also you can get a Legion Go or Ally X for $600 if you know where to look and that's over 3 TFLOPS handheld at 20W and over 4 docked at 30W, again the games are cheap/free on it, so why buy this tendie POS

Most indieshit is not as well optimized as you would think

I have like 250 games total, approximately 240 of them are digital
You niggers are lying out your ass pretending like most of your game library isn't digital.
The only issue with the key card thing is not that it exists, it's not even that it forces you to download games, the issue is that MicroSD Express has had next to no demand prior to the Switch 2. Eventually, the prices will drop rapidly, but they should have just let people install an m.2 nvme into the Switch 2

nta but yeah thats my thoughts too honestly
i dont play ps5 or xbox, got a pc, didnt see a reason to buy either when neither has exclusives and i can guarantee whatever the exclusives are will come to pc eventually.
I feel secure with Nintendo that they will make more games I want to play that wont make it to pc so I'm just like fuck it.
Switch 2 emulation is gonna take like what? a year or two minumum? and its not gonna be great when it first launches anyway and probably gonna get sniped by nintendo with how trigger happy they've been recently
It's not like I'm buying new games anyway, the most recent games I've played have been ps1 and ps2 games on emulators kek, will just set aside some money from my job and eat the bullet.

if it's 20xx tier then it's just the DLSS upscaler
If it's DLSS1/2/3/4 that depends on the .dll the devs decide to include in the game

10x stronger*

*with DLSS running at 25% the resolution

physical games

about that...

Because I don't want a fucking PS5 or a Steam Deck, you annoying nìgger.

Can Deckies understand that I, and most first worlders here, already have PCs. Very powerful PCs at that?
Stop trying to sell me a Steam Deck, I don't want one

Switch was $300 on launch when you could get PS4 for $250

Just because you think this doesn't mean it'll be true. Hell not even the Switch 3 will be able to provide 1080p 30fps

It has 10x the flops and 12x the CPU power than Switch.
DLSS is on top of that

Damn now I can pay twice that for something on par with the PS4

The said and unfortunate truth is that nobody on Anon Babble is buying Switches because they're handhelds, nor to be their main gayming platform. Gaymers don't need handhelds, they're just a gimmick. If Switch was permadocked the only thing that would change around here is that the "it's a handheld" cope from tendies would go away, Anon Babbleiggers are buying Switches because of their exclusives, that's all there is to it. And as laughable as some of them are, Switch library still beats PS4/5. And Steamdeck has nothing.

I can pay

You know you can't afford one, you poorfag.

What is the ideal portable or handheld console/device for the gamer who hates the Steam Deck, hates Valve, isn't interested in the Switch 2 crap, and only likes completely free-to-play games?

Damn imagine wasting money and trying to brag about it

The point of owning a $450 Switch is to play Switch games. I bought mine to play BotW, Splatoon 2, Mario Odyssey, Mario Kart 8, Monster Hunter Generations Ultimate, and so on. Handheld mode literally didn't matter to me.

It has 10x the flops

no, it doesn't. that would mean Series S hardware, but mobile. it doesn't have that. no way.

Lmao, you're basically admitting you can't afford it.

Haha yep can't afford it anon!

1536 ALUs at 1275mhz or so which is reasonable for the arch. Its just about 3/4 of a base mobile 3050.
There is nothing impressive about this, and it won't be able to clock anywhere near that high unless docked.

10x the power

Why do games look like maybe 2x the power of the Switch then?

For a handheld? Sure.

This is being sold as a console, with console software prices. I'm still amazed that Nintendo got away with jacking up the price of handheld games from $40 to $60+ just by adding video out to Switch. It shows how fucking stupid gamers can be.

Imagine being this retarded. Oh wait, you don't have to.

DLSS is fucking awful and I can't believe there are people paid to shill it, because not even NVIDIA can seriously believe it's a product worth selling. It looks hideous. It turns games into blurry messes. It's even worse on a small screen because a small screen needs all the detail it can get.

This entire thread.

Switch 2 is different from the first one, it has a massive fucking dock and the docked performance is literally 2x of handheld
So yeah docked it's approaching Series S, but handheld, no way

You saw it in the Direct with 20fps Elden Ring and blurry 540p Cyberpunk, yes this is much weaker than the PS4.

Because it's a lie.

Yeah imagine being back in 2017 when there were no emulators and a bunch of fun games coming out for a new system I wanted to play
Retard

Tflops to compare power are different since Nvidia hardware has better compute performance than AMD it achieves greater Tflops at a similar rendering performance point, it's about 30% better than AMD in terms of raw compute.

Because they're lying, if it could do it they would have shown it.

DLSS has been good for a while, you guys need to stop pretending it's 2019 still

Stop trying to talk out of your ass, you dumb little kid.
ALU throughput is compute power. You literally don't even know what these words mean, you can't bluff your way through this conversation.

