But why ?

But why ?

psychopath has extremely poor grasp on history

Whoa

Bump

yeah most of those guys were actually really short

Does Pol Pot really belong on the same list as the other three?

Genghis Khan

great

They didn’t even win Eurovision.

a chink genocide always has bigger numbers than the rest, pretty sure he killed all the people who had glasses

I had to look up who Pol Pot was
am i retarded bros?

Yes

read Crime and Punishment

High scores.

How was I supposed to know who he was though??
I know Hitler and Stalin because WW2 is pounded into your brain at school. I knew Ghenghis Khan because of the Disney movie Mulan...

Genghis Khan was actually successful, he doesn't belong on that list.

anon has extremely poor grasp on language

Whoa

It wasnt mongols in mulan
It was huns

how was I supposed to know that???

He was a cuck who raised his wife son tho

gets cucked out of his clan

has to sit in chink prison for years

gets cucked out of his wife

has to raise her child too

doesn't tell anyone how to rule the massive territory that is his in name only

"""empire""" falls apart as soon as he's gone

Because the movie say so

Stalin wasnt succesful

Literal churka hobo who raised to the top of power making an irrelevant country into the world second superpower

tsarist russia

irrelevant country

also stalin luckshitted russias way into the number 2 spot after the groundwork was laid and with a ton of help from usa handouts and the world that was too exhausted from 2 world wars
+ it was khruschev that cemented ussrs position

I first heard about him from an anime. I still don't know anything about him, except "he killed intellectuals."

Thanks to FDR propping him up

The government doesnt want you to know this but there's actually books written about history and you can read them

yeah, he has commited his own fair share of atrocities

happy pol.jpg - 747x1214, 110.2K

Russia during the civil war/20s was pretty much irrelevant

I know Hitler and Stalin because WW2 is pounded into your brain at school

really? it's the opposite here. it's barely mentioned even though we were on the winning side. most of the stuff we learned about ww2 is through the internet and other pieces of media. ww1 is even worse, we always skipped the ww1 part in the school books

No it wasn't. Rapallo was in 1923.

yeah history class is basically WW2 movies

Where do you live

yes. doesn't he have the highest kill count of all dictators (or was it Mao)?

Its ironic that some people and even politician see him as a misunderstood hero of the people even after all his crimes against humanity was exposed.

why are u posting the elon musk ?

because we still remember them and the impact they left in the world.

single handedly killed millions of chinese because he had amazing plan in which he sperged out at birds n shit

lmao that nigga based

that's Mao tho

They were great no doubt, were they good? That's another question.

No the education system failed you because you have to learn about Hitler Hitler over and over was the most evilest man ever to live (not disputing that im not a wehraboo) even though Pol Pot slaughtered like 70% of his OWN population

Also to add to my point there are plenty of people who are still alive that remember life under Pol Pot there's almost no one left that can tell you how Germany under Hitler was so that makes it even worse

thats Mao but if you want pol pot text

evacuated all the city's and forced everyone into becoming farms to larp his communist fantasy, which resulted in millions dead from starvation, tuberculosis and Urinary tract infection of all things

my grandaprents from a slavic shithole always remembered the times under hitler fondly(er) than those under communism
I'd imagine the same goes for germs but they aren't legally allowed to talk about it

Is it even possible to beat Mao's score?

D'ailleurs reminder that musk has a siberian haplogroup
Thats Mao you retard

Tamerlane ?
He killed 40 millions in 20 years and all of this with swords and bows

we have to start WW3 to reach those levels.

Yeah the population of a country that doesnt matter, you can genocide as many of those as you like

He got away with it. He died relatively painlessly and in peace in a bed after decades of killing nearly his entire country

Stalin and genghis too

stalin died choking on his own vomit cause no doctor wanted to be killed by the nkvd for assassinating the party secretary

He still died of natural causes

the fact that yankies will always ignore, Amerikkka literally financed 90% of genocides on this planet

Leopold II was seriously one of the most fucked up people in history

What french education does to a mf

I've never heard about Leopold 2, wtf

natural causes

By this logic dying to literally anything is "natural causes"

Illness is natural causes

He died alone because everyone was too scared of him to even help. A fitting end.

How so? He used the money he made from the Congo to help his people in Belgium, what does he owe niggers in the Congo?

Shit if anything the Congolese were falling over themselves to give him a hand

He could do that without being comicaly evil at the same time but just couldnt help himself i guess

How was he comically evil?