HAHAHA
Put the name on, Huang

Left - soulless
Right - soul

MHW just released and DLSS makes it look like shit.

720p in handheld mode

Some people gave Valve shit for not putting a full HD screen in the Steam Deck, but they understood the limitations of portable gaming systems.

Benchmark metrics show this to be the case.

Switch 2 makes every other system irrelevant.

Literally gonna be the greatest console of all time.

fake frames

:/

fake frames, nintendo

:O

If the 2 main components of the system are made by Nvidia

Nvidia designs them and licences their technology for it, but they don't actually make them, TSMC does.

every single rendering mode looks like shit in that game because Wilds is a shit looking game no matter what you do and Crapcom is absolutely terrible at this

Stop.
I already explained this. You are a shit eating retard who doesn't know any of these words. You are mistaken and confused FLOPs for gaming performance. It is a theoretical metric of ALU throughput, thats what compute power is. Stop talking out of your ass, you're posting gibberish and makes it really easy to see how out of your own depth you are.

You got that backwards. DLSS will be shit for 720p to 1080p like the switch. It's great for 1440p to 4k

fake frames

Not buying. I can't believe it's fake frames of all things that's gonna push me out of handheld gaming. There's nothing more disgusting than the gross ghosting or the schizophrenic inconsistency in picture quality on a frame per frame basis, shit's basically unplayable if you're a real human being.
No thanks. I'm out.

you can tell Anon Babble doesn't actually use upscalers because they say dumb shit like "it's good for helping lower resolutions but pointless for higher resolutions" because in practice it's the exact opposite

PS4

lmao
PS4 ($400) released one year after
GTX 660 ($220) and was less powerful

t.png - 1203x320, 64.35K

$450 for fake frames and fake resolutions

lmfao

It's ok when Nintendo D(LSS)oes it

Why is it referred to as DLSS even when it's being used to upscale instead of super sample

I never stated that Flops and gaming performance are the same, they aren't Flops is better at benchmarking raw compute performance, which Nvidia GPUs are better at, but we know how much better they are and that's about 30%.

dlss

Well that confirms I won't be getting it

Fake frames, so any fast paced game is going to play like ass

Cybershit is only targeting 720p 30-40fps in handheld mode, which highlights this thing is going to be weaker than even the portable gaming PCs from last year

$450, when you can pick up an Rog Ally for less new

I'll pass on this thing, at least until the hardware revision in a few years.

fake frames

3x the amount of input lag vs faked refresh rate

:skull:

So literally pic rel (right side is what you should actually be buying)

LOL FAKE FRAMES xD

All frames are fake you fucking retards. Get new shitpost material.

>Fake frames, so any fast paced game is going to play like ass

It's not frame generation, it's upscaling. Which works perfectly for fast paced games.

540p

fuck this garbage, I'm not touching these games until I can emulate them

Thank you for admitting it.
450 is less than both the PS5 and Series x, if you can afford it, you can afford those.

That's going to ruin real image quality in handheld mode. No upscaler avoids the plasticky vaseline filter and erroneous sharpening of most of the image.
Waifu2x is okay for shitposting. But putting it in a dedicated gaming console?

we've seen inside it, there's a whole bunch of tiny people. I think they do the upscaling

Variable refresh rate via NVIDIA G-SYNC in handheld mode ensures ultra-smooth, tear-free gameplay.

Surely this means it's also available in docked mode, right?

How did not wanting to waste money become being poor? New consumer cockriding cope?

That's going to ruin real image quality in handheld mode.

Much less noticeable on smaller screens.
Besides, the Switch 1 often used FSR2 for its games which is a far far worse upscaler than recent DLSS models. So it's not like it's going to be a downgrade.

No upscaler avoids the plasticky vaseline filter and erroneous sharpening of most of the image.

TAA already has this even at native resolutions.

Because I'm not a dirty nigger.

NIGGER NIGGER THE nIgGeR NIGGER

WELL THAT'S BECUASE iT's nOT nIGGer NiGgEr

NIGER

Nigger

Only if your connected tv or monitor supported it

Yeah, the 120fps 1080p screen might just suck battery life up for no reason when most games don't even use it. But the games that do will be first party ones and people will talk about "Nintendo magic" because the 120fps games will feel much smoother than 40fps or even 60 fps games.

OK.

If DLSS is so bad, then why do people still buy Nvidia's overpriced graphics cards?

10 times stronger

games look the same

Nvidia yet again using dlss + maybe frame gen to make these sort of calculations i guess

Vast majority of PC gamers are still on 1080p monitors and smaller, and fall for the propaganda of people who use DLSS at 1440p/4k. It looks great at 4k, looks good enough at 1440p, but goes to shit at lower resolutions because your input resolutions become really tiny. So for most people DLSS is indeed bad because they just lack the pixels to make it work well.