The big thing I remember about pol pot is that he invited this commie american journalist to come over to write fluff pieces about how great the country is, and mr pot had a paranoia attack and had the guy assassinated midway through writing his bit about how the country is actually doing super great and is really peaceful and stable.

I mean i cant really prove that he was evil to someone that thinks "BASED NIGGER GENOCIDE" unironicaly. To more sane individuals which you are not part of, barbaric cruelty and tortures seem disgusting. But the niggers and dumb and ugly so i guess that makes it ok in your chudish worldview

the uncharted series are great action slop games

Absolutely not. He was a complete fucking retard.

It was Mao. Pol Pot would have had to kill his entire country's population about 10 times over to match Mao.

How can you be a great man if you lose and are forced to an hero?

Is there anything you know that you only know because you sought it out through your own curiosity?

I asked you to tell me how he was "comically evil" his actions may be reprehensible even to his European contemporaries but his actions aren't so uniquely evil in history from my understanding which is why I asked you how he was "comically evil"

Modern burger education?

To be fair, we've been nice to niggers for over a hundred years now and not only have there been no positives to show for it, there are many many negatives.

It is becoming clearer by the day that the best thing ever to happen in africa was white invasion. Second best thing was the hilarious failed italian invasion, good for comedy.

Enver was /ourguy/

Cutting of limbs for not meeting quotas sounds like Sauron tier evil to me. This isnt even practical, its just purely for terror. He also may not be "uniquely evil", but he is still indeed evil. His death toll being somewhere in the top 10 dictators in history also speaks for itself

denbtland, most of our history education is centered around >muh ancestors

I haven't played this game in ages, and frankly I don't feel the urge to replay it either, it's not bad, it's just that the gameplay is mediocre, in the true sense of the word, not awful nor great, and the story is also alright. Nice art direction and visuals though, especially for the time, I remember playing it back then and shitting myself at how good everything looked. Say what you will but ND always nailed visuals, they didn't make a single bad looking game, except for maybe Uncharted 1, which got caught in that weird transitional period between the PS2 and PS3 era, I'm talking 2007 and thereabouts. Remember GTA IV? Great game that still holds up today, I shit on all its detractors, but graphics weren't particularly impressive not even back then

dont fill banana quota because guards jacked up the quota for no reason 10 minutes before you have to turn them in

have your foot cut off

also you're a child

but you're an edgy faggot who'll just go "so? Im so fuckin based lollolololol"

Cutting of limbs for not meeting quotas sounds like Sauron tier evil to me

Limbs were cut off by the Force Publique to show proof of death

It's quite clear you are ignorant of what you're talking about so I won't waste my time further conversing with you

Eyyy!

There are plenty of images showing children and people with hands or feet but you'll probably call them "tricks" and "not real"

I think demanding piles of smoked penises is pretty deranged.

what your moms vagina looks like

Ah so its the same as "hitler didnt know about holocaust!" cope

I won't waste my time further conversing with you

Good riddance

You're dumb as fuck dude cut hands = payment so soldiers just started chopping off hands alive or not for payment and no one gave a shit dumb asshole

In theory, each right hand proved a killing. In practice, to save ammunition soldiers sometimes "cheated" by simply cutting off the hand and leaving the victim to live or die. Several survivors later said that they had lived through a massacre by acting dead, not moving even when their hands were severed, and waiting till the soldiers left before seeking help. In some instances a soldier could shorten his service term by bringing more hands than the other soldiers, which led to widespread mutilations and dismemberment.

Please brush up on what actually happened Leopold II wasn't a moron who would just mutilate his workforce that would be counter productive you dense cunt

This looks like the nazi chud is giving the other 2 handjobs

Historian David Van Reybrouck stated that the photographs of mutilated people have created a misconception that dismemberment of the living was a widespread practice. He wrote that while dismemberment of the living did occasionally happen, the practice was not as systemic as often presented

Jean Stengers and Daniël Vangroenweghe [nl] have also stated there was no systemic practice of dismembering living people as a punishment for not producing enough rubber. Most cases of dismemberment of the living were caused by soldiers who had shot people and had cut off their hands thinking they were dead while they were in fact still alive.

Your ignorance is astonishing

He was the biggest fucking low iq mongoloi imaginable.
But man, he did some giant purgin.

are you wearing glasses?

you're ded

know how to read?

ded

you taught some kids how to spell?

ded

He practiced the purest form of communism imaginable and the outcome resulted in 1/4 of his state's population dead. Nuff said

Funny how these graphs always seem to forget FDR, Truman, Churchill.

They werent dictators