Calculations

Nigga they're just lying it's not that complicated

Maybe if you're living in the year 2022, with AMD hardware. This is DLSS quality in 2025.

Waifu2x

I see you're confused.

frogposter is retarded

DLSS

native resolution

retard

soulless / soul

Downsampling, fake frames and shitty lightning….yay?

downsampling

retard

The issue is that

10x the graphics performance

Is vague as fuck. I can guarantee you they mean

10x the framerate with DLSS

So where the switch 1 would get 3 fps at 4k, the switch 2 will now do 30. 6fps becomes 60. Boom. 10x the "graphics performance."

Never trust these companies with their obfuscated language. It never means what we want it to mean. It's ALWAYS deceptive.

seeing how nvidia called the 5070 as strong as a 4090, they're def counting dlss in there.

That also included frame generation, which the switch 2 IS NOT USING.

exactly what does ray tracing do and what is DLSS?

uhhh it has dlss tech, nvidia will 100% use that when hyping the systems theoretical potential like the 5070.

exactly what does ray tracing do

Nothing

what is DLSS

Margarine

DLSS is just better resolution scaling from a lower number for improved performance. Ray tracing is just a meme after 6 years of being available for consumers.

DLSS can magically generate 90% of the frames

some of you are unqualified to post here

ray tracing

A lighting technique that simulates how light actually behaves IRL, every ray of light follows a real path and affects the environment. Makes games look more realistic, usually makes them look better although it varies how much better (sometimes it's not worth using) and it incurs a significant FPS cost compared to standard 'fake' lighting.

DLSS

DLSS upscaling (the thing Switch 2 will use) is a temporal upscaler that uses dedicated hardware to produce much better visual results than upscalers usually do. In most cases that means getting 30-50% more FPS at the cost of 0-10% visual quality, depending on the setting/resolution/implementation.

when you can buy a $450 PS5

for what gaems?

Wait until you find out what pc mustard fags pay for that

I bought a steam deck right after the direct.

The two big titles shown have focussed on gimmicks which take up a decent amount of processing power. DK has pretty much the entire in-game environment as destructable, and MK World has double the number of racers.

Oh it will definitely be a terra flop

Nvidia makes up stupid shit

Yeah remember when they said a 5060 outperformed a 4090?

this. hardline anti-dlss fags out themselves as poorfag and/or resolutionlets. with a high end gpu playing at 4k, you would have to be fucking retarded to complain about dlss

That's nice. Hopefully the pro version gets rid of the tranny pastels on the sticks.

game with literally endless options of top tier grils

posts fucking quatre

what the fuck is your problem? even if you're an actual homo why would you pick him? seek help. immediately.

fake resolution and memetracing

fucking DROPPED

flops as a measure of real-world performance

tech-illiterate retard spotted

The only flop here will be the Nintendo Switch 2.

Even ninty fell for the fake frames meme

Raytracing on a console barely more powerful than a ps4, likely nuking performance

the more they talk the worse this shit looks.

Everytime Anon Babble says something will flop it does well. Hell, Anon Babble cant see any mention of nuDoom without having a mental breakdown because it didnt flop like they "predicted".

Everytime Anon Babble says something will flop it does well

Yeah, just like Concord, Dustborne and AC Shadows, amirite?

With a $450 PS5, you can play the top games on the system, which are the most popular children's games in the world.

- Minecraft
- Fortnite
- FIFA
- Call of Duty

And many other children's games.

1585672655099.jpg - 1029x1000, 274.61K

Yes. What swearing the Switch 2 will flop will do is that Anon Babble will be having constant manic attacks for the next decade since you third worlders literally cant cope with the fact that Anon Babble has no relevance in the industry.

Wasn't this just a shitty streaming box type thing?

None of that matters as long as the games cost 80 or 90 fucking dollars.

most of them are outsourced to India and Vietnam so might as well be

No, it had some native games, like a Half Life 2 and Doom 3 ports. Problem is beyond this it was all just Android games.

no gaems

weabooslop

quality

but muh amd

do we know how much ram this jew console has?

12 if shipment data leaks are correct

Maybe read my full post you fucking retard

What Nintendo provides

Games.

One has games and is a handheld for one.

Everytime Anon Babble says something will flop it does well

according to you dumb tendie cocord was a stellar launch

it's going to be the next two months of people yet again not understanding tech, failing to comprehend reasonable comparisons, and bitching and moaning about how it isn't the bestest awesomest thing ever so therefore it's a failure automatically

when politics aren't being dragged in anyway

Maybe it's time for a sabbatical.

Switch 2 has 2 TFLOPS

1.7TFLOPS is for handheld when the gpu has lower clocks to save battery
3.9TFLOP is for docked with higher clocks because the Switch 2 is charging and doesn't need to worry about battery

Switch 2 in docked mode is comparable to a PS4 PRO though so you should use that price point which is $399

literally fake frames the